logo
On average, people in Ireland are working less since the Covid-19 pandemic

On average, people in Ireland are working less since the Covid-19 pandemic

The Journal11 hours ago
A SHIFT TOWARDS remote working is likely to have contributed to a drop in average working hours since the Covid-19 pandemic, according to a report from the Department of Finance.
The report
shows that Ireland's labour market has had a 'remarkable' recovery from the Covid-19 pandemic and is actually in a stronger position than it was before, with employment at record highs in 2024.
This has been driven by inward migration and increased participation in the labour market, with the increased participation largely coming from groups who traditionally have a lower attachment to the labour force, namely women and older workers.
This expansion of the labour force has been tempered, however, by a decline in average hours worked.
The report states that while further research is needed to find out the exact reasons for this decline, it suggests that it may be a result of remote working.
Between 1998 and 2009, average hours worked declined consistently, falling by 13% from around 37 to 32 hours per week.
However, the report states that it increased again after the economic crash, with average hours worked rising again over the decade that followed.
Advertisement
The bulk of this growth took place in the years leading up to the pandemic (2015-2019), with average hours worked increasing by 3.5%.
This contrasts with other European countries, where average hours worked continued to decline in France, Germany, Italy and Spain during this period.
Following the pandemic, average hours worked dropped significantly in the immediate aftermath, falling by over 7% in 2020.
As the economy reopened, average hours worked did not recover and remained 7% below their 2019 level in 2024.
The report states that, as a result, to get the same level of labour input now requires 7% more employees than before.
Overall, however, total hours worked have increased by 10%during this period, with population growth and increased labour market participation offsetting the decline in average hours worked.
Welcoming the report, Finance Minister Paschal Donohoe said:
'Just over five years ago, during the peak of the pandemic, the economic outlook was shrouded in uncertainty with large sections of our economy forced to shut down overnight. At that time, around 1.2 million people were dependent on the State for some form of income or job support, and there was a fear that the pandemic would leave lasting scars on our economy.
'Thankfully, that economic scarring was avoided. Today, the labour market is in a stronger position than before the pandemic with record levels of employment and an unemployment rate below 5 per cent for over three years. As this publication outlines, record levels of female labour force participation have made a significant contribution to our post-pandemic recovery.'
Readers like you are keeping these stories free for everyone...
A mix of advertising and supporting contributions helps keep paywalls away from valuable information like this article.
Over 5,000 readers like you have already stepped up and support us with a monthly payment or a once-off donation.
Learn More
Support The Journal
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Trump says he thinks Putin is ready to make deal for peace in Ukraine
Trump says he thinks Putin is ready to make deal for peace in Ukraine

Irish Independent

time2 hours ago

  • Irish Independent

Trump says he thinks Putin is ready to make deal for peace in Ukraine

Ukrainian president Volodymyr Zelensky and his European allies have intensified their efforts this week to prevent any deal between the US and Russia emerging from Friday's summit in Alaska that leaves Ukraine vulnerable to future attack. 'I think President Putin will make peace, I think President Zelensky will make peace,' Mr Trump told reporters at the White House. 'We'll see if they get along.' Mr Trump has downplayed talk of a ceasefire emerging from the summit and speculated about a possible second meeting to come, involving more leaders. 'I think it's going to be a good meeting, but the more important meeting will be the second meeting that we're having. We're going to have a meeting with President Putin, President Zelensky, myself, and maybe we'll bring some of the European leaders along. Maybe not. I don't know that.' Putin earlier spoke to his most senior ministers and security officials as he prepared for a meeting with Mr Trump in Anchorage, Alaska, at 11.30am Alaskan time (8.30pm Irish time) that could shape the endgame to the largest war in Europe since World War II. In televised comments, Putin said the US was 'making, in my opinion, quite energetic and sincere efforts to stop the hostilities, stop the crisis and reach agreements that are of interest to all parties involved in this conflict'. This was happening, Putin said, 'to create long-term conditions for peace between our countries, and in Europe, and in the world as a whole – if, by the next stages, we reach agreements in the area of control over strategic offensive weapons'. His comments signalled that Russia will raise nuclear arms control as part of a wide-ranging discussion on security when he sits down with Mr Trump. A Kremlin aide said Putin and Mr Trump would also discuss the 'huge untapped potential' for Russia-US economic ties. A senior Eastern European official, who requested anonymity to discuss sensitive matters, said Putin would try to distract Mr Trump from Ukraine at the talks by offering him possible progress on nuclear arms control or something business-related. 'We hope Trump won't be fooled by the Russians; he understands all [these] dangerous things,' the official said, adding that Russia's only goal was to avoid any new sanctions and have existing sanctions lifted. Mr Trump said there would be a press conference after the talks, but that he did not know whether it would be joint. He also said in an earlier interview with Fox News that there would be 'a give and take' on boundaries and land. 'This meeting sets up like a chess game,' Mr Trump said. 'This meeting sets up a second meeting, but there is a 25pc chance that this meeting will not be a successful meeting.' Mr Trump said it would be up to Putin and Mr Zelensky to strike an agreement, saying: 'I'm not going to negotiate their deal.' Russia controls around a fifth of Ukraine, and Mr Zelensky and the Europeans worry that a deal could cement those gains, rewarding Putin for 11 years of efforts to seize Ukrainian land and emboldening him to expand further into Europe. An EU diplomat said it would be 'scary to see how it all unfolds in the coming hours. Trump had very good calls yesterday with Europe, but that was yesterday'. Mr Trump had shown willingness to join the security guarantees for Ukraine at a last-ditch virtual meeting with European leaders and Mr Zelensky on Wednesday, European leaders said, though he made no public mention of them afterwards. Today's summit, the first Russia-US summit since June 2021, comes at one of the toughest moments for Ukraine in a war that has killed tens of thousands and displaced millions since Russia's full-scale invasion in February 2022. Speaking after Wednesday's meeting, French president Emmanuel Macron said Mr Trump had said the transatlantic Nato alliance should not be part of any security guarantees designed to protect Ukraine from future attacks in a post-war settlement. However, Mr Trump also said the US and all willing allies should be part of the security guarantees, Mr Macron added. Expanding on that, a European official told Reuters that Mr Trump said on the call he was willing to provide some security guarantees for Europe, without spelling out what they would be. On Wednesday, Mr Trump threatened 'severe consequences' if Putin does not agree to peace in Ukraine and has warned of economic sanctions if his meeting today proves fruitless.

Johnny Ronan's planned 17-storey mixed use scheme for Dublin's docklands is rejected
Johnny Ronan's planned 17-storey mixed use scheme for Dublin's docklands is rejected

The Journal

time9 hours ago

  • The Journal

Johnny Ronan's planned 17-storey mixed use scheme for Dublin's docklands is rejected

AN COIMISIÚN PLEANÁLA has upheld Dublin City Council's rejection of Johnny Ronan's RGRE planned 17-storey mixed use scheme for Dublin's docklands. In February, Ronan's Ronan Group Real Estate (RGRE) lodged plans for the redevelopment of global banking giant Citigroup's current European headquarters at 1 North Wall Quay in Dublin's docklands. The scheme involves the demolition of Citigroup's existing six-storey office building and the development of four buildings in its place, ranging in heights of nine storeys to 17 storeys. According to the plans, the scheme would include office accommodation, arts/ community/cultural uses and a retail/café/restaurant unit. RGRE firm NWQ Devco Limited was seeking a ten-year planning permission The council comprehensively rejected the scheme in April, resulting in applicants NWQ Devco Ltd appealing the refusal to An Coimisiún Pleanála (ACP). In refusing planning permission, ACP has found that the scheme's excessive height, bulk, massing and form would constitute an overly dominant and isolated tall building that would be at odds with the surrounding context and would seriously injure the amenity of the Liffey Quays and key views along the river corridor. The ACP refusal order pointed out that the planned site is a prominent and sensitive location which fronts onto the River Liffey and within the Liffey Quays conservation area and is in close proximity to neighbouring properties. Advertisement The development was to be located at Citigroup's current European headquarters at 1 North Wall Quay in Dublin's docklands. Dublin City Council Dublin City Council ACP found that the proposed development would result in significant adverse impacts to residential amenity due to the unacceptable and unjustified loss of daylight and overshadowing of a principal shared amenity space. ACP also found that the scheme did not meet the criteria for exceptional circumstances for enhanced height, density and scale for Landmark Tall Buildings. In the second part of the board order refusing planning permission, signed off by Planning Commissioner Mary Henchy, ACP stated that having regard to the age, form and condition of the existing office building and the results of the Whole Carbon assessment, the commission found that the wholesale demolition of the existing building would be both premature and unjustified and would set an unwelcome precedent for the demolition on similar sites in Dublin. As a result, the commission found that the scheme was contrary to a policy in the City Development Plan that supports and promotes the retrofitting of existing buildings. Clarion Quay Management (CQE) Company CLG was a third party appellant in the support of the Council refusal and its appeal to ACP was aimed at protecting the residential amenity of dwellings and maintaining and improving safe and uncongested access to other uses of CQE. The RGRE appeal included an Arthur Cox submission which stated that the application submitted meets the criteria for 'exceptional circumstances' that would allow planning permission to be granted for a landmark building. The letter stated that it appears that the City Council did not engage in any analysis or consideration of the 'exceptional circumstance' and whether it is met by the development. Architects of the scheme, Henry J Lyons, contended that the scheme as submitted is appropriate for the context of the site.

Johnny Ronan group refused permission to build 17-storey block in Dublin docklands
Johnny Ronan group refused permission to build 17-storey block in Dublin docklands

Irish Independent

time10 hours ago

  • Irish Independent

Johnny Ronan group refused permission to build 17-storey block in Dublin docklands

In February, Ronan Group Real Estate (RGRE) lodged plans for the redevelopment of Citigroup's current European headquarters at 1 North Wall Quay. The scheme involves the demolition of Citigroup's existing six-storey office building and the development of four buildings in its place, ranging in heights of nine storeys to 17. The RGRE firm NWQ Devco Ltd sought a 10-year planning permission Dublin City Council comprehensively rejected the scheme in April, however, prompting NWQ Devco Ltd to appeal the case to An Coimisiún Pleanála (ACP). Now, in refusing planning permission, the planning appeals board has found that the scheme's excessive height, bulk, massing and form would constitute an overly dominant and isolated tall building, one that would be at odds with the surrounding context and would seriously injure the amenity of the Liffey quays and views along the river corridor. The ACP refusal order pointed out that the planned site is a prominent and sensitive location which fronts onto the river Liffey, is within the Liffey quays conservation area, and is in close proximity to neighbouring properties. ACP found that the proposed development would result in significant adverse impacts to residential amenity due to the unacceptable and unjustified loss of daylight and sunlight, and overshadowing of a principal shared amenity space. The planning appeals body also ruled that the scheme did not meet the criteria for exceptional circumstances for enhanced height, density and scale that are set out for landmark tall buildings. In the second part of its order, signed off by planning commissioner Mary Henchy, it says that having regard to the age, form and condition of the existing office building and the result of the whole carbon assessment, the wholesale demolition of the existing building would be both premature and unjustified and would set an unwelcome precedent for similar sites in Dublin. As a result, the commission found that the scheme was contrary to a policy in the City Development Plan, which is to support and promote the retrofitting of existing buildings. Clarion Quay Management (CQE) Company CLG was a third party appellant in support of the council refusal, and its appeal to ACP was aimed at protecting the residential amenity of dwellings and maintaining and improving safe and uncongested access in the area. The RGRE appeal included a claim that the application meets the criteria for 'exceptional circumstances' that would allow planning permission to be granted for a landmark building. The company's submission stated that it appears the City Council did not engage in any analysis or consideration of the 'exceptional circumstance' and whether it is met by the development. Henry J Lyons, the architects, contended that the scheme as submitted was appropriate for the context of the site.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store