King urged to seek Canadian apology for historical abuse of British children
King Charles and Queen Camilla are being urged to use their visit to Canada to seek an apology for the abuse of British children.
Campaigners have called on them to pursue an apology for the "dire circumstances" suffered by so-called "Home Children" over decades.
More than 100,000 were shipped from orphan homes in the UK to Canada between 1869 and 1948 with many used as cheap labour, typically as farm workers and domestic servants. Many were subject to mistreatment and abuse.
Canada has resisted calls to follow the UK and Australia in apologising for its involvement in child migrant schemes.
Campaigners for the Home Children say the royal visit presents a "great opportunity" for a change of heart.
"I would ask that King Charles uses his trip to request an apology," John Jefkins told Sky News.
John's father Bert was one of 115,000 British Home Children transported to Canada, arriving in 1914 with his brother Reggie.
"It's really important for the Home Children themselves and for their descendants," John said.
"It's something we deserve and it's really important for the healing process, as well as building awareness of the experience of the Home Children.
"They were treated very, very badly by the Canadian government at the time. A lot of them were abused, they were treated horribly. They were second-class citizens, lepers in a way."
John added: "I think the King's visit provides a great opportunity to reinforce our campaign and to pursue an apology because we're part of the Commonwealth and King Charles is a new Head of the Commonwealth meeting a new Canadian prime minister. It's a chance, for both, to look at the situation with a fresh eye.
"There's much about this visit that looks on our sovereignty and who we are as Canadians, rightly so.
"I think it's also right that in contemplating the country we built, we focus on the people who built it, many in the most trying of circumstances."
King Charles and Queen Camilla are on a two-day visit to Canada.
On Tuesday, the King will deliver the Speech from the Throne to open the 45th session of Canada's parliament.
Camilla was made Patron of Barnardo's in 2016. The organisation sent tens of thousands of Home Children to Canada. She took on the role, having served as president since 2007.
Buckingham Palace has been contacted for comment.
A spokesperson for the Canadian government said: "The government of Canada is committed to keeping the memory of the British Home Children alive.
"Immigration, Refugees and Citizenship Canada deeply regrets this unjust and discriminatory policy, which was in place from 1869 to 1948. Such an approach would have no place in modern Canada, and we must learn from past mistakes."
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Telegraph
35 minutes ago
- Telegraph
Public sector employment swells to highest level in 14 years
Public sector employment has surged to the highest level in 14 years as Rachel Reeves prepares to unveil a £300bn spending spree this week. Almost 6.2m people were employed in the public sector in March, official figures show, 35,000 more than a year earlier. This is the highest number of public sector employees since December 2011. The figures from the Office for National Statistics came ahead of Ms Reeves's spending review on Wednesday, which is expected to offer big increases to defence and health while squeezing other departments. The Chancellor has raised departmental spending by nearly £400bn since Labour won the election. It comes as economists have warned more tax rises are 'inevitable' in autumn. The figures from the ONS also show that the number of civil servants is the highest since 2006, at 550,000, rising by 6,000 from a year earlier. This helped to push the total figure of central government workers to a record high of 4m, up by 93,000 from a year ago. The ONS said the rise was driven by the NHS, the Civil Service and some local authority schools becoming academies, which changes how their staff are classified in the numbers. While public sector hiring surged, the jobs downturn across the economy deepened as firms grappled with big tax and minimum wage hikes. The number of vacancies fell from 760,000 on average across February to April to 736,000 for the three months to May.
Times
39 minutes ago
- Times
Reeves forced into U-turn over pensioner fuel payments
The U-turn, when it came, was even bigger than expected. Rachel Reeves decided to clear the decks before the spending review by announcing that nine million pensioners would receive winter fuel payments this winter. It was a move born of political necessity and that has little fiscal logic. When the chancellor announced that she was stripping ten million pensioners of the winter fuel allowance next year, she argued that it was fundamental to restoring economic stability. 'This is not a decision I wanted to make,' she said. 'Nor is it one that I expected to make. But these are the necessary and urgent decisions I must make. It is the responsible thing to do to fix the foundations of our economy and bring back economic stability.' On Tuesday, economists point out that the fiscal circumstances are, if anything, significantly worse. The reversal means that a policy intended to save £1.5 billion will now save only £50 million this year, at the expense of huge reserves of public goodwill and political capital. It will only add to pressure on the already ailing public finances. Paul Johnson, director of the Institute for Fiscal Studies, said the decision meant there would have to be tax rises or more cuts to welfare in the autumn budget. 'To suggest the fiscal situation has got a lot better flies in the face of reality,' he said. 'If they are saying this means there will not be any additional borrowing then it follows, as sure as night follows day, that this will mean they will need to raise the equivalent of an additional amount of tax.' It also means that Reeves has crossed another line. She had insisted that she would never make an unfunded spending pledge, arguing that to do so would be 'desperate and reckless'. That is exactly what she has now done, and the detail of how the about-turn will be paid for will be confirmed in the autumn budget. After the announcement on Monday, Reeves found herself trying to argue that she had been right in scrapping the universal payments in the first place while simultaneously trying to justify the change in position. It was not an easy circle to square. The decision was the result of a recognition in both No 10 and No 11 that cutting the allowance had been a mistake, although Reeves would not acknowledge that on Monday. During the local elections in May, Labour activists found the issue of winter fuel coming up again and again on the doorstep. Polling found that the decision was one of the main reasons voters deserted the party, whether they moved to Reform UK or to the Greens. • What to expect in Rachel Reeves's spend, spend, spending review Discussion about a reversal began in No 10 almost immediately, but was denied for weeks by the government. By the time Sir Keir Starmer was confronted over the 'toxic' policy by a succession of angry MPs at a meeting of the Parliamentary Labour Party three weeks ago, it was clear that the position was beginning to shift. However, concern that there was a lack of detail about what would replace the previous policy quickly made clear that the government could not wait long before setting out a replacement. Ministers were determined to introduce a means test to avoid paying 'a few hundred pounds to millionaires', and officials struggled to graft one on to ageing computer systems in the Department for Work and Pensions. Eventually, it became clear that HM Revenue & Customs would have to be used, clawing payments back from wealthier pensioners through the tax system. This meant that a wish to base payments on household incomes had to be abandoned, as the system assesses only individual incomes. Ministers picked a relatively high income, covering three quarters of pensioners, to make sure that no older people in poverty would lose out even at the cost of hundreds of millions of pounds. Theoretically, this means that the pensioner partner of a millionaire will receive a winter fuel payment of £100 if they have an income below £35,000 themselves, but ministers decided that this was a price worth paying for a rapid solution. For ministers who have spent months defending hugely unpopular cuts, there has been frustration about how much political capital was wasted for such tiny sums of money. • Rachel Reeves's winter fuel cut reversal is a sign of desperation Much of the blame is being pinned on Reeves. It was she who chose to press ahead with a cut long recommended by Treasury advisers but rejected as politically toxic by a succession of previous chancellors. Starmer nodded the decision through, however, despite the clear risk of a severe political backlash. He is said to have been surprised by the scale of the reaction. Ministers will be hoping that the turnaround is enough to quell public anger, which led Labour to slump in the polls. Sharon Graham, head of the Unite union, one of Labour's biggest donors, put it bluntly. 'While this is an important step forward, questions will be asked about how this disastrous decision was made in the first place — the damage may not easily be reversed,' she said. 'Leadership is about choices and the choice to pit workers against pensioners was simply wrong.'
Daily Mail
44 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
EXCLUSIVE Outrage as Trump's Education Department forced to pay $7 million per MONTH to 'idle employees'
The Department of Education is reportedly spending $7 million a month on employees who are not even working according to a shocking new report. The department has spent over $21 million on idle employees over the last three months per calculations made by the American Federation of Government Employees (AFGE) Local 252. Part of the employees collecting checks include those that accepted the Trump 'buyout' at the start of his second term. The Trump administration offered federal workers a chance to voluntarily vacate their government posts while remaining on the payroll for months, with many opting to get checks through September 2025. Congresswoman Marjorie Taylor Greene, chair of the Subcommittee on Delivering on Government Efficiency (DOGE) a subcommittee of the House Committee on Oversight and Accountability told the Daily Mail in that 'President Trump gave federal workers an incredible offer—8 months of pay to walk away. Hardly anyone gets that kind of deal.' 'But now, thanks to the courts, $7 million a month is being wasted on idle employees at the Department of Education. If the courts had respected the will of the American people when they voted for DOGE, we wouldn't be in this mess,' Greene continued. 'President Trump ran on cutting waste, fraud, and abuse from the federal government, which included defunding the Department of Education, and that's exactly what Americans voted for.' 'The people want DOGE cuts. The courts are forcing wasteful spending,' Greene concluded. Senator Joni Ernst (R-Iowa), who heads up DOGE government slashing efforts in the Senate told the Daily Mail in a statement that federal employees wasting taxpayer funds in such a manner is a 'complete slap in the face to the hardworking Americans footing the bill.' 'From attending Mardi Gras to engaging in union activities and even appealing creepy personal misconduct violations, federal employees have long abused paid administration leave to escape work,' Ernst stated. 'For years, I have exposed how do-nothing bureaucrats cost taxpayers millions every year. It is a complete slap in the face to the hardworking Americans footing the bill.' 'I am working with the Trump administration to undo the years of backwards bureaucratic policy in Washington to ensure that anyone collecting a taxpayer-funded paycheck is spending their day serving the American people,' Ernst added. Senator Ernst has worked to expose the billion dollar cost of do-nothing bureaucrats in her $2 trillion roadmap for the Trump administration to eliminate waste, fraud and abuse. Trump's education secretary Linda McMahon pushed during her confirmation hearing earlier this year for her Department to be completely shut down, a move in line with promises made by the president on the campaign trail last year. At her February confirmation hearing, McMahon noted that 'in conjunction with [Trump's] fervor to shut down the bureaucracy of the Department of Education, he has also stated that he will work with Congress to make that happen.' Back in February, the Trump administration also moved to decrease the size of the federal government by announcing a voluntary deferred resignation program for federal employees. An estimated 75,000 federal employees across agencies took the differed resignation offer under which they were promised to be paid and provided with benefits until September 30th, 2025 or until they accepted a new job. In March, the Department of Education cut nearly half of its workforce, a total of nearly 1,300 employees. After the reduction in DOE staffing levels was announced, Democrats on the House Committee on Oversight Government Reform and House Committee on Education and Workforce sent a letter to McMahon expressing their disapproval with the move. 'The approximately 1,300 employees who you wish to leave the Department are dedicated public servants who have devoted their careers to serving their country and ensuring that all students are able to learn and to thrive, regardless of race, gender, disability, or zip code,' the Democrats noted. 'Discarding thousands of civil servants without regard for their job performance is an attack on those hardworking and passionate individuals as well as our government and the critical services it provides,' they continued.
