Our galactic neighbor Andromeda has a bunch of satellite galaxies — and they're weirdly pointing at us
Our neighboring Andromeda Galaxy (Messier 31, or M31) appears to sport a lopsided arrangement of satellite galaxies that defy scientific models, stumping astronomers who are also trying to figure out why so many of this galaxy's family members point in our direction. All but one of M31's brightest 37 satellites are on the side of the Andromeda spiral that faces our Milky Way galaxy – the odd one out being Messier 110, which is easily visible in amateur images of the Andromeda Galaxy.
"M31 is the only system that we know of that demonstrates such an extreme degree of asymmetry," Kosuke Jamie Kanehisa of the Institut für Physik und Astronomie at Universität Potsdam in Germany told Space.com.
According to cosmology's standard model, the universe is filled with vast clouds of dark matter. Within these clouds, large galaxies such as Andromeda and our Milky Way grow — and they grow by merging with myriad smaller dwarf galaxies that have been pulled in by the gravity of the dark matter. The dwarf galaxies that we see around large galaxies today are the leftovers of this formation process. According to this picture of "hierarchical growth," these dwarf satellite galaxies should be spread randomly around larger galaxies. However, that's not quite what astronomers are finding.
A large fraction of M31's dwarf satellites are confined to a plane around the Andromeda Galaxy, as confirmed earlier in 2025 by the Hubble Space Telescope, and a similar satellite plane exists around the Milky Way. There's also tentative evidence for a plane of satellites around another nearby galaxy, Centaurus A. For galaxies farther afield, it's difficult to find faint dwarf galaxies and measure the distance to them, so astronomers cannot say for certain what those systems are doing. However, even the planes of satellites scientists have confirmed are difficult to explain in the standard model of cosmology.
And now, M31 and its satellites have become even more mysterious, with almost all those satellites positioned on the side of M31 that faces the Milky Way.
New simulations by Kanehisa, along with his Potsdam colleagues Marcel Pawlowski and Noam Libeskind, show that, according to cosmology's standard model, the odds of having such a lopsided arrangement are less than 0.3%. And yet, the closest galaxy to us is beating those odds. So when is a coincidence just a coincidence, and when does it open a window into a deeper mystery?
The dwarf galaxies are all orbiting M31 at different velocities and distances; in another billion years, they will be more spread out. So, on the face of it, the current alignment could just be seen as a coincidence. However, the low probability of this coincidence occurring means that it is the kind of coincidence that scientists have a hard time believing in.
If something in the cosmos appears a certain way, it's usually because something has caused it to be like that. Still, there's no firm evidence pointing towards any particular explanation so far, other than that for this alignment to be present now, its cause must be recent.
"The following is speculation, but I expect the underlying culprit behind the M31 system's discrepancy with cosmological expectations to be some unique accretion history," said Kanehisa. "The fact that we see M31's satellites in this unstable configuration today —-- which is strange, to say the least — may point towards many having fallen in recently, possibly related to the major merger thought to have been experienced by Andromeda around two to three billion years ago."
This major merger involved a mid-size galaxy being consumed by the larger Andromeda Galaxy. The Hubble Space Telescope's recent deep-dive into Andromeda has been able to track the disorder in M31 that the merger left in its wake: streams of stars cannibalized from the galaxy eaten by M31 and producing a burst of star formation. However, even if the dwarf galaxies are recent arrivals that lagged behind that galaxy merger, it still doesn't quite explain why they are all on the side of M31 that faces our Milky Way galaxy.
Another thought is, well, could the dwarf galaxies on our side of M31 be literally pointing at the culprit? Not so fast. If our Milky Way did play a role, then we might expect our system of dwarf satellites to display their own lopsidedness towards M31 — but they do not, and gravitational tidal forces between the two galaxies are not strong enough to pull M31's dwarfs into this arrangement.
There are also some caveats to note about the improbable lopsidedness exhibited by M31's satellites.
Accurate data regarding the motion of the dwarf galaxies is known for only four of M31's satellites (five if IC 10 is counted, which is a contested member of the M31 system), which means that simulations can be a little rough. However, astronomers are aiming to determine the motions for at least a dozen of M31's dwarfs to high precision within another year or two with the release of the next dataset from the Gaia astrometric mission.
"Once we have a more substantial sample of M31 dwarfs with proper motions, we should be better positioned to study the time evolution of the observed asymmetry," said Kanehisa. In other words, we would be able to better understand for how long this lopsided alignment can stay in place.
Another caveat is that there likely remains many fainter, as yet undiscovered, satellite dwarf galaxies around M31. We know that this is probably the case because cosmology's standard model predicts that there should be more dwarf satellites around both M31 and our Milky Way than we have currently found. These undiscovered dwarfs would be small and contain few stars, making them hard to identify. Indeed, the faintest dwarf galaxy currently known around M31, named Andromeda XXXV, was found on the far side of M31 and does not fall into the lopsided pattern of the others.
"We need to wait and see if the global asymmetry persists with the detection of fainter dwarfs, although if we found that only brighter dwarfs participated in the asymmetry, this would also raise some more questions as to their origin," said Kanehisa.
Related Stories:
— How did Andromeda's dwarf galaxies form? Hubble Telescope finds more questions than answers
— Hubble Space Telescope reveals richest view of Andromeda galaxy to date (image)
— Temperamental stars could be ruining our view of thousands of exoplanets, Hubble Telescope finds
The final caveat is that perhaps the alignment of M31's system is not as improbable as we think. Very few galaxies beyond our Local Group have had their dwarf families mapped out in detail — the galaxies are just too far away and too faint, and those that we can detect do not have accurate distance measurements, so we can't say for sure which side of their parent galaxy they are on.
"We can't yet be sure that similar extreme systems don't exist out there, or that such systems would be negligibly rare,' said Kanehisa.
The Andromeda Galaxy's family of dwarfs are an enigma. First it was the unusual flat plane around which more than half of them orbit, and now this lopsidedness. It just goes to show that sometimes it is our closest neighbors who are the ones that turn out to be most alien to us.
The findings were published on April 11 in the journal Nature Astronomy.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
8 hours ago
- Yahoo
Gene that differs between humans and Neanderthals could shed light on the species' disappearance, mouse study suggests
When you buy through links on our articles, Future and its syndication partners may earn a commission. A protein that helps synthesize DNA is different in modern humans than it is in Neanderthals and Denisovans — our closest extinct relatives — and new experiments in mice genetically modified to express the modern human version hint that this may have made us behave differently. That discovery, in turn, could shed light on why Neanderthals and Denisovans vanished, researchers propose in a new study. But the significance of the findings for humans is still unclear. "It's too early to translate these findings directly to humans, as the neural circuits of mice are vastly different," study lead author, Xiangchun Ju, a postdoctoral researcher at the Okinawa Institute of Science and Technology in Japan, said in a statement. However, this work hints that the variant seen in modern humans "might have given us some evolutionary advantage in particular tasks relative to ancestral humans," such as competing for scarce resources. Key protein Previous research found that modern humans diverged from their closest evolutionary relatives, Neanderthals and Denisovans, about 600,000 years ago. It's not clear why modern humans survived while our closest relatives died off. To search for potential genetic clues to solve this mystery, the researchers analyzed the enzyme ADSL (adenylosuccinate lyase). This protein helps synthesize purine, one of the fundamental building blocks of DNA and other vital molecules. Related: A braided stream, not a family tree: How new evidence upends our understanding of how humans evolved "There are a small number of enzymes that were affected by evolutionary changes in the ancestors of modern humans. ADSL is one of them," study co-author Svante Pääbo, Nobel laureate, leader of the human evolutionary genomics unit at the Okinawa Institute of Science and Technology in Japan, and director of the Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology in Leipzig, Germany, said in a statement. ADSL is made up of a chain of 484 amino acids. The version of this enzyme found in virtually all modern humans differs from that seen in both Neanderthals and Denisovans by just one amino acid — the 429th amino acid in ADSL is valine in modern humans but alanine in our extinct relatives. The scientists noted the ADSL mutation is seen in modern humans and not our closest extinct relatives, and so likely appeared after we separated from the lineage that led to Neanderthals and Denisovans. This led the researchers to investigate the possible behavioral effects of this mutation. Previous research on lab-grown cells found that the ADSL variant seen in modern humans resulted in a more unstable version of the enzyme that broke down more quickly compared to the one in Neanderthals and Denisovans. Behavior changes The new study, published Aug. 4 in the journal PNAS, similarly found that, in mice, the modern variant leads to higher levels of the chemicals that ADSL normally acts on to synthesize purine in several organs, especially the brain. This finding supported the idea that the modern human version of ADSL is less active than the variant seen in Neanderthals and Denisovans. In experiments where mice learned they could get a drink of water following specific lights or sounds, female mice genetically modified to possess a version of ADSL similar to the kind seen in modern humans were better at getting water than their littermates without this variant were. This might suggest the human-like variant made female mice better at learning to connect the dots between the water and the lights or sounds, or more motivated to seek out the water in some way. The changes in behavior and ADSL levels seen in female mice with the modern-human variant of the enzyme was not seen in male mice. "It's unclear why only female mice seemed to gain a competitive advantage," study co-author Izumi Fukunaga, a researcher at the Okinawa Institute of Science and Technology, said in a statement. "Behavior is complex." Statistical tests analyzing Neanderthal; Denisovan; and modern African, European and East Asian DNA found that mutations in the ASDL gene appeared in modern human genomes at higher rates than random variations over time would suggest, making it likely that these mutations provided some evolutionary advantage. Perhaps running counter to the new findings, prior work found that genetic disorders leading to ADSL deficiency in modern humans can lead to intellectual disability, speech and language impairment, and other problems. This suggests that during evolution, modern humans had to balance the potential benefits of reducing ADSL activity with the problems that could occur from ADSL deficiency, study co-author Shin-Yu Lee, also of the Okinawa Institute of Science and Technology, said in a statement. Implications unclear Not everyone thinks the study has direct implications for why modern humans thrived or for why Neanderthals or Denisovans disappeared. These results in mice "don't say too much about human evolution at this stage," Mark Collard, a paleoanthropologist at Simon Fraser University in Burnaby, British Columbia who did not take part in this research, told Live Science. RELATED STORIES —What was the first human species? —2.6 million-year-old stone tools reveal ancient human relatives were 'forward planning' 600,000 years earlier than thought —'It makes no sense to say there was only one origin of Homo sapiens': How the evolutionary record of Asia is complicating what we know about our species However, the strategy of using mice to study the behavioral effects of genetic differences between modern humans and our closest extinct relatives "seems very promising as a way of investigating the evolution of our brain and behavior," Collard said. "I expect we'll see a cascade of studies like this one in the next few years." Future research can investigate the specific mechanisms by which changes in ADSL activity influence behavior. Scientists can also explore how changes in ADSL activity are associated with other behaviors and how multiple genetic changes might work in concert, the study authors wrote. Solve the daily Crossword
Yahoo
13 hours ago
- Yahoo
See a razor-thin crescent moon join Jupiter and Venus in the predawn sky on Aug. 20
When you buy through links on our articles, Future and its syndication partners may earn a commission. Look to the east in the hours preceding sunrise on Aug. 20 to see a thin crescent moon rendezvous with Venus and Jupiter to form a celestial triangle in the predawn sky. TOP TELESCOPE PICK Want to see the planets of the solar system for yourself? The Celestron NexStar 8SE is ideal for beginners wanting quality, reliable and quick views of celestial objects. For a more in-depth look at our Celestron NexStar 8SE review. The 9%-lit waning crescent moon can be found roughly 15 degrees above the eastern horizon an hour and a half before sunrise on Aug. 20, embedded in the twinkling stars of the constellation Gemini. Venus will be visible as a bright 'morning star' shining approximately 5 degrees to the lower right of the lunar disk, while Jupiter will sit less than 10 degrees to the upper right of the moon, forming the highest point of the cosmic triangle. Remember, the width of your fist held at arm's length accounts for roughly 10 degrees of night sky. The bright stars Castor and Pollux will be positioned to the left of the moon in the early morning hours of Aug. 19. Mercury, meanwhile, will be visible close to the horizon, but will swiftly become lost in the glare of the sun, which rises at 6:11 a.m. ET (1011 GMT) for viewers in New York. Viewing the cosmic trio with a 6-inch telescope will reveal the dark oval of the Grimaldi Basin impact site scarring the lunar surface, along with cloud bands on the surface of Jupiter, and the moon-like phases of Venus, under good atmospheric conditions. The coming nights will see the wafer-thin lunar crescent sweep past Venus to join Mercury and the Beehive open star cluster in the constellation Cancer, the crab, ahead of its new moon phase on Aug. 23. Stargazers looking for new equipment with which to explore the night sky should check out our roundups of the best telescopes and binoculars available in 2025. Photographers should also read up on our roundups of the best lenses and cameras for astrophotography. Editor's Note: If you capture a picture of the crescent moon with Jupiter and Venus and want to share it with readers, then please send your photo(s), comments, name and location to spacephotos@
Scientific American
17 hours ago
- Scientific American
NASA's James Webb Space Telescope Discovers New Moon of Uranus
Scientists have discovered a new, elusive moon around Uranus, making it the 29th natural satellite known to orbit the ice giant. The research team that made the discovery estimates that the moon, dubbed S/2025 U1 for now (at least, until the International Astronomical Union assigns an official name), is just 10 kilometers, or six miles, across, making it particularly small. 'I could walk around this moon,' says Heidi Hammel, a planetary scientist and astrophysicist, who was not involved in the research. In 1986 Voyager 2 flew within 81,800 km of Uranus's cloud tops and gave humans their first close-up glimpse of this giant planet. The spacecraft returned with images of 11 new moons, on top of the five that were already known. Since Voyager, astronomers using the Hubble Space Telescope and ground-based telescopes have spotted other tiny moons—ones as little 12 to 16 km in diameter. But 'this one was so small and so faint and so close to the bright ring system around Uranus that we missed it,' Hammel says. On supporting science journalism subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today. A team led by the Southwest Research Institute detected the moon in images captured by the high-resolution Near-Infrared Camera on the James Webb Space Telescope (JWST) during a series of 10 40-minute-long exposures. 'The cameras on [JWST] are very sensitive,' Hammel says. 'They were designed to see the faintest galaxies in the universe,' as well as faint things that are close to very bright ones (such as the planet Uranus). NASA announced the moon's discovery today via a blog post. 'One of the reasons this moon is interesting is that it's very close to the main ring system,' Hammel says. Unlike Saturn's rings, which are packed together, Uranus's rings are more like Hula-Hoops, with lots of separation between each. The rings cluster between a main inner system and a faint outer one, Hammel says, and researchers speculate that the rings are sculpted by the planet's little orbiting moons. There are still many questions about the new minuscule moon for astronomers to explore: How does it compare with other moons? What is its color and composition? JWST might help answer a few of these questions. But regardless of what comes next, the discovery shows 'how we can extend the horizons of our knowledge, even in our own solar system, using an advanced telescope like JWST,' Hammel says. 'And it helps us get a better understanding of what drives the phenomena in our solar system—like ''What is crafting that ring system around the planet Uranus?''
