logo
First criminal conviction linked to Capture referred to Court of Appeal

First criminal conviction linked to Capture referred to Court of Appeal

The Criminal Cases Review Commission (CCRC) said the case of Patricia Owen, who was found guilty of five counts of theft in June 1998, has been referred on the grounds that it was an abuse of process.
Mrs Owen pleaded not guilty to all five charges after the Broad Oak Post Office branch in Sweechgate, Canterbury, was left with a shortfall of £6,000.
Those who were affected by Capture have suffered the longest of all Solicitor Neil Hudgell
She received a sentence of six months' imprisonment, suspended for two years.
The case is being sent to the Court of Appeal posthumously following an application by Mrs Owen's family after she died in 2003.
Mrs Owen's legal team stood down an independent IT specialist on the day of her trial despite Adrian Montagu's report concluding that 'bugs and errors existed in sufficiently significant numbers and seriousness' and that any evidence relying on the system 'must be regarded as very unsafe'.
The CCRC said in March that it was examining 27 cases to determine whether the Capture accounting software played a part in convictions.
The Capture system pre-dated the now infamous Horizon software – which has been responsible for almost 1,000 wrongful convictions.
An independent report into Capture was commissioned last year after subpostmasters said they had suffered similar problems to those faced by the Horizon victims.
The CCRC said it has sent more than 70 cases associated with the Post Office Horizon scandal to the appeal courts.
Solicitor Neil Hudgell, whose firm Hudgell Solicitors represents more than 100 people affected by the Capture system, said the referral is a 'hugely positive step'.
Why compelling IT evidence was not used in court remains a mystery Solicitor Neil Hudgell
He said: 'This is another landmark moment in the continuing campaign to ensure all those who were wrongly prosecuted at the hands of the Post Office have their names cleared.
'Those who were affected by Capture have suffered the longest of all.
'It is important to recognise that we await the Post Office's position on this matter, and whether it will offer any evidence against Mrs Owen's conviction being overturned, and then of course the Court of Appeal's decision itself.
'I was always struck by how Mrs Owen protested her innocence throughout, pointing the finger of blame at the system.
'Why compelling IT evidence was not used in court remains a mystery.
'However, this is a hugely positive step, and we hope this is the first of many cases to be referred for consideration.'
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Rapist (79) died alone in custody after family not notified of stroke, investigation finds
Rapist (79) died alone in custody after family not notified of stroke, investigation finds

BreakingNews.ie

time7 hours ago

  • BreakingNews.ie

Rapist (79) died alone in custody after family not notified of stroke, investigation finds

A 79-year-old inmate who had been jailed for brutally raping a six-year-old girl died alone in custody after prison authorities failed to notify his family that he had suffered a suspected stroke, an investigation has found. Dan Flynn, a former farm labourer who lived in Tipperary, was sentenced to six years in prison with four years suspended in 2019 after pleading guilty to raping a child when he was 36 years old in 1979. Advertisement The Court of Appeal subsequently found the sentence to have been 'unduly lenient', and said it had not 'come close to reflecting the gravity' of the offence, increasing it to five years. The court said the rape had involved a troubling level of brutality and degradation, hearing that Flynn had thrown his victim onto his bed, telling her 'I have got you now' before raping her and spitting in her face. The victim, who is now a married mother, told the court that he had stepped over her as she lay on the ground after the attack, 'as if I was nothing'. Flynn was living in a community hospital for older people before he was jailed at the Midlands Prison in June 2019. He was suffering from Parkinson's disease and had complex medical needs. Advertisement He was provided with a high-backed orthopaedic chair in his cell, and he received "round the clock" support from healthcare assistants in prison with his personal and hygiene needs as part of an advanced healthcare plan. An investigation into Flynn's death by the Office of the Inspector of Prisons (OIP) found that he was reported to be 'in good form' on the morning of October 8th, 2022, as he watched television in his cell. After lunch, he was helped into bed in accordance with his daily routine, and appeared to be 'fine' when he got up again with the assistance of healthcare professionals around 2.15pm. However, he was found 'slumped over' the arm of his chair around an hour later. He was unresponsive, and his face was slumped to one side, a nurse officer told OIP investigators. Advertisement It was suspected that Flynn had suffered a stroke, and an ambulance was called. He was transferred to Naas General Hospital in the company of two prison escorts around 4pm. Around midnight, Flynn was moved from the emergency department to the intensive care unit (ICU). When a prison officer took over escort duty at 7.15am the next day, they were told by colleagues that they hadn't expected the prisoner to survive the night. At 8.25am, a doctor informed the prison escorts that Flynn had passed away. A prison chaplain who started work at 8am made contact with Flynn's family around 8.30am, advising them that he had become ill and had been taken to Naas General Hospital. Advertisement The chaplain was updated on the situation around 30 minutes later, and had to contact the family again to inform them that Flynn had died, according to the OIP investigation report, which did not identify the deceased by name. The OIP noted that Irish Prison Service (IPS) protocol requires the families of inmates to be contacted 'in the quickest way possible' in the event of grave illness, so they have an opportunity to be with their loved ones. The IPS accepted a recommendation that it should comply with this protocol in future. Ireland Kerry farmer tearfully hugs wife as they succeed i... Read More It also accepted a recommendation regarding the provision of working medical aids and appliances, after the OIP found that an air cushion supplied to Flynn for a bed sore on his buttock had been defective. Advertisement Around a month later, he was found to have developed a second bed sore on the other buttock, and only then did a nurse observe that the air cushion was not working. The OIP report noted that Flynn's family was 'upset' that they had not been informed when he was transferred from the Midlands Prison to Naas General Hospital. It offered its sincere condolences to the family on their loss. If you have been affected by any of the issues raised in this article, you can call the national 24-hour Rape Crisis Helpline at 1800-77 8888, access text service and webchat options at or visit Rape Crisis Help.

Having to admit guilt in order to win parole is wrong
Having to admit guilt in order to win parole is wrong

Times

timea day ago

  • Times

Having to admit guilt in order to win parole is wrong

Another apparent miscarriage of justice has emerged. This time, it is the case of Clive Freeman, an 82-year-old former soldier who has spent 37 years in prison for a murder that may never have happened. In 1989, Freeman was convicted of killing a vagrant whose partially burnt body was discovered in his home. The prosecution relied on questionable pathology evidence to claim that the victim was suffocated using a 19th-century 'burking' technique. Freeman has always maintained his innocence. His refusal to confess to the crime has ensured his continued incarceration. The Criminal Cases Review Commission (CCRC) has now concluded there is 'a real possibility' that the Court of Appeal will quash his conviction. The question is whether justice will come in time for a man who is terminally ill and has been separated from his family for nearly four decades. Freeman's ordeal highlights two chronic failings in our justice system: first, that wrongful convictions happen far more often than the state cares to admit; and second, that our parole system cruelly insists that prisoners convicted of serious offences must admit guilt before they can be released, even when they are protesting innocence. The case of Andrew Malkinson is another recent reminder of what is wrong. Malkinson spent 17 years in prison for a rape he did not commit. DNA evidence eventually cleared him, but not before the system had dismissed his appeals, ignored emerging evidence and treated his steadfast claim of innocence as an obstacle to his release. Cases such as Freeman's and Malkinson's are indictments of a process that places too much trust in flawed evidence, resists admitting error and coerces the innocent into impossible moral compromises. How many languish behind bars, wasting years — even lifetimes — because of false allegations, botched investigations, wrongful imprisonment and a state too proud to say it was wrong? The true number is a figure that, if ever revealed, would be difficult for Britain to swallow — and even harder to reconcile with any claim that our country is a paragon of fairness and justice. • Andrew Malkinson: 'What do you think a false rape conviction does to a man's mind?' What should change? First, the requirement for prisoners to admit guilt to qualify for parole must be abolished. Second, the CCRC needs greater independence, resources and powers to compel the disclosure of evidence. It should not take decades for fresh evidence to be properly considered. Third, there must be genuine accountability for police and prosecutors who withhold or distort evidence and for expert witnesses whose flawed testimony helps secure wrongful convictions. Finally, we must change the culture. The justice system must remember that its duty is not to secure convictions at all costs but to seek the truth. That means being willing to revisit cases, admit mistakes and put fairness before finality. Harvey Proctor is a former Conservative MP and the president of Facing Allegations in Contexts of Trust

Prestatyn man who said his ‘brakes failed' appears in court
Prestatyn man who said his ‘brakes failed' appears in court

Rhyl Journal

timea day ago

  • Rhyl Journal

Prestatyn man who said his ‘brakes failed' appears in court

Nathan Owen, 32, of The Grove, is charged with dangerous driving, causing a public nuisance, and two counts of fraud by false representation. Owen appeared at Liverpool Magistrates Court on Wednesday (August 13) for his first hearing. His case was sent to Liverpool Crown Court, where a plea and trial preparation hearing will take place on Wednesday, September 10. He was granted unconditional bail until then. On March 6, 2024, Merseyside Police was called to help stop a black Jaguar I-PACE car safely on the eastbound carriageway of the M62. This followed the driver of the vehicle – Owen - reporting to 999 that his vehicle was out of control and he could not brake while travelling on the M58/M57 and M62 motorways. The incident led to two lanes being shut on the motorway as Owen was escorted by police vehicles until his electric car battery ran out.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store