HKIC says some firms in its portfolio have IPO plans
HKIC chief executive Clara Chan says about five to 10 firms it has invested in are considering listing in Hong Kong this year. Photo: RTHK
The SAR government investment vehicle on Thursday revealed that several of the companies it has invested in are considering or have filed applications to list in Hong Kong this year. It did not specify which firms.
This came as the Hong Kong Investment Corporation (HKIC) hosted its inaugural "International Forum for Patient Capital (IPC)" to attract global funds to invest in the city.
Speaking to reporters after the event, HKIC's chief executive, Clara Chan, said that of the 100 projects in the body's portfolio, about five to 10 have expressed an interest in or have already filed an application to list in the city this year.
She said that the speed of such progress has been impressive and came much faster than anticipated, adding that the firms are also rapidly growing and seek overseas market potential.
The firms with initial public offering plans are "Hong Kong representatives" and HKIC will assist them during the process while attracting more firms to set up shop here, Chan added.
"For every HK$1 invested by HKIC, it can now generate over HK$4 in the long-term follow-up investment funds, which is a further improvement compared to the past," she said.
Separately, Chan said that the IPC has brought together some 400 representatives from 80 global patient capital institutions, or organisations focusing on long-term growth, with total asset management amounting to over US$20 trillion.
"They are very diverse because patient capital institutions cover a wide range of different entities, for example, civil funds, pension plans, family officers and university endowments.
"A lot of them are really action-oriented, and they're very low profile, noting the various geopolitical considerations, but at the same time, they really want to capture the growth trends in this part of the world".
Chan said the participants cover developed markets such as the US, Europe, Australia, Japan, and also a number of Global South markets, including the Middle East and Southeast Asia.
Many of the institutions are interested in investment opportunities in innovation and technological development on the mainland and Hong Kong, such as artificial intelligence and robotics, which aligns with HKIC's investment portfolio, said Chan.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
AllAfrica
an hour ago
- AllAfrica
Inequality, taxes and a false fiscal dilemma in Singapore
Since its inception, Singapore's paramount economic advantage has lain in its seamless integration with global markets, attracting vast foreign investment and driving trade flows that transformed it from a sleepy entrepot into a burgeoning metropolis. Yet the turbulence unleashed by Donald Trump's tariff wars has starkly illuminated how such openness can become a strategic liability. With Singapore's GDP forecast for 2025 recently slashed to a mere 1.7% — a precipitous decline from the twenty-year average of 4.2% — it's time to reconsider the island-nation's fiscal paradigm to catalyze economic stimulus and fortify long-term resilience. Two fiscal levers merit particular scrutiny: the Goods and Services Tax (GST), a 9% consumption levy and the Net Investment Returns Contribution (NIRC), which channels returns from GIC, Temasek and the Monetary Authority of Singapore into the national budget. Parliamentary discourse has misleadingly cast these instruments in binary terms. The Workers' Party and Progress Singapore Party have advocated increasing the share of the NIRC used for public spending from 50% to 60%, potentially unlocking S$4 billion to S$5 billion (US$3.1 billion to US$3.9 billion) annually to boost the economy and strengthen social safety nets. Both have also proposed targeted GST relief, whether through the PSP's call for a rollback to 7%, or the WP's push for exemptions on essential goods. Meanwhile, the incumbent People's Action Party (PAP) remains wedded to the austere status quo, preserving the full GST rate while stockpiling national reserves for our 'rainy day fund.' To avert further economic torpor, Singapore must confront its two greatest exigencies: persistent inequality and an impending demographic crisis. The PAP should therefore harness the full spectrum of government resources by synthesizing salient opposition fiscal proposals into a hybrid framework — maintaining the existing GST structure while augmenting NIRC expenditure. Contrary to the PAP's postulations, Singapore has considerable scope to responsibly expand NIRC spending. The party routinely echoes the plight of Indonesia, Malaysia and Thailand during the 1997-98 Asian financial crisis as proof that insufficient reserves can catalyze currency collapses. But this narrative is patchy at best. Those countries suffered from profound structural vulnerabilities, including fragile financial systems, vast short-term foreign-currency debts and inadequate reserves. Even South Korea, which benefitted from relatively robust investor confidence, was beset by comparable systemic risks, as exemplified by its parlously overleveraged chaebols and limited domestic savings base. None of these conditions applies to contemporary Singapore. With a meticulously regulated financial system, Singapore is the only country in Asia to boast a AAA credit rating. The country commands approximately US$511 billion in foreign exchange reserves. This comprises a minute fraction of the total estimated S$1.9 trillion, yielding an extraordinary reserves-to-GDP ratio of just under 300%, one rivaled only by resource-rich states such as Qatar and Norway. Crucially, the WP and PSP merely wish to modestly increase the share of investment returns allocated for public expenditure, not the assets themselves – hardly a radical adjustment that would imperil the country's formidable fiscal bulwark. The government's stringent criteria for reserve utilization further underline the infrequency with which such funds are deployed; over the past two decades, reserves have been tapped only twice: S$4.9 billion during the 2008 global financial crisis (which was fully replenished within two years), and S$40 billion amid the highly unprecedented Covid-19 pandemic. Former Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong's admonition to restrain NIRC spending, given the unpredictability of future crises ranging from geopolitical upheavals to climate threats, should buttress rather than diminish the imperative to address pressing domestic challenges. Unmitigated, these internal issues could pose even graver risks to Singapore's long-term prosperity, increasing the necessity for emergency withdrawals in future crises. The merits of raising public spending also rationalize maintaining the GST at its current rate. While the WP and PSP rightly highlight its disproportionate burden on lower-income households, the GST confers irreplaceable advantages. It preserves Singapore's fiscal flexibility to sustain ultra-competitive personal and corporate tax rates, a pivotal asset given the city-state's dependence on foreign capital inflows. Moreover, the PAP correctly notes that as a broad-based consumption tax, GST revenue is significantly underpinned by tourists, expatriates, and the wealthiest 20% of residents, who account for 70% of total collections. Instead, transfer schemes such as GST-V should be bolstered to mitigate the GST's regressive impact. Inequality remains alarmingly rampant; even after accounting for such transfers, the bottom 10% and 20% of households only earn 15% and 30% of the median income, respectively, disparities that are both morally indefensible and economically detrimental. Financial insecurity deters lower-income individuals from risk-taking, whether by seeking better-suited employment or entrepreneurial ventures such as heartland food stalls, thereby stifling overall productivity. Furthermore, this inequity renders these groups disproportionately susceptible to economic shocks, escalating the future fiscal burden of crisis support. Additional revenues should be channelled into two pivotal areas to unlock the potential of lower-wage workers, investments that promise handsome rewards. The first involves upskilling initiatives, particularly SkillsFuture, which remain largely inaccessible to those most in need. Employer support is markedly skewed, with 69% of degree holders receiving training sponsorship compared to just 41% of those with only secondary education, and the scarcity of hybrid and online learning options further restricts participation among lower-income workers constrained by time. Enhanced funding could redress these gaps and facilitate upward mobility, an especially critical priority in the face of rising automation risks. Secondly, the increased spending from the NIRC and GST could bolster Singapore's SMEs, which employ lower-income workers more often than larger companies. Since these businesses have a relative lack of creditworthiness and collateral, initiatives such as the Enterprise Financing Scheme and SME Working Capital Loans would empower these businesses to invest in digitalization, sweeten incentives to attract talent and broaden their international customer bases, strengthening their resilience amid economic downturns. Addressing the needs of lower-income groups also intersects with a critical demographic imperative: reversing Singapore's vertiginously declining birth rate, which plummeted to a historic low of 0.97 in 2024. This trend portends a drastic reduction in working-age adults per senior from 5.7 in 2015 to an alarming 2.7 by 2030, threatening to curtail output and tax revenues. Singapore's status as the world's most expensive city in 2022 elucidates much of this reluctance to procreate; 89% cite the exorbitant cost of child-rearing, while 81% lament insufficient time. NIRC and GST revenues could meaningfully alleviate these pressures, chiefly by subsidizing housing and childcare and enabling businesses to adopt more flexible work arrangements. Admittedly, many countries, such as Russia and Hungary, have expended mammoth resources into reversing their population declines, only to see minimal results. But Singapore's enviable economic fundamentals could make similar measures far more efficacious, as demonstrated by Sweden's success in the early 1990s, where sustained family support during an economic boom lifted fertility rates even above replacement levels. With renewed global economic uncertainty on the horizon, coupled with the longstanding pressures of inequality and demographics, Singapore's political leaders can ill afford to obdurately cling to their reductive views of the GST and NIRC. Rather, they must recognize both as complementary levers to amplify public investment, uplifting present well-being while safeguarding the future. Sean Tan is a former King's Scholar at Eton College and intern at the Center for International Governance Innovation. He has also written articles for St Antony's International Review Oxford, Yale's undergraduate US-China magazine 'China Hands', Oxford Political Review and several other notable publications.
RTHK
2 hours ago
- RTHK
Top talent visa doesn't guarantee PR status: Sun
Top talent visa doesn't guarantee PR status: Sun Chris Sun emphasised the critical importance of attracting top talent to counter the SAR's declining labour force and shrinking young population. File photo: RTHK Secretary for Labour and Welfare Chris Sun stressed that obtaining a visa under the Top Talent Pass Scheme (TTPS) does not automatically grant permanent residency. Speaking after a radio programme on Saturday, he said those admitted under the scheme must have their talent scheme visas renewed twice and demonstrate stable employment or business operations within Hong Kong to qualify for permanent resident status. Sun's comments addressed concerns raised by Leung Chun-ying regarding resource sharing, with the former SAR chief executive expressing apprehension that some mainlanders might be using talent schemes primarily to gain Hong Kong residency and access associated benefits. Sun emphasised the critical importance of attracting top talent to counter the SAR's declining labour force and shrinking young population, saying that they provide significant impetus to the city's economy. The labour chief said talent and their children who come to Hong Kong in accordance with the law should be welcomed as part of the community, adding that all systems and social services must operate in an orderly manner, ensuring fairness for both locals and newcomers. "We are making full use of the whole spectrum of talent admission schemes available to us, including the schemes targeting those [who] already had a job offer before arriving in Hong Kong," he said. "And also, for talents under the TTPS, where we only require them to prove either they are high-earners, or graduates from one of the top 100 universities in the world. "We are encouraged by the visa renewal outcome of the TTPS. We are going to further step up our promotion, so that we are going to attract more talents to Hong Kong to help us grow our economy." Sun also expressed deep concern over an industrial accident that occurred on Friday, in which a 20-year-old MTR worker died after being pinned against the wall by an engineering vehicle that rolled backwards at the company's Siu Ho Wan depot on Lantau. Sun confirmed that the Labour Department has issued a suspension notice related to the incident. He said the authorities would conduct a strict investigation according to relevant regulations and that any legal violations uncovered would be pursued.
RTHK
2 hours ago
- RTHK
Top talent visa doesn't guarantee PR status: Sun
Top talent visa doesn't guarantee PR status: Sun Chris Sun emphasised the critical importance of attracting top talent to counter the SAR's declining labour force and shrinking young population. File photo: RTHK Secretary for Labour and Welfare Chris Sun stressed that obtaining a visa under the Top Talent Pass Scheme (TTPS) does not automatically grant permanent residency. Speaking after a radio programme on Saturday, he said those admitted under the scheme must have their talent scheme visas renewed twice and demonstrate stable employment or business operations within Hong Kong to qualify for permanent resident status. Sun's comments addressed concerns raised by Leung Chun-ying regarding resource sharing, with the former SAR chief executive expressing apprehension that some mainlanders might be using talent schemes primarily to gain Hong Kong residency and access associated benefits. Sun emphasised the critical importance of attracting top talent to counter the SAR's declining labour force and shrinking young population, saying that they provide significant impetus to the city's economy. The labour chief said talent and their children who come to Hong Kong in accordance with the law should be welcomed as part of the community, adding that all systems and social services must operate in an orderly manner, ensuring fairness for both locals and newcomers. "We are making full use of the whole spectrum of talent admission schemes available to us, including the schemes targeting those [who] already had a job offer before arriving in Hong Kong," he said. "And also, for talents under the TTPS, where we only require them to prove either they are high-earners, or graduates from one of the top 100 universities in the world. "We are encouraged by the visa renewal outcome of the TTPS. We are going to further step up our promotion, so that we are going to attract more talents to Hong Kong to help us grow our economy." Sun also expressed deep concern over an industrial accident that occurred on Friday, in which a 20-year-old MTR worker died after being pinned against the wall by an engineering vehicle that rolled backwards at the company's Siu Ho Wan depot on Lantau. Sun confirmed that the Labour Department has issued a suspension notice related to the incident. He said the authorities would conduct a strict investigation according to relevant regulations and that any legal violations uncovered would be pursued.
