Exclusive-Fistful of dollars and rice for Vietnam farmers displaced for $1.5 billion Trump golf club
The golf resort, for which construction is scheduled to begin next month, is offering thousands of villagers such compensation packages to leave the land that has provided their livelihood for years or decades, according to six people with direct knowledge and documents seen by Reuters.
The project is the first partnership for the family business of U.S. President Donald Trump in Vietnam, which fast-tracked approvals as it negotiated a crucial trade deal with Washington.
Developers are now cutting compensation forecasts from an initial estimate exceeding $500 million, said one person familiar with the plans who declined to elaborate on reasons for the reduction.
The 990-hectare site designated for the golf course currently supports fruit farms growing bananas, longan, and other crops. While some see opportunity, many farmers are elderly and fear they will struggle to find alternative livelihoods in Vietnam's vibrant economy with its largely young demographic.
"The whole village is worried about this project because it will take our land and leave us jobless," said 50-year-old Huong, who was told to leave her 200-square-metre (2152.78 square-feet) plot in Hung Yen province near capital Hanoi for less than the average pay for one year in Vietnam.
Vietnamese real estate company Kinhbac City and its partners will develop the luxury golf club after paying the Trump Organization $5 million for brand licensing rights, according to regulatory filings and a source familiar with the deal.
Trump's family business will run the club once completed, but is not involved in the investment and in compensationto farmers.
Trump has said his assets in the businesses are held in a trust managed by his children, but disclosures in June showed income from those sources ultimately accrues to the president.
Vietnam's agriculture ministry, Hung Yen authorities, the Trump Organization and Kinhbac City did not reply to questions on compensation rates.
Authorities will determine final compensation rates based on land size and location, with formal approval expected next month. Five farmers facing dispossessions said authorities flagged reimbursements worth between $12 and $30 per square metre of farmland.
They also offered additional payments for uprooted plants and provisions of rice for some months, roughly in line with one document seen by Reuters.
The person familiar with the compensation plan said the range was accurate, declining to be named because the information was not public.
A local official declined to talk about the compensation but said rates for farmland in the area have usually not exceeded $14 per square metre. They are often higher in other provinces.
In Communist-run Vietnam, farmland is managed by the state. Farmers are assigned small plots for long-term use but have little say when authorities decide to take the land back. Protests are common but usually fruitless.
Compensation is paid by the state but developers foot the bill.
Four of the farmers contacted by Reuters were not happy with the proposed rates because their small plots would produce low payments.
Thousands of villagers will be affected, according to a second document from local authorities seen by Reuters, which stated final payment decisions were expected next month.
Huong leases a larger plot from other villagers, but can claim land compensation only for the small one assigned to her and for the plants she grows. "What can someone like me do after that?"
RICE FOR LAND
Vietnam's Prime Minister Pham Minh Chinh said farmers would be reimbursed fairly when he spoke in May at the groundbreaking ceremony for the golf project to an audience that included Trump's son Eric, a senior vice president of the Trump Organization.
"We have no right to negotiate. That's a shame," said Do Dinh Huong, another farmer who was told his plot would be compensated at roughly $12 per square metre.
He said he would have accepted what he believed was a low rate if the land were to be used to build roads or other public infrastructure.
"But this is a business project. I don't know how that would contribute to people's life."
Authorities have also offered rice as compensation, with provisions varying from two to twelve months, according to one of the documents seen by Reuters.
Nguyen Thi Chuc, a 54-year-old farmer who grows bananas in what will become the Trump golf club, was told by authorities she might receive roughly $30 per square metre for her 200-square-metre plot.
"I'm getting old and can't do anything else other than working on the farm," she said.
Conversely, lawyers and investors in the province said the golf club would create better jobs and enrich villagers.
Le Van Tu, a 65-year-old local who will be compensated for his small plot and owns an eatery in a village that the golf club will abut, said he will upgrade his diner into a restaurant to cater to wealthier clients.
Land prices in the village have risen fivefold since the project was announced in October, he said. He was also happy a nearby pig farm will be gone: "It won't be stinky anymore."
(Reporting by Francesco Guarascio and Khanh Vu; Editing by Saad Sayeed)
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Star
a minute ago
- The Star
US report says India acts minimally, Pakistan rarely acts against rights abuses
Aran Ali, 53, looks out of a makeshift shelter that is now his new home following a demolition drive by authorities in Goalpara district in the northeastern state of Assam, India, July 18, 2025. Amnesty International and Human Rights Watch fault Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi's government for its treatment of minorities, including the demolition of properties owned by Muslims.- Reuters WASHINGTON: The US government noted abuses in India and Pakistan in a shortened human rights report released on Tuesday (Aug 12) that said India "took minimal credible steps" to combat the abuses while Pakistan "rarely took credible steps." The Trump administration scaled back the annual US government report on human rights worldwide, dramatically softening criticism of some allies and countries that have been President Donald Trump's partners. The State Department human rights documentation for India and Pakistan was also much shorter and scaled back this year. India has been an important US partner in recent years in Washington's effort to counter China's rise, although relations have been tense over Trump's imposition of a 50 per cent tariff on goods from India. Pakistan is a non-NATO US ally. About India, the report said: "The government took minimal credible steps or action to identify and punish officials who committed human rights abuses." On Pakistan, it added: "The government rarely took credible steps to identify and punish officials who committed human rights abuses." Indian and Pakistani embassies in Washington had no immediate comment on the report released on Tuesday, which documented instances in 2024. Amnesty International and Human Rights Watch fault Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi's government for its treatment of minorities. They point to rising hate speeches, a religion-based citizenship law the UN calls "fundamentally discriminatory," anti-conversion legislation that challenges freedom of belief, the 2019 removal of Muslim-majority Kashmir's special status, and the demolition of properties owned by Muslims. Modi denies discrimination and says his policies, such as the food subsidy programme and electrification drives, benefit everyone. In Pakistan, Amnesty International says government authorities fail to protect minorities, including Christians, and use "excessive and unnecessary force" against civil society voices and protesters. In particular, rights groups, the UN, and Western governments raised concerns over the 2024 Pakistani elections. A UN working group said last year that former Prime Minister Imran Khan's detention violated international law. Khan remains in jail. Islamabad says its elections were fair and dismisses allegations of rigging and foul play. Washington and New Delhi have not reached a trade deal, while the United States has reached an agreement in recent weeks with Pakistan. Trump angered India by taking credit for an India-Pakistan ceasefire in May after hostilities between the neighbours following an April attack in India-administered Kashmir. India says New Delhi and Islamabad should resolve their ties directly without outside involvement. - Reuters
The Star
2 hours ago
- The Star
Vietnam exporters brace for tougher US market
HO CHI MINH CITY: A fresh 20 per cent tariff and tougher US import rules are forcing Vietnam's exporters to move fast lest they lose ground in their biggest market, according to the Vietnam Trade Promotion Agency (Vietrade). Speaking at a seminar on 'With US Tariffs in Place, Vietnam Must Speed Up,' Vu Ba Phu, general director of Vietrade, said the US had long been Vietnam's top export market. Trade between the two countries grew exponentially to reach US$132 billion last year, while Vietnam's exports in the first half of 2025 rose by 29 per cent year-on-year to $70.91 billion. Despite its new tariffs, the US remained an attractive market, Phu said. 'Whether the tariff is 20 per cent or 40 per cent, we still have to export to the US. The question is how to do it in the most advantageous way.' He pointed out that the challenge was not just the tariff but a series of 'technical gateways.' Green standards and international certification had become mandatory 'passports' for market entry, and factories wanting to keep customers must invest in energy-efficient production lines, emission reduction and recycled materials, he said. Exports to the US grew by 29 per cent this year, driven largely by customers rushing orders to beat the tariffs, and this could leave US importers with high inventories, potentially slowing shipments of products such as wooden furniture and textiles in the latter half of 2025 and possibly early 2026, he said. Tran Nhu Tung, vice chairman of the Vietnam Textile and Apparel Association, said exports to the US had been growing steadily. Of Vietnam's textile and garment exports of $21.8 billion in the first half of the year, the US accounted for $17.5 billion, he said. But he too said many buyers scrambled to pre-empt the tariffs, and this could mean a fall in orders in the third quarter. Nevertheless, he was optimistic that once the 20 per cent tariff was firmly in place, the US market would stabilise, orders would resume in the fourth quarter, and the industry would be able to meet its year's export target of $48 billion. He also noted that with many buyers now demanding compliance with green standards and international certifications, businesses needed to invest in upgrades to production lines and technologies, raising costs and lowering profit margins. But meeting these requirements would be essential to maintaining market share, he warned. Competition is also intensifying, according to Tung. Alongside Bangladesh, India and Indonesia, China remains the largest competitor, boasting scale, a fully integrated supply chain, and superior production capacity. Vietnam still relies heavily on imported raw materials from China, making rules of origin a decisive factor. If a Vietnamese enterprise buys cotton from the US, spins it into yarn, weaves it into fabric, manufactures garments, and then exports, the tariff applicable will be very different from when fabric is imported from China. Tung warned that the US might soon require detailed declarations of raw material origin by country, forcing businesses to adopt ERP systems and precise traceability or else face the risk of attracting the highest tariffs. 'Textile and garment enterprises must proactively prepare both in terms of management technology and raw material strategies to meet stringent standards while maintaining profit margins amid increasingly fierce competition.' Phu pointed out that the 20 per cent tariff on agricultural products would be higher than before, and advised exporters to move towards deep processing and value-added products instead of raw produce. Export documentation must be clear and transparent, with industry associations conducting cross-checks to prevent origin fraud, as even a single violation could harm the entire sector, he added. At the seminar, Kris Nguyen, founder of Ocean USA and co-founder of the B2B e-commerce platform said businesses could not succeed in the US market by simply focusing on sales; they would need an ecosystem to build globally competitive capabilities from ESG documentation and traceability to efficient logistics. Most importantly, everything must be verified and transparent, he added. — Vietnam News/ANN
The Star
2 hours ago
- The Star
India reels from US tariff hike threat
MUMBAI: Indian exporters are scrambling for options to mitigate the fallout of US President Donald Trump's threatened tariff salvo against the world's most populous nation. Many warn of dire job losses after Trump said he would double new import tariffs from 25 per cent to 50 per cent if India continues to buy Russian oil, in a bid to strip Moscow of revenue for its military offensive in Ukraine. "At 50 per cent tariff, no product from India can stand any competitive edge," said economist Garima Kapoor from Elara Securities. India, one of the world's largest crude oil importers, has until Aug 27 to find alternatives to replace around a third of its current oil supply from abroad. While New Delhi is not an export powerhouse, it shipped goods worth about US$87 billion to the United States in 2024. That 50 per cent levy now threatens to upend low-margin, labour-intensive industries ranging from gems and jewellery to textiles and seafood. The Global Trade Research Initiative estimates a potential 60 per cent drop in US sales in 2025 in sectors such as garments. Exporters say they are racing to fulfil orders before the deadline. "Whatever we can ship before Aug 27, we are shipping," said Vijay Kumar Agarwal, chairman of Creative Group. The Mumbai-based textile and garment exporter has a nearly 80 per cent exposure to the US market. But Agarwal warned that is merely triage. Shipping goods before the deadline "doesn't solve" the problem, he said. "If it doesn't get resolved, there will be chaos," he said, adding that he's worried for the future of his 15,000 to 16,000 employees. "It is a very gloomy situation... it will be an immense loss of business." Talks to resolve the matter hinge on geopolitics, far from the reach of business. Trump is set to meet Vladimir Putin on Friday, the first face-to-face meeting between the two countries' presidents since Russia launched its full-scale invasion of Ukraine in February 2022. New Delhi, with longstanding ties with Moscow, is in a delicate situation. Since Trump's tariff threats, Prime Minister Narendra Modi has spoken to both Putin and Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky, urging a "peaceful resolution" to the conflict. Meanwhile, the US tariff impact is already being felt in India. Businesses say fresh orders from some US buyers have begun drying up -- threatening millions of dollars in future business and the livelihoods of hundreds of thousands in the world's fifth biggest economy. Among India's biggest apparel makers with global manufacturing operations, some are looking to move their US orders elsewhere. Top exporter Pearl Global Industries has told Indian media that some of its US customers asked that orders be produced in lower-duty countries such as Vietnam or Bangladesh, where the company also has manufacturing facilities. Major apparel maker Gokaldas Exports told Bloomberg it may boost production in Ethiopia and Kenya, which have a 10 per cent tariff. Moody's recently warned that for India, the "much wider tariff gap" may "even reverse some of the gains made in recent years in attracting related investments". India's gems and jewellery industry exported goods worth more than US$10 billion last year and employs hundreds of thousands of people. "Nothing is happening now, everything is at a standstill, new orders have been put on hold," Ajesh Mehta from D. Navinchandra Exports told AFP. "We expect up to 150,000 to 200,000 workers to be impacted." Gems, and other expensive non-essential items, are vulnerable. "A 10 per cent tariff was absorbable -- 25 per cent is not, let alone this 50 per cent," Mehta added. "At the end of the day, we deal in luxury products. When the cost goes up beyond a point, customers will cut back." Seafood exporters, who have been told by some US buyers to hold shipments, are hoping for new customers. "We are looking to diversify our markets," says Alex Ninan, who is a partner at the Baby Marine Group. "The United States is totally out right now. We will have to push our products to alternative markets, such as China, Japan... Russia is another market we are really looking into." Ninan, however, warns that is far from simple. "You can't create a market all of a sudden," he said. - AFP
