Iranians buying supplies in Iraq tell of fear, shortages back home
Fatah — who like others in this story is being identified by a pseudonym — was among dozens of truck drivers waiting impatiently to cross back into Iran from Iraq's northern Kurdistan region, hauling not only their commercial cargo, but also essential goods for their families after days of Israeli attacks.
AFP spoke with at least 30 Iranians near the Bashmakh crossing. They all refused to be interviewed on camera, and the few who agreed to describe life back home asked to remain anonymous for fear of reprisals back in Iran.
'There are shortages of rice, bread, sugar and tea,' Fatah said Tuesday.
Finding fuel has also become a major problem, with long queues of cars waiting hours in front of gas stations hoping the fuel did not run out, the 40-year-old driver added.
A long journey awaits Fatah, who must deliver his load of asphalt to the Iranian port of Bandar Abbas about 1,700 kilometers (1,060 miles) away, before turning around and driving almost the same distance back to the western city of Marivan, where his family lives and which has so far been spared bombardment.
But 'my route passes near the Natanz nuclear facility,' Fatah said, referring to one of Iran's underground uranium enrichment sites that Israel has struck several times since the start of its campaign last week.
Surprise attack
Israel launched a devastating surprise attack on Friday targeting Iran's military and nuclear sites and killing top commanders and scientists.
Israel says its attacks are aimed at preventing Iran from obtaining a nuclear weapon, an ambition Tehran denies.
At least 224 people, including women and children, have been killed in the Israeli strikes, according to official figures.
The assault has prompted retaliatory barrages of missiles from Iran that have killed at least 24 people in Israel, according to the prime minister's office.
Aram, 28, keeps calling his wife, fearing for his family's safety after they had to flee their home when a strike hit a military site nearby in the city of Sanandaj.
'My family is safe, but they had to move in with relatives in a village,' Aram said.
His wife told him that many families who lived near military sites in the area had been similarly displaced.
The father of two said the shortages back home were mostly due to panic-stricken Iranians who rushed to markets to stockpile basic supplies.
Fear of shortages mounts
Back in Iran, car dealer Shwan recalled how Israeli jets struck several military sites near his city of Bukan in the west.
'People are shocked and distraught, they don't know what they should do,' the 35-year-old told AFP via a messaging app from inside Iran.
'We have a major problem with bread shortages,' he said.
People were queuing at bakeries for hours to get loaves of bread, sometimes to no avail, Shwan said.
'Sometimes four members of one family go around bakeries looking for bread,' he added.
'It is also difficult to find rice or oil,' and many civil servants have not received their salaries yet, he said.
Avin, a 38-year-old seamstress, told AFP via a messaging app that the war 'has spread fear among residents,' even though the bombs have not touched her town of Saqqez in northwest Iran.
'Some families with children left to villages outside the city,' she said.
Like others, she fears more shortages to come.
'Most of the provisions come from Tehran,' which has seen a massive exodus and is also grappling with scarcity.
'Because of this, the market in our city came to a standstill.'
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Al Arabiya
an hour ago
- Al Arabiya
Munition from Israel war explodes in Iran, killing one: Media
Munition left from Israel's war with Iran earlier this year exploded on Tuesday in the Islamic Republic's west, killing one person, state media said. Official news agency IRNA said that 'unexploded ordnance of the Zionist regime' detonated near the city of Beyranshahr, in Lorestan province of western Iran. 'The incident left one person dead and nine people injured,' it added, quoting a statement from the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC). The 12 days of fighting in June saw Israel bomb Iranian nuclear and military sites as well as residential areas, killing more than 1,000 people, including senior commanders and nuclear scientists. Iran retaliated with missile and drone attacks that killed dozens in Israel. The United States, which briefly joined the war by striking Iranian nuclear sites, announced a halt in fighting on June 24. While the hostilities ended, there was no agreement formalizing the ceasefire. Iranian officials have since maintained that Tehran remains ready in case another confrontation breaks out with its sworn enemy Israel. On Sunday, Yahya Rahim Safavi, a military advisor to Iran's Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei, told local media the country was 'preparing plans for the worst-case scenario.'
Al Arabiya
4 hours ago
- Al Arabiya
Lebanon's Patriarch: Hezbollah must surrender weapons after state asserts monopoly on arms
Lebanon's top Christian cleric escalated his criticism of Hezbollah on Tuesday, saying the Iran-backed group has no right to keep its arsenal after the government decided that only the state can bear arms. Maronite Patriarch Bechara al-Rai said there is now a rare political consensus to strip all weapons from groups outside the Lebanese Armed Forces. 'This is the first time there is consensus among the president, the parliament speaker, and the prime minister to monopolize weapons under state control. This brings peace to Lebanon. No one can live without peace,' Rai told Al Arabiya in an interview. His comments come after months of cross-border fighting between Hezbollah and Israel that devastated southern Lebanon and large swathes of the country's capital and Bekaa Valley and displaced tens of thousands. The Lebanese government announced this month that it would enforce a monopoly on arms, a move condemned by Iran, Hezbollah's main backer. Rai said Hezbollah's credibility as an armed 'resistance' had collapsed once the state asserted its exclusive authority. 'We cannot accept one person, the secretary-general [of Hezbollah], to decide war and peace. The constitution says this is a government decision,' he said. The patriarch accused Tehran of undermining Lebanon's sovereignty. 'Iran crosses red lines because it stands with one side in Lebanon, the Shia sect and Hezbollah. It cannot give weapons to one side. This is blatant aggression and intervening in domestic affairs,' he said. Rai said he would not visit Tehran right now, citing its 'bad policies,' revealing that he turned down a previous invitation just over four years ago to visit Iran. Rai urged Hezbollah to embrace its Lebanese identity and stop taking directions from Tehran. 'You are Lebanese. Live as Lebanese and don't look to Iran like you used to,' he said, adding that the Shia of Lebanon 'were present in government and parliament long before the resistance' and that their political role does not depend on weapons. The patriarch recalled comments by Hezbollah's former secretary-general, Hassan Nasrallah, that the group receives its money, food, weapons and directions from Iran. 'Then how are you a Lebanese citizen? You are Lebanese, just like me. But you need to pledge allegiance to the Lebanese state, not Tehran.' He dismissed warnings of another civil war as 'an exaggeration,' saying no one was prepared to start another civil war and that the Lebanese people were fed up with constant wars since 1975. 'No one wants war anymore.' The patriarch also addressed Lebanon's fraught relationship with Israel, ruling out normalization for now but leaving the door open in the future. 'In the future, when there is no danger to Lebanon, why wouldn't there be a deal?' He acknowledged Israeli aspirations to expand its borders and create the 'Kingdom of David,' but said a strong Lebanese state that asserted its sovereignty over all its territory was the best way to prevent that from happening. Despite his sharp criticism, Rai said dialogue with Hezbollah remains open. 'We still have ongoing dialogue with Hezbollah, and we are honest with them. Bkerki will not sugarcoat, it will speak for the interests of Lebanon,' he said.
Arab News
7 hours ago
- Arab News
Where did Iran's Arab supporters disappear?
A deathly silence looms over the Arab street, unmoved by the wave of dramatic events in the region. We have not seen demonstrations, protests, or sit-ins in the Arab countries, and in my view, this is the first time in seven decades or more that such displays have vanished. What has befallen Iran is no small matter; its military losses and nuclear facilities are immense — facilities that cost billions of dollars, and much blood and sweat to build. To its ballistic and nuclear losses, we can add the loss of the popular current it had cultivated across the region, from Iraq to Morocco. When the Lebanese government took its bold decision to confiscate Hezbollah's weapons, the response was limited to just a few dozen motorcycles roaming Beirut's streets in protest. So, what happened to the human waves, the millions who once flooded the streets at a mere gesture from the party's leader or from Tehran? The collapse of Iranian influence is clear within Arab regions, like the collapse of Nasserism after its defeat in the 1967 war. It lost the ability to mobilize the street and resorted to relying on its socialist party members and labor unions to attend events after the masses — who once filled the squares with passion and spontaneity in response to radio appeals that dominated people's awareness and emotions for nearly two decades — dwindled. In the wake of that defeat, a sense of shock and betrayal spread across the region, which had been waiting for the liberation of Palestine. People do not admire the defeated Abdulrahman Al-Rashed Iran, too, once enjoyed dominance and popular support in the region, defying attempts to block its ideas and curb its activities. It managed to raise generations of Arabs on its ideas. Tehran opened its doors and arms to extremist Sunnis, including leaders of Al-Qaeda, overlooking their anti-Shiite ideology, and supported most Sunni opposition groups and movements against their governments. It built an organic, deeply coordinated relationship with the Muslim Brotherhood. It organized nearly annual conferences and seminars for Arab nationalists and communists. It spent heavily to woo Arab politicians and intellectuals; books were published, and odes of praise were written in support of the imam's regime and in its defense. Tehran gathered Shiites, Sunnis, and Arab Christians alike — thinkers from the Gulf, Egypt, the Levant, the Maghreb, Sudan, Yemen, and Arab diaspora communities. It climbed onto many Arab media outlets to promote Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei's line. At times, we could hardly understand how it managed to reconcile all these contradictions. In Tripoli — a city with tensions against the Shiites of Beirut — there were Sunni groups that, since the 1980s, continued to pledge allegiance to Tehran. In Jordan, among the Muslim Brotherhood, some openly declared their affection for Tehran's leaders. Numerous works emerged in its defense: in Egypt, for example, 'Iran and Political Islam'; in Kuwait, 'Iran and the West: Conflict of Interests'; in the Gulf, conferences were held under the banner of 'rapprochement' between sects, celebrating the history of Abbasid Caliph Al-Nasir Li-Din Allah. All these activities might have been laudable, were it not for the fact that the intentions behind them were not out of love for ending or easing sectarian strife, but rather as part of a political project of domination. Tehran was managing elite and grassroots movements in dozens of Arab cities; protests against novels, films, negotiations, and regimes. But in the recent wars, following the October 2023 attack, the kind of mobilization we were used to in every confrontation faded. The first reason: People do not admire the defeated. The second: The apparatuses that used to orchestrate these gatherings have lost their connections and their resources have dried up. The Arab street venerates the victorious hero until he falls, then replaces him with another hero. Its believers have been shaken by successive defeats, just as Nasserists were shattered by the setbacks of the 1960s. The remaining challenge is to hold on to its supporters within its Shiite popular base; they are the ones most harmed and who still live the trauma of shock. With time, the Shiites of Lebanon will come to realize the truth — that they are victims of Hezbollah and Iran; that it is a burden on them, rather than a support. For four decades they have borne the confrontation with Israel and the consequences of ties with Iran: economic and personal sanctions, the destruction of their areas and neighborhoods, the targeting of their remittances from Africa and the Americas, and more.
