Is pet insurance worth it? How to decide.
That's the gap pet insurance tries to fill: It helps you say yes to life-saving care without panicking about the cost. But it's not always straightforward. Policies can be full of fine print, and the value you get depends heavily on your pet and your finances.
Here's how to figure out when pet insurance is worth it — and when it might not be.
Learn more: How does pet insurance work? A complete guide.
'Pet insurance is ideal for pet owners who can afford a monthly premium but would find it a hardship to pay a large emergency bill all at once,' said Dr. Robyn Jaynes, director of veterinary affairs at PetSmart Charities.
If an unexpected vet bill would break your budget or force you to dip into savings meant for other goals, a pet insurance policy could allow you to make medical decisions based on what's best for your pet, rather than what you can afford.
'Most pet parents don't anticipate having to spend thousands of dollars up front on their pet's health,' said Dr. Amy Fox, doctor of veterinary medicine and author at Kinship, a pet parenting website. 'But when accidents happen like pets getting hit by cars, eating something they shouldn't, or breaking a bone, the medical bills can easily be thousands of dollars. Insurance can be a literal lifesaver when emergencies arise.'
Still, pet insurance may not be right for everyone. If your pet is older and has preexisting conditions or if you have the savings to cover big expenses out of pocket, paying for pet insurance may not make financial sense.
Learn more: The best pet insurance companies of 2025
Here are some of the biggest pros and cons to consider as you weigh whether pet insurance is worth it.
Pros
Can reduce the financial blow of unexpected emergencies
Can make difficult treatment decisions easier
Offers peace of mind against unexpected costs
Many coverage levels and policies to choose from
Cons
Monthly premiums can add up, especially if you don't use the insurance
Preexisting conditions typically aren't covered
You generally have to pay the vet bill up front and wait for reimbursement (unless your vet accepts direct payment)
Most policies have waiting periods, exclusions, and payout limits
Learn more: Pet insurance that pays the vet directly: How does it work?
Pet insurance isn't a guaranteed win, especially if your pet is older or already has health issues that will be excluded as preexisting conditions. Use these steps to think through whether it makes sense.
Could you afford an emergency pet surgery tomorrow? If not, pet insurance might be worth considering. A 2025 report from the North American Pet Health Insurance Association found that the average annual premium for accident and illness coverage is $749.29 for dogs and $386.47 for cats, potentially far less than a single major vet bill.
If you already have a healthy emergency savings account, you might prefer to self-insure. But remember: Tapping into savings could mean less money available for other emergencies or goals.
Some pets are more likely to rack up expensive vet bills than others, and insurance can be a better bet in those cases.
Start by talking to your vet because they can flag common conditions you might expect in the future based on your pet's age, breed, and health history.
'Generally, pet insurance is most helpful when you start it early, ideally when your pet is young and healthy,' said Fox. 'At this age, you'll get the most comprehensive coverage and avoid exclusions for preexisting conditions.'
Health history. If a condition develops or is diagnosed before you buy a pet insurance policy or during the policy's waiting period, it will generally be excluded from coverage as a preexisting condition. This can include arthritis, allergies, and chronic GI issues. That's why your pet's health history matters. If they already have ongoing issues when you buy pet insurance, coverage will likely be limited to only new problems.
Breed. Some breeds are prone to specific (and costly) health problems, like hip dysplasia in large dogs or respiratory issues in brachycephalic breeds such as pugs and bulldogs.
Lifestyle. Outdoor cats and active dogs are at higher risk for accidents and injuries, while indoor pets tend to face fewer emergencies, but can still develop chronic conditions over time.
'For pets that are not insured, expenses in their golden years can add up,' Fox said. 'This can strain finances or force pet parents to pick and choose between treatments.' But when pet insurance is already in place, she notes, it can help cover frequent visits, medications, and monitoring.
Learn more: Pets Best pet insurance review 2025
Veterinary care costs can vary widely depending on where you live. Understanding local costs can help you weigh whether paying a monthly pet insurance premium is worth it and less stressful than paying for an emergency out of pocket.
According to the Animal Urgent Care clinic in Dallas, here are some examples of their common vet costs:
Comprehensive lab work: $225
Laceration repair: $500-$1,500 and up
Toxicities: $500-$1,000
Heat stroke: $1,200-$2,000
Gastroenteritis: $500-$850
Feline urethral obstruction: $1800-$2,100
Before you buy, it's important to understand what pet insurance covers. While coverage will vary by policy, here's what you can typically expect.
Commonly covered:
Accidents (like broken bones, poisoning, or swallowing objects)
Illnesses (such as infections, cancer, arthritis)
Chronic conditions diagnosed after your coverage starts
Hereditary and congenital conditions
Emergency surgeries and hospitalization
Prescription medications
Diagnostic tests like X-rays
Often not covered:
Preexisting conditions (anything diagnosed before coverage begins)
Preventive care (unless you add a wellness plan)
Cosmetic or elective procedures (like ear cropping)
Breeding-related expenses
Behavioral therapy (sometimes available as an add-on)
Policies also have:
Annual coverage limits: This is the maximum the insurer will pay in a year. Some policies provide unlimited annual coverage.
Deductibles: This refers to the amount you must pay out of pocket toward vet bills before coverage kicks in.
Coinsurance: After the deductible is met, you're responsible for a certain percentage. For example, you might pay 20% of the bill, and insurance covers 80%.
Waiting periods: Many pet insurers require 14 days after enrollment before illness coverage begins, and longer for certain conditions like cruciate ligament injuries.
'Don't choose a policy with a particularly low ceiling of coverage,' advised Dr. Rebecca Greenstein, veterinary medical advisor for Rover. 'A broken leg can cost $4,000 to $6,000 to repair these days.' Having a maximum of around $2,000 in coverage can leave you with significant out-of-pocket costs.
Once you have a sense of your pet's potential needs and the typical vet costs in your area, it's time to shop around. Pet insurance prices will vary, even for the same type of coverage.
When gathering quotes, make sure you're comparing similar coverage options, such as:
Annual limit: $5,000, for example, or unlimited
Reimbursement rate: Usually 70%, 80%, or 90%
Deductible: Can be $250, $500, or $1,000
Greenstein recommends looking for policies with at least $5,000 to $10,000 in coverage per year and evaluating how deductibles and claim frequency may affect what you'll actually get back.
Here's a snapshot of how much a $5,000 annual coverage policy costs for a 1-year-old, mixed-breed dog:
Pets Best — Essential plan: $23.79
Lemonade: $24.32
Pets Best — Plus plan: $26.77
Pets Best — Elite plan: $27.50
Embrace: $35.24
Spot: $41.03
MetLife: $41.34
Figo: $41.84
Fetch: $43.11
AKC: $43.41
ASPCA: $43.42
Liberty Mutual: $45.03
Before you buy pet insurance, it's smart to do a little math.
'Be honest about your finances,' recommended Jaynes. 'It's worth talking to your vet openly. They can often suggest options, from payment plans to community clinics, if insurance isn't the right fit.'
Here's how to make an estimate:
Tally your expected premium costs. For example, if you pay $70 a month for a $5,000 annual coverage policy, that's $840 a year, or $4,200 over five years, assuming rates stay steady (but they often increase as pets age).
Factor in your deductible and reimbursement rate. Most plans reimburse 70%, 80%, or 90% of covered expenses after you meet your deductible (often $250 to $500), up to your policy's annual limit.
Now, compare that to potential vet bills. Here's what common emergencies could cost, according to ManyPets:
Broken bone: $3,000-$6,000
Cancer treatment: $5,100-$16,200+
Emergency hospitalization (per day): $800-$1,500
If you think you could comfortably cover one or more of these emergencies out of pocket, you might be fine self-insuring. But if a surprise bill would be financially devastating, pet insurance could be well worth the cost for the financial safety net.
Pet insurance isn't the only way to prepare for big vet bills. If you decide it's not the right fit, here are alternatives that could work:
Build a dedicated pet emergency fund. Instead of paying monthly premiums, you could set aside money in a high-yield savings account to cover unexpected vet bills.
Ask your vet about payment plans. Many veterinary offices offer payment plans directly through the practice or by partnering with financing companies to help spread out the cost of major procedures.
Use financing options like CareCredit. CareCredit is a healthcare credit card that many vets accept. It sometimes offers 0% interest for a promotional period, but if you don't pay it off in time, deferred interest can kick in at a higher rate. There are some 0% APR credit cards too. Just aim to pay it off before the interest-free window closes.
Research charitable funds and assistance programs. Nonprofits like RedRover Relief and resources listed by the American Veterinary Medical Association offer financial assistance for emergency vet care if you qualify.
There is no universally right answer to whether pet insurance is worth it. The key is to run the numbers, weigh your risk, and make a plan before you're in crisis mode.
Amy Danise and Tim Manni edited this article.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
9 hours ago
- Yahoo
5 annuity strategies for high net worth individuals
Most people who own annuities are middle class. Seventy percent of annuity owners had total annual household incomes under $100,000 with a median annual household income of $79,000, according to The Survey of Owners of Individual Annuity Contracts, conducted by Gallup in 2022, the most recent year available. While many annuity owners are solidly middle class, high-net worth people buy annuities, too. Mostly, they do so for the same reasons anyone else would: Guaranteed income for life, protection from market volatility and peace of mind in retirement. With an annuity, you hand over a lump sum or series of payments to an insurance company, and in exchange, the insurer promises a series of payments to you either now or in the future. They're often described as self-funded pensions. For those with high income and significant assets, annuities can play a more nuanced role in a larger wealth strategy — especially in the areas of tax planning, estate planning and asset protection. They can generate tax-deferred growth with no annual IRS contribution limits, shield assets from creditors and ensure a surviving spouse receives stable, long-term income. Here are several ways high-net worth individuals can use annuities strategically — and when you might be better off exploring other options. 1. Tax-deferred growth Once you've contributed the maximum to your 401(k), IRA, HSA and other tax-advantaged accounts, there aren't many places left to park money where it can grow tax-deferred. Additional funds are usually funneled into taxable brokerage accounts, but this can create a growing annual tax bill on interest, dividends and potentially capital gains. A nonqualified annuity — that is, one purchased outside a tax-advantaged retirement plan — can step in to fill that gap. They allow gains to grow tax-deferred and there's no annual IRS contribution caps. Insurance companies may cap how much you can contribute to a contract, but these limits are generally quite high, often ranging between $1 million and $3 million. However, keep in mind gains are subject to ordinary income tax when funds are withdrawn or payouts begin. If funds are accessed prior to age 59 ½, a 10 percent penalty from the IRS also applies. One option is a multi-year guaranteed annuity (MYGA), which functions like a CD but with tax deferral. Instead of receiving and paying tax on interest annually, you can delay taxation until the end of the term — potentially timing that income to land in a lower tax bracket. Variable and indexed annuities also offer tax deferral, although they come with market risk and higher fees. Still, for high earners looking to shelter additional growth outside retirement accounts, nonqualified annuities can be a potential option. Compare advisors: Bankrate's list of the best financial advisors 2. Income protection for a spouse In many relationships, one spouse takes the lead in managing investments and financial decisions. But if that person dies first, the surviving spouse may be left with a complex portfolio and little experience managing it. By choosing a joint life annuity, you can ensure payments continue for as long as either spouse is alive. It can help reduce the burden of financial decision-making for the survivor during an otherwise overwhelming transition. Of course, a life insurance policy can also provide for your spouse after you're gone, but annuities offer a distinct advantage over a lump sum life insurance payout, says Willie Jones, managing director of member success at DPL Financial Partners, an online annuities marketplace for fee-only advisors. 'Only annuities can set up a guaranteed income stream for the rest of their life,' says Jones. 'You can set up an annuity that covers at least their basic expenses for life, and have that built-in peace of mind.' 3. Protection from creditors and bankruptcy In several states — including Florida, Texas and New York — annuities offer strong protection from creditors. That means if you're sued or face bankruptcy, the cash value and income stream from your annuity are generally off-limits. Take Florida, for example. Under Section 222.14 of the Florida Statutes, the proceeds of annuity contracts issued to Florida residents 'shall not in any case be liable to attachment, garnishment or legal process' in favor of any creditor. This makes annuities a practical asset protection tool, especially for individuals with high legal risks and high incomes, such as physicians, business owners and real estate investors. It's important to note that protections vary by state and annuities shouldn't be relied on as a standalone solution to asset protection — or used for nefarious means. Annuities tend to work best as one component of a layered approach that might also include things like umbrella insurance, trusts and business entity structures. 4. Buying an annuity for your child For high-net-worth individuals, buying an annuity for a child or grandchild can be a strategic way to lock in long-term financial security for the next generation. It's a relatively low-maintenance way to transfer wealth, especially if you're wary of giving a lump sum to someone who may not manage it wisely. Compared to a spendthrift trust, an annuity can be a simpler, lower-cost way to create a lifetime income stream for an heir. A deferred annuity can gradually grow in value over time, for example, and eventually convert into monthly or annual payments for the beneficiary. But annuities are a long-term commitment. Once locked in, contracts are difficult to unwind without penalties. Fixed payments also may not keep pace with inflation, and your child's needs or your own financial goals could evolve over time. So, while annuities can be a powerful planning tool, they're best used as one part of a broader strategy. 5. Stretching an inheritance Before 2020, wealthy families could rely on a 'stretch IRA' strategy to pass wealth to the next generation in a tax-efficient way. Under the old rules, non-spouse beneficiaries could take required minimum distributions (RMDs) over their own life expectancy, allowing the assets to grow tax-deferred for decades. The Secure Act of 2019 largely eliminated that strategy. Now, most non-spouse beneficiaries must liquidate inherited IRAs within 10 years, which shortens the window of compounded growth and often results in higher tax bills for heirs. However, nonqualified annuities aren't subject to the same rule. Beneficiaries still get the option to extend their withdrawals over their own life expectancy. This 'stretch' provision spreads out taxes over a longer window while keeping assets invested. Non-spousal beneficiaries have one year from the owner's date of death to establish and begin receiving their annuity distributions. Miss that deadline, and a shorter five-year rule automatically applies. 'If you don't make the decision quickly, the decision is made for you,' says Jones. Why annuities don't make sense for every portfolio Despite the opportunities, annuities don't belong in every portfolio. In fact, they often don't make much sense for those at either end of the wealth spectrum — the ultra wealthy and lower-income households. For individuals with $30 million or more in assets, the core benefit of an annuity — guaranteed income — may be irrelevant. With ample cash flow and a myriad of assets, they can likely self-insure against market volatility and longevity risk. For this group, the relatively modest monthly income may simply not feel worth it. On the other end of the spectrum, individuals with limited assets or income may find annuities too expensive and restrictive. Many types of annuities require a sizable upfront investment, often $10,000 or more. And to generate any sort of meaningful monthly income in retirement, you'll likely need to put down much more than that — think $100,000 and up. That's capital some households simply can't afford to tie up, especially if access to emergency funds is a more pressing priority. And once money goes into an annuity, it can be hard to get out without facing surrender charges and/or tax penalties. For someone without much financial cushion, that loss of flexibility can be risky. Generally, the most appropriate use cases for annuities tend to fall somewhere in the middle. They can be a powerful tool for what's known as mass affluent households — people with assets ranging between $100,000 and $500,000 — who want to lock in future income, manage taxes or diversify their broader portfolio. So while billionaires might not view annuities as a go-to financial product, annuities can still fill important gaps for high-net worth clients that traditional investment accounts and retirement plans don't cover. Get started: Match with an advisor to help you achieve your financial goals Bottom line Ultimately, annuities are best viewed as one option in a toolkit — not a one-size-fits-all solution. When structured intentionally, they can defer taxes, safeguard wealth and create a predictable income stream. The key is to match the product with your specific need. Don't base your decision on income or net worth alone, but instead on your goals, risk tolerance and how much control you want over your money. Editorial Disclaimer: All investors are advised to conduct their own independent research into investment strategies before making an investment decision. In addition, investors are advised that past investment product performance is no guarantee of future price appreciation. Sign in to access your portfolio
The Hill
19 hours ago
- The Hill
Social Security at 90: Where the program stands and how to fix it
Social Security is a vital source of income for millions of Americans, but after 90 years, the program faces significant financial challenges that could reshape it for future generations. If Congress fails to act, retirees could see their monthly checks cut by 23 percent in less than a decade — slashing thousands of dollars from the average person's annual benefits. Lawmakers are unlikely to let that happen, but so far, they've opted to kick the can down the road, avoiding politically unpopular solutions and complicating eventual fixes. President Franklin D. Roosevelt (D) signed Social Security into law on Aug. 14, 1935, as a way to give 'some measure of protection to the average citizen and to his family against the loss of a job and against poverty-ridden old age.' Here's what to know about the state of the program 90 years later: How many people receive Social Security? Nearly 70 million people received Social Security benefits in July, with the average check totaling $1,863. Retired workers made up the largest share — roughly three-quarters, or about 53 million. The program also supports other groups: Nearly six million people received survivor benefits last month, while more than eight million collected disability insurance. Most people aged 65 and older receive the majority of their income from Social Security, making it a vital lifeline for millions of adults — and children — who would otherwise fall below the poverty line. Without Social Security benefits, 37 percent of older adults would have had incomes below the official poverty line in 2023 — instead, only 10 percent did, according to the Center on Budget and Policy Priorities. More Americans now expect to rely on Social Security than in the past. In a recent Gallup poll, 37 percent of non-retirees said it will be a 'major source' of income in retirement — up from 28 percent two decades ago. When Social Security benefits could be cut Social Security isn't going away, but in less than a decade, millions of Americans could see their monthly retirement checks shrink if Congress doesn't intervene. The program's retirement trust fund is expected to run out by 2033, at which point Social Security would only be able to pay 77% of promised benefits. For today's average retired worker, that would mean a cut of about $460 a month — more than $5,500 a year. That said, experts caution against claiming Social Security benefits early out of fear that the program may not be around in the future, as doing so results in permanently lower monthly checks. Federal lawmakers are expected to act before the cuts take effect, but the main concern is that the longer they wait, the more complicated the fix will become. Social Security is so widely supported that, until now, politicians have largely avoided moves that could prove unpopular with voters. The last major overhaul came roughly 40 years ago when the federal government gradually raised the full retirement age from 65 to 67. When that happened in 1983, Social Security insolvency was just months away. Why Social Security is facing a financial shortfall The program's financial shortfall largely stems from the nation's changing demographics, which have resulted in fewer workers supporting more retirees. In 2010, there were 43 million people age 65 and older, and by 2024, that number had grown to 59 million, according to the Peter G. Peterson Foundation. At the same time, the number of workers contributing to the program has fallen — from 2.9 covered workers per beneficiary in 2010 to 2.7 in 2024 — a ratio projected to decline further to 2.3 by 2044, the foundation said. That imbalance is a concern because Social Security is primarily funded through a payroll tax, which accounts for about 90 percent of the trust fund's income. Fewer workers mean less payroll tax revenue. The good news is that the demographic shift isn't a surprise, giving policymakers time to prepare. The bad news is that it's not easily reversed, and major policy changes may be needed to shore up the program for generations to come. Something else to keep in mind: Despite raising the income cap over time, a smaller share of wages is now subject to the payroll tax compared to the '80s and '90s. The portion of wages and salaries covered by the payroll tax has fallen to about 82 percent, down from 90 percent in 1983, according to the Tax Foundation. Part of that is due to a rise in employer-provided benefits, like health insurance, which is tax-deductible, and thus faces neither the income nor payroll tax, the Tax Foundation said. What can be done to fix Social Security? Lawmakers have a few options: increase Social Security revenue, reduce costs or, most likely, some combination of both. Democrats want to raise more money by making high earners pay Social Security taxes on income above the current cap. For 2025, the tax only applies to the first $176,100, so any earnings above that aren't taxed. Gradually increasing the payroll tax rate is another way to raise revenue. Right now, the Social Security tax rate is 12.4 percent total — split evenly between employees and employers at 6.2 percent each. The combined rate has been steady since 1990. While raising taxes is rarely popular, polling suggests boosting revenue is generally more acceptable to the public than cutting benefits. A 2024 Pew Research survey found that wide majorities of both Republicans (77%) and Democrats (83%) do not support Social Security benefit reductions. President Trump has repeatedly promised not to cut Social Security benefits and even suggested eliminating federal income taxes on retirement checks — though that move would worsen the program's financial shortfall. Like his predecessors before him, Trump has offered little concrete policy direction for fixing Social Security. Tech billionaire Elon Musk's efforts to root out widespread waste, fraud and abuse fell short of expectations and sparked significant confusion. Earlier this year, Brookings released a bipartisan blueprint for fixing Social Security. The proposal included tax-based revenue boosts like increasing the maximum taxable ceiling and raising the payroll tax from 12.4 percent to 12.6 percent. It also suggested benefit reductions, like increasing the retirement age for high earners, among other changes.
Forbes
2 days ago
- Forbes
The Hype Gap: Why Most Organizations Aren't Ready For AI At Scale
Most companies I speak to about AI leadership are stuck in what I call pilot purgatory: an endless loop of small AI experiments that never seem to scale. This feels weird because the AI hype is loud. While the headlines promise transformation, inside many organisations, there is little more than isolated sparks of innovation Recently, I spoke to a senior leader at a global manufacturer with cutting-edge capabilities and a generous R&D budget. On paper, this was precisely the kind of organisation you'd expect to be leading the AI charge. In reality: no strategy, no governance, no roadmap. AI activity was fragmented, driven by curious employees running unsanctioned experiments in corners of the business. Top leadership was interested in the benefits, but ROI was unclear, and it wasn't a priority. Even industries in AI's direct line of fire are holding back. Take the law. Legal work runs on words - drafting, reviewing, interpreting - exactly what generative AI does best. Yet uptake is slow. Recent research shows 47% of private practice lawyers say their firm is slow or very slow to adopt new tech, with only 18% calling themselves fast movers. A quarter of law firm employees believe failing to embrace AI could harm their career; 1 in 10 would consider leaving over it. Restraint is understandable. Powerful technologies have always taken time to transform the economy. James Watt patented his steam engine in 1769, but steam didn't overtake water power until the 1830s. Electricity took decades to replace steam in factories. I suspect leaders are waitng for others to blaze a trail they might follow more easily. But AI is moving far faster. It's advancing at speed and organisational readiness - strategy, governance, skills, culture - is lagging badly. Market leadership can be built in this gap, while laggards are left behind. Hype vs. reality Like a badly dubbed movie, Silicon Valley's instant-value promises don't match the real story on the ground (that AI will take time, effort and skilled change leadership): The hidden revolution: shadow adoption A Gallup poll shows 33% of senior leaders use AI frequently, compared to 16% of individual contributors. But McKinsey's data tells the other side of the story: employees are using AI far more than their bosses know. Microsoft and LinkedIn report that 75% of knowledge workers now use AI daily - half starting in the past six months - many without telling their managers. Some even pay for premium tools out of their pocket: BYOAI (Bring Your Own AI). Without leadership recognition and guidance, much of that learning stays locked in individuals. Worse, it creates compliance, security, and reputational risks. That's why I urge leaders I'm working with, especially mid-career ones who may feel a confidence gap, to experiment personally. Using AI yourself builds credibility, gives you a tangible example of change, and offers first-hand insight into how teams can use the technology. The real bottleneck: trust, not tech As with much digital transformation, the most significant friction isn't the technology. It's trust. Even the most accurate AI will be ignored if its outputs aren't understood or believed. Employees hesitate because they distrust the black box, lack transparency on data, or fear for their jobs. Without trust, adoption stalls. Why boldness wins History favours the early movers: • Retail: Tesco's Clubcard launched in 1995, locking in loyalty before Sainsbury's and others caught up. • E-commerce: Amazon went online in 1995; established retailers hesitated and fell away. • Cloud computing: Netflix moved to the cloud in 2008; Blockbuster stayed tied to physical infrastructure and collapsed. The LEAD framework: from hype to value Here is a simple checklist for moving from pilots to scaled impact: L — Locate the Power Users Find the people already experimenting with AI. Learn what's working.E — Experiment Yourself Use the tools personally. Run small pilots with clear measures. Learn alongside your team.A — Acknowledge and Reward AI Talent Recognise those driving results. Promote them, learn from them, and make them role models.D — Define New Performance Measures Shift metrics from volume and speed to quality, originality, and strategic value. Right now, most organisations are still at the AI starting line. Those who adopt early - with strategy, governance, skills, and trust - will build compounding advantages in productivity, innovation, and market insight. The leaders who close the hype gap will be the ones who treat AI not as a plug-in technology, but as a culture shift they lead from the front.
