China's firms must integrate to succeed abroad, executives say at ‘Summer Davos'
Chinese companies should relocate their entire manufacturing ecosystems – rather than just completing the assembly of goods in another country – to solidify their overseas expansions, industry insiders said during the Annual Meeting of the New Champions in Tianjin.
With uncertainty over global trade on the rise in the second term of US President Donald Trump, Chinese companies will look to strengthen the resilience of their supply chain by building factories in new markets, either for export or local sale, said Ben Simpfendorfer, partner and chief Asia-Pacific macro strategist at consulting firm Oliver Wyman.
'We're moving to a world where tariffs are generally higher. Trade tensions will worsen – not just between China and the US, but potentially between other countries as well,' said Simpfendorfer on Tuesday during the
World Economic Forum event, also known as 'Summer Davos'.
'In order to avoid tariffs entirely … we actually might see a larger part of the Chinese ecosystem move abroad.'
China's manufacturers began relocating their supply chains overseas during Trump's first term. To mitigate the fallout from his tariff increases, they started building plants in Southeast Asia and gradually expanded their footprints to countries like Mexico and Morocco.
But Washington does not want these countries to become reliable bypass routes for Chinese products. Under Trump's initial
'Liberation Day' tariff package , unveiled on April 2, some countries in the Association of Southeast Asian Nations (Asean) would have been subject to higher duties than China.
They avoided this fate after the US paused those higher rates for 90 days to placate global markets, instead applying a 'baseline' 10 per cent increase to nearly all its trading partners.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
South China Morning Post
an hour ago
- South China Morning Post
Why can't Hong Kong invest in a Formula One race?
Feel strongly about these letters, or any other aspects of the news? Share your views by emailing us your Letter to the Editor at [email protected] or filling in this Google form . Submissions should not exceed 400 words, and must include your full name and address, plus a phone number for verification Advertisement The Thai government has approved a US$1.2 billion bid to host a Formula One race in Bangkok in 2028. This decision is not merely a bold move; it embodies vision and, most importantly, potential benefits to Bangkok and the rest of Thailand. As spectators in the same region, we in Hong Kong find ourselves overshadowed once again by our neighbours. What measures could we take in response? Typically, the reaction might be that we need not emulate others since we possess unique advantages that are incomparable. However, this stance may overlook the broader implications of regional dynamics and the benefits of active participation in high-profile international events. The crux of the matter lies in our belief system regarding government spending : is the Thai government justified in investing a billion dollars with the expectation of substantial returns? Advertisement
South China Morning Post
an hour ago
- South China Morning Post
US lawmakers blast ‘Enter the Dragon' hearing's anti-China ‘conspiracy' theories
Democrats accused Republicans of pushing conspiracy theories about China in a clash on Wednesday over Beijing's role in the US energy sector – days ahead of a potential Senate vote on a tax bill that would penalise American companies for having financial relationships with Chinese energy businesses. The fiery exchanges began at the outset of a hearing of the Senate Judiciary Committee, with Republican Senator Ted Cruz of Texas alleging that China's Communist Party was 'funnelling millions of dollars' into environmental lawsuits against US fossil fuel companies. Cruz highlighted the non-profit Energy Foundation China, a non-profit headquartered in San Francisco with an office in Beijing, citing its members' ties with the Chinese government and ruling party. 'This is not remotely a grass-roots non-profit. It is a foreign policy weapon disguised as philanthropy run by Communist Party operatives,' he said. Democrats were quick to push back on his claims, with Rhode Island's Sheldon Whitehouse, ranking member of the subcommittee on federal courts and oversight, lodging his own accusations. 'This hearing is a perfect display of projection: blaming your adversary for what you are doing. Dark money? Judicial capture? Propaganda? Oh my! The fossil fuel industry would have nothing to do with those things,' he said pointedly.
South China Morning Post
an hour ago
- South China Morning Post
Hong Kong stocks slip as HKMA currency intervention stokes rate concerns
Hong Kong stocks retreated from a three-month high as property developers and lenders slumped after the monetary authority intervened in the currency market and mopped up liquidity, threatening to push up local interest rates. The Hang Seng Index fell 0.5 per cent to 24,348.08 at 10.03am local time on Thursday. The Hang Seng Tech Index gained 0.3 per cent. On the mainland, the CSI 300 Index and the Shanghai Composite Index both slipped 0.1 per cent. Sun Hung Kai Properties tumbled 3.8 per cent to HK$89.50 while peers Henderson Land lost 3.7 per cent to HK$27.60. HSBC slipped 0.3 per cent to HK$95.35, Bank of China (Hong Kong) weakened 0.8 per cent to HK$4.72 and ICBC fell 0.6 per cent to HK$6.41. The Hong Kong Monetary Authority (HKMA) sold US$1.2 billion and bought the equivalent worth of Hong Kong dollars at HK$7.85 during New York trading hours on Wednesday. It was the first move since 2023 to prevent the currency from weakening beyond the weak side of its trading band. It had forewarned that the intervention would stoke local interbank rates and make property financing more expensive. Other tech leaders also declined, surrendering some of their best gains this week. Alibaba Group Holding fell 2.4 per cent to HK$112.70 and Tencent Holdings slipped 0.4 per cent to HK$510.50. New Oriental Education and Technology slumped 4.1 per cent to HK$42.55, giving up some of the previous gains spurred by a JPMorgan rating upgrade.
