US judge orders release of Turkish student detained in immigration case
Judge William Sessions said Rumeysa Ozturk, a PhD student at Tufts University in Massachusetts, should be released "immediately" from custody while her removal proceedings continue.
Ms Ozturk's student visa was revoked by the State Department after she co-authored an article in the university newspaper, The Tufts Daily, criticising the college's handling of student anger around Israel's war in Gaza.
Video of her 25 March arrest by masked agents on a sidewalk sparked outrage online, and added to concerns about freedom of speech and respect for due process under Mr Trump.
Judge Sessions echoed the concerns during today's live-streamed custody hearing, at which Ms Ozturk appeared remotely from a detention centre in Louisiana.
"Continued detention potentially chills the speech of the millions and millions of individuals in this country who are not citizens," the judge said.
"Any one of them may now avoid exercising their First Amendment rights for fear of being whisked away to a detention center from their home," he said.
"The court finds that her continued detention cannot stand," Judge Sessions said. "The court orders the government to release Ms Ozturk from custody immediately."
The judge said he was not putting any travel restrictions on Ms Ozturk and she was free to return to her home in Massachusetts.
Ms Ozturk is one of a number of foreign students facing deportation over their pro-Palestinian campus activities, and she still faces removal proceedings.
Tufts University has publicly backed Ms Ozturk, demanding her release so she can return to the school and complete her doctoral studies in child development.
Jessie Rossman, legal director at the American Civil Liberties Union of Massachusetts, which was among the groups representing Ms Ozturk, welcomed her release.
"For 45 days, Rumeysa has been detained in Louisiana," Ms Rossman said. "During that time, she has suffered regular and escalating asthma attacks.
"And at the same time, the government has failed to produce any justification for her detention," Ms Rossman said, adding that the ACLU "won't stop fighting until she is free for good".
Mr Trump has targeted prestigious universities that became the epicentre of the US student protest movement sparked by Israel's war against Hamas in Gaza, stripping federal funds and directing immigration officers to deport foreign student demonstrators.
Critics argue that the campaign amounts to retribution and will have a chilling effect on free speech, while its supporters insist it is necessary to restore order to campuses and protect Jewish students.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Irish Examiner
34 minutes ago
- Irish Examiner
Israel's plan for massive new West Bank settlement would make a Palestinian state impossible
The Israeli government has approved a plan for construction of a massive new settlement bloc in the controversial E1 area in the occupied West Bank. In reviving a project first proposed in 1994, which will comprise about 3,500 new dwellings in a line across the West Bank, finance minister Bezalel Smotrich laid bare the intentions of his government. He declared that 'approval of construction plans in E1 buries the idea of a Palestinian state, and continues the many steps we are taking on the ground as part of the de facto sovereignty plan'. E1 ('East 1') refers to 12 sq km of unsettled land east of Jerusalem. It sits inside the boundaries of the third most populous Israeli settlement in the West Bank, Ma'ale Adumim. In 1975, Israel expropriated 30 sq km of land on which seven Palestinian villages had once stood. Here they built Ma'ale Adumim, one of three Israeli settlement blocs that form an 'outer ring' around the Israeli-defined municipal boundaries of Jerusalem. Israeli authorities refer to these blocs as 'facts on the ground'. They were initiated in the West Bank by the Israeli government after the 1967 War to ensure that Israeli population centres were protected from potential attacks. Today, almost 40,000 Israelis live in Ma'ale Adumim – largely secular Israelis and diaspora Jews who have moved to Israel. Far from the makeshift Israeli outposts that are scattered across the rural West Bank, Ma'ale Adumim was designated a city by Israel in 2015. It is considered by the majority of Israeli Jews to be a permanently protected settlement bloc, which will be retained through land swaps in any final agreement with Palestinians. The E1 development plan would involve a significant expansion of the existing settlement. All settlement building in East Jerusalem and the West Bank is deemed illegal under international law, but the E1 plans are particularly controversial. At the heart of the controversy is the viability of a Palestinian state. Israeli construction in E1 would cut the West Bank into two separate parts, rendering it impossible to establish a contiguous Palestinian state with East Jerusalem as its capital. In addition, according to an objection lodged by the Israeli pressure group Peace Now, Israeli construction in E1 would negatively affect the economic development of a future Palestinian state. Its objection argues the E1 area is essential for expansion of an urban metropolis necessary for economic growth, and is the only land in East Jerusalem suitable for further development in the Palestinian part of the city. It states that E1 should therefore be left for Palestinian rather than Israeli development. Political threat The plan to develop E1 was first proposed in 1994 by Israel's then-prime minister, Yitzhak Rabin, to make sure Ma'ale Adumim was part of a 'united Jerusalem'. This was subsequently reaffirmed by Shimon Peres during his prime ministership in 1996, as part of proposed territorial swaps in the framework of a permanent peace agreement. In 2005, those plans were frozen after the US administration under George W Bush told Israel that settlement in E1 would 'contravene American policy'. The plan was reignited by Israel's current prime minister, Benjamin Netanyahu, in 2012, in retaliation for the United Nations' extension of non-member status to Palestine. But it was then put on hold for eight years due to international pressure. In 2020, a week ahead of the third national elections held in Israel in a single year, Netanyahu pledged to revive the E1 project, with the hope of securing votes and to court the ultra-nationalist parties into a potential coalition. In 2022, Netanyahu renewed the E1 construction plans, weeks before then-US president Joe Biden was due to visit Israel. Opposition and support Each time the plans have been proposed, the decision to advance construction has been met with both internal and international condemnation. On June 9 2023, the planning hearing was 'indefinitely' postponed following a call between Netanyahu and Biden's secretary of state, Antony Blinken. In response to the most recent announcement to reinstate the plans, the European Union put out a statement expressing concern. It urged Israel 'to desist from taking this decision forward, noting its far-reaching implications and the need to consider action to protect the viability of the two-state solution'. However, Donald Trump now appears to be breaking with the position of previous US administrations. It was recently reported in the Jerusalem Post that the Trump administration supports the reactivation of the development plans. A spokesperson for the US state department said 'a stable West Bank keeps Israel secure and is in line with this administration's goal to achieve peace in the region'. Israel's latest attempt to initiate construction in E1 shows that, while the plans have consistently been delayed, they have never been abandoned. The question is why did Smotrich, with the apparent approval of Netanyahu, make this announcement now? The answer is most likely that, with the international focus firmly on the continued assault on Gaza, the Israeli government believes it has the breathing space to press ahead with its commitment to building settlements across the West Bank. Alongside the proposed Israeli takeover of Gaza City, the promise by Smotrich that 2025 would be Israel's 'Year of Sovereignty' — and with it the end of a future Palestinian state — appears to be coming ever closer. Leonie Fleischmann is Senior Lecturer in International Politics at City St George's, University of London The Conversation
The Journal
35 minutes ago
- The Journal
US court overturns $464m civil fraud penalty against Trump, calling the sum 'excessive'
A US COURT has thrown out a $464 million civil penalty against President Donald Trump imposed by a judge who found he fraudulently inflated his personal worth, calling the sum 'excessive' but upholding the judgment against him. Trump's son, Don Jr, has labelled it a 'massive win'. Judge Arthur Engoron ruled against Trump in February 2024 at the height of his campaign to retake the White House, which coincided with several active criminal prosecutions. Engoron went on to order the mogul-turned-politician to pay $464 million, including interest, while his sons Eric and Don Jr. were told to hand over more than $4 million each. The judge found that Trump and his company had unlawfully inflated his wealth and manipulated the value of properties to obtain favourable bank loans or insurance terms. Alongside the financial hit to Trump, the judge also banned him from running businesses for three years, which the president repeatedly referred to as a 'corporate death penalty.' On Thursday, the Appellate Division of the New York Supreme Court upheld the verdict, but ruled that the size of the fine was 'excessive' and that it 'violates the Eighth Amendment of the United States Constitution.' Advertisement 'Massive win!' State Attorney General Letitia James, who brought the initial case, could now appeal to the state's highest court, the New York Court of Appeals. Following the initial verdict, Trump subsequently sought to challenge the civil ruling as well as the scale and terms of the penalty, which has continued to accrue interest while he appeals. He repeatedly condemned the case and the penalty as politically motivated. His son Don Jr. termed the appellate court ruling a 'massive win!!!' 'New York Appeals Court has just THROWN OUT President Trump's $500+ Million civil fraud penalty! It was always a witch hunt, election interference, and a total miscarriage of justice… and even a left leaning NY appeals court agrees! NO MORE LAWFARE!' he wrote on X. During hearings, conducted without a jury under state law, Trump accused then-president Joe Biden of driving the case, calling it 'weaponization against a political opponent who's up a lot in the polls.' As the case was civil, not criminal, there was no threat of imprisonment. - © AFP 2025
The Journal
35 minutes ago
- The Journal
Ireland and UK among 21 nations to condemn Israel's plan for illegal Jerusalem settlements
IRELAND IS AMONG 21 countries to sign a joint statement calling Israel's approval of a major settlement project in the occupied West Bank 'unacceptable and a violation of international law'. Settlement development in E1, an open tract of land east of Jerusalem, had been under consideration for more than two decades – but was frozen due to US pressure during previous administrations. Israel approved the plans for the roughly 12-square-kilometre parcel of land which would effectively cut the West Bank in two on Wednesday. The joint statement, which has also been signed by Australia, Canada and Italy, said the plans are 'unacceptable and a violation of international law'. We condemn this decision and call for its immediate reversal in the strongest terms. Belgium, Denmark, Estonia, Finland, Iceland, Ireland, Japan, Latvia, Lithuania, Luxembourg, the Netherlands, Norway, Portugal, Slovenia, Spain and Sweden also signed the statement, as did the European Commission's foreign affairs chief. Tánaiste @SimonHarrisTD has joined 21 counterparts from Europe and globally in condemning plans for settlement construction in the E1 area of the West Bank. These plans are a violation of international law & a fundamental threat to the two-state solution - they must be reversed. — Irish Foreign Ministry (@dfatirl) August 21, 2025 Advertisement The statement noted that Israel's far-right Finance Minister Bezalel Smotrich said the plan 'will make a two-state solution impossible by dividing any Palestinian state and restricting Palestinian access to Jerusalem'. 'This brings no benefits to the Israeli people,' the foreign ministers said. 'Instead, it risks undermining security and fuels further violence and instability, taking us further away from peace. The statement concluded: 'The government of Israel still has an opportunity to stop the E1 plan going any further. We encourage them to urgently retract this plan. 'Unilateral action by the Israeli government undermines our collective desire for security and prosperity in the Middle East. The Israeli government must stop settlement construction in line with UNSC Resolution 2334 and remove their restrictions on the finances of the Palestinian Authority.' The plan includes around 3,500 apartments to expand the settlement of Maale Adumim, Smotrich said during a press conference at the site last week. All of Israel's settlements in the West Bank, occupied since 1967, are considered illegal under international law, regardless of whether they have Israeli planning permission. The location of E1 is significant because it is one of the last geographical links between Ramallah, in the northern West Bank, and Bethlehem in the southern West Bank. Related Reads American citizen killed in the West Bank died from arson by Israeli settlers, his family say 'They just want to bury him': West Bank village devastated as Israel holds onto body of slain activist Israeli settler kills Palestinian teacher and activist linked to Oscar-Winning film in West Bank The two cities are 14 miles apart by air, but Palestinians travelling between them must take a wide detour and pass through multiple Israeli checkpoints, adding hours to the journey. The hope for final status negotiations for a Palestinian state was to have the region eventually serve as a direct link between the cities. The Ramallah-based Palestinian Authority has slammed the latest move, which has also been criticised by UN chief Antonio Guterres. Britain today summoned Israeli ambassador to the UK Tzipi Hotovely to the foreign ministry to protest the decision. 'If implemented, these settlement plans would be a flagrant breach of international law and would divide a future Palestinian state in two, critically undermining a two-state solution,' the foreign office said in a statement. With reporting from © AFP 2025 Readers like you are keeping these stories free for everyone... A mix of advertising and supporting contributions helps keep paywalls away from valuable information like this article. Over 5,000 readers like you have already stepped up and support us with a monthly payment or a once-off donation. Learn More Support The Journal
