
Hannah Thomas: NSW police use emergency riot powers to justify arrest of pro-Palestine protester
The 35-year-old was arrested at a pro-Palestine protest in Sydney on 27 June that was attended by about 60 people. She was subsequently taken to hospital and this week will undergo a second round of surgery amid fears she could lose sight in her right eye.
Thomas was a Greens candidate who ran against the prime minister at the federal election.
Last week, Thomas was charged with resisting police and refusing or failing to comply with a direction to disperse. It was revealed on Monday that Thomas's arrest documents show that her second charge cited emergency police powers under part 6A of the Law Enforcement Powers and Responsibilities Act (Lepra).
The laws, which were introduced in the wake of the Cronulla riots, require authorisation and give police a series of powers to quell 'large-scale public disorders'. An authorisation can be given by the police commissioner or by a deputy or assistant commissioner of police.
The NSW Greens MLC Sue Higginson on Monday wrote a formal complaint to the police watchdog – the Law Enforcement Conduct Commission (Lecc) – against the assistant commissioner Brett McFadden. She alleged he had 'issued an unlawful or retrospective authorisation to use emergency powers in violation of their conditions'.
The complaint, seen by Guardian Australia, is also against the arresting officers who Higginson alleged had 'issued unlawful move-on orders and made unlawful arrests'.
Five protesters, including Thomas, were arrested and charged at Belmore.
McFadden, in a statement prior to the complaint being filed, said that he had put in place a process last Monday to review the charges laid against Thomas.
'I put in place a process to review the charges laid in this matter to ensure the relevant and most appropriate charges are applied. The review is part of normal critical incident protocols,' he said.
McFadden said NSW police were unable to provide further information given the matter was now before the courts and subject to a critical incident investigation overseen by the Lecc.
Higginson noted in her letter to the Lecc that an authorisation to use the emergency powers required an officer to have reasonable grounds for believing 'there is a large-scale public disorder occurring or a threat of such disorder occurring'.
She wrote that for a commissioner to have reasonable grounds for this belief, they needed to establish a riot or other civil disturbance that 'gives rise to a serious risk to public safety' was occurring or was about to occur. They also need to establish that the 'exercise of those powers is reasonably necessary to prevent or control the public disorder'.
Higginson said video from the scene showed police officers issued move-on orders and then arrested protesters after they questioned what Lepra powers were being relied on.
Video footage suggested one of the protesters later charged, Zach Schofield, was grabbed by a police officer after he asked what legislation empowered the officers to move on the protesters.
In the video, an officer can be heard telling the protesters they are being issued a move-on order and are required to leave Belmore and not return for 24 hours.
A protester can be heard saying: 'What legislation is empowering you to do this? Can you name it please because this is actually counter to Lepra.'
The protester is cut off mid-sentence when asking about the legislation as police officers move to grab him. A scuffle ensues, according to the video footage seen by Guardian Australia.
Higginson argued in a statement about the complaint that 'there was no evidence whatsoever to form the basis to invoke the extraordinary police community control powers'.
'The event was intended and was a small lawful gathering of people protesting about SEC Plating and the genocide taking place in Gaza,' she said.
Sign up to Morning Mail
Our Australian morning briefing breaks down the key stories of the day, telling you what's happening and why it matters
after newsletter promotion
'When an officer exercises these powers after being authorised, any person given the direction must be informed that the direction is to prevent or control a public disorder.'
Higginson said the appearance of the emergency powers on the arrest documents for Thomas was 'concerning' and suggested an assistant commissioner or above 'must have authorised their use and they must have believed that a large-scale public disorder was about to take place'.
'The other possibility for these emergency powers to be mentioned is that the NSW police are currently engaging in reverse engineering evidence to justify the [alleged] assault of an innocent member of the community.
'At no point over the last 10 days have any of the police, the premier, or the minister for police referred to public disorder, let alone large-scale public disorder.'
The 27 June protest was outside SEC Plating, which protesters claimed was manufacturing parts used in the F-35 jet program. However, SEC Plating has denied this is the case.
When part 6A of Lepra was introduced in response to the Cronulla riots, then premier Iemma Morris stated that 'these powers are not intended to be used in respect of peaceful protests, union demonstrations and the like'.
In October 2023, the NSW deputy police commissioner David Hudson told reporters during a press conference that he was seeking to enable the riot powers before a rally in Sydney's Hyde Park.
The announcement came amid fierce backlash against a 9 October rally outside the Sydney Opera House during which some people – who were not part of the initial protest – were chanting antisemitic slurs.
On Friday, during an upper house parliamentary inquiry into antisemitism, Hudson defended the right to protest at that 9 October rally.
'We can't prevent the free movement of people throughout the city just because you're in a protest. You can walk down the street, the footpath,' he said.
'Bearing in mind, at that particular protest at the Town Hall, there were a lot of women, children [and] women pushing prams.
'It's not like we were going to put walls up and start boxing on with these people who have a right to protest.'
Comment was sought from NSW police on Monday.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


BreakingNews.ie
16 minutes ago
- BreakingNews.ie
Gardaí criticised for alleged strip searches of protestors following vigil for Gaza
Members of the public criticised gardaí over how they treated a group of women at a protest for Gaza in Dublin earlier this year. Fourteen people who attended the Mothers Against Genocide group protest against the Israeli war in Gaza were arrested after an entrance to Leinster House in Dublin was blocked. Advertisement The group said some of the women who were arrested at a group protest were strip-searched, and one was subjected to a cavity search. In documents seen by , there were 132 correspondences to the Department of Justice on how protestors were treated by gardaí that day, and the alleged cavity and strip searches. The gardaí's actions compared to how they handled other protests were brought up to the Department of Justice, as one person said: "I have not seen this level of aggressiveness directed towards people who were literally running riot on our streets or those burning down buildings dedicated to housing immigrants, or camping out and stoking racism in sites such as Coolock. " In another email to the Minister for Justice, a member of the public said: "Given the nature of the protest, there are legitimate questions to be asked about why this level of force was deemed necessary. Advertisement "In particular, there is concern about the apparent disparity in Garda responses to this protest when compared with other demonstrations, for example by far-right groups, which at times have involved threatening or intimidating behaviour with a visibly lighter." The number of gardaí involved in the protest was also brought into question, with people saying the number of gardaí heavily outnumbered the protestors. "The high level of Garda presence is very difficult to comprehend. These women were mothers, and were present at the Dáil as part of a Mother's Day Vigil to honour the murdered mothers and children of Palestine. They hoped to deliver a letter to incoming TDs this morning regarding Ireland's part in all of this." Another person compared their experience in needing the gardaí in a different situation and questioned why such a large force was necessary. Advertisement "I recently called the Gardaí in a serious situation, and it took 20 minutes for officers to arrive. How was such a large force available so quickly for a non-violent gathering?" An email to the Taoiseach's Office was also forwarded to the Department of Justice, where concerns were raised over alleged strip searches. "This practice raises significant human rights concerns and has the potential to cause undue distress and humiliation, particularly when conducted without sufficient justification or oversight. "Numerous reports have highlighted instances where strip searches were carried out in circumstances that may not have warranted such invasive procedures. Advertisement "The lack of clear safeguards, transparency, and independent oversight leaves room for potential abuse and a violation of individuals' dignity and rights. Furthermore, strict guidelines, accountability measures, and independent oversight must be implemented to prevent the misuse of strip searches. " A joint letter from Senators Lynn Ruane, Alice-Mary Higgins, Frances Black and Eileen Flynn was sent to the Department questioning how protestors were treated when arrested. "From our knowledge, some of those arrested were strip searched and visually cavity-searched. Can you outline for us the reasons for such an escalation on behalf of the Gardaí for what was a peaceful protest? "We are very worried about the lack of standardised policing practice that was applied to different individuals who were arrested. It is our understanding arrested protestors received different levels of treatment at different Garda stations, with significantly different levels of invasiveness. Advertisement "We request that you seek a full report from each Garda station as to the steps and decisions they took. "Specifically, we also want to ask you what are the internal policies are in the Gardaí when it comes to respecting cultural and religious norms in the event of a strip search, with particular regard to hijabs?" Both the Department of Justice and gardaí were contacted, and both said they had nothing further to comment on the story. Back in May, Garda Commissioner Drew Harris said: 'I can confirm the Garda members involved in conducting the searches acted at all times professionally, lawfully, and in accordance with established procedures and legislative provision." Mr Harris said statements made by People Before Profit TDs Richard Boyd-Barrett, Paul Murphy, and Ruth Coppinger on the arrests and alleged strip-searches were "wholly inaccurate". 'As a direct consequence of these wholly inaccurate statements and the widespread coverage of them in the media, I am deeply concerned about the damage that may be caused to public confidence and trust in policing."


Daily Mail
28 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
The one question about Australia's plans for China that Trump wants answered - as Anthony Albanese touches down in Shanghai
Anthony Albanese 's trip to China could be derailed by the Trump administration, who have issued a demand to know how he would respond to an invasion of Taiwan. Prime Minister Albanese and fiancé Jodie Haydon touched down in the Chinese financial hub of Shanghai on Saturday, ahead of a week-long visit that includes a meeting with Chinese Communist Party leader President Xi Jinping. While the Australian leader is set to discuss lighter topics, like trade and tourism campaigns, US President Donald Trump 's team on Saturday demanded answers on whether Australia would back America in a war against China. The US has been largely ambiguous about what its response would be to a Chinese invasion of Taiwan, which China has long claimed territorial rights over. Nevertheless, a report by the Financial Times on Saturday claimed US defence undersecretary Elbridge Colby had questioned Japan and Australia over its positions. The outlet cited five sources who all recalled the topic of the countries' response to a conflict in the Indo-Pacific being raised during meetings. Colby responded to the report on X, formerly Twitter, on Sunday, Australian time. 'As the department has made abundantly and consistently clear, we at Department of Defence are focused on implementing the President's 'America First', common sense agenda of restoring deterrence and achieving peace through strength,' he said. The senior defence official claimed the America First approach was already working. 'This has been a hallmark of President Trump's strategy - in Asia as in Europe where it has already been tremendously successful.' He also suggested several American allies were seeing the 'urgent need to step up' and 'are doing so'. 'President Trump has shown the approach and the formula - and we will not be deterred from advancing his agenda,' he said. In response to questions about Australia's hypothetical response to conflict in the Indo-Pacific, Albanese said 'we have our AUKUS arrangements in place'. 'We'll continue to work through all of these issues,' he said. 'Our alliance with the United States is a very important one for Australia so we'll continue to engage constructively in a coherent, stable, orderly way. 'That's the way I conduct this government.' As for his position on Taiwan, Albanese simply said Australia supports the 'status quo'. 'I think it's important that we have a consistent position, which Australia has had for a long period of time,' he said. 'We support the status quo when it comes to Taiwan. We don't support any unilateral action there. We have a clear position and we have been consistent about that.' Reports on Thursday claimed the US believed Australia should voice its direct support of the US by stating it would use American-made nuclear submarines should a conflict with China arise. However, the production of those submarines was called into question earlier this year by Colby himself, who is leading a review into the AUKUS pact under which the submarine deal was made. Albanese also addressed pressure to make a public statement on Sunday, noting tactical conversations between it and Australia would remain 'private'. 'You don't take private comments to a media conference. By definition, that's in private,' he said. 'We engage in a mature way. That's the way that we deal with our relationships.' Defence Industry Minister Pat Conroy on Sunday was more blunt in telling the US it would not dictate Australia's military decisions. 'The sole power to commit Australia to war, or to allow our territory to be used for conflict, is the elected government of the day,' he told the ABC. 'That is our position. Sovereignty will always be prioritised and that will continue to be our position.' Albanese's upcoming sit-down with Xi will be the second time he's met with the Chinese leader, following his excursion to China in November 2023. He is yet to meet with Trump after the president left Canada's G7 summit early in June citing urgent developments in the Middle East. Albanese has faced criticism for meeting with Xi before the leader of one of Australia's biggest allies. However, it's not the first time an Australian leader has met with Xi before the US president. Tony Abbott pulled the same move by meeting with Xi in the weeks after taking office in 2013, before he met with Barack Obama. Tensions between Australia and China have grown since the Asian superpower began ramping up efforts to grow influence over the Indo-Pacific since the 2010s. That included the creation of armed artificial islands in the South China Sea. The Chinese Communist Party's intent to shift from a diplomatic player to a strategist became clear in 2019 with Kiribati and the Solomon Islands both switching its policies regarding Taiwan to side with China. Since then the Chinese People's Liberation Army has extended its presence in international waters, including an excursion down Australia's east coast by three Chinese People's Liberation Army Navy ships.


The Sun
an hour ago
- The Sun
The deeply selfish holiday trend sweeping Europe's beaches this summer – and it's WORSE than sunbed hogging
IT used to be the reserve of the selfish hotel sun bed hoggers. But across Europe there's a new menace on those beautiful Mediterranean beaches - and in my eyes, it's even worse. 5 5 We're talking about the selfish sun-seekers who are bringing more to the beach than a bucket and spade. Nowadays, people are pitching up with ever more complicated, sand-stealing tents, cabanas and more, that provide their self-serving owners with very little extra shade, but take up a LOT more space. I'm talking about these new 'beach tent canopies' - monstrous gazebo-type structures that take up huge amounts of beach space. Where once we were happy with a beach umbrella and a couple of towels, now these new contraptions are making a land grab that ruins any beach scene. Gone are blissful sea views and instead, a barricade of tacky tarpaulin is suddenly erected in front of you. With complicated sand-bag sides and ever more elaborate systems of ropes and cords, it makes a stroll across many Mediterranean seashores a terrifying assault course. And it's not just me who's up in arms. Australia's Prime Minister has got in on the act, declaring it's 'not on' to use large, portable cabanas to reserve great swathes of the country's beaches. Anthony Albanese declared the practice of nabbing the sands a 'breach' of the principle that 'every Australian is equal' on the beach. It's a debate raging on social media Down Under where some have praised the ingenuity of the sand-grabbers, saying they offer important shade in a country with some of the highest skin cancer rates in the world. But others are outraged that these large structures take up huge amounts of space, and much like the sunlounger hoggers of old, are rarely used for the entire day. Center Parcs launches new treetop adcventure at Longleat Forest Beach, please On the public beach in La Faviere in the South of France last summer, I watched in dismay as they turned up and started digging early every morning. With beach buggies filled to the brim with sails and ropes, they would start to create their own little private spaces with little regard for others. Hours would be spent erecting these flapping edifices - before the whole family would then wander off for a dip in the sea, or even more irritatingly, a three-hour lunch. Admirable as it is that no one ever seems to want to nick their big beach set ups, it does mean that when those who do want to head down to the beach for a sunbathe or a swim in peak season are having to pick their way between endless guide ropes and tents. 5 5 Of course, I've got nothing against some decent beach kit. A basic beach umbrella is of course a must - for a little shade in the harsh sunshine. And those little beach tents for children - with SPF 50+ UV protection are an essential for families with young babies and tots who may need a break from harsh sunlight. Absolutely fine by me. Babies, of course, take up very little space. But as our beaches become ever more crowded in the peak summer months, this horrible habit is starting to pitch up on the UK coast too. We come to the beach for the wonderful sea views and chance to lay out on soft sands and enjoy the sun. What's wrong with a towel and beach umbrella with a good, hardy base that either is filled with sand or screws into the ground to avoid being blown away in the wind? I take up very little space - for me, a low-rise chair for sunbathing or reading my book is perfect. I bring a cool bag for extra supplies and that's about it. The sooner these sand-stealers are called out and evicted from the beaches, the better! The bags, plane outfits and accessories The Sun's travel team loves K-Brands Sick Bags - £14.99 for 24 (approx. 55p each). Sturdy sick bags with a plastic ring for easy holding and a heavy-duty design to prevent leaks. Phone Suction Holder - From 99p on Amazon. Features 12 suction pads to stick your phone to any glass surface for hands-free video calls or selfies. Amazon Foam Earplugs - 34p per pair (£3.39 for 10). Moulds to your ear shape for comfort, muffles noise effectively on planes, in hotels, or from crying babies. Matador's Pocket Blanket Mini - A water-resistant mat that fits in the palm of your hand, perfect for laying down in airports, on the beach, or anywhere a child might need a break. Flight Socks - From £5.99 on Amazon or £7.95 from Asda. These help prevent swollen ankles on long flights and are advised to avoid DVT. Amazon Kindle Fire HD 8 - £69.99. A trusty e-reader that can store hundreds of books and doubles as a tablet for offline viewing of shows like Netflix on flights. Primark Packing Cubes - £8 for a pack of three. Life-savers for compressing clothes to save space and for organising items like trousers, tops, and swimwear within your luggage. Bluetooth Headphone Adapter - £16.99 from Amazon. Allows you to connect your own headphones (including noise-cancelling ones) to onboard inflight entertainment, with 18 hours of battery life. Hoppstar Artist Kids Camera - Pricier end of travel accessories (specific price not given). Takes excellent pictures, has a decent screen, and can print black and white versions in about three seconds for a non-messy activity. Primark Dark Pink Joggers & Matching Sweatshirt - £6 each. Comfortable, loose-fitting tracksuit pieces that are ideal for flights and are very budget-friendly.