logo
Israeli army strikes Yemen ports after ship attack in Red Sea

Israeli army strikes Yemen ports after ship attack in Red Sea

The National6 days ago
The Israeli army launched a wave of strikes on Houthi-controlled ports in Yemen overnight, hours after a ship was attacked in the Red Sea.
The Yemeni port city of Hodeidah was struck along with the ports of Ras Isa and Salif and the Ras Al Kathib power station, according to the Houthi-run Al Masirah television station.
The Israeli army said that it 'struck and destroyed terror infrastructure belonging to the Houthi terrorist regime'.
'Among the targets were the ports of Hodeida, Ras Isa, and Salif,' it said.
It was the Israeli army's first attack on Yemen in about a month.
The army also attacked the Galaxy Leader ship docked at Ras Isa port, which was seized by the Houthis in late 2023, it added.
'The Houthi terrorist regime's forces installed a radar system on the ship, and are using it to track vessels in international maritime space, in order to promote the Houthi terrorist regime's activities,' it said.
Shortly after Israel's attacks, two missiles were launched from Yemen towards Israel, the army said on Telegram, adding that it was working to intercept them.
The strikes came about half an hour after an Israeli army spokesman warned on social media of its attacks.
They also came hours after a vessel was attacked in the Red Sea on Sunday by several small boats that opened fire on it including with grenades, according to the UK Maritime Trade Operations.
A fire broke out on the Liberian-flagged vessel Magic Seas and the crew were forced to abandon ship, the UKMTO said on social media. A passing merchant vessel rescued all crew members, while the ship remains abandoned.
No one immediately claimed responsibility for the attack, but security firm Ambrey said the vessel fit the typical profile of a Houthi target.
Israel has carried out several strikes in Yemen over recent months in response to missile attacks by the Houthis.
The Houthis have been launching missiles and drones at Israel since the Gaza war broke out in October 2023. The Houthis say they are acting in solidarity with the Palestinians.
The group have also attacked shipping vessels they deem to be linked to Israel in the Red Sea and Gulf of Aden since November 2023.
They broadened their campaign to target ships tied to the US and Britain after the two countries began military strikes aimed at securing the waterway in January last year.
But in May this year, the Houthis reached a ceasefire with the US that ended weeks of intense American strikes against the group. US President Donald Trump said the rebels had 'capitulated'. Israel was not included in the truce.
The Houthis pledged last month to resume attacks in the region after the US entered the Israel-Iran war with strikes on Iranian nuclear targets. Yemeni security sources told The National in June that the rebels were considering renewed attacks on US targets around the Middle East and increasing attacks on Israel in support of Tehran.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

UK: More than 80 protesters arrested at Palestine Action protests
UK: More than 80 protesters arrested at Palestine Action protests

Middle East Eye

time12 hours ago

  • Middle East Eye

UK: More than 80 protesters arrested at Palestine Action protests

UK police on Saturday arrested more than 60 protesters who were demanding the reversal of a ban on the pro-Palestine direct action group, Palestine Action. The government proscribed the activist group under anti-terror laws on 4 July, after the group broke into RAF Brize Norton earlier this month and spray-painted two planes that they said were 'used for military operations in Gaza and across the Middle East." The legislation made membership of, and support for, the group a criminal offence punishable by up to 14 years in prison, marking the first time a direct action group has been proscribed in the UK as a terrorist group. In response, the campaign group Defend Our Juries (DOJ) announced rallies on Saturday in several UK cities to protest the ban and Israel's war on Gaza. In a statement on X, the Metropolitan Police said it had 'made 41 arrests for showing support for a proscribed organisation'. New MEE newsletter: Jerusalem Dispatch Sign up to get the latest insights and analysis on Israel-Palestine, alongside Turkey Unpacked and other MEE newsletters DOJ said 86 people had been arrested across the UK in total, with other protests held in Wales and Northern Ireland. 'Over 300 police officers have been seen carrying away dozens of people from the foot of statues of Nelson Mandela and Gandhi for alleged 'terrorism offences',' the group said in a statement on X. 'Those arrested are accused of holding signs in support of Palestine Action,' it added. On 5 July, twenty-seven people were arrested in London's Parliament Square, including an 83-year-old priest, a former government lawyer, an emeritus professor, and health workers. UN experts, human rights groups, and leading figures have condemned the ban as draconian and warned that it will have major adverse consequences for the freedom of expression, with implications for the rule of law. 'Terrorism legislation hands the authorities massive powers to arrest and detain people, suppress speech and reporting, conduct surveillance, and take other measures that would never be permitted in other circumstances,' Sacha Deshmukh, Amnesty International UK's Chief Executive, said in a statement ahead of the ban. 'Using them against a direct-action protest group is an egregious abuse of what they were created for," Deshmukh said.

When Britain's 'feminists' cheer for bombs and sneer at Palestinian suffering
When Britain's 'feminists' cheer for bombs and sneer at Palestinian suffering

Middle East Eye

time16 hours ago

  • Middle East Eye

When Britain's 'feminists' cheer for bombs and sneer at Palestinian suffering

A familiar breed of British pundit has resurfaced - loud, self-declared feminists whose outrage is as selective as it is performative, and whose moral compass somehow always aligns with western state power. They remain silent as Gaza burns, but are quick to find their voice to cheer on Israel and its allies as they threaten to flatten Iran - civilian casualties be damned. During Israel's recent strikes on Iran, the radical feminist journalist and co‑founder of Justice for Women, Julie Bindel, branded leftist anti-war feminists "Team Iran" sympathisers. It was a disingenuous, grotesquely misleading and dangerously ideological accusation, but not a surprising one. What we're witnessing goes beyond reasoned critique - it is the cynical weaponisation of feminism to uphold state violence. This is no isolated incident. It's a pattern. New MEE newsletter: Jerusalem Dispatch Sign up to get the latest insights and analysis on Israel-Palestine, alongside Turkey Unpacked and other MEE newsletters In October 2023, Bindel shared a Telegraph column that championed Israel's genocidal war on Gaza as "a stand for civilisation", while spreading propaganda against Palestinians and vilifying those who defend their humanity. When Palestinian women are pulled from rubble, starved in besieged hospitals, denied reproductive care or give birth next to the corpses of their children, Britain's loudest feminists look away. UN experts have documented acts of sexual violence against women and girls in Gaza - including rape, forced nudity and public humiliation. No statements. No hashtags. No vigils. The same figures who demand global outrage over gender-based violence have nothing to say when those crimes are committed with American firepower and British backing. Smearing solidarity While women in Gaza bleed in silence, these pundits reserve their fury for pro-Palestine protesters - smearing them as extremists, branding solidarity as terrorism, twisting every act of dissent into an endorsement of "jihad" and weaponising antisemitism to crush critique. Such hypocrisy is as strategic as it is shameful. Nothing unnerves Britain's loudest self-styled 'feminist' commentators more than the Palestinian flag - seen not as a cry for justice but an affront to their moral high ground Nothing seems to unnerve Britain's loudest self-styled "feminist" commentators more than the Palestinian flag - a symbol they treat not as a cry for justice, but as an affront to their proclaimed moral high ground. When groups like Palestine Action engage in peaceful civil disobedience - spraying red-paint slogans on Royal Air Force fences and even RAF planes to protest genocide - they are labelled "terrorists". Indeed, those who dare to expose and resist mass killing face criminalisation as part of a calculated assault on any challenge to the status quo. This isn't careless commentary - it is a deliberate ideological distortion disguised as feminist critique. Moreover, it is a betrayal of feminism's proud legacy of nonviolent resistance. From the Reclaim the Night marches that defied police curfews in the 1970s to Southall Black Sisters, who took to the streets to confront domestic violence, state racism and police inaction long before it was politically convenient, this unbroken tradition of protest against gendered state violence lies at the heart of the movement itself. The same voices who once championed the right to free speech - to occupy, stencil and disrupt - now recoil at a banner that simply demands accountability for colonial violence. Smokescreen for war Apparently, the mere objection to the bombing of Iranian civilians is now considered "supporting the regime". It is a framing that is at once ahistorical and a staggering collapse of intellectual rigour. Even those who have previously criticised some of Iran's policies are accused of siding with the Ayatollah simply for opposing western air strikes. When it comes to Iran, these pundits become overnight experts - reciting floggings, hijabs and hangings with righteous certainty. Iranian 'freedom' won't come from Israeli bombs or US regime change Read More » But raise Israel's war crimes - the bombed hospitals, the mass graves, the deliberate targeting of civilians - and their intellectual faculties, let alone moral clarity, suddenly short-circuit. Iran is treated as uniquely monstrous - requiring exceptional condemnation and meriting exceptional violence from the so-called champions of human rights. The doublethink is exhausting. The same feminists who once championed the invasions of Afghanistan and Iraq under the banner of "saving women" are now recycling that same logic to legitimise ongoing western aggression. Have we learned nothing from two decades of war, occupation and manufactured consent? This isn't solidarity - it's a smokescreen for war dressed up in feminist language. Equally, opposing Israel's assault on civilians does not imply an endorsement of the Iranian regime. It is a feminist stance against yet another bloodbath disguised as liberation. To dismiss such opposition as regime sympathy is a reductive insult to the Iranian feminists who have risked everything to confront injustice without calling for foreign bombs. As Nazanin Zaghari-Ratcliffe, one of the country's most courageous feminist dissidents who was jailed for defying the state, has made clear, real change will come from within. In Libya, Afghanistan and Iraq, where western intervention was sold as salvation, its bombs left only mass graves, collapsed infrastructure and broken societies. Selective sisterhood Some pro-war commentators have falsely claimed that most Iranians support US or Israeli bombing of their country. In reality, the small crowds seen celebrating air strikes outside Iran's embassy were rallying behind exiled monarchist Reza Pahlavi - a man known for his open support of Israel, who in recent interviews dismissed the killing of his own people as "collateral damage". To frame this fringe display as representative of Iranian opposition is not nuance - it is propaganda dressed up as political principle. Follow Middle East Eye's live coverage of the Israel-Palestine war A hashtag like #TeamIran, barely used beyond one media personality's feed, has been transformed into the centrepiece of a manufactured smear campaign against leftist solidarity. This astroturfed narrative, pushed by pundits and politicians alike, attempts to paint anti-war voices as "regime" loyalists - all to shut down dissent and shore up support for military escalation. These dissenters are then ridiculed as "stupid", "ignorant" or "beyond comprehension". What truly defies comprehension, however, is how some of the UK's loudest feminist voices have spent the past 20 months standing shoulder to shoulder with a military occupier, exposing their casual racism, far-right flirtations and a deep-seated contempt for Muslims cloaked in moral posturing. Western feminism's silence on Gaza lays bare its moral bankruptcy Maryam Aldossari Read More » Their outrage flares only when it flatters imperial power - and disappears entirely when Israeli forces bomb hospitals, block aid convoys or leave women and children to burn while seeking refuge beneath crumbling roofs. Where is their outrage at Israel's catalogue of war crimes? Where is the feminist fury at apartheid policies, the suffocating siege of Gaza and the systematic erasure of Palestinian life? Why has selective sisterhood become the norm - loud for some women, silent for others? Why do so many feminist organisations cower in fear, unwilling to speak unless it serves the powerful? Feminism must mean more than slogans for empire. It is meant to stand against all oppression, not just the kind convenient for white saviours and western allies. It's time to honour that promise by reclaiming it from those who've turned "women's rights" into a weapon of war and whitewashing. The views expressed in this article belong to the author and do not necessarily reflect the editorial policy of Middle East Eye.

Iran says 'military capabilities' not up for negotiation in nuclear talks
Iran says 'military capabilities' not up for negotiation in nuclear talks

Khaleej Times

time18 hours ago

  • Khaleej Times

Iran says 'military capabilities' not up for negotiation in nuclear talks

Foreign Minister Abbas Araqchi said Saturday that any talks with major powers would focus only on Iran's nuclear activities, not military capabilities like its ballistic missile arsenal. "If negotiations are held, the subject of the negotiations will be only nuclear and creating confidence in Iran's nuclear programme in return for the lifting of sanctions," Araghchi told diplomats in Tehran. "No other issues will be subject to negotiation." Iran said Saturday it was reviewing the details of a possible resumption of talks with the United States on its nuclear programme. "We are examining its timing, its location, its form, its ingredients, the assurances it requires" from Iran for possible negotiations, Araqchi said. Tehran and Washington had been engaged in talks since April, but those efforts were disrupted when US-ally Israel launched a surprise attack on Iran's nuclear facilities on June 13, just two days before a planned meeting in Oman.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store