logo
Bipartisan lawmakers, educators, parents push to expand Maine's child tax credit

Bipartisan lawmakers, educators, parents push to expand Maine's child tax credit

Yahoo08-04-2025

April Tardiff of Old Orchard Beach urges lawmakers to expand Maine's version of a child tax credit while her son plays in the committee room on April 8, 2025. (Photo by Emma Davis/ Maine Morning Star)
April Tardiff, a mother of three from Old Orchard Beach, told the Taxation Committee that expanding Maine's version of a child tax credit would allow her to worry less and focus on raising happy, healthy children, one of which had wriggled free from his seat and ran around the room as she testified.
'After paying for groceries, diapers, rent, transportation and utilities, there's nothing left,' Tardiff said, explaining that her family falls in the category of Asset Limited, Income Constrained, Employed, or ALIC, which refers to households earning above the federal poverty level but not enough to afford basic necessities. 'Some months, we're just holding on until the next paycheck arrives.'
Other parents, medical professionals, educators and policy experts testified in support of legislation that would double the state's child tax credit for some recipients, which would be paid for by phasing out the benefit for the state's highest earners.
LD 1294, proposed by Senate President Mattie Daughtry (D-Brunswick) with bipartisan co-sponsors, would provide an additional $300 per child under six years old for the Dependent Exemption Tax Credit, for a total of $600 per child per tax year.
'At the end of the day. This bill is about values. It's about recognizing the hard work and sacrifices that parents make every day and ensuring that our tax code reflects that reality,' Daughtry said. 'Additionally, which I am proud to say in the budget outlook that we exist in currently, this proposal is designed to be revenue neutral.'
It seems like it's not a lot, but we've all seen the prices going up on everything. I think $300 is a small price to pay for dignity.
– Hazel Willow
Currently, the phase out rate for the credit begins at $400,000 for married couples filing jointly and $200,000 for all other filers. LD 1294 would lower the phase out threshold — $100,000 for single filers, $125,000 for head of households, $150,000 for married people filing jointly.
Gov. Janet Mills' administration is recommending the changes proposed in the bill be delayed until the 2026 tax year to give the state time and ability to react to any changes to the federal child tax credit, said Michael Allen, associate commissioner for tax policy for the Department of Administrative and Financial Services, testifying neither for nor against the legislation.
Currently, the maximum federal credit is $2,000 per qualifying child for an individual making less than $200,000 annually or a couple filing jointly that makes less than $400,000 — a refundability cap President Donald Trump increased with a 2017 tax law during his last presidency, expanding the credit to wealthier Americans. That law is set to expire at the end of 2025, though congressional Republicans have advanced a plan to continue those cuts.
Many who testified in support of the legislation said the additional credit is particularly helpful for parents of young children because of the high cost of child care.
Given that reasoning, Rep. Shelley Rudnicki (R-Fairfield) questioned whether it would be more effective to loosen child care regulations instead. But child care providers pushed back, arguing that would loosen the quality of the care and that liability insurance would likely refuse to insure providers.
Others on the committee posed questions to the public about whether an extra $300 would truly make a difference.
With her young son holding onto her dress at the podium, Hazel Willow responded that that amount would allow her to enroll her child in a sport or buy clothes rather than rely on shelter hand me downs. A survivor of domestic abuse, Willow added that the extra money is also about giving autonomy back to the people who've had it stripped away by trauma and circumstance.
'It seems like it's not a lot, but we've all seen the prices going up on everything,' Willow said. 'I think $300 is a small price to pay for dignity.'
One day before the public hearing on Tuesday, Daughtry, child care providers and parents gathered at the Magic Years Center, which provides Head Start, preschool and childcare for young children in the Augusta area, to share their support for the legislation.
Tabitha Thomas, a mother of six in Waterville, said increasing the tax credit would help her afford things others may take for granted, such as being able to pay rent and take her children to important appointments. Thomas is a student at Kennebec Valley Community College, studying mental health and case management, and works part time in food service at Colby College.
'I would work more but between long hours being a mom and going to school it is impossible to fulfill the needs of my children while still keeping up financially,' Thomas said.
That's why the tax credit is crucial for her family, Thomas said. That is also true for Raychel Ward's family. Ward, a mother of three from Livermore Falls, said she'd use the extra money to pay for visits to the Children's Hospital of Philadelphia for her five month old son, who has a condition where he produces too much insulin that few doctors specialize in.
'The thing is, for families with special needs children, we don't have wiggle room,' Thomas said. 'Every dollar that comes into our house is already allocated to meet their needs, whether it's getting them to the therapy appointments, making sure our cars are maintained or making sure that they get to see specialists that maybe aren't deemed necessary.'
The expansion of the federal child tax credit during the COVID-19 pandemic had helped her and her husband put window and door alarms on their apartment as one of her daughters, who is on the autism spectrum, had been getting out, she said.
For the 2021 tax year, the federal credit was increased to $3,600 per child under six and $3,000 per child aged six to 17 and switched to monthly, rather than annual, payments for the first several months. The expansion cut child poverty in half nationwide but those gains have since been erased with the expiration of the enhanced credit at the end of 2021.
Maine picked up where Congress left off, said Ann Danforth, policy advocate for Maine Equal Justice, pointing to the Legislature making the state credit refundable and indexing it to inflation in 2023.
'We have the chance to continue that progress,' Danforth said. 'Child poverty is not an unsolvable problem.'
According to the most recent data available from 2023, Maine has a child poverty rate of 12.6%, which is a historic low. The number of children in poverty in Maine has declined in recent years, but the overall share of Mainers living in 'deep poverty' — with incomes less than half the official poverty level — has slightly increased.
Garrett Martin, president and CEO of the Maine Center for Economic Policy, called the child tax credit expansion a smart economic move for Maine, citing research that shows families use child tax credits for basic needs such as food, school expenses and child care.
'This is an economic investment with long-term returns: higher earnings, better health outcomes, and stronger communities,' Martin said.
SUPPORT: YOU MAKE OUR WORK POSSIBLE

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Looking ahead to Missouri special session, Show Me Sports Investment Act
Looking ahead to Missouri special session, Show Me Sports Investment Act

Yahoo

time13 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Looking ahead to Missouri special session, Show Me Sports Investment Act

KANSAS CITY, Mo. — The Missouri General Assembly's special session reconvenes Monday, and it's the House side of the rotunda's turn in Jefferson City. The state Senate passed a trio of bills last week, one providing a plan to fund up to half of stadium projects for the Chiefs or Royals or Cardinals in St. Louis. The Missouri State House will consider the Show Me Sports Investment Act. The stadium funding bill sets the framework for the Royals and the Chiefs to pay back some of the costs for new and renovated venues. Construction bonds would be paid back using tax money generated at the stadiums and would cover up to 50% of the cost to build it. The teams would have to qualify to have access to that money. The stadiums would need to be built for football or baseball, have more than 30,000 seats, and cost at least half a billion dollars. On Sunday, Rudi Keller, the deputy editor of the Missouri Independent, discussed what could happen as the special session continues this week. Kansas City superheroes assemble behind local child battling cancer 'A member of the House budget Committee who will consider the spending bill on Tuesday said there is an assumption the House will pass this, and that's correct. I also talked to the Chair of the House Budget Committee earlier today, and it turns out he's not going to be demanding anything new. So as long as there aren't serious demands that endanger the bill from the House, much as the way demands from Senators resulted in a change to the call, I'm anticipating this will go relatively smoothly this week,' Keller said on 4 The People. The stadium funding bill does not have the words 'Royals' or 'Chiefs' in it, but a big reason for the calling of this special session was to find a way to keep both teams in the state and counter the plans of Kansas lawmakers. Nearly a year ago, the Kansas legislature approved a bill to utilize STAR bonds to cover stadium construction costs. The deadline for that bill is coming up at the end of June. 'If Kansas believes that we could really be in the conversation, you could see some limited extension,' said Kansas Senate President Ty Masterson. 'The way the law is written, it could be extended for up to a year. I don't see that happening.' You can watch the full conversation with Masterson and Keller here. Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.

Hays County Judge calls for humane immigration practices amid rising detentions
Hays County Judge calls for humane immigration practices amid rising detentions

Yahoo

time13 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Hays County Judge calls for humane immigration practices amid rising detentions

HAYS COUNTY, Texas (KXAN) – The Hays County Commissioners Court will consider adopting a resolution Tuesday calling for due process and humane treatment of immigrants. Hays County Judge Ruben Becerra said he's bringing forward the resolution because of recent federal immigration activity that has caused disorder across the county. 'The resolution I'm presenting on Tuesday is about us being Americans, being respectful, respecting the rule of law,' Becerra said. 'What I want to do is help support peace, unity, and harmony throughout our county.' Becerra said there has been an increase in federal immigration officers detaining people in Hays County since the Trump Administration took office. According to a KXAN special project, over 12,000 undocumented immigrants living in Texas were detained from January to March, the most of any other state. 'I'm not looking for anything except to treat people like humans, be respectful, follow the rule of law, and let's move in an orderly manner without causing havoc and destruction,' Becerra said. Texas immigration attorney Adrian Resendez said immigrant detainments have steadily risen in the last several months. 'There are only certain amounts of ICE agents available, and only a certain amount of resources that the government allocated. Now what we're seeing is a larger allocation of resources, we are seeing a ramping up across the board,' Resendez said. Fox News reported in May that the Trump Administration raised its ICE arrest target to 3,000 undocumented immigrants per day. Resendez said he has clients who were following the proper procedures but were still arrested and detained. 'The controversy is now that they are detaining people who technically followed all the rules that were asked of them,' he said. 'We are seeing some people being detained who have been here [several years] – they're permanent residents.' Resendez said that due process in an immigration context could involve someone arriving in the U.S. to flee danger in their home country. If that claim is deemed credible, they would be given a court date to make their case. 'That court date, that's the due process that they get,' Resendez said. 'In my opinion, I am seeing a lack of due process.' Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.

Rand Paul slams Graham's push for Russian sanctions as ‘self-defeating economic warfare'
Rand Paul slams Graham's push for Russian sanctions as ‘self-defeating economic warfare'

The Hill

time3 hours ago

  • The Hill

Rand Paul slams Graham's push for Russian sanctions as ‘self-defeating economic warfare'

Sen. Rand Paul (R-Ky.) slammed Sen. Lindsey Graham's (R-S.C.) push for Russian sanctions, calling his bill 'self-defeating economic warfare.' Graham's sanctions bill on Russia would impose a 500 percent tariff on imports from any country that buys Russian oil, gas, uranium and other products. The legislation has more than 80 co-sponsors in the Senate, potentially making it veto-proof. But GOP senators are waiting on President Trump to move ahead with the legislation, and Trump said this week he hasn't even looked at it. Trump has also said he doesn't want to undermine the chances of a peace deal between Russia and Ukraine. Paul, in a series of posts on X on Saturday, said the bill would be ineffective and backfire against efforts to achieve peace, as the war between Russia and Ukraine continues in its fourth year. 'The Graham bill would derail President Trump's efforts to negotiate an end to the war in Ukraine. Self-defeating economic warfare is no way to achieve peace,' Paul said on X. 'This bill won't force China or India to change behavior, but it will impose an effective embargo on ourselves that will hurt American families,' he said. Paul also argued that the bill could hurt U.S. allies and raise gas prices. 'The Graham bill could raise tariffs on allies like Israel and Taiwan to 500 percent and potentially even higher. Why are we punishing our friends while pretending it'll hold Russia accountable? This isn't strategy—it's economic self-sabotage,' he wrote. 'Cutting off Russian oil takes a major source of supply off the market, resulting in higher gas prices. Analysts warned that a U.S. ban on Russian oil could cause prices to hit $160–$200 a barrel. That's $5+ gas at the pump,' he said. Graham, this past week, sought to address some of those concerns by proposing a carveout for his bill to exempt countries that aid in Ukraine's defense. The carveout could help insulate countries in Europe that still import Russian gas and have provided military support for Ukraine, as well as other U.S. partners that have straddled the line between maintaining ties with Moscow and providing assistance to Kyiv. 'A lot of countries still buy Russian oil and gas but less. Some European countries still have relationships with Russia, but they've been very helpful to Ukraine. So I want to carve them out,' Graham told reporters Wednesday. 'I tell China, if you don't want to have a 500 percent tariff, help Ukraine.'

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store