logo
Trump's 'big, beautiful bill' passes Senate with JD Vance's tie-break

Trump's 'big, beautiful bill' passes Senate with JD Vance's tie-break

1News10 hours ago
Senate Republicans hauled US President Donald Trump's big tax breaks and spending cuts bill to passage on Wednesday on the narrowest of margins, pushing past opposition from Democrats and their own GOP ranks after a turbulent overnight session.
The sudden outcome capped an unusually tense weekend of work at the Capitol, the president's signature legislative priority teetering on the edge of approval or collapse. In the end, that tally was 50-50, with Vice President JD Vance casting the tie-breaking vote.
Three Republican senators — Thom Tillis of North Carolina, Susan Collins of Maine and Rand Paul of Kentucky — joined all Democrats in voting against it.
"In the end, we got the job done," Senate Majority Leader John Thune of South Dakota said afterward.
What exactly is in the bill? - Find out here
ADVERTISEMENT
The difficulty for Republicans, who have the majority hold in Congress, to wrestle the bill to this point is not expected to let up. The package now goes back to the House, where Speaker Mike Johnson had warned senators not to overhaul what his chamber had already approved.
But the Senate did make changes, particularly to Medicaid, risking more problems ahead.
House GOP leaders vowed to put it on Trump's desk by his Fourth of July deadline.
Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer of N.Y., speaks during a news conference after passage of the budget reconciliation package of President Donald Trump's signature bill . (Source: Associated Press)
It's a pivotal moment for the president and his party, as they have been consumed by the 940-page "One Big Beautiful Bill Act", as it was formally titled before Democrats filed an amendment to strip out the name, and invested their political capital in delivering on the GOP's sweep of power in Washington.
Trump acknowledged it's "very complicated stuff", as he departed the White House for Florida.
"I don't want to go too crazy with cuts," he said. "I don't like cuts."
ADVERTISEMENT
What started as a routine but laborious day of amendment voting, in a process called vote-a-rama, spiralled into a round-the-clock slog as Republican leaders were buying time to shore up support.
The morning's headlines in 90 seconds, including Australia's weather bomb, the surprising costs of getting one more dog, and BTS are back. (Source: 1News)
The droning roll calls in the chamber belied the frenzied action to steady the bill. Grim-faced scenes played out on and off the Senate floor, amid exhaustion.
Thune worked around the clock desperately reaching for last-minute agreements between those in his party worried the bill's reductions to Medicaid will leave millions more people without care and his most conservative flank, which wants even steeper cuts to hold down deficits ballooning with the tax cuts.
The GOP leaders had no room to spare, with narrow majorities. Thune could lose no more than three Republican senators, and two — Tillis, who warned that millions of people will lose access to Medicaid health care, and Paul, who opposed raising the debt limit by $5 trillion — had already indicated opposition.
Attention quickly turned to two other key senators, Lisa Murkowski of Alaska and Collins, who also raised concerns about health care cuts, as well as a loose coalition of four conservative GOP senators pushing for even steeper reductions.
Sen. Susan Collins, R-Maine, chair of the Senate Appropriations Committee, walks from the chamber. (Source: Associated Press)
ADVERTISEMENT
Murkowski in particular became the subject of the GOP leadership's attention, as they sat beside her for talks. She was huddled intensely for more than an hour in the back of the chamber with others, scribbling notes on papers.
Then all eyes were on Paul after he returned from a visit to Thune's office with a stunning offer that could win his vote. He had suggested substantially lowering the bill's increase in the debt ceiling, according to two people familiar with the private meeting and granted anonymity to discuss it.
Senate Democratic Leader Chuck Schumer of New York said "Republicans are in shambles because they know the bill is so unpopular."
An analysis from the nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office found 11.8 million more Americans would become uninsured by 2034 if the bill became law. The CBO said the package would increase the deficit by nearly US$3.3 trillion (NZ$5.4 trillion) over the decade.
Pressure built from all sides. Billionaire Elon Musk said those who voted for the package should "hang their head in shame" and warned he would campaign against them. But Trump had also lashed out against the GOP holdouts including Tillis, who abruptly announced his own decision over the weekend not to seek reelection.
(Source: Associated Press)
Senators insist on changes
ADVERTISEMENT
Few Republicans appeared fully satisfied as the final package emerged, in either the House or the Senate.
Collins fought to include US$50 billion (NZ$82 billion) for a new rural hospital fund, among the GOP senators worried that the bill's Medicaid provider cuts would be devastating and force them to close.
While her amendment for the fund was rejected, the provision was inserted into the final bill. Still she voted no.
The Maine senator said she's happy the bolstered funding was added, "but my difficulties with the bill go far beyond that".
And Murkowski called the decision-making process "agonising".
She secured provisions to spare Alaska and other states from some food stamp cuts, but her efforts to bolster Medicaid reimbursements fell short. She voted yes.
What's in the big bill
ADVERTISEMENT
All told, the Senate bill includes US$4.5 trillion (NZ$7.3 trillion) in tax cuts, according to the latest CBO analysis, making permanent Trump's 2017 rates, which would expire at the end of the year if Congress fails to act, while adding the new ones he campaigned on, including no taxes on tips.
The Senate package would roll back billions of dollars in green energy tax credits, which Democrats warn will wipe out wind and solar investments nationwide. It would impose US$1.2 trillion (NZ$1.9 trillion) in cuts, largely to Medicaid and food stamps, by imposing work requirements on able-bodied people, including some parents and older Americans, making sign-up eligibility more stringent and changing federal reimbursements to states.
Additionally, the bill would provide a US$350 billion (NZ$574.6 billion) infusion for border and national security, including for deportations, some of it paid for with new fees charged to immigrants.
"The big not so beautiful bill has passed," said Paul.
Democrats fighting all day and night
Unable to stop the march toward passage, the Democrats tried to drag out the process, including with a weekend reading of the full bill.
A few of the Democratic amendments won support from a few Republicans, though almost none passed. More were considered in one of the longer such sessions in modern times.
Senator Patty Murray of Washington, the ranking Democrat on the Appropriations Committee, raised particular concern about the accounting method being used by the Republicans, which says the tax breaks from Trump's first term are now 'current policy' and the cost of extending them should not be counted toward deficits.
She said that kind of "magic math" won't fly with Americans trying to balance their own household books.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Paramount settles with Trump over 60 Minutes interview for $16m
Paramount settles with Trump over 60 Minutes interview for $16m

RNZ News

time5 hours ago

  • RNZ News

Paramount settles with Trump over 60 Minutes interview for $16m

By Helen Coster and Jack Queen , Reuters US President Donald Trump, May 2025. Photo: AFP / Saul Loeb CBS parent company Paramount have settled a lawsuit filed by US President Donald Trump over an interview broadcast in October, the latest concession by a media company to a president who has targeted outlets over what he describes as false or misleading coverage. Paramount said on Wednesday (local time) that it would pay US$16 million to settle the suit, with the money allocated to Trump's future presidential library, and not paid to Trump "directly or indirectly." "The settlement does not include a statement of apology or regret," the company statement added. Trump filed a $10-billion lawsuit against CBS in October, alleging the network deceptively edited an interview that aired on its 60 Minutes news program with then-vice president and presidential candidate Kamala Harris to "tip the scales in favour of the Democratic Party" in the election. In an amended complaint filed in February, Trump bumped his claim for damages to $20b. CBS aired two versions of the Harris interview in which she appears to give different answers to the same question about the Israel-Hamas war, according to the lawsuit filed in federal court in Texas. CBS previously said the lawsuit was "completely without merit" and had asked a judge to dismiss the case. The White House did not immediately respond to a Reuters request for comment. Edward A. Paltzik, a lawyer representing Trump in the civil suit, could not be immediately reached for comment. Paramount said it also agreed that 60 Minutes would release transcripts of interviews with future US presidential candidates after they aired, subject to redactions as required for legal or national security concerns. A spokesperson for Paramount Chair Shari Redstone was unavailable for comment. The case entered mediation in April. Trump alleged CBS's editing of the interview violated the Texas Deceptive Trade Practices-Consumer Protection Act, which makes it illegal to use false, misleading or deceptive acts in commerce. Media advocacy groups said Trump's novel use of such laws against news outlets could be a way of circumventing legal protections for the press, which can only be held liable for defamation against public figures if they say something they knew or should have known was false. The settlement comes as Paramount prepares for an $8.4b merger with Skydance Media, which will require approval from the US Federal Communications Commission. On the campaign trail last year, Trump threatened to revoke CBS's broadcasting license if elected. He has repeatedly lashed out against the news media, often casting unfavourable coverage as "fake news." The Paramount settlement follows a decision by Walt Disney-owned ABC News to settle a defamation case brought by Trump. As part of that settlement, which was made public on 14 December, the network donated $15m to Trump's presidential library and publicly apologized for comments by anchor George Stephanopoulos, who inaccurately said Trump had been found liable for rape. It also follows a second settlement, by Facebook and Instagram parent company Meta Platforms, which on 29 January said it had agreed to pay about $25m to settle a lawsuit by Trump over the company's suspension of his accounts after the 6 January 2021 attack at the US Capitol. Trump has vowed to pursue more claims against the media. On 17 December, he filed a lawsuit against the Des Moines Register newspaper and its former top pollster over its poll published on 2 November that showed Harris leading Trump by three percentage points in Iowa. The lawsuit seeks unspecified damages and an order barring the Des Moines Register from engaging in "ongoing deceptive and misleading acts and practices" related to polling. A Des Moines Register representative said the organisation stands by its reporting and that the lawsuit was without merit. On 30 June, Trump dropped the federal lawsuit and refiled it in an Iowa state court. - Reuters

Trump, Leakers And Journalists: The Assange Precedent And Revisiting The Espionage Act
Trump, Leakers And Journalists: The Assange Precedent And Revisiting The Espionage Act

Scoop

time9 hours ago

  • Scoop

Trump, Leakers And Journalists: The Assange Precedent And Revisiting The Espionage Act

When campaigning in 2016, presidential candidate Donald Trump was delighted by leaked, hacked or disclosed material that wound its way to the digital treasure troves of WikiLeaks. The online publisher of government secrets had become an invaluable resource for Trump's battering of the Democratic establishment hopeful, Hillary Clinton, with her nonchalant attitude to the security of email communications and a venal electoral strategy. 'Very little pick-up by the dishonest media of incredible information provided by WikiLeaks,' he tooted on what was then Twitter. 'So dishonest! Rigged system!' After winning the keys to the White House, he mysteriously forgot the organisation whose fruit he so merrily feasted on. During the Biden administration, the fate of the founding publisher of WikiLeaks, an Australian national who had never been on American soil and had published classified US defence and diplomatic material outside the country (Cablegate was a gem; Collateral Murder, a chilling exposure of atrocity in Baghdad), was decided. Kept in the excruciating, spiritually crushing conditions of Belmarsh Prison in London for over five years, Julian Assange was convicted under the US Espionage Act of 1917 in June 2024, the victim of a relic dusted and burnished for deployment against the Fourth Estate. Assange's conviction on one count of conspiracy to obtain and disclose national defence information has paved a grim road for future prosecutions against the press, a pathway previously not taken for its dangers. With this nasty legacy, recent threats by Trump against journalists who published and discussed the findings of a leaked preliminary report from the Defense Intelligence Agency are hard to dismiss. The report dared question the extent of damage inflicted on Iran's nuclear facilities by Operation Midnight Hammer, which involved 75 precision guided munitions in all. 'Monumental Damage was done to all Nuclear sites in Iran, as shown by satellite images,' Trump asserted with beaming confidence. 'Obliteration is an accurate term!' CNN and The New York Times duly challenged the account in discussing the findings of the short DIA report. Damage to the program had not been as absolute as hoped, setting it back by a matter of months rather than years. This sent Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth into a state of apoplexy, haranguing those press outlets who 'cheer against Trump so hard, it's like in your DNA and in your blood'. For his part, Trump accused the Democrats on a Truth Social post of leaking 'information on the PERFECT FLIGHT on the Nuclear Sites in Iran', demanding their prosecution. He further charged his personal lawyer to harangue The New York Times with a letter demanding it 'retract and apologize for' the article, one it claimed was 'false' and 'defamatory'. To Maria Bartiromo of Fox Business, Trump also added that reporters could be forced to reveal their sources on 'National Security' grounds. 'We can find out. If they want to, we can find out easily. You go up and tell a reporter, 'National security, who gave it?' You have to do that, and I suspect we'll be doing things like that.' According to Rollingstone, the President has already queried whether the press could be snared by the Espionage Act. While the magazine misses a beat in ignoring the Assange precedent, it notes the current administration's overly stimulated interest in the statute. Prior to returning to the White House, Trump and his inner circle considered how the Act could be used not only to target leakers in government and whistleblowers 'but against media outlets that received classified or highly sensitive information'. The publication relies on two sources who had discussed the matter with the President. One source, a senior Trump administration official, insists that the Act has again come up specifically regarding reports on the efficacy of the US strike on Iran's nuclear facilities. Members of the administration are 'looking for the right case to launch their 'maiden voyage' of an unprecedented type of Espionage Act prosecution', one designed to deter news outlets from publishing classified government information or concealing the identities of their leaking sources. 'All we'd really need is one text or email from a reporter telling a source: 'Can you pull something for me?' or something very direct of that nature'.' A less ignorant source would not have to look far for the one existing, successful example in the US prosecutor's kit. When pressed on the issue of whether the espionage statute would become the spear for the administration to target leakers and journalists, White House spokesperson Anna Kelly was broad in reply: 'Leaking classified information is a crime, and anyone who threatens American national security in this manner should be held accountable.' The unanswered question regarding Assange's prosecution and eventual conviction remains the possible and fundamental role played by the Constitution's First Amendment protecting press freedom. Unfortunately, the central ghastliness of the Espionage Act is its subversion of free speech and motive. Given the Australian publisher's plea deal, the mettle of that defence was never tested in court. Some members of Congress have shown a worthy interest in that valuable right, notably in the context of defending Assange. In their November 8, 2023 letter to President Joe Biden, sixteen lawmakers spanning both sides of politics, including Trump loyalist Marjorie Taylor Greene and progressive Democrat Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, declared their commitment 'to the principles of free speech and freedom of the press' in urging the withdrawal of the US extradition request for Assange. Unfortunately, and significantly, that request was ignored. Where Greene and other MAGA cheerleaders sit on Trump's dangerous enchantment with the Espionage Act remains to be seen, notably on the issue of prosecuting publishers and journalists. MAGA can be incorrigibly fickle, especially when attuned to the authoritarian impulses of their great helmsman. Dr. Binoy Kampmark was a Commonwealth Scholar at Selwyn College, Cambridge. He currently lectures at RMIT University. Email: bkampmark@

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store