logo
Iranians buying supplies in Iraq tell of fear, shortages back home

Iranians buying supplies in Iraq tell of fear, shortages back home

Arab News5 hours ago

PENJWEN, Iraq: Near the once-bustling Iraqi border crossing of Bashmakh, Iranian driver Fatah stocked up on rice, sugar and tea, staples that have become increasingly hard to get back home.
Fatah — who like others in this story is being identified by a pseudonym — was among dozens of truck drivers waiting impatiently to cross back into Iran from Iraq's northern Kurdistan region, hauling not only their commercial cargo, but also essential goods for their families after days of Israeli attacks.
AFP spoke with at least 30 Iranians near the Bashmakh crossing. They all refused to be interviewed on camera, and the few who agreed to describe life back home asked to remain anonymous for fear of reprisals back in Iran.
'There are shortages of rice, bread, sugar and tea,' Fatah said Tuesday.
Finding fuel has also become a major problem, with long queues of cars waiting hours in front of gas stations hoping the fuel did not run out, the 40-year-old driver added.
A long journey awaits Fatah, who must deliver his load of asphalt to the Iranian port of Bandar Abbas about 1,700 kilometers (1,060 miles) away, before turning around and driving almost the same distance back to the western city of Marivan, where his family lives and which has so far been spared bombardment.
But 'my route passes near the Natanz nuclear facility,' Fatah said, referring to one of Iran's underground uranium enrichment sites that Israel has struck several times since the start of its campaign last week.
Surprise attack
Israel launched a devastating surprise attack on Friday targeting Iran's military and nuclear sites and killing top commanders and scientists.
Israel says its attacks are aimed at preventing Iran from obtaining a nuclear weapon, an ambition Tehran denies.
At least 224 people, including women and children, have been killed in the Israeli strikes, according to official figures.
The assault has prompted retaliatory barrages of missiles from Iran that have killed at least 24 people in Israel, according to the prime minister's office.
Aram, 28, keeps calling his wife, fearing for his family's safety after they had to flee their home when a strike hit a military site nearby in the city of Sanandaj.
'My family is safe, but they had to move in with relatives in a village,' Aram said.
His wife told him that many families who lived near military sites in the area had been similarly displaced.
The father of two said the shortages back home were mostly due to panic-stricken Iranians who rushed to markets to stockpile basic supplies.
Fear of shortages mounts
Back in Iran, car dealer Shwan recalled how Israeli jets struck several military sites near his city of Bukan in the west.
'People are shocked and distraught, they don't know what they should do,' the 35-year-old told AFP via a messaging app from inside Iran.
'We have a major problem with bread shortages,' he said.
People were queuing at bakeries for hours to get loaves of bread, sometimes to no avail, Shwan said.
'Sometimes four members of one family go around bakeries looking for bread,' he added.
'It is also difficult to find rice or oil,' and many civil servants have not received their salaries yet, he said.
Avin, a 38-year-old seamstress, told AFP via a messaging app that the war 'has spread fear among residents,' even though the bombs have not touched her town of Saqqez in northwest Iran.
'Some families with children left to villages outside the city,' she said.
Like others, she fears more shortages to come.
'Most of the provisions come from Tehran,' which has seen a massive exodus and is also grappling with scarcity.
'Because of this, the market in our city came to a standstill.'

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Pakistan has had no new military cooperation with Iran since Israeli strikes began, defense minister Asif tells Arab News
Pakistan has had no new military cooperation with Iran since Israeli strikes began, defense minister Asif tells Arab News

Arab News

time26 minutes ago

  • Arab News

Pakistan has had no new military cooperation with Iran since Israeli strikes began, defense minister Asif tells Arab News

ISLAMABAD: Pakistan's Defense Minister Khawaja Asif said on Monday that Islamabad had not engaged in any new military cooperation with Tehran since Israel launched attacks on Iran last week and had not held specific talks with the US over the escalating crisis in the Middle East. Iran, which borders Pakistan, has hit back with strikes against Israel after it unleashed waves of attacks on Friday at Iranian nuclear installations, missile stockpiles, scientists and military commanders, among other targets, sparking global alarm that the conflict could erupt into a regional war. The latest escalation follows months of hostilities between Israel and Iranian-backed groups in Lebanon, Syria and Yemen, which intensified after the war in Gaza was launched late in 2023. Regional powers fear a direct confrontation could spiral into a broader conflict involving major oil shipping lanes and global energy supplies. For Pakistan, a close Iranian neighbor and a longtime opponent of Israel, a prolonged conflict risks disrupting border security, inflaming sectarian tensions at home and possibly putting it in a tight spot with Arab allies and the West. Speaking to Arab News, Asif said regular security cooperation was continuing with Iran along their shared border to combat militant groups, but no fresh operational coordination had been initiated in response to Israel's attacks on Iranian territory since June 13. 'I don't see any need for it,' the defense minister said in response to a question on whether Pakistan's military was coordinating with its Iranian counterparts on the border or engaging in any fresh defense cooperation. 'We coordinate on a very regular basis as far as the Iran and Pakistan border is concerned because of terrorist activities … that sort of cooperation is already on. So I don't see any new activity.' Asked if Pakistan had held talks with Washington to discuss the fast-evolving situation, the minister said there had been no contact specifically on the crisis in the past five days. 'But we are in constant touch with the United States of America regarding the tense situation we have in this region.' Asif said Pakistan's leadership was instead focused on engagement with close partners like China and Muslim countries to press for calm, warning that the conflict risked engulfing the entire region. 'The countries who have religious affinity with us or geographical affinity, even China or other countries, because what we are pursuing is peace,' he said. 'And we would like to mobilize the countries of this region. This conflict can multiply and it can engulf the whole region into a situation which could be very, very disastrous.' Diplomatic and security experts warn that the Israel-Iran hostilities could affect Pakistan by destabilizing its western border with Iran, threatening energy imports as oil prices surge and creating new pressures on Pakistan's relations with the US and Gulf partners if Islamabad is seen as tilting too far toward Tehran. On the other hand, if Tehran were to fall or be severely weakened, analysts say Pakistan would likely side with the US and its allies — despite being Iran's immediate neighbor — to protect its strategic and economic interests. Addressing concerns over past remarks by Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu that have drawn parallels between Iran and Pakistan as so-called militant Islamic regimes that needed to be deterred, Asif rejected any immediate threat to Pakistan from Tel Aviv, but stressed Islamabad would remain vigilant. 'If we are threatened by Israel, which I will discount at the moment … what happens in the coming months or years I can't predict, but at the moment I discount (a threat from Israel),' he said. He described Israel as a state with 'hegemonic intent' whose recent actions in Gaza and against Iran were 'extremely dangerous to the immediate region,' and said global public opinion was turning against Israeli policies despite support or muted reactions from many Western governments. Asif declined to comment on reports that Pakistan had scrambled fighter jets near its nuclear sites and the Iranian border in response to Israel's initial strikes on Iran but insisted that its nuclear security remained robust. In addition to the Middle East tensions, Pakistan faced a major military standoff with India last month in which the two sides exchanged missile, drone and artillery attacks. Islamabad claimed to have shot down six Indian jets and struck back at military positions, triggering fears of a wider conflict between the nuclear-armed rivals before a ceasefire was announced by the Trump administration on May 10. When questioned about any direct threat to Pakistan's national security or strategic assets as a result of the conflict in the Middle East, Asif said Pakistan's armed forces were already on high alert following the latest confrontation with New Delhi, describing the country's nuclear facilities as 'very militantly guarded, very grudgingly guarded' and fully compliant with international safeguards. 'Since our short war with India, we have been on alert so we have not lowered guards … We can never take the risk of any attack on our nuclear facility from anywhere, that is something which is a lifeline as far as our defense is concerned,' he said. Asif said Pakistan's performance in the recent fight with India was evidence of his country's defense capability and national resolve, which would deter Israel from any adventurism. 'We have just had a bout with India and we clearly established our superiority, the superiority of our armed forces, air force, Pakistan army, Pakistan navy and the determination of our people, the way the nation stood behind the armed forces,' he said. 'So I think Netanyahu or his people or his government will think many times before taking on Pakistan.'

'Nobody knows': Trump won't say whether he will move forward with US strikes on Iran
'Nobody knows': Trump won't say whether he will move forward with US strikes on Iran

Arab News

time2 hours ago

  • Arab News

'Nobody knows': Trump won't say whether he will move forward with US strikes on Iran

WASHINGTON: President Donald Trump would not say Wednesday whether he has decided to order a US strike on Iran, a move that Tehran warned anew would be greeted with stiff retaliation if it happens. 'I may do it, I may not do it,' Trump said in an exchange with reporters at the White House . 'I mean, nobody knows what I'm going to do.' Trump added that it's not 'too late' for Iran to give up its nuclear program as he continues to weigh direct US involvement in Israel's military operations aimed at crushing Tehran's nuclear program. 'Nothing's too late,' Trump said. 'I can tell you this. Iran's got a lot of trouble.' 'Nothing is finished until it is finished,' Trump added. But 'the next week is going to be very big— maybe less than a week.' Trump also offered a terse response to Iran Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei's refusal to heed to his call for Iran to submit to an unconditional surrender. 'I say good luck,' Trump said. Khamenei earlier Wednesday warned that any United States strikes targeting the Islamic Republic will 'result in irreparable damage for them' and that his country would not bow to Trump's call for surrender. Trump said Tuesday the US knows where Iran's Khamenei is hiding as the the Israel-Iran conflict escalates but doesn't want him killed — 'for now.' 'He is an easy target, but is safe there — We are not going to take him out (kill!), at least not for now,' Trump said. Trump's increasingly muscular comments toward the Iranian government come after he urged Tehran's 9.5 million residents to flee for their lives as he cut short his participation in an international summit earlier this week to return to Washington for urgent talks with his national security team. Trump said that the Iranian officials continue to reach out to the White House as they're 'getting the hell beaten out of them' by Israel. But he added there's a 'big difference between now and a week ago' in Tehran's negotiating position. 'They've suggested that they come to the White House— that's, you know, courageous,' Trump said. Iran's mission to the United Nations refuted Trump's claim in a statement on social media. 'No Iranian official has ever asked to grovel at the gates of the White House. The only thing more despicable than his lies is his cowardly threat to 'take out' Iran's Supreme Leader. ' The US president said earlier this week Russian President Vladimir Putin offered to serve a mediator with. But Trump said he told Putin to keep focused on finding an endgame to his own conflict with Ukraine. 'I said, 'Do me a favor, mediate your own,'' Trump said he told Putin. 'I said, 'Vladimir, let's mediate Russia first. You can worry about this later.'' The Russia-Iran relationship has deepened since Putin launched a war on Ukraine in February 2022, with Tehran providing Moscow with drones, ballistic missiles, and other support, according to US intelligence findings.

‘I may do it, I may not do it,' Trump says on whether US will attack Iran
‘I may do it, I may not do it,' Trump says on whether US will attack Iran

Al Arabiya

time2 hours ago

  • Al Arabiya

‘I may do it, I may not do it,' Trump says on whether US will attack Iran

President Donald Trump said he was considering Wednesday whether the United States will join Israeli strikes on Iran and said that Tehran had reached out to seek negotiations on ending the conflict. Speaking as he watched installation of a new flagpole at the White House, Trump added that his patience 'had already run out' with Iran and repeated his call for the Islamic Republic's 'unconditional surrender.' 'I may do it, I may not do it. I mean, nobody knows what I'm going to do,' Trump told reporters on the South Lawn when asked if he had decided whether to launch US airstrikes. 'I can tell you this, that Iran's got a lot of trouble, and they want to negotiate.' Trump said Iran had even suggested sending officials to the White House for talks on Tehran's nuclear program in a bid to end Israel's air assault, but added that it was 'very late.' 'I said it's very late to be talking. We may meet. There's a big difference between now and a week ago, right? Big difference,' Trump added. 'They've suggested that they come to the White House. That's, you know, courageous, but it's, like, not easy for them to do.' When asked if it was too late for negotiations, he said: 'Nothing is too late.' Trump had favored diplomatic route to end Iran's nuclear program, seeking a deal to replace the one he tore up in his first term in 2018. But since Israel launched strikes on Iran six days ago Trump has moved in behind the key US ally and is now weighing whether to use US military power against Tehran too. Trump issued a series of bellicose statements on social media on Tuesday, saying that Iran's Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei was an 'easy target' and calling for Iran's 'UNCONDITIONAL SURRENDER!'. Khamenei said Wednesday the nation would never surrender and warned the United States of 'irreparable damage' if it intervenes. Asked on Wednesday what he meant by his earlier statement, Trump replied: 'Two very simple words. It's very simple – unconditional surrender.' 'That means I've had it, okay? I've had it. I give up, no more, we go and blow up all the nuclear stuff that's all over the place,' Trump said. Trump meanwhile backed Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu to continue Israel's offensive against Iran. Iran has hit back with salvos of ballistic missiles. Asked what he had told Netanyahu in a call on Tuesday, he said: 'Keep going. I speak to him every day, he's a good man, doing a lot.' The US president however rebuffed Russian President Vladimir Putin's offer to mediate in the Israel-Iran conflict, saying Russia should end its own war in Ukraine first. 'He actually offered to help mediate, I said 'do me a favor, mediate your own. Let's mediate Russia first, okay? You can worry about this later,' Trump said. Iran later denied it had offered to send officials to Washington. 'No Iranian official has ever asked to grovel at the gates of the White House,' Iran's mission to the UN said in a post on X. 'The only thing more despicable than his lies is his cowardly threat to 'take out' Iran's Supreme Leader.'

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store