Martin Lewis gives his verdict on Labour's winter fuel payment U-turn
Money expert Martin Lewis has given his verdict on Labour's decision to partially reverse its changes to the annual winter fuel payment for pensioners.
Chancellor Rachel Reeves has confirmed that while the payment will still not be paid to all pensioners as in previous years, it will be extended to far more than last winter.
Around nine million more pensioners should get the payment as a result of the change – meaning about three quarters of pensioners overall are now eligible.
Announcing the change, Ms Reeves said: 'Targeting winter fuel payments was a tough decision, but the right decision because of the inheritance we had been left by the previous government.
'It is also right that we continue to means-test this payment so that it is targeted and fair, rather than restoring eligibility to everyone including the wealthiest.
'But we have now acted to expand the eligibility of the winter fuel payment so no pensioner on a lower income will miss out.'
The change essentially raises the threshold for receiving the payment from £11,600, plus the need to be claiming Pension Credit, to £35,000 with no additional requirements.
Reacting to the news, Mr Lewis said the change is a 'very big improvement', but highlighted a piece of key information pensioners should be aware of regarding the decision.
Crucially, pensioners with an income of over £35,000 will see their winter fuel payment 'clawed back' through the tax system (unless they opt out). But this can bring some slightly complicated rules for households with more than one pensioner which it may be helpful to understand.
Mr Lewis gives an example: "You've got a household that's due to get £300 with two state pensioners in. That £300 for the clawback is treated as £150 and £150.
'So if this person earns over £35,000, they lose it. If this person earns under £35,000, they keep it; they still get £150. If both of them earn over £35,000, they both lose it. And if both of them earn under £35,000, they both keep it.'
This is a relatively 'good system,' The Money Saving Expert founder says, as it means only one pensioner's income won't decide whether the entire payment is kept or not.
Mr Lewis also said that he is 'very grateful to the Chancellor' for the decision, adding: 'This is a very big improvement on what we already had, and it does mean there's still a means test in place.'
"And many people said they don't want millionaires and billionaires to get the Winter Fuel Payment. Well, they won't get the Winter Fuel Payment, they can either opt out or have it clawed back through the tax system.
'But it means far more pensioners who were struggling with still-high energy bills will get this payment.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Rough sleeping to be decriminalised in England and Wales
Rough sleeping will be decriminalised next year under government plans to scrap a 200-year-old law. Ministers are planning to scrap the Vagrancy Act, which outlaws rough sleeping in England and Wales. The law was introduced in 1824 to deal with rising homelessness, but Deputy Prime Minister Angela Rayner has called it "cruel and outdated". The government's plan includes new legislation which will target crimes such as organised begging by gangs and trespassing, a statement said. Rayner, who is also housing secretary, said Labour was "drawing a line under nearly two centuries of injustice towards some of the most vulnerable in society". "No one should ever be criminalised simply for sleeping rough and by scrapping this cruel and outdated law, we are making sure that can never happen again," she said. The number of prosecutions and convictions under the 1824 act has declined over the past decade. According to government statistics, there were a total of 79 prosecutions and 59 convictions for offences related to rough sleeping in 2023 - down from a peak of 1,050 and 810 respectively in 2011. Repealing the Vagrancy Act was first announced in 2022 by the previous Conservative government. It had wanted to pass alternative legislation first, but this did not happen before the general election was called last year. The party's Criminal Justice Bill would have allowed police to move on "nuisance" rough sleepers and fine them if they did not comply. The Labour government said it plans to replace the Vagrancy Act with "targeted measures" that will "ensure police have the powers they need to keep communities safe". These measures, which will be introduced through amendments to the Crime and Policing Bill, will include new offences of facilitating begging for gain and trespassing with the intention of committing a crime. Homeless charities have long called for the Vagrancy Act to be scrapped. Crisis chief executive Matt Downie said: "This is a landmark moment that will change lives and prevent thousands of people from being pushed into the shadows, away from safety." He praised the government for having "shown such principled leadership in scrapping this pernicious Act". He said: "We hope this signals a completely different approach to helping people forced onto the streets and clears the way for a positive agenda that is about supporting people who desperately want to move on in life and fulfil their potential." People living on London's streets rises by 26% Pressure grows over rough sleeping clampdown
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Battery energy store agreed despite concerns
Plans for a battery energy storage facility have been given the green light, despite opposition. Root Power North Limited wants to build a 38MW facility on agricultural land at Hastings Hill Farm, close to the A19, near Sunderland. The city council's planning and highways committee said the plan would help achieve net zero greenhouse gas emissions and it was not an "inappropriate development" on green belt land. Local councillor Margaret Crosby, Liberal Democrat, said she hoped the Labour-led council would not "live to regret" the unit's proximity near the Hastings Hill Round Barrow ancient monument. Developers said the facility would store energy in times of energy surplus and release it back to the grid when demand exceeded supply, according to the Local Democracy Reporting Service. During a public consultation, 14 objections were lodged raising concerns about impact on the landscape, as well as highway and pedestrian safety and fire risk. The planning committee said the development would have a "low to moderate level of harm to the significance" of the Hastings Hill Round Barrow, which is 590ft (180m) from the site. Crosby, who represents Grindon and Hastings Hill, said: "This industrial development is totally out of keeping with the agricultural land and rural nature of the area and risks damaging the ability of people to enjoy a scheduled ancient monument and the surrounding countryside. "There is no shortage of brownfield site or industrial estates that would be much better to locate an energy storage system." She said that she feared a "big fire" could cause disruption to the A19 and nearby houses, as well as damage to the landscape. Councillors were told the site would be screened through landscaping and the land would be restored to its original condition after 40 years, along with fire safety and monitoring measures built into the scheme when it is operational. A representative for the applicant Root Power (North) Limited said the proposed site was the "only site available", as alternatives were not large enough or "landowners did not come forward". Follow BBC Sunderland on X, Facebook, Nextdoor and Instagram. Council approves battery energy storage facility Battery energy storage facility backed The highly charged green energy battery debate Sunderland City Council
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
The UK is about to pass Europe's most extreme abortion law
Britain may soon have one of the most extreme abortion regimes in the world. Next week, the Commons will vote on amendments, proposed by Labour MPs Stella Creasy and Tonia Antoniazzi, to the Crime and Policing Bill that seek to decriminalise abortion up to the moment of birth. In Britain, abortion is currently legal until 24 weeks of pregnancy. But for the pro-abortion lobby this isn't enough. A YouGov survey revealed that 70 per cent of MPs think women should not be liable for prison sentences if they have abortions outside current restrictions. Yet this is wildly out of step with public opinion. Just 1 per cent of British people support abortion up to birth. How is such a wildly unpopular opinion on the verge of becoming law? Let's rewind to 2020. The UK was in lockdown. Face-to-face appointments for abortions were suspended. Women were allowed to access over-the-phone appointments with clinicians and have abortion pills sent to them by post. These pills can only be used legally until 10 weeks' gestation. But without an in-person appointment, there is no way of knowing how far along a pregnancy has progressed. And there is no way of preventing women who are well past 10 weeks – and even past the 24-week limit – from claiming, or being coerced into claiming, that they are less than 10 weeks pregnant. Due to the risks, this arrangement was intended to be temporary. But in 2022, pro-abortion MPs hijacked an unrelated Bill to make pills-by-post permanent. Many people – including me – warned that this would lead to an increase in illegal abortions, dangerous late-stage terminations, coercion and undetected abuse. And we were right. In June 2023, Carla Foster was found guilty of aborting her baby eight months into pregnancy. She was given abortion pills after claiming she was only seven weeks pregnant. In December 2024, Stuart Worby was jailed after spiking a woman's drink with fraudulently-obtained abortion pills and ending the life of her unborn child. In just 18 months after pills-by-post was introduced, some estimates suggest that more than 10,000 women had to receive hospital treatment after taking abortion pills at home. These cases only exist because of pills-by-post, a scheme for which abortion providers enthusiastically campaigned. Before 2022, there were just three prosecutions for illegal abortions in 160 years. Yet instead of arguing for a return to face-to-face appointments, the abortion lobby is now capitalising on these prosecutions to convince MPs that women are being wrongly criminalised. The consequences of full decriminalisation will be grim, with inevitable increases in coercion and medical complications. The experience of Victoria, Australia suggests we will see more babies born alive after failed 'DIY' late-term abortions, and a rise in sex-selective abortions. Abortion is a sensitive issue and there is no public consensus on what the legal time limit should be. But in a society where human rights are respected and the vulnerable protected, it is unthinkable that there should be no consequences for ending the life of an unborn, fully-formed human child. Just moments after birth, such an action would incur life in prison. MPs must not allow the unpopular obsession of a handful of activists to change the law. Stand up to the extremists – the public are behind you. Broaden your horizons with award-winning British journalism. Try The Telegraph free for 1 month with unlimited access to our award-winning website, exclusive app, money-saving offers and more.
