Scientists Discovered a Way to Reverse Time—and Possibly Erase Mistakes
In the physical world, time marches in one direction, but things aren't so straight forward in the quantum realm.
Researchers have discovered that it's possible to speed up, slow down, or reverse the flow of time in a quantum system.
This isn't exactly time travel, but is instead implementing or reverting to different quantum states from different points in time.
In the subatomic universe of quantum physics, you can achieve things considered impossible in our flesh-and-blood physical world. Things like superposition, entanglement, and even teleportation all seem possible when things go quantum. Now, scientists from the Austrian Academy of Sciences (ÖAW) and University of Vienna are adding a kind of time travel to the list.
In a series of papers published on preprint servers and in various online journals (including Optica, arXiv, and Quantum), researchers including ÖAW's Miguel Navascués and University of Vienna's Philip Walther explain the possibility of speeding up, slowing down, and even reversing the flow of time within a quantum system.
Navascués compares the phenomenon to different movie-watching experiences. 'In a theater [classical physics], a movie is projected from beginning to end, regardless of what the audience wants,' he told the Spanish-language newspaper El País. 'But at home [the quantum world], we have a remote control to manipulate the movie. We can rewind to a previous scene or skip several scenes ahead.'
The researchers achieved this by 'evolving' a single photon as it passes through a crystal. Using an experimental device called a 'quantum switch,' the single photon of light returns to its previous state before it ever makes the journey. In a way, this is less Doc Brown-style time travel and more about reverting or otherwise altering the states of quantum particles, or 'time translation' as Navascués described in 2020.
However, this isn't exactly like a rewind button on your TV because usually, viewers can see how things got from plot point A to B—just sped up and in reverse. In quantum mechanics, however, simply observing a system causes it to change, which makes it impossible to track a system's progress through time. Crucially, these rewinding protocols still work because they can be performed without knowing what the changes were or its 'internal dynamics,' according to the scientists.
And this quantum time machine doesn't just go one direction—Navascués said they've also hit upon a method for going forward in evolutionary time as well. He told El País:
'To make a system age 10 years in one year, you must get the other nine years from somewhere. In a year-long experiment with 10 systems, you can steal one year from each of the first nine systems and give them all to the tenth. At the end of the year, the tenth system will have aged 10 years; the other nine will remain the same as when the experiment began.'
Sadly, these sci-fi findings in the quantum world can't be sized up to send humans backward and forward in time, because a single human represents a mind-boggling amount of information to 'rejuvenate'—in fact, the scientists estimate it would take millions of years to pull it off for just one second.
But for the teams at ÖAW and the University of Vienna, the point isn't jetting off to the distant future, but the ability to increase the capability of quantum processors by arming them with the possibility of reversing errors in a system. After all, if life had a rewind button, wouldn't you use it?
Get the Issue
Get the Issue
Get the Issue
Get the Issue
Get the Issue
Get the Issue
Get the IssueGet the Issue
Get the Issue
You Might Also Like
The Do's and Don'ts of Using Painter's Tape
The Best Portable BBQ Grills for Cooking Anywhere
Can a Smart Watch Prolong Your Life?
Solve the daily Crossword
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Gizmodo
36 minutes ago
- Gizmodo
Was Jesus Really Wrapped in the Shroud of Turin? 3D Study Says Probably Not
The Shroud of Turin is an ancient linen cloth with the subtle impression of the front and back of a crucified man. While many believe it was the burial shroud in which Jesus was wrapped when he died in the 30s CE, scientific research has dated it to between 1260 and 1390 CE, suggesting it's a medieval artifact. An ingenious new approach using 3D scans is now adding further credence to the suggestion that Jesus's body—or any body for that matter—never touched this famous fabric. Cicero Moraes, a 3D designer specializing in digital 3D facial reconstruction, has joined the contentious debate by using computer models to simulate two scenarios: draping a sheet of fabric (the same size as the Shroud of Turin) on a 3D human and one on a low-relief depiction of a human to compare their imprints, or contact patterns. Low-reliefs, also known as bas-reliefs, are carvings in which the figures emerge only slightly from their backgrounds. In other words, Moraes wanted to see whether the figure on the Shroud of Turin corresponds more closely to the imprint of a human body or a bas-relief. 'The results demonstrate that the contact pattern generated by the low-relief model is more compatible with the Shroud's image, showing less anatomical distortion and greater fidelity to the observed contours, while the projection of a 3D body results in a significantly distorted image,' Moraes wrote in a study published late last month in the journal Archaeometry. Moraes is the sole author. Simply put, 'the Shroud's image is more consistent with an artistic low-relief representation than with the direct imprint of a real human body, supporting hypotheses of its origin as a medieval work of art.' The study paid particular attention to the 'Agamemnon Mask effect.' The effect sees the contact pattern of fabric draped over volume, like a body, appear distorted and bloated once flattened or pulled taut. The name comes from the famous Agamemnon Mask, a 3,500-year-old gold death mask Heinrich Schliemann (the amateur archaeologist best known for 'discovering' the city of Troy) unearthed in Greece and misidentified as belonging to the Homeric hero Agamemnon. The full-face mask, which represents the face of the deceased, appears strangely wide for the same reason that the imprint of a human face in fabric would also appear wide once flattened. The real Shroud of Turin does not display the Agamemnon Mask effect. On the other hand, 'the printed image, generated from the contact regions in low relief, shows high compatibility with that present on the Shroud of Turin, significantly corresponding to its contours, even considering a not entirely flat base,' Moraes explained in the study. This conclusion supports the theory that the Shroud was not wrapped around a real human (or divine) body. Instead, it may have been an artistic representation, he suggested, potentially related to funerary practices. 'This work not only offers another perspective on the origin of the Shroud of Turin's image but also highlights the potential of digital technologies to address or unravel historical mysteries,' he concludes, 'intertwining science, art, and technology in a collaborative and reflective search for answers.'
Gizmodo
36 minutes ago
- Gizmodo
15 TikTok Videos About ‘Clankers', a New Slur for Robots
Terms like 'social media,' 'podcast,' and 'internet' emerged years ago as ways to talk about the latest advancements in the world of technology. And over the past month, we've seen some new terms popping up in the world of tech, from clanker to slopper, even if they seem to be mostly tongue-in-cheek at this point. What's a clanker? It's a derogatory word for a robot, a term coined in 1920 for a Czech play about dangerous mechanical men. And given the fact that humanoid robots are still pretty rare in everyday life, the term clanker has emerged as a way to joke about a future where robots face discrimination in jobs and relationships. That's what the folks of TikTok have been doing with some frequency since the word started to spread widely online in early July. As io9 reported Monday, clanker as a slur actually originates from the Star Wars universe, starting with the 2005 video game Republic Commando and becoming more popular with the Clone Wars animated series in 2008. But the term has taken off recently as a way to joke about our uneasiness with new technology in 2025. Some of the videos currently circulating on social media are just directed at robots that show up in daily life already, like the bots that are sometimes cleaning in supermarkets. But other videos imagine what the future will look like, placing the viewer in an era, maybe 20 or 50 years from now, when robots will presumably be much more common. The jokes often use stereotypes of the 20th century around racial integration, mimicking the bigoted responses white people had reacting to civil rights advancements in the U.S. and repurposing them for this version of a future where humans are uncomfortable with a robotic other. Obviously, we don't know how common humanoid robots will be in five, 10, or 20 years. Elon Musk has promised 'billions' of robots will be sold around the globe within your lifetime. And while Musk is often far too, let's say, optimistic about his tech timelines, it seems perfectly reasonable that we will have more humanoid robots walking around in the near future. For his part, Musk has only been showing off teleoperated robots that are closer to a magic trick than visions of the future. But technological change can be scary. And it's interesting to see how content creators channel those fears by imagining a new future where robots are oppressed—something that's incredibly common in science fiction, even before the word clanker was coined. Whatever you think of the term (and there are some people who are uncomfortable with it as coded racism rather than a comment on racism), it's everywhere on TikTok right now. good for nothing cl***ers #groopski #robophobic #futuretech #humanityfirst ♬ Bell Sound/Temple/Gone/About 10 minutes(846892) – yulu-ism project #fyp ♬ original sound – baggyclothesfromjapan Robophobia running rampant in clanker society #robot #fyp #fypage #robophobia #ai #police #cops #robo ♬ Beethoven's 'Moonlight'(871109) – 平松誠 #fyp #pov #robot #skit ♬ Bell Sound/Temple/Gone/About 10 minutes(846892) – yulu-ism project Sorry I just thought you were one of the good ones 🤖❌ #clanker #ai #fypシ #viral #fyp ♬ Bell Sound/Temple/Gone/About 10 minutes(846892) – yulu-ism project All these new gens bro💔🥀 #clanker#ai#robot#clonewars #starwars#clone#jangofett #starwarsfan #obiwan#anakin ♬ Classic classical gymnopedie solo piano(1034554) – Lyrebirds music How would pissed would you get at a robot ump? #baseball #comedy #clanker #pov ♬ original sound – LucasRoach15 Clanker #clanker #clankermeme #robophobic #robot #fyp ♬ original sound – TrendsOnline – TrendsOnline Asked ChatGPT if it liked this video it said yeah ♬ Rust – Black Label Society #clanker #fyp #fypシ #relatable #funny #trending #blowthisup ♬ original sound – 👩🏼🎤 Robophobia running rampant in clanker society #robot #robophobia #fyp #fypage #ai #clanker #robo ♬ Dust Collector – ybg lucas ♬ original sound – Conner Esche These clankers am I right #skit #meme #edit #clanker ♬ original sound – coopermitcchell #pov : You're coming out to your parents in 2050 #ai ♬ original sound – bjcalvillo Clanker #clanker #clankermeme #robophobic #robot #fyp #robots ♬ original sound – TrendsOnline – TrendsOnline Every new era sees an expansion of the tech lexicon. That's just how the march of time works. And it's unclear whether clankers will have any staying power beyond the summer of 2025. Another term, sloppers, has seen a similar rise, a term for people who use generative artificial intelligence for everything. There's just no predicting what new words are going to stick. After all, the internet was almost called the catenet. Language works in really funny ways.
Washington Post
37 minutes ago
- Washington Post
A Danish zoo is seeking unwanted pets — to feed to its predators
A zoo in Denmark has put out a call for people to donate unwanted pets and animals — including chickens, rabbits and guinea pigs — so they can be turned into feed for its predators. Aalborg Zoo wrote on social media last week that healthy animals it receives will be 'gently euthanized' by trained staff and then used as food for the predators, adding that this would help the zoo replicate its animals' natural food chain. 'That way, nothing goes to waste — and we ensure natural behavior, nutrition and well-being of our predators,' the zoo said, adding that some of its animals needed to eat 'whole' prey. The zoo also accepts donations of certain horses, which are also euthanized and then used as food. Online, critics balked at the idea of pets being fed to zoo animals, calling it a 'cheap publicity stunt,' 'disrespectful' and 'sick,' and a policy they say could encourage pet neglect. However, others said it was a good option for people whose pets are nearing the end of their lives and a way to make sure their deaths serve a purpose. Experts say donation can be a more cost-effective and natural way of feeding zoo animals who might otherwise be fed meat from commercial sources that can come from animals raised in poor conditions. 'If you agree to the general principle that you have carnivorous animals in a zoo, you somehow succumb to the necessity that you have to feed them animal material,' Marcus Clauss, co-director of the Clinic for Zoo Animals, Exotic Pets and Wildlife at the University of Zurich, said in an interview. 'If you do this in a way that is not primarily directed at economics, but at animal welfare, you will strive to get animals that had high welfare, ideally.' Aalborg Zoo did not immediately respond to a request for comment Tuesday. In a statement shared with the outlet Popular Science, spokeswoman Pia Nielsen said the practice of feeding carnivorous animals with smaller livestock has been used at Aalborg Zoo for many years and is common in Denmark. 'When keeping carnivores, it is necessary to provide them with meat, preferably with fur, bones, etc., to give them as natural a diet as possible. Therefore, it makes sense to allow animals that need to be euthanized for various reasons to be of use in this way,' Nielsen told Popular Science. 'In Denmark, this practice is common, and many of our guests and partners appreciate the opportunity to contribute.' Zoos in other countries also accept donations of livestock, or deceased animals, to feed their predators. The Wild Spirit Wolf Sanctuary in New Mexico, for example, states on its website that it accepts donations of 'livestock that has passed away or needs to be humanely euthanized' to feed its wolves and recommends donation over 'having to dispose of the deceased in a landfill, or go through the costly process of cremation.' The Alaska Zoo in Anchorage recently put out a call for frozen meat and fish donations for its animals. Clauss said that when horses are slaughtered, 'you have a huge amount of animal — meat, bones, etc. — that goes to waste in our system because it's not used by humans.' He said he supports zoos offering people the option of donating their horses if the alternative is that zoos purchase horsemeat to feed their carnivores. 'Why not get it that way directly?' Clauss acknowledged concerns that encouraging people to donate animals might mean fewer unwanted pets are placed in shelters. But he said pet shelters in many countries, including the United States, are overcrowded and can't always ensure optimal conditions for the pets in their care, so that option might not guarantee a higher welfare for the unwanted animals. And he said that forcing someone who doesn't want or can't afford their pet to keep them may also not be good for the animal. 'People who want to get rid of their animals will find a way of doing that,' he said. In response to the call for donations by the Aalborg Zoo, several Facebook users wrote that they took their horses to be donated there and praised the zoo's handling of their animals, while others wrote that they were planning to donate their horses in the future. It was not immediately clear how the donated animals would be euthanized. On Facebook, the zoo said trained professionals worked to make the deaths as quick and painless as possible.
