Constituents critical of York MP's suspension
It came after she was a key figure in organising a rebellion against her party's welfare reform bill, which she said would introduce "Dickensian cuts belonging to a different era and a different party".
Maskell defended her decision as standing up for disabled people but the prime minister argued the MPs were "elected on a Labour manifesto" and so should back the government's agenda.
But what do Maskell's York constituents think? People in Acomb have spoken to the BBC about their reaction to the news.
'Absolutely disgusting'
Richard Lowe, from the Huntington Road area of York, is visiting shops on Front Street with his wife.
When quizzed about Maskell's suspension, he says this is a topic the couple has discussed in depth, due to their careers in healthcare.
"Rachael Maskell, for me, embodies what the Labour movement should be," the former mental health nurse says.
"My thoughts are that the suspension is absolutely disgusting.
"As she says, she's been a Labour member for 34 years, she's stood up for disability rights, she's a disability campaigner."
As an ex-nurse, Richard says he has always had a duty of care to his patients - and that Maskell has a duty of care to her constituents.
"I won't be voting Labour at the next general election," he says.
"If Rachael Maskell is still an independent MP, I'll vote for her but I'm not voting Labour.
"I hope she's retaken into the Labour Party very shortly. I can't see it happening myself, but there you go."
'Where are the lines?'
Sat on a bench alongside their dog are Angela and her mother-in-law, Carole, who both live locally.
They explain they do not share the same political views as Maskell but were on the fence about Sir Keir Starmer's decision to suspend her.
"It's difficult, isn't it? Everybody's entitled to their own opinion but where are the lines?" Angela asks.
"I think Labour has made a lot of terrible choices in the past year or so.
"They're not doing themselves any favours."
However, they both thought the welfare system needed an overhaul.
"If you're a disabled person, you should be entitled to a benefit if that benefit is appropriate for your disability," Angela says.
"But I think possibly there's been a bit of a trend of people claiming disability benefits and I don't think there's been enough checks into the background of what's actually needed for some people."
Carole believes more "double checks" should be made to see what benefit is fair for each claimant.
'Over the top'
Further down the street, Carolina Ficco, 62, also stops to chat.
She believes that no matter the political party, MPs should not be punished for representing their constituents.
"I think it was extremely harsh and over the top that she's been suspended," Carolina says.
"Everybody is entitled to an opinion and if she's representing people, why should she be dismissed for that?
"That's what politicians are supposed to be about, they're a voice for us. It's bang out of order."
She says Maskell's suspension is "absolutely, totally wrong".
The prime minister defended his decision to suspend Maskell, along with Neil Duncan-Jordan, Brian Leishman and Chris Hinchliff.
He said: "I am determined we will change this country for the better for millions of working people – and I'm not going to be deflected from that.
"Therefore, we have to deal with people who repeatedly break the whip.
"Everyone was elected as a Labour MP on a Labour manifesto of change and everybody needs to deliver as a Labour government."
In a statement, the York Central MP said she wanted this Labour government to be the "very best ever" and said she had "used every opportunity" to reach into government to be an advocate for disabled people.
"I am, of course, sad of the decision to suspend me for simply seeking the very best for others," Maskell said.
"As someone of deep conviction and faith, I bring these values with me in all I do in representing my constituents and ensuring that I advocate for them, keep them safe and ensure that their voices are taken into the very heart of politics."
Listen to highlights from North Yorkshire on BBC Sounds, catch up with the latest episode of Look North.
Starmer says he had to 'deal with' rebel Labour MPs
Labour suspends four MPs after welfare cuts rebellion

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
4 hours ago
- Yahoo
Starmer's plan to recognise Palestinian state labelled 'appeasement towards jihadist terrorists' by Netanyahu
Sir Keir Starmer's plan to recognise Palestine as a state has been attacked as "appeasement towards jihadist terrorists" by Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu. The prime minister said by September unless Israel takes "substantive steps" to end the situation in Gaza, Israel agrees to a ceasefire, commits to a long-term sustainable peace, allows the UN to restart aid supplies and does not annexe the West Bank. About 250 MPs from all parties - half of them Labour - had signed a letter last week calling for Sir Keir to immediately recognise a Palestinian Keir said that by giving Israel a deadline of 9 September UN meeting, he hoped this would play a part "in changing the conditions on the ground, and making sure aid gets into making sure that there is hope of a two-state solution for the future". But Mr Netanyahu condemned the plan, saying Sir Keir "rewards Hamas's monstrous terrorism and punishes its victims". "A jihadist state on Israel's border today will threaten Britain tomorrow," he wrote on X. "Appeasement towards jihadist terrorists always fails. It will fail you too. It will not happen." The Israelis also accused Sir Keir of pandering to his MPs and France, after Emmanuel Macron committed to recognising a Palestinian state last week, and harming efforts to release Israeli hostages. Lib Dems and Greens: 'Bargaining chip' Sir Keir also faced accusations of using Palestinian state recognition as a "bargaining chip" by both the Lib Dems and the Green Party. Lib Dem leader Sir Ed Davey said a Palestinian state should have been recognised "months ago" and "far greater action" is needed to stop the humanitarian disaster in Gaza. Green Party foreign affairs spokesperson Ellie Chowns, who wants immediate state recognition, said it was a "cynical political gesture". Humza Yousaf, Scotland's former SNP first minister, who revealed a family member was killed in Gaza days ago, told Sky News statehood "shouldn't be dependent" upon the conditions Sir Keir has set for Israel, but is the "inalienable right" of the Palestinian people. The British Palestinian Committee, representing Palestinian interests in the UK, described conditions as "absurd and performative". UK Jewish groups seek clarity The Board of Deputies of British Jews, the UK's largest Jewish organisation, said it was "seeking urgent clarification" that the UK will not recognise Palestine as a state if Israeli hostages remain in Hamas captivity, or if Hamas keeps rejecting a ceasefire deal. The Labour Friends of Israel group said it has "shared goals" with the government but state recognition "will be a merely symbolic act unless the UK uses its influence to establish the principles of a meaningful pathway to a Palestinian state". Read more: What does recognising a Palestinian state mean?Children 'eating out of piles of garbage' as time runs out for Gaza Sarah Champion, Labour MP and chair of the international development committee, who started the MP letter calling for state recognition, said she was "delighted and relieved". However, she added: "I'm troubled our recognition appears conditional on Israel's actions." When Foreign Secretary David Lammy announced the plan at a UN meeting, he received applause. Not many other Labour MPs commented. Tories accuse Starmer of appeasing MPs Conservative leader Kemi Badenoch accused Sir Keir of being more focused on a "political problem for the Labour Party" than other issues facing the UK. "Recognising a Palestinian state won't bring the hostages home, won't end the war and won't get aid into Gaza," she posted on X. "This is political posturing at its very worst." Tory shadow foreign secretary Priti Patel said the announcement was "to appease his backbenchers" as "he knows that promises to recognise Palestine will not secure lasting peace". Trump did not discuss statehood with Starmer Donald Trump said he and Sir Keir "never did discuss" the PM's plan to recognise a Palestinian state during their meetings in Scotland the day before. However, Tammy Bruce, spokeswoman for the US state department, said Sir Keir's plan is a "slap in the face for the victims of October 7", which "rewards Hamas", the Telegraph reported.

Wall Street Journal
5 hours ago
- Wall Street Journal
Keir Starmer Has Conditions for Israel
Under former leader Jeremy Corbyn, the British Labour Party would have thrown in long ago with 'our friends from Hamas,' as he once called them. The new Labour Party, led by Prime Minister Keir Starmer, may settle for handing Hamas a symbolic victory. On Tuesday Mr. Starmer said the U.K. will join France in recognizing a State of Palestine at the United Nations in September, but with a twist. He'll do it 'unless the Israeli government takes substantive steps to end the appalling situation in Gaza, agree to a cease-fire and commit to a long-term, sustainable peace, reviving the prospect of a two-state solution.'
Yahoo
7 hours ago
- Yahoo
Minister 'weaponising' Savile will make Labour MPs queasy - but there's a bigger risk
Sometimes governments blindly idle into political fights and sometimes they go windmilling in with purpose. is most definitely the later of these two. The science secretary's reference to was no slip of the tongue. Ministers seem to believe has made a misjudgement in pledging to scrap internet safety laws, given the massive unease across the country about what children are viewing online. As a result, Kyle is trying to point at their position by stoking a spat with (some would say) inflammatory language that sucks up media attention. It's not exactly a new technique. Think back to 2023 and Labour did something very similar when it ran attack ads accusing of not wanting to lock up child abusers - in a bid to draw attention to the criminal justice system. Go even further back, and it's essentially the same strategy employed on the red Brexit bus in 2016 with its pledge to divert money from the EU to the NHS. All heavily disputable claims that are made to start a row and move the spotlight onto a politically convenient topic. But the risk inherent in tactics like this is that it makes some on your own side feel a little icky. The last politician to invoke Jimmy Savile as part of a political attack was when he accused of failing to investigate the serial child abuser when he was the country's head prosecutor. That led to the resignation of the then prime minister's top policy aide. Read more from Sky News: There will be plenty in who feel similarly queasy about a cabinet minister weaponising one of the country's most notorious paedophiles to lay into an opposition party. The bigger risk though is whether Peter Kyle will really emerge victorious from this fight. is going for the in part because it fits with his party's narrative around mainstream politics trying to silence the concerns of ordinary people. Those disenfranchised sections of society are a key group of voters that Reform are trying to reach. Whether they are outweighed by those put off the party by its recent pronouncements remains to be seen. But for now, this seems to be a fight that Nigel Farage is also keen to have.