
How Underinvestment Is Starving Grocery Stores And Feeding Wall Street
A new report on Kroger and Albertsons reveals the stunning impacts of continued underinvestment and understaffing in retail stores, all while stock buybacks and Ecommerce losses have skyrocketed. Commissioned by a group of retail and wholesale unions currently in contract negotiations, Bullies At The Table surveys employees across stores in three states and underscores how customers and retail workers are paying the price for the misguided priorities of two of America's largest grocery chains.
Kroger and Albertsons are, respectively, the second and third largest U.S. grocery chains (after Walmart) and employ 28 percent of U.S. grocery workers. Both grocers rank in the top three in market share across dozens of metro areas where they operate, including significant dominance in Seattle, Chicago and much of California. A federal judge recently blocked a two year long, billion dollar attempt by the two chains to merge. Kroger's longtime CEO resigned in March and the CEO of Albertsons retired in early May. Both companies face significant headwinds in the grocery industry, including impending tariffs, competitive pressures from non-union discounters and specialty chains, and a slowdown in consumption driven by years of price increases. Albertsons management in particular has disclosed to investors concerns about the company's longterm fiscal health and retail readiness.
Grocery workers surveyed in Bullies At The Table cited understaffing and pay that was not commensurate to their work as major concerns at the chains, while the amount of work they have to complete during their shift has continued to increase. Their stores are also unable to provide good customer service, with tasks such as the regular cleaning and maintenance of equipment also going uncompleted. Surveyed workers also said that product sits in their stores' backrooms because there are not enough staff to stock store shelves.
Marshay Clark, a bakery clerk at a Safeway in South Auburn, Washington stated, "They've been cutting hours, and they've been expecting us to fit eight hours' worth of work into these shorter, five and half or six-hour shifts. As the only person in my household who earns an income, I'm struggling to get by and I'm more stressed at work."
The 2003-2004 Southern California grocery strike and lockout was a turning point in the fortunes for such Kroger and Albertsons workers. Since that time, scheduled hours dropped by eleven percent, actual buying power of hourly wages decreased five percent, weekly earnings declined by fifteen percent and the pay gap between the earnings of grocery workers and their counterparts in all other industries jumped from thirty two percent in 2003 to fifty percent in 2024. The result is that fifteen percent of nonsupervisory workers at the two chains receive Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) benefits.
More than four-fifths of surveyed workers are unable to pay basic living costs and more than two-thirds do not have secure housing, while more than nine out of ten workers reported price gouging at their stores, that their company is raising prices higher than production costs. As a consequence, customers cannot afford to buy the healthy foods they used to. Such pricing moves have helped drive profitability and record shareholder payouts across the food industry over the last four years.
While employee real wages and spending power dropped off, Kroger and Albertsons' sales and profits skyrocketed. Between 2019 and 2024, Kroger's net income and operating income grew by over 92 percent and 99 percent, and Albertsons' net income and operating income grew by over 108 percent and 122 percent. And from 2018 and 2022, Kroger and Albertsons took a combined $15.8 billion in cash out of their businesses and sent it to shareholders in the form of stock dividends and buybacks. The report documents that as a result, 'capital expenditures for stores have declined as a share of sales and reduced the capacity of these companies to sustain operations into the future… Kroger and Albertsons have sought to fund payments to Wall Street by lowering labor costs and underinvesting in infrastructure.' The two companies also announced over $10 billion in additional buybacks in 2024 after their failed merger.
Ecommerce, including the Kroger-Ocado partnership, has been a loss leader for both chains and drag on profitability. The report estimates that Kroger's profits would have been 43 percent higher and Albertsons profits would have been 31 percent higher without the losses from Ecommerce.
In order to fund Wall Street payouts and compensate for these Ecommerce losses, both Kroger and Albertsons reduced staffing levels in stores. In 2023, Kroger reported 14.1 percent fewer labor hours per store than in 2019 and Albertsons' reported 13 percent lower staffing levels. and this potent combination of market dominance and cost cutting has been well-received by investors. In that timeframe, the value of Kroger and Albertsons' stock increased at a faster rate than the U.S. stock market as a whole.
"I juggle multiple roles—opening check stands, managing self-checkout, unloading pallets—while the front end falls apart. We're working with a skeleton crew, yet CEOs give billions to shareholders instead of investing in our stores," said Paszion Horner-Smith, a front-end supervisor at Vons in Granada Hills. "Customers wait in 35-minute lines, endure frustrating self-checkouts, and even abandon full carts out of sheer frustration," she added.
Bullies At The Table was partly underwritten by trade unions representing 65,000 grocery workers whose current contract expired on March 2, 2025 and are fighting for 'living wages, affordable healthcare benefits, a reliable pension, and more staffing and better working conditions for a better customer experience'. The report picks up where a previous study of Kroger's business model left off. This 2022 survey commissioned by UFCW found that over three quarters of Kroger workers were food insecure and fourteen percent were housing insecure. A 2018 leaked internal Kroger report showed that hundreds of thousands of company workers relied on food stamps and other public benefits in order to make ends meet. The 2018 report also coincided with that year's launch of the Kroger Zero Hunger Zero Waste. The source who leaked the 2018 report noted that the company leveraged such initiatives while suppressing wages in order to deliver higher returns for Wall Street, reinforcing the inequality that causes hunger. A recent survey by Food Chain Workers Alliance illustrated that the crisis of food insecurity and poverty among food workers is widespread and severe. Frontline food workers were 93% more likely to be food insecure than non-food workers, with nearly one in five frontline food workers being insecure and food workers 60% more likely to rely on SNAP.
For grocery clerks, whose workdays revolve around food and whose livelihoods are dependent on how much food their customers can afford, Bullies At The Table documents a case both of insult to injury and Robin Hood in reverse: grocers cutting hours, underinvesting in stores, suppressing wages, and raising prices to boost earnings and shareholder payouts, while taxpayers pick up the tab of increased food insecurity and medical needs. These two powerhouse retailers' business models and priorities have gone far afield of what they ostensibly should be doing: providing well-staffed stores and affordable, healthy food to their customers, with living wages and fulfilling jobs to their staff. While executives and investors have done quite well, retail workers and store customers alike deserve so much better.
The author did not receive responses to requests from comments from Kroger and Albertsons.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Forbes
25 minutes ago
- Forbes
What The CPI Inflation Numbers Mean For The Future
The Consumer Price Index numbers for May came out on Wednesday. The seasonally adjusted number was up 0.1% in May, a drop from April's 0.2%. except for March, it was the lowest monthly inflation figure since July 2024. Over the last 12 months, inflation was 2.4% before seasonal adjustment. There is volatility over time, but also a downward trend line, even if it hasn't dropped fast enough for people's tastes. Below is a graph from the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis, showing year-over-year comparisons. Year-over-year changes in the CPI Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis The news was good, at least in theory and at a high level. At a more detailed look, perhaps not. Other issues — tariffs, rising deficit spending, and spending cuts for important common good activities — combine with inflation to create greater uncertainty in the near future and the potential for a recession. Here Are The CPI Details That Affect You CPI at the headline level sounds good. Details are, on the whole, more discouraging. Here are some product categories where inflation was much higher: All are necessities, if not for everyone, for many millions. Other items helped keep the headline inflation down: The moderating factors don't necessarily remove the burden of the items with greater inflation, depending on how households spend and experience inflation. Near Future Effects On Inflation 'Shelter and energy are going to keep the disinflation trend intact,' wrote Jamie Cox, managing partner for Harris Financial Group, in a note. 'Prices are moving down in two of the largest categories, so investors should expect further declines in inflation in the coming months. 'However, CPI remains above 2% and even though the tariff rates are going to be less than originally feared, after they are implemented, they will further increase the cost of goods,' wrote Chris Zaccarelli, chief investment officer for Northlight Asset Management, in a second note. 'Because of this and the tariff pause that's scheduled to be lifted next month, we are still cautious, but many of the risks that were present in early April, appear to be receding at this time.' As Oxford Economics noted, the May CPI data have been 'encouraging, but unlikely the new norm.' For example, the administration announced a temporary trade truce — again — with China following talks in London. This time, tariffs will be 55%. That's a blended number and includes 20% tariffs on fentanyl, a 10% reciprocal tariffs, and then an average 25% for tariffs already in place before this year, according to a MarketWatch report. The congressional spending bill is likely going to send spending and the deficit up, which will also provide inflationary pressure. While the headline numbers sound like a reprieve, it probably won't be ultimately.


Bloomberg
37 minutes ago
- Bloomberg
Top Meat Processor JBS Delays Start of New York Trading by a Day
The world's largest meat packer JBS NV delayed the start of trading of its shares in New York by one day, the company said in a regulatory filing The move comes after the company couldnt't conclude certain operational procedures necessary for the listing. Shares are now expected to start trading on Friday.


CNET
41 minutes ago
- CNET
Yes, an iPhone Could Cost More Than $2,200 With Tariffs. Should You Buy One Now?
Tariffs could soon raise the price of iPhone. James Martin/CNET President Donald Trump announced he has made a deal with China, which could potentially affect the cost of a new iPhone -- but maybe not as much as you think. "WE ARE GETTING A TOTAL OF 55% TARIFFS, CHINA IS GETTING 10%," Trump said in a post on Truth Social, noting that he and China's president, Xi Jinping, still need to give their final approval for the deal. However, 55% "total" tariff incorporates 30% the countries agreed to in May (10% "reciprocal tariff" + 20% "fentanyl tariff") and approximately 25% from tariffs that Trump imposed on China during his first term, according to a White House official. Although 55% is substantially less than the original 145% tariff against China Trump originally put in place, it's still likely to result in higher prices for many items, said Michael Coon, associate professor of economics at the University of Tampa. And the new tariff deal doesn't take into account the 25% smartphone tariff Trump announced shortly after Apple said it was moving production of US iPhones to India. "I would suspect that the 25% smartphone tariff would be added on top of the existing tariffs in China," he said. "I think the smartphone tariff is more reaction to India -- Apple's announcement that they were going to ship most of their production to India." Apple didn't mention tariffs during its Worldwide Developers Conference this week, but with the rumored iPhone 17 due for a price hike -- regardless of tariffs -- is now the time to buy a new iPhone? Read more: Thinking About Buying a New iPhone? Here's Why You Should Wait How much could tariffs raise iPhone prices? We do the math Companies don't always pass the full tariff onto customers in the form of higher prices, but they can. Even if Apple could absorb some of the costs, you should expect to see significant price jumps if tariffs take effect. "They're still going to probably pass 80% to 90% onto consumers, if they can," Coon said. "Unless they wanted to do some sort of marketing ploy out of it, which I don't suspect they would want to do, because that would be directly going up against the administration." Based on the current tariff rate, iPhones manufactured in China are already subject to a 25% tariff (from Trump's first term), but could now get an additional 30% tariff. Goods from India currently have a 10% baseline tariff but that could potentially soar to 26% next month. Here's how the current tariffs and potential 25% Apple tariff could affect the price of the iPhone. These figures are based on our estimates and not confirmed by Apple: How much could iPhones made in China cost after tariffs? Current price With new 30% tariff New tariff + 25% smartphone tariff iPhone 16e (128GB) $599 $779 $928 iPhone 16 (128GB) $829 $1,078 $1,285 iPhone 16 Plus (128GB) $929 $1,208 $1,440 iPhone 16 Pro (128GB) $999 $1,299 $1,548 iPhone 16 Pro Max (256GB) $1,199 $1,559 $1,858 iPhone 16 Pro Max (1TB) $1,599 $2,079 $2,478 How much could iPhones made in India cost after tariffs? Current price Current 10% tariff Potential 26% tariff Potential 26% tariff + 25% smartphone tariff iPhone 16e (128GB) $599 $659 $755 $904 iPhone 16 (128GB) $829 $912 $1,045 $1,252 iPhone 16 Plus (128GB) $929 $1,022 $1,171 $1,403 iPhone 16 Pro (128GB) $999 $1,099 $1,259 $1,508 iPhone 16 Pro Max (256GB) $1,199 $1,319 $1,511 $1,810 iPhone 16 Pro Max (1TB) $1,599 $1,759 $2,015 $2,414 Based on Coon's estimates that Apple could pass along up to 90% of the tariff cost to customers, that could raise the price of a new iPhone 16 Pro Max (1 TB) assembled in China to $2,230. "Estimates say it would cost $3,500 to produce an iPhone in the US. So, it would still be cheaper to produce in China," Coon said. There's a lot more that goes into the price of an iPhone than simply where it's assembled. Apple sources components for its products from a long list of countries, which could face higher tariffs after the pause. And a tariff on goods doesn't necessarily mean prices will increase by the same amount. If companies want to stay competitive, they could absorb some of the costs to keep their prices lower. Apple did not respond to a request for comment. When could we see iPhone prices increase? It's unclear exactly when prices could go up, but if companies sell out of devices produced before the tariffs, they may have to increase prices on products in tariffed shipments. However, even if Apple can't avoid tariffs entirely, it has ways to offset the impact through its services -- including its music, news and data plans -- according to supply chain expert Joe Hudicka. "Apple will likely absorb some of the tariff costs up front to keep sticker prices stable, then pass the rest on to consumers gradually through service bundles, device longevity and ecosystem upgrades," he said. "Consumers will still pay, just not all at once." And regardless of how the tariff drama plays out, the Wall Street Journal reports that Apple plans to raise iPhone prices later this year. So expect prices to go up soon. Is it better to buy an iPhone and other tech now or wait? If you already planned to buy a new smartphone, buying it now might save you money. But if you don't need a new phone immediately, you might want to wait, said CNET Managing Editor Patrick Holland, who's been reviewing phones for CNET since 2016. "If iPhone prices rise, know that, like cars, the prices for used iPhones will likely rise, too," he said. "If Apple does raise its prices, you'll likely get more for your old iPhone when you trade it in, and that should offset any increased prices." If you don't have the cash on hand and are considering using a credit card or buy now, pay later plan just to avoid tariffs, make sure you have the money to cover the costs before you start accruing interest. With credit cards' average interest rates currently more than 20%, the cost of financing a big purchase could quickly wipe out any savings you'd get by buying before prices go up because of tariffs. "If you finance this expense on a credit card and can't pay it off in full in one to two months, you'll likely end up paying way more than a tariff would cost you," said Alaina Fingal, an accountant, founder of The Organized Money and a CNET Money Expert Review Board member. "I would recommend that you pause on any big purchases until the economy is more stable." One way to save on Apple products, even if prices go up, is to buy last year's model instead of the newest release or a used one. And trading or selling a used one can help offset the cost even more. "Apple has leaned into that with its Certified Refurbished program, much like the auto industry's used car model," Hudicka said. "This program helps extend the lifespan of devices, keeping customers in the Apple ecosystem longer while distributing the cost impact over time." Buy or Wait Guide: How Tariffs Will Change Tech Prices and What to Do Next Buy or Wait Guide: How Tariffs Will Change Tech Prices and What to Do Next Click to unmute Video Player is loading. Play Video Pause Skip Backward Skip Forward Next playlist item Unmute Current Time 0:00 / Duration 0:30 Loaded : 79.36% 0:00 Stream Type LIVE Seek to live, currently behind live LIVE Remaining Time - 0:30 Share Fullscreen This is a modal window. Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window. Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Opacity Opaque Semi-Transparent Text Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Opacity Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Caption Area Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Opacity Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Drop shadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps Reset Done Close Modal Dialog End of dialog window. Close Modal Dialog This is a modal window. This modal can be closed by pressing the Escape key or activating the close button. Close Modal Dialog This is a modal window. This modal can be closed by pressing the Escape key or activating the close button. Buy or Wait Guide: How Tariffs Will Change Tech Prices and What to Do Next