logo
City of Ekurhuleni coffers indicate improvement

City of Ekurhuleni coffers indicate improvement

The Citizen07-05-2025
City of Ekurhuleni MMC of Finance Jongizizwe Dlabathi said the city is on the path to financial recovery, with encouraging signs of progress in revenue collection, expenditure control, and cash flow management.
However, while significant strides have been made, he acknowledges that the road to full financial health is far from complete.
A recently released report reflecting the city's financial performance for the third quarter of the 2024/25 financial year signals a shift from past fiscal instability toward improved governance and accountability.
ALSO READ: City of Ekurhuleni calls for water conservation at car washes
'When I assumed responsibility for leadership and oversight of the finance portfolio, the city was facing a concerning financial trajectory, exemplified by a staggering R3.1 billion under-collection in electricity sales during the 2023/24 financial year.
'This was due to a lack of strategic focus. Our primary objective has since been to drive financial recovery by rebuilding effective revenue systems and enhancing operational efficiency,' said Dlabathi.
Encouraging revenue gains
One of the most notable developments is the improved revenue collection in the electricity sector, which had previously suffered major shortfalls.
The city reduced its electricity revenue under-collection from R2 billion in the first quarter to R417 million by the third quarter.
ALSO READ: City of Ekurhuleni responds to alleged R65m worth of unused inventory
This improvement is closely linked to increased meter reading accuracy, which rose from 76.2% to 85.9%.
Efforts to curtail interim billing—especially among large power users—have also yielded results.
The number of interim electricity readings dropped from 1904 to just over 1000, demonstrating a commitment to accurate, accountable billing practices.
Financial discipline paying off
On the expenditure front, the city has reinforced financial discipline.
ALSO READ: City of Ekurhuleni says medication was not stolen in Klopperpark Clinic robbery
Operational spending dropped by 19% in the third quarter, with no overspending on bulk electricity purchases or consumables.
While overtime spending remains an area of concern, a council resolution is in place to reduce these costs by half going forward.
The city has also managed to stabilise its cash flow.
Cash on hand increased to 22 days—double what it was in the first quarter—reducing the city's reliance on overdraft facilities.
All bulk service invoices, totalling R3.1 billion, have been settled, and repayment plans with Eskom and Rand Water are progressing without default.
Addressing long-term debt
ALSO READ: City of Ekurhuleni urges for water conservation this National Water Week
Dlabathi said that despite the improvements, the city faces a daunting debt landscape.
Outstanding consumer debt has reached R30.9 billion, with households responsible for over 76% of the amount owed.
In response, the city has intensified its credit control campaigns and launched the Debt Relief and Rehabilitation Incentive Programme, which offers up to 70% write-offs for qualifying historic debt.
'To date, more than 6,300 residents have applied for the programme—an encouraging sign that the city's message is resonating,' expressed Dlabathi.
Restoring trust and accountability
The city's leadership has attributed much of the past fiscal decline to strategic missteps, such as the misallocation of the meter reading function, which was previously moved from the Energy Department to ICT.
This decision has since been reversed to restore accountability and operational integrity.
Independent forensic investigations are ongoing into allegations of account manipulation and meter tampering—issues that had previously eroded public trust and undermined revenue.
Additionally, capital spending, currently at just over 50% of the total capital budget, will be bolstered by increasing the maintenance allocation in the 2025/26 draft budget.
ALSO READ: City of Ekurhuleni says R21 bus was roadworthy
Call to action
'While financial indicators are stabilising, the city is calling on all residents, businesses, and government departments to meet their payment obligations.
'Non-payment undermines our ability to deliver services. Sustainable service delivery relies on consistent revenue collection,' said Dlabathi.
He said the city is not out of the woods yet, but the tide is changing course.
'The city's financial picture is improving, with key metrics showing positive movement.
'Yet, the task ahead remains substantial. Continued fiscal discipline, enhanced service delivery, and community co-operation will be critical in ensuring the city's long-term financial resilience,' he added.
ALSO READ: Demands made for City of Ekurhuleni manager to step down
Executive endorsement
Executive Mayor Nkosindiphile Xhakaza praised Dlabathi for the work he has been doing.
'These are not just numbers; they are evidence that the city's recovery is real, governance is being restored, and trust is being earned through action—not demanded by title.
'We are under no illusions about the scale of the work ahead, but the direction is right and the momentum is building,' said the mayor.
He said his executive is committed to taking the city back to its former glory.
'We remain resolute, energised, and focused, because the people of Ekurhuleni deserve nothing less—and because the renewal of our public service must be more than a promise; it must be a lived reality in every department, every ward, every day,' said Xhakaza.
At Caxton, we employ humans to generate daily fresh news, not AI intervention. Happy reading!
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Investec Witness Admits Contradictions in Rushil Singh Fraud Trial
Investec Witness Admits Contradictions in Rushil Singh Fraud Trial

The Star

time7 hours ago

  • The Star

Investec Witness Admits Contradictions in Rushil Singh Fraud Trial

During the ongoing fraud trial of Rushil Singh, a key Investec employee testifying for the State admitted under cross-examination that Singh was not directly involved in the alleged fraud. This acknowledgment challenges a central aspect of the prosecution's case, which is based on Singh's position as CEO of BIG and assumptions about his knowledge of the loan witness initially testified that the financial guarantee involved in the case was 'cash backed.' However, under questioning by the defense, he conceded that this was incorrect. 'The guarantee was not, in fact, cash backed,' the witness said. He further explained that no contractual agreement explicitly required the guarantee to be backed by cash. 'There was an assumption that the guarantee was cash backed, but there is no documentary proof to support this,' he added. This admission weakens the prosecution's argument that Singh knowingly engaged in fraudulent activity related to the guarantee. The witness also contradicted himself multiple times during cross-examination. When reminded that he was under oath, he responded, 'No man is infallible.' The defence highlighted these inconsistencies to question his credibility. Compounding these issues, the court heard that the original R20 million guarantee issued by Stanbic Bank was initially cash backed and included a conditional clause confirming this security. However, it was Investec that requested the removal of this clause, transforming the guarantee from a secured instrument to an unsecured one. 'The original Stanbic guarantee was secured, but Investec itself asked for the security to be removed,' the defence argued, raising concerns about Investec's internal oversight and defense further emphasized that Singh's involvement is based on presumption rather than evidence. 'The State's own witness conceded Rushil Singh was not directly involved,' the defence said. 'Singh's implication rests solely on the assumption that he must have known about a cash backing requirement, a notion without contractual or factual basis.'Adding to the scrutiny of Investec's role are allegations that several Investec employees received personal benefits from Nishani Singh, related to the loans. The Star has learnt of a new man on the story, referred to as Mr X reportedly received monthly payments of R19,000 through a shell company registered in his name from December 2020 to October 2021 — the period during which the loan agreements were being structured and finalized. Mr X. also received a lump sum payment of R70,000 in August 2020 and may have received a R2 million contribution towards his Pretoria home's construction. After resigning from Investec in June 2021, he joined BIG as a director with a reported monthly salary of R300, other bank employees were linked to questionable benefits. Mr X.2 received two Sandton City gift vouchers worth R10,000 each, given during active loan negotiations. Mr X.2 was given a fully paid Sun City trip in December 2016. The defence suggests these benefits breached banking ethics and could constitute inducements.

Investec Witness Admits Contradictions in Rushil Singh Fraud Trial
Investec Witness Admits Contradictions in Rushil Singh Fraud Trial

IOL News

time7 hours ago

  • IOL News

Investec Witness Admits Contradictions in Rushil Singh Fraud Trial

During the ongoing fraud trial of Rushil Singh, a key Investec employee testifying for the State admitted under cross-examination that Singh was not directly involved in the alleged fraud. This acknowledgment challenges a central aspect of the prosecution's case, which is based on Singh's position as CEO of BIG and assumptions about his knowledge of the loan witness initially testified that the financial guarantee involved in the case was 'cash backed.' However, under questioning by the defense, he conceded that this was incorrect. 'The guarantee was not, in fact, cash backed,' the witness said. He further explained that no contractual agreement explicitly required the guarantee to be backed by cash. 'There was an assumption that the guarantee was cash backed, but there is no documentary proof to support this,' he added. This admission weakens the prosecution's argument that Singh knowingly engaged in fraudulent activity related to the guarantee. The witness also contradicted himself multiple times during cross-examination. When reminded that he was under oath, he responded, 'No man is infallible.' The defence highlighted these inconsistencies to question his credibility. Compounding these issues, the court heard that the original R20 million guarantee issued by Stanbic Bank was initially cash backed and included a conditional clause confirming this security. However, it was Investec that requested the removal of this clause, transforming the guarantee from a secured instrument to an unsecured one. 'The original Stanbic guarantee was secured, but Investec itself asked for the security to be removed,' the defence argued, raising concerns about Investec's internal oversight and defense further emphasized that Singh's involvement is based on presumption rather than evidence. 'The State's own witness conceded Rushil Singh was not directly involved,' the defence said. 'Singh's implication rests solely on the assumption that he must have known about a cash backing requirement, a notion without contractual or factual basis.'Adding to the scrutiny of Investec's role are allegations that several Investec employees received personal benefits from Nishani Singh, related to the loans. The Star has learnt of a new man on the story, referred to as Mr X reportedly received monthly payments of R19,000 through a shell company registered in his name from December 2020 to October 2021 — the period during which the loan agreements were being structured and finalized. Mr X. also received a lump sum payment of R70,000 in August 2020 and may have received a R2 million contribution towards his Pretoria home's construction. After resigning from Investec in June 2021, he joined BIG as a director with a reported monthly salary of R300, other bank employees were linked to questionable benefits. Mr X.2 received two Sandton City gift vouchers worth R10,000 each, given during active loan negotiations. Mr X.2 was given a fully paid Sun City trip in December 2016. The defence suggests these benefits breached banking ethics and could constitute inducements.

Eskom may face Competition Commission
Eskom may face Competition Commission

eNCA

time8 hours ago

  • eNCA

Eskom may face Competition Commission

JOHANNESBURG - The South African Independent Power Producers Association is pushing back against Eskom. READ: Energy Action Plan | Flipping the switch on power monopoly SAIPPA is considering laying a complaint to the Competition Commission against the power utility for inviting larger power users to enter into long-term energy purchase agreements. The association considers the move anti-competitive as Eskom will now be able to sell solar energy generated at the utilities old power stations to larger power users. The agreements range from five to 25 years for a minimum of 10 mega watts. Energy expert, Professor Vally Padayachee, gave eNCA his insight on this issue.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store