Gov. Hochul only leads Rep. Elise Stefanik by this much in hypothetical New York governor matchup: Siena poll
While still a hefty lead, it's the smallest gap between Hochul and a potential GOP challenger since then Rep. Lee Zeldin trailed Hochul by only 11 points just three weeks before the 2021 general election. Hochul would go on to win by only 7 points.
'Stefanik can highlight that more than a year out from a potential match-up, Hochul's lead over Stefanik is only 14 points, 45-31%, down from 23 points in June, and that Hochul doesn't hit 'the magic 51% mark,'' Siena poll spokesperson Steven Greenberg said.
Gov. Kathy Hochul suffered from another month of underwater poll numbers, according to the Siena University poll released Tuesday.
Tomas E. Gaston
The poll results come as Stefanik has seemingly consolidated the GOP field should she pull the trigger on a gubernatorial run following Hudson Valley Congressman Mike Lawler's official exit from the race last month.
Stefanik also had some other bright spots from the Siena poll.
She eked out a few points over Hochul among independents, 35% to 32%. Stefanik also won among suburban voters — those from Suffolk, Nassau, Westchester, Rockland and Putnam Counties — 41% to 39%. Zeldin had similarly been leading among the two constituencies in October 2021.
North Country Rep. Elise Stefanik trails Gov. Kathy Hochul by 14 points, according to a Siena poll released Tuesday.
Bloomberg via Getty Images
A fifth of those polled weren't familiar with Hochul or Stefanik.
'Stefanik clearly has room to grow with voters – either positively or negatively. While 49% of voters say they are very or somewhat familiar with her, 46% are not very or not at all familiar with Stefanik,' Greenberg said.
Hochul, once again, suffered from underwater favorability ratings this quarter.
Respondents rated her 42% favorable to 44% unfavorable. The Democrat has had negative favorability ratings in nine of the last 10 Siena polls.
Asked if New York is on the right track or heading in the wrong direction, 41% said 'right track' as opposed to 45% who said it was heading in the 'wrong direction.'
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
14 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Trump whisperer makes dire prediction about future of GOP
Far-right activist Laura Loomer has an ominous outlook about the state of the Republican Party once President Donald Trump finishes his second term. In a post on X on Tuesday, Loomer — who has been dubbed as an 'instrument' of the president — predicted that she doesn't think the GOP is 'going to survive post-Trump.' 'There's too many conflicting personalities trying to jockey for the mantle to MAGA, and none of them have what it takes to be Trump's successor,' Loomer wrote. 'We are witnessing the end of a future post-MAGA movement as we know it because everyone inside the 'big tent' the GOP forced on us realizes that hate each other,' she continued. Loomer's post comes as she finds herself at the center of a firestorm with Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene (R-Ga.), another close ally of Trump. The feud between the two erupted after Loomer criticized the Army for recognizing Medal of Honor recipient Florent Groberg, who saved the lives of fellow soldiers from a suicide bomber in Afghanistan, resulting in catastrophic injuries. Loomer claimed that Groberg was a Democrat who has 'campaigned against Trump,' and added that he was not a 'US born soldier,' despite Groberg becoming a naturalized citizen in 2001. Greene shot back on Monday, calling her a 'coward' and saying that she has 'ZERO respect or reverence for even the most heroic people in America.' The jabs, however, quickly became personal. Loomer went on to call Greene a 'lying fake Christian wh---' and 'probably the dumbest b---- in Congress' after the congresswoman said 'she psychotically turns on everyone,' including Trump's most ardent supporters. 'Like I said before, @RepMTG's claims about me on X yesterday are completely unhinged, deceitful, and rooted in jealousy,' Loomer wrote on Tuesday, adding 'She started to hate me as soon as I started being recognized for my work in support of Trump. That's when she went from calling me her friend to calling me a foreign spy.' Her prediction was met with mixed reactions on social media — with many floating Vice President JD Vance as a successor. 'I really hate seeing the infighting, bums me out, though I understand the passion on both sides,' one user replied, adding that Vance 'has pleasantly surprised me more than anyone else in the Trump administration...' Another user asked: 'If anyone has it, it's JD Vance. Do you disagree?' 'How about find 3 optimistic things to post about for every one negative post. All your negativity is exhausting!' a different user said. Trump last week had described Vance as the next 'most likely' GOP leader. Vance has been floated as a potential contender for the 2028 presidential election as numerous recent polls list him as the clear frontrunner in the Republican Party. Since Trump took office, Loomer has used her prominence on social media to expose figures in Trump's administration that she sees as disloyal, such as digging up their old social media posts and sifting through their past political donations. She has claimed credit for a number of firings, including a senior Customs and Border Protection official. Our journalism needs your support. Please subscribe today to
The Intercept
15 minutes ago
- The Intercept
Trump's Use of Troops for Policing Hasn't Been Seen Since America Was Ruled by a King
The United States crept closer to becoming a full-blown police state yesterday when President Donald Trump made good on a promise to further militarize the nation's capital. Trump threatened to employ similar tactics in cities across the country as the Pentagon evaluates plans for a 'Domestic Civil Disturbance Quick Reaction Force' composed of hundreds of National Guard troops poised to surge into American cities. The power grab in the District of Columbia, which bypassed the city's elected leaders, follows deployments of federal troops from coast to coast, surges of masked federal agents around the United States, and consistent tyrannical use of executive authority in ways with little precedent in modern U.S. history. 'Our capital city has been overtaken by violent gangs and bloodthirsty criminals,' Trump said at a White House news conference on Monday, painting the city as a hellscape filled with 'drugged out maniacs' and 'caravans of mass youth' who 'rampage through city streets' day and night. 'I'm deploying the National Guard to help reestablish law, order and public safety in Washington, D.C.,' he declared. As of Monday afternoon, Guard members had yet to be deployed. 'They've got to muster in. They've got to do a little brief training and processing, and then they're going to move out. But we do expect this to happen pretty rapidly,' an Army spokesperson told The Intercept. Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth said Monday that the Guard would be 'flowing into the streets of Washington in the coming week.' The timeline for the troop deployment is hazy. According to a memorandum Trump issued on Monday, National Guard troops will remain deployed until the president determines 'that conditions of law and order have been restored.' Justice Department figures show violent crime in the nation's capital is at a 30-year low. 'If we look at both practically the way the Trump administration is using the military around the country and also formally, in what they are asserting about their authority — the ability to use the military anywhere, anytime, for any purpose — it's absolutely unprecedented,' said Joseph Nunn, an attorney with the Brennan Center for Justice's liberty and national security program who focuses on the domestic role of the U.S. military. 'The last person to assert that sort of boundless authority to deploy the military domestically and use it for law enforcement in this country was King George,' he told The Intercept, referencing King George III who lost the American Revolution. 'President Trump's ever-expanding use of the military for domestic matters is beyond alarming,' Sen. Jack Reed of Rhode Island, the top Democrat on the Armed Services Committee, said in a statement criticizing the deployment. 'Our military is trained to defend the nation from external threats and assist communities during disasters or emergencies, not to conduct day-to-day domestic policing. This deployment is a serious misuse of the National Guard's time and talent.' Approximately 800 National Guard soldiers were activated as part of the 'D.C. Safe and Beautiful Task Force,' with about 100 to 200 of them supporting law enforcement at any given time, according to a statement provided to The Intercept by the Army. 'Hey, that's a real thing, man. I double-checked,' the Army spokesperson told The Intercept when asked about the name of the task force. 'I was like, 'That can't be real.' But yeah. It's real.' The Army said that the National Guard forces operating in the capital would perform 'an array of tasks from administrative, logistics and physical presence in support of law enforcement.' D.C. Mayor Muriel Bowser said she did not believe it was legal 'to use the American military against American citizens on American soil' at a press conference on Monday evening. The White House did not respond to a request for comment regarding Bowser's remarks. The National Guard deployment is one facet of Trump's efforts to put the District of Columbia under federal authority; he also declared that he is temporarily taking control of the city's police department. Hundreds of officers and agents from more than a dozen federal agencies — including the FBI; Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives; Drug Enforcement Administration; Immigration and Customs Enforcement; and the U.S. Marshals Service — have also fanned out across Washington in recent days. The federal crackdown on Washington was precipitated by the attempted carjacking of Edward Coristine, a 19-year-old software engineer and former Department of Government Efficiency staffer better known by his online sobriquet 'Big Balls.' Police officers arrested two 15-year-old suspects, a boy and a girl. Trump invoked a section of the District of Columbia Home Rule Act that grants him the power to temporarily seize control of the city's police department. He said Attorney General Pam Bondi would oversee the federal takeover of the capital's Metropolitan Police Department and, with Hegseth at his side, added that he was prepared to send the military into Washington 'if needed.' In a Monday memorandum, Trump directed Hegseth to coordinate with governors of states and 'authorize the orders of any additional members of the National Guard to active service, as he deems necessary and appropriate, to augment this mission.' Hegseth said that beyond the D.C. National Guard, the Pentagon was prepared to surge other military units into the capital. 'There are other units we are prepared to bring in, other National Guard units, other specialized units,' Hegseth said. 'They will be strong, they will be tough, and they will stand with their law enforcement partners.' He added, 'We will work alongside all D.C. police and federal law enforcement to ensure this city is safe. This city is beautiful.' The Pentagon failed to respond to questions from The Intercept about which units might be deployed, what would precipitate that, and when. This is the second time this summer that Trump has deployed troops to a Democratically governed city. A federal trial began on Monday in San Francisco to decide whether Trump violated the law by deploying National Guard troops to Los Angeles in June without the approval of California Gov.r Gavin Newsom. 'President Trump is exploiting his power and testing it in ways that could lead to more U.S. troops deployed on American soil. As we saw in Los Angeles, President Trump is willing to deploy U.S. military forces on American streets for inflammatory and political reasons,' said Reed, the Rhode Island senator. 'Normalizing the use of U.S. military forces for everyday policing risks eroding the very freedoms our servicemembers swear to protect.' In his first seven months in office, Trump has overseen the deployment of around 20,000 federal troops on American soil, including personnel from the National Guard, the Army, the Navy, the Air Force, and the Marines, according to the Pentagon. But the true number of troops deployed may be markedly higher. U.S. Northern Command has no running tally of how many troops have been deployed around the country. These federal forces have been operating under Title 10 authority, or federal control, in at least five states — Arizona, California, Florida, New Mexico, and Texas — in service of the Trump administration's anti-immigrant agenda. More than 10,000 troops are deploying or have deployed to the southern border, according to Northern Command. Under the direction of NORTHCOM, military personnel have deployed under the moniker Joint Task Force-Southern Border, or JTF-SB, since March, bolstering approximately 2,500 service members who were already supporting U.S. Customs and Border Protection's border security mission. 'Members of the National Guard should be under no illusions about what they're being sent to do in Washington.' One-third of the U.S. border is now completely militarized due to the creation of four new national defense areas, or NDAs: sprawling extensions of U.S. military bases patrolled by troops who can detain immigrants until they can be handed over to Border Patrol agents. Around 5,500 troops — Marines and California National Guard members — have also been deployed to Los Angeles since early June. The forces were sent to LA over the objections of local officials and Newsom. Experts say that the increasing use of military forces in the interior of the United States represents an extraordinary violation of Posse Comitatus, a bedrock 19th-century law seen as fundamental to the democratic tradition in America. 'Though the rhetoric is sometimes different, from Los Angeles streets to ICE detention centers to our nation's capital, President Trump is repeatedly acting to turn the National Guard into the first-choice implementers of his authoritarian agenda,' Sara Haghdoosti, the executive director of Win Without War, told The Intercept. 'Whether it is assaulting immigrant communities or seizing control of law enforcement in DC, his goal for these deployments is the same: using state violence to strip power, safety, and dignity from people. Members of the National Guard should be under no illusions about what they're being sent to do in Washington.' Many more troops, like the National Guard forces deploying to the capital, are operating under so-called Title 32 status, meaning they are under state, rather than federal, control, unlike deployments in Los Angeles and across the southern border. With no governor to report to, the D.C. National Guard's chain of command runs from its commanding general to the secretary of the Army to Hegseth to the president. The plan for the Domestic Civil Disturbance Quick Reaction Force, which was first reported by the Washington Post on Tuesday, calls for two groups of 300 troops to be on standby for rapid deployment across the country, from military bases in Alabama and Arizona. The proposed force would also reportedly operate under Title 32. The Pentagon refused to offer further details about the initiative. 'The Department of Defense is a planning organization and routinely reviews how the department would respond to a variety of contingencies across the globe,' a defense official, speaking on the condition of anonymity, told The Intercept on Tuesday. 'We will not discuss these plans through leaked documents, pre-decisional or otherwise.' 'What worries me specifically is when you create a tool for a specific purpose you're going to want to use it — in this case, inserting the military in routine law enforcement,' Nunn, the Brennan Center a attorney, said of the rapid response force. 'Having a button you can push easily, so to speak, to deploy the military domestically will make domestic deployment of the military more frequent and more likely.' Late last month, the Trump administration authorized the deployment of National Guard troops to immigration facilities in 20 states, further entwining the military in civil and law enforcement functions. The National Guard will be deployed in Arkansas, Florida, Georgia, Indiana, Iowa, Louisiana, Nebraska, South Carolina, Texas, Utah, and Virginia, among other states, according to a defense official who was not authorized to disclose the information. On Monday, Trump took aim at numerous cities led by Democratic mayors in states with Democratic governors, threating authoritarian power grabs similar to his effort in Washington. 'If we need to, we're going to do the same thing in Chicago, which is a disaster,' Trump said. 'You look at Los Angeles, how bad it is. We have other cities that are very bad. New York has a problem. And then you have, of course, Baltimore and Oakland. We don't even mention that anymore. They're so far gone,' said Trump. 'We're not going to let it happen. We're not going to lose our cities over this. And this will go further.' The June deployment of troops to Los Angeles did very little and has largely wound down. Newsom warned then that Trump would target other states. 'Who else saw that coming?' he wrote on X on Monday. Last month, Trump also threatened a federal takeover of New York City if Democratic mayoral nominee Zohran Mamdani is elected. 'We have tremendous power at the White House to run places when we have to,' Trump said in July. 'Maybe we're going to have to straighten it out from Washington.' Nunn pointed to the risks of inserting the military in routine domestic law enforcement. 'The deeper and more fundamental danger is that you don't want the people with guns, tanks, and bombers to be looking inward, at their own country, and thinking of themselves as a domestic political actor,' he told The Intercept. 'The military is and should be a fundamentally outward-looking entity. You don't have to look very far around the world to see what happens when the military sees itself as a domestic political actor.'
Indianapolis Star
17 minutes ago
- Indianapolis Star
Braun: A Trump marijuana reclassification could add 'fuel to the fire' on Indiana legalization
President Donald Trump may change how dangerously the federal government views marijuana. Gov. Mike Braun said this could add "a little more fuel to the fire" of the marijuana legalization movement in Indiana, which remains on a cannabis prohibition island. At a news conference Aug. 11, Trump said his administration will make a decision in the next few weeks on whether to reclassify marijuana from a Schedule I drug ― alongside non-medical, addictive narcotics and synthetic opioids ― to a Schedule III, along with codeine and anabolic steroids that are found in licensed pharmacies. This wouldn't legalize recreational marijauana federally, but it would be the most significant policy change since marijuana was outlawed in 1970 with the Controlled Substances Act and make it easier to research. Indiana's four neighboring states have all legalized some form of cannabis, while all forms remain illegal in Indiana. Braun has consistently said, and reiterated at a news conference Aug. 12, that his views on the subject would be dictated by the views of law enforcement, who would have to enforce any laws. But he also acknowledged that some winds have shifted in the last few years. The legalization movement has gained steam within the Indiana GOP, and some even propped up a lobbying effort last year, encouraged by Braun's expressed openness to medical marijuana. It remains a divisive issue: though several Republicans filed decriminalization or legalization bills last session, several others filed bills banning marijuana billboards. "I think you can kind of extrapolate what's happened over the last five to seven years if you're going to want to try to guage what may happen over the next few years," Braun said on Aug. 12. "So I think (Trump's comment) probably adds a little more fuel to the fire in terms of the speed with which it might occur." Leaders in the legislature have been opposed to full marijuana legalization, with Senate President Pro Tempore Rodric Bray expressing a litany of safety concerns and House Speaker Todd Huston long saying that the opportunity to draw in more revenue should not be a reason to make such a substantial policy decision. Bray has said, however, that he is open to discussing decriminalizing small amounts of marijuana. Former President Joe Biden's Department of Health and Human Services first made the recommendation to reclassify the drug in 2023. In 2024, the Drug Enforcement Agency proposed a rule change, which has been on hold until now. More: With a new governor and Republican-backed marijuana lobbying effort, will anything change?
