logo
Medical Experts Continue to Support Gender-Affirming Care for Trans Youth

Medical Experts Continue to Support Gender-Affirming Care for Trans Youth

Yahoo07-05-2025

Yahoo is using AI to generate takeaways from this article. This means the info may not always match what's in the article. Reporting mistakes helps us improve the experience.
Yahoo is using AI to generate takeaways from this article. This means the info may not always match what's in the article. Reporting mistakes helps us improve the experience.
Yahoo is using AI to generate takeaways from this article. This means the info may not always match what's in the article. Reporting mistakes helps us improve the experience. Generate Key Takeaways
Fact checked by SarahKey Takeaways
A new report from the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) advises against gender-affirming care for trans youth.
However, the American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP) and other medical experts and organization continue to support gender-affirming care, emphasizing its role in the mental health and wellbeing of trans children and teens.
Evidence continues to show that gender-affirming care and supportive environments can help reduce rates of depression, anxiety, and suicidal ideation in trans youth.
The U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) recently released a review about gender dysphoria and gender-affirming care for youth in America. The review was written following President Trump's executive order that calls on the federal government to stop supporting gender transitioning for children under the age of 19.
It's important to note that major medical organizations in the U.S. continue to support gender-affirming care for minors, including the Academy of American Pediatrics (AAP), who released a statement saying they are 'deeply concerned' about this report and the impacts it may have on transgender kids.
Here, we'll take a closer look at this report, and what these policies mean for trans and gender-nonconforming kids and their families.
What Does This Statement Mean for Families?
The HHS explainer is a 409 page review titled 'Treatment for Pediatric Gender Dysphoria.' In a press release, HHS said the reviewers found the benefits of gender-affirming medical care for minors to be 'very weak' and that some gender affirming medical interventions posed 'significant risks' to children.
The Academy of American Pediatrics (AAP) questioned the integrity of the report and its conclusions in their recent statement. 'This report misrepresents the current medical consensus and fails to reflect the realities of pediatric care,' Susan Kressly, MD, president of the AAP, commented. 'AAP was not consulted in the development of this report, yet our policy and intentions behind our recommendations were cited throughout in inaccurate and misleading ways.'
Molly O'Shea, MD, a pediatrician with Birmingham Pediatrics + Wellness Center, who treats trans kids, shared that even though the report was described as evidenced-based by HHS, over 2,000 studies were screened for inclusion in the report, but 99% were rejected from consideration.
Dr. O'Shea emphasizes that the majority of pediatric and adolescent physicians across the world continue to support gender-affirming care for youth. 'The report's recommendations are based on a tiny sliver of the peer-reviewed literature in the field and as a result does a disservice to transgender children, their families, and the physicians who care for them,' she says.
Understanding Gender Dysphoria
The main topic of the HHS report is gender dysphoria, how it impacts youth, and what should be done about it. It's important to know that gender dysphoria is often misunderstood.
Gender dysphoria refers to the distress some individuals experience when their gender identity doesn't match their body or how others perceive them, explains Rebecca Minor, LICSW, gender specialist and author of Raising Trans Kids: What to Expect When You Weren't Expecting This. 'It's not the same thing as being trans—plenty of trans people don't experience dysphoria all the time—but for those who do, it can be intense and debilitating, especially during puberty,' she describes.
Importantly, gender dysphoria is not a mental illness or a sign that something is wrong. 'The distress doesn't come from being trans, but from being misunderstood, misgendered, or prevented from living as oneself,' Minor says. 'When kids are supported in expressing their gender and accessing appropriate care, dysphoria can significantly lessen—and in some cases, completely resolve.'
What Is Gender-Affirming Care?
Gender-affirming care is a broad umbrella term, and there's no one-size-fits-all, says Minor. Moreover, it typically begins with non-medical interventions, and doesn't necessarily ever include medical interventions at all. 'For kids and teens, it often starts with things like using the right name and pronouns, making social changes like clothing and hairstyle, and accessing affirming mental health support,' Minor describes.
If medical care is part of a gender-affirming care plan, it's typically introduced in a very careful and gradual manner, usually in collaboration with mental health providers, endocrinologists, and families, Minor emphasizes. 'In reality, gender-affirming care is thoughtful, thorough, and rooted in what's best for each individual,' she says.
Medical interventions aren't offered to young trans children, but may be offered closer to puberty. 'For adolescents, puberty blockers (which are known to be reversible) may be offered or necessary,' says Prerna Menon, LCSW, a queer psychotherapist at Boundless Therapy, who works with LGBTQ+ teens. Later, hormone replacement therapy may be offered to older teens or young adults. Surgery is rarely—if ever—part of a gender-affirming care plan for a minor, Menon says.
'The narrative that minors are undergoing routine surgery is a myth,' Menon says. 'Such procedures are wholly rare before adulthood and should only be done after extensive medical and psychological evaluation.'
What Doctors and Therapists Say About Gender-Affirming Care for Trans and Non-Binary Youth
Doctors and therapists who treat trans and non-binary youth know first-hand how impactful gender-affirming care can be.
Gender-affirming care can change lives, says Minor. 'I've seen kids go from anxious, withdrawn, and depressed to vibrant, engaged, and hopeful—just because they were finally given the space to be themselves,' she describes. 'For many of my clients, it's not about 'becoming' someone else—it's about shedding layers of shame, fear, or silence.
Dr. O'Shea agrees. 'I have a non-binary adult child and have cared for many transgender youth over the years,' says Dr. O'Shea. She says that when children receive care from a gender-affirming doctor, their life journey is much easier to navigate. Gender-affirming care is all about creating a loving, supporting environment that allows the child or teen to be their authentic self.
The positive impacts of this care can't be understated. 'Affirming who they are and supporting their journey, wherever it leads, with all the available support will ensure the best possible outcome,' says Dr. O'Shea.
How Gender-Affirming Care Supports the Mental Health of Trans People
Not only can gender-affirming care change lives, it can save them. 'Clients of mine have repeatedly stated that gender-affirming care saved their life,' says Rachel D. Miller, PhD, LMFT, founder at Hold The Vision Therapy and a therapist who works with transgender youth.
Consider the mental health impacts of untreated gender dysphoria. Gender dysphoria can create significant distress for kids who experience it. 'The distress can manifest as anxiety, depression, low self-worth, and suicidal ideation and impact their school, social, and home lives,' Dr. Miller describes.
Here's where the power of gender affirming care can be felt. As Trevor Project's 2023 Survey on the Mental Health of LBGTQ youth found, trans and non-binary youth who lived with people who affirmed them and respected their pronouns had lower rates of attempted suicide. Additionally, trans and non-binary youth who went to schools they described as gender-affirming had lower rates of attempted suicide.
Common Misconceptions About Trans Teens
One takeaway these experts want to impart is that there are a lot of myths out there about gender affirming care and trans teens in general.
'A primary misconception I see is that trans teens are being urged into irreversible medical choices,' says Menon. 'In the healthcare community I am in, and in my state of New York, this simply is not how the process works.' Evaluations of trans and non-binary youth are comprehensive and thorough, and there are multiple assessments made before any medical inventions happen, she says.
Dr. Miller says that another myth—and one shared in the HHS report—is that mental health providers are underutilized for trans and non-binary youth, and that therapy isn't an integral part of the medical decisions made for trans kids.
On the contrary, 'mental health professionals are typically the gatekeepers of medical interventions,' says Dr. Miller. 'Medical interventions, again when used, traditionally come after mental health assessments and psychotherapy for the child individually and with their family prior to any decisions about medical options.'
Lastly, there's a myth that being trans or non-binary is simply a cultural trend—one that scores of young people seem to be "latching onto." But this is untrue. 'One of the most dangerous misconceptions is that being trans is trendy, a phase, or the result of confusion or mental illness,' Minor says.
Minor wants families to know that being trans isn't a trend, and that trans kids should continue to be affirmed and cared for by experts with experience treating them. 'Being trans is simply one way of being human—and when teens are affirmed in their identities, we see improved mental health, not worse,' she says.
Read the original article on Parents

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

HHS budget cuts threaten America's health and innovation—including in NC
HHS budget cuts threaten America's health and innovation—including in NC

Yahoo

timean hour ago

  • Yahoo

HHS budget cuts threaten America's health and innovation—including in NC

(Photo courtesy of National Institutes of Health) By slashing nearly one-fourth of the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) discretionary budget, the Trump administration's proposed fiscal year 2026 budget signals a dramatic retreat from evidence-based health research, disease prevention, and innovation. This $33.3 billion cut—to just under $95 billion—may be framed as a reorganization to tackle chronic disease and reduce healthcare costs, but beneath the rhetoric lies a troubling dismantling of the very infrastructure designed to advance public health, drive medical discovery, and protect our most vulnerable. Nowhere is the proposed rollback more alarming than in the realm of scientific research. The National Institutes of Health (NIH), the engine of U.S. biomedical innovation from which we all benefit, would see its funding slashed by $18 billion—from $45 billion to $27.5 billion—and its structure gutted, consolidating into just eight institutes or centers. Such a move ignores decades of bipartisan support for the NIH and undermines the United States' global leadership in medical research. These cuts will decelerate clinical trials, delay therapies, and disincentivize young scientists from entering the field. The American Cancer Society Cancer Action Network warns that the 37% cut to the National Cancer Institute would 'stall scientific breakthroughs' and hamper efforts against the increasing incidence of cancer across America. Translation: lives will be lost waiting for discoveries that now may never happen. The effects of these cuts will be especially devastating in states like North Carolina, a national leader in biomedical research, academic medicine, and public health innovation. Institutions such as Duke University, the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Wake Forest, and East Carolina University receive hundreds of millions annually from NIH and HHS to fund research on everything from cancer to mental health to rural healthcare delivery. If these funding sources dry up or diminish, North Carolina's research infrastructure—its labs, its jobs, and its ability to develop life-saving treatments—will likely suffer. In 2022 alone, North Carolina institutions received over $1.8 billion in NIH funding. These dollars supported everything from HIV prevention programs in underserved areas to groundbreaking cancer immunotherapy research. The University of North Carolina's Gillings School of Global Public Health, which has led critical studies on pandemic response and maternal health, faces a direct threat under these budget proposals. And Duke's renowned Clinical and Translational Science Institute, which works to turn research into real-world healthcare solutions, would likely struggle to maintain operations at current levels. Beyond academic campuses, the proposed cuts threaten North Carolina's community health centers, rural hospitals, and telehealth programs—many of which rely on HHS grants to reach underserved populations. The elimination of key funding for CDC public health initiatives and the Affordable Care Act's Prevention and Public Health Fund will hit rural counties the hardest, where high rates of chronic illness and limited access to care demand more investment, not less. The proposed budget does include some provocative titles—like the $500 million 'Make America Healthy Again' initiative—but these piecemeal programs offer a fraction of the scale needed to address national health challenges. Only $119 million is allocated for a Prevention Innovation program, while over $1.5 billion in HIV prevention programs are being slashed. North Carolina, which continues to fight high rates of HIV, will feel the consequences firsthand. Innovation is not just about profit or prestige—it's about people. Patients waiting for a clinical trial in Charlotte, veterans accessing mental health support through telehealth in western North Carolina, and community health workers in rural eastern North Carolina trying to curb diabetes rates. These are the real faces behind the numbers. Congress now holds the line. It must reject this dangerous budget, reinvest in science and health equity, and protect the institutions that allow America—and North Carolina—not just to respond to crises, but prevent them. Innovation cannot survive on slogans. It thrives on sustained, strategic, and science-driven investment. Anything less is not just shortsighted—it's reckless.

Hundreds of laid-off CDC employees are being reinstated
Hundreds of laid-off CDC employees are being reinstated

Boston Globe

timean hour ago

  • Boston Globe

Hundreds of laid-off CDC employees are being reinstated

Whole CDC programs were essentially shut down, including some focused on smoking, lead poisoning, gun violence, asthma and air quality, and workplace safety and health. The entire office that handles Freedom of Information Act requests was shuttered. Infectious disease programs took a hit, too, including programs that fight outbreaks in other countries, labs focused on HIV and hepatitis in the U.S., and staff trying to eliminate tuberculosis. Get Starting Point A guide through the most important stories of the morning, delivered Monday through Friday. Enter Email Sign Up An estimated 200 of the reinstated workers are based in the CDC's National Center for HIV, Viral Hepatitis, STD, and Tuberculosis Prevention, HHS officials confirmed. Staffers at a CDC lab that does testing for sexually transmitted diseases are being brought back, said one CDC employee who wasn't authorized to discuss what happened and spoke to The Associated Press on condition of anonymity. Advertisement Also reinstated are an estimated 150 employees at the CDC's National Center for Environmental Health, including people staffing a lab that works on lead poisoning, according to the union and employees. Layoffs at federal agencies were challenged in lawsuits, with judges in some cases ordering federal agencies to halt terminations of employees. Advertisement Officials at HHS have never detailed how they made the layoff decisions in the first place. And they did not answer questions about why the notices went out, or how decisions were made about who to bring back. HHS spokesperson Andrew Nixon said the agency was streamlining operations and that 'the nation's critical public health functions remain intact and effective.' 'The Trump Administration is committed to protecting essential services — whether it's supporting coal miners and firefighters through NIOSH, safeguarding public health through lead prevention, or researching and tracking the most prevalent communicable diseases,' he said. The reinstatements don't undo the damage being done by Kennedy and the Trump administration to federal public health, said members of Fired But Fighting, a group of affected CDC workers who have helped organize rallies in Atlanta. The most recent was in the rain on Tuesday, at which some attendees called for Kennedy to resign. 'Bringing a few hundred people back to work out of thousands fired is a start, but there are still countless programs at CDC that have been cut, which will lead to increased disease and death,' one of the group's founding members, Abby Tighe, said in a statement. This is not the first time that employees at the Atlanta-based agency were told they were being terminated only to then be told to come back. After an earlier round of termination notices went out in February, about 180 CDC employees in March were told to come back.

Rep. Raja Krishnamoorthi: Budget debate in Washington ignores the human cost in Illinois
Rep. Raja Krishnamoorthi: Budget debate in Washington ignores the human cost in Illinois

Chicago Tribune

time2 hours ago

  • Chicago Tribune

Rep. Raja Krishnamoorthi: Budget debate in Washington ignores the human cost in Illinois

The latest political fight over President Donald Trump's self-described 'big, beautiful bill' might seem pretty remote — unless you happen to be one of the millions of individuals who could be affected. Take one of my constituents who contacted my office just a few weeks ago. She was diagnosed with breast cancer and had been receiving Medicaid. But the cost of treatment was too high, and her family had to sell their home and move into temporary housing to pay for it. As a result of that move, this person missed her annual redetermination notice to confirm her continued eligibility and was dropped from the Medicaid program. For the past few months, she has been desperately trying to get back on the program but hasn't received a response from federal officials. Now, she is running dangerously low on her lifesaving medications. After she contacted us, my office reached out to the Social Security Administration to find out why her address wasn't updated and why her appeal for reinstatement wasn't processed more quickly given the nature of her illness. We will continue to press the SSA for answers and quick action. Multiply this person's experience by 13.7 million. That's the number of Americans who could lose Medicaid under Trump's budget bill, according to the Congressional Budget Office. In Illinois alone, Medicaid supports the health and economic security of 3.4 million people. Cuts or caps to federal Medicaid funding would force Illinois taxpayers to fill the gap or result in service reductions for everyone. The Trump budget plan, recently approved by the House on a party-line vote of 215-214, would cut at least $625 billion from Medicaid. But this doesn't nearly pay for the budget's additional tax cuts, which go overwhelmingly to the wealthiest Americans and large corporations. Instead, the bill adds trillions more to the national debt — possibly raising interest rates and bringing on a recession. Three changes account for most of the Medicaid cuts in the bill: requiring states to implement onerous, unnecessary paperwork and administrative requirements for many recipients; increasing barriers to enrolling in and renewing Medicaid coverage; and limiting states' ability to raise their share of Medicaid revenues through provider taxes. The bill's supporters say these new paperwork hurdles will reduce waste and fraud in the program. But 58% of Illinois Medicaid recipients already are working, and most of the rest are not able to work due to their own disability or caring for a close family member. Overall, the bill is projected to strip nearly a million Illinoisans on Medicaid of their health care. These cuts would take a particularly devastating toll on our state's rural residents, whose hospitals and health systems rely heavily on Medicaid patients. Already, eight Illinois rural hospitals are at risk of immediate closure, which will be worsened by the Medicaid cuts in the Trump budget. Those closures would affect the health care of all local residents, regardless of whether they receive their care under Medicaid or private plans. Already, we are seeing people such as my constituent struggling to keep their eligibility for Medicaid. If the Senate passes Trump's 'big, beautiful bill,' there will be a lot more losing their eligibility and being kicked off the program. With the Senate about to take up the Trump plan, there's still time to remember the faces and families behind the numbers and ask ourselves whether this bill truly reflects our values as Americans. U.S. Rep. Raja Krishnamoorthi, a Democrat, has represented Illinois' 8th Congressional District since 2017.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store