Trump's attorney general drops fraud case tied to Covid vaccinations
WASHINGTON : US Attorney General Pam Bondi on Saturday dropped a case against a Utah doctor accused of falsifying Covid-19 vaccination certificates and destroying more than US$28,000 worth of government-provided Covid-19 vaccines.
Bondi, in a statement posted on X, said Michael Kirk Moore Jr of Salt Lake County, Utah, did not deserve the jail time he was facing. Moore was indicted by a federal grand jury in 2023, and his trial had begun earlier this month.
'Dr. Moore gave his patients a choice when the federal government refused to do so. He did not deserve the years in prison he was facing. It ends today,' Bondi said.
Covid-19 vaccine sceptics have been embraced by the Trump administration. The Pentagon, for example, has sought to re-enlist servicemembers who were ousted for refusing to be vaccinated during the pandemic.
Health secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr, who for decades has sown doubt about the safety of vaccines contrary to evidence and research by scientists, wrote on X in April: 'Dr. Moore deserves a medal for his courage and his commitment to healing!'
According to a 2023 statement from the US attorney's office in Utah, Moore allegedly ran the false certifications out of a plastic surgery centre. His activities allegedly included administering saline shots to minors, at the request of their parents, so the children would think they were receiving Covid-19 vaccines, the statement said.
Marjorie Taylor Greene, a US lawmaker from Georgia and staunch Trump supporter, had championed dropping the case against Moore, who she called a hero in a statement on Saturday.
'We can never again allow our government to turn tyrannical under our watch,' she said in a post on X.
The latest move by Bondi comes amid scrutiny of her firings of senior justice department officials who worked on investigations into Trump, stoking accusations of political retribution in a department whose mission is to enforce US laws.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Malay Mail
6 hours ago
- Malay Mail
Why Trump's push for a 1pc Fed policy rate could spell trouble for US economy
WASHINGTON, July 14 — US President Donald Trump says the Federal Reserve should set its benchmark interest rate at 1 per cent to lower government borrowing costs, allowing the administration to finance the high and rising deficits expected from his spending and tax-cut bill. Trump should be careful what he wishes for. A Fed policy rate that low is not typically a sign that the US is the 'hottest' country in the world for investment, as Trump has said. It is usually a crisis response to an economy in serious trouble. The US economy isn't in that kind of trouble now. But with near-full employment, ongoing economic growth and inflation above the US central bank's 2 per cent target, the super-low interest rates Trump seeks could easily backfire if investors in the US$36 trillion (RM153 trillion) Treasury market saw such a move as meaning the Fed had caved to political pressure and cut rates for the wrong reasons. Congress tasked the Fed with maintaining stable prices and full employment, not making deficit spending cheap, and slashing rates in the current environment could well reignite inflation. 'I am not necessarily convinced that ... if the Fed tomorrow decided we are cutting to 1 per cent, that this would have the traditional impact on long-term interest rates. The bond market fear would be that inflation would reignite and essentially we would have a loss of Fed independence and a de-anchoring of inflation expectations,' said Gregory Daco, chief economist at EY-Parthenon. Though there is 'scope to ease' from the current 4.25 per cent-4.50 per cent range, it is nothing like the magnitude of cuts Trump envisions, he said. Daco, noting the unemployment rate is 4.1 per cent, the economy is growing around 2 per cent and inflation is about 2.5 per cent, said: 'From a data perspective there is not anything to suggest the need for an immediate and substantial lowering.' Is 1 per cent normal? A 1 per cent Fed policy rate has not been uncommon in the last quarter of a century, but is no sign of good times, coinciding with joblessness of 6 per cent or higher. Former President George W. Bush governed at a time when the rate was 1 per cent. It occurred shortly after the US invaded Iraq in 2003 and at the end of a string of Fed rate cuts following the dot-com crash and the September 11, 2001, attacks on the US Former President Barack Obama inherited a near-zero Fed policy rate when he took office in January 2009. He also inherited a global financial crisis. Trump himself got the same near-zero interest rate treatment from the Fed in the last months of his first term in the White House - when the Covid-19 pandemic shut down the economy. What the Fed controls, and doesn't While hugely influential, the Fed has limited tools to influence the economy in normal times. US central bankers meet typically eight times a year to set what is called the federal funds rate. Only banks borrow overnight at that rate, but it is a benchmark for other credit, influencing everything from corporate debt to home mortgages, consumer credit cards, and Treasury yields. Perhaps as importantly, it shapes expectations about where rates are headed. While closely correlated with the Fed's policy rate, those other rates are not set directly by the central bank. There's always a spread, including for what's been top of mind for Trump: the interest rate on US Treasuries. Supply, demand and risk Global trading across an array of markets ultimately determines those other rates. A foreign pension fund's demand for Treasuries or mortgage-backed securities, for instance, influences what Americans pay for a mortgage or the US government pays to finance its operations. Supply and demand are critical. US government debt supply is determined by spending and tax levels set by the president and Congress. The federal government typically spends more each year than what it receives in tax collections and other revenue, and Treasury covers that annual deficit with borrowed money, issuing securities due in as few as 30 days to as long as 30 years. All things equal, larger deficits and more accumulated debt mean higher interest rates. Deficits and debt are expected to rise following the passage in Congress earlier this month of Trump's 'One Big Beautiful Bill Act.' On the demand side, the US enjoys a privileged position that holds down government borrowing costs since it is still considered a relatively risk-free investment with plenty of supply, deep and well-functioning markets and a history of strong institutions and legal norms. Current returns above 4 per cent are particularly attractive for large pension funds or retirees who want income while being assured their investment is safe. But, like any borrower, the US government must pay a premium for the risk an investor takes on. Locking up money in a 10-year Treasury note means other opportunities are foregone. Rates of interest, inflation and economic growth may all change in that span, and investors want compensation for those risks. With the Fed policy rate as a starting point, all of those factors are piled on in the form of a 'term premium.' Intangibles, like trust in a country's institutions, also matter. When Trump's threats to fire Fed Chair Jerome Powell intensified in April, yields rose and the president backed off - a sign that global markets have an important vote in central bank independence. Is Fed policy out of line? Trump recently sent Powell a handwritten note with a list of central bank rates and penciled in where he thought the Fed's policy rate should be, near the bottom. US central bank policymakers say it would be risky to cut rates until it is clear that Trump's new tariffs - many already imposed and more still to come - aren't going to stoke inflation. Central bankers often refer to policy formulas or rules that relate their inflation target to incoming and forecasted economic data to point to an appropriate interest rate. None suggest a Fed policy rate as low as Trump wants. — Reuters
Free Malaysia Today
6 hours ago
- Free Malaysia Today
Several killed in blaze at senior living facility in Massachusetts
About 50 firefighters tackled the fire at the Gabriel House assisted living facility. (EPA Images pic) FALL RIVER : Multiple people died and many more were injured after a fire broke out at an assisted living centre in the city of Fall River, Massachusetts yesterday, a spokesman for the US state's fire department said today. 'We are withholding the exact number pending updates on some patients' conditions. This is a terrible tragedy for the city of Fall River and the families involved. Our hearts are with them this morning,' Massachusetts fire department spokesman Jake Wark told Reuters in an emailed statement. Wark said that about 50 firefighters responded to the incident and tackled the fire at the Gabriel House assisted living facility. Firefighters rescued numerous occupants, but multiple residents were declared dead at the scene, while many others were transported to hospitals, he added. The origin and cause of the fire are under investigation.
Free Malaysia Today
6 hours ago
- Free Malaysia Today
Trump teases ‘major statement' on Russia ahead of Nato talks
US President Donald Trump is seeking to negotiate an end to the three-year Ukraine war. (AP pic) JOINT BASE ANDREWS : US President Donald Trump is hosting the Nato chief in Washington today after teasing a 'major statement' on Russia's war in Ukraine, with senior Republicans preparing an arsenal of sanctions against Moscow. Trump, seeking to negotiate an end to the three-year war, has expressed growing impatience with Kremlin leader Vladimir Putin, and over the weekend announced a fresh weapons cache for Ukraine. 'We will send them Patriots, which they desperately need,' Trump said yesterday, referring to the air defence system. He did not specify how many weapons he would send, but added that he would make a 'major statement… on Russia' today, when Nato secretary-general Mark Rutte will be in Washington. The White House has U-turned from an announcement earlier this month that it would pause some arms deliveries to Kyiv, instead announcing a new deal which would involve Nato purchasing some US weapons to send to Ukraine. In a statement, Nato said Rutte will be in Washington today and tomorrow and will also meet with defence secretary Pete Hegseth and secretary of state Marco Rubio. Rutte's 10am Oval Office meeting today will be closed to media. 'We basically are going to send them various pieces of very sophisticated military and they're going to pay us 100% for them,' Trump said. 'It'll be business for us,' he added. Trump also repeated that he was 'disappointed' in Putin, as he grows increasingly exasperated with the Russian leader. 'Putin really surprised a lot of people. He talks nice and then he bombs everybody in the evening,' Trump said, as he returned from watching the Fifa Club World Cup final in New Jersey. Last week, Trump accused Putin of throwing 'bullshit' at Washington on Ukraine, openly frustrated with the impasse on peace efforts. As he began his second stint in office in January, Trump insisted he could work with the Russian leader to swiftly end the war in Ukraine, and held off on hiking sanctions, unlike Kyiv's European allies. But Russia has for months refused a ceasefire proposed by the US and Ukraine. Trump has hinted he might be ready to slap sanctions on Moscow as momentum grows for a deterrent package in congress. When asked about whether he would announce any levies against Russia, Trump responded: 'We're going to see what we will see tomorrow, okay?' and repeated plans to meet with Rutte. 'Sledgehammer' Republican senators meanwhile are touting a bipartisan bill that would arm Trump with a 'sledgehammer' to use against Russia. The sanctions bill would allow Trump 'to go after Putin's economy, and all those countries who prop up the Putin war machine', Republican senator Lindsey Graham told broadcaster CBS news. It 'would give president Trump the ability to impose 500% tariffs on any country that helps Russia', said Graham, adding that those could include economies that purchase Russian goods like China, India or Brazil. 'This is truly a sledgehammer available to president Trump to end this war,' said Graham. Graham and Democratic senator Richard Blumenthal were also due to meet Nato's Rutte today. Blumenthal told CBS news they would also discuss the legally thorny issue of unlocking frozen Russian assets in Europe and the US for access by Ukraine. 'The US$5 billion that the US has also could be accessed, and I think it's time to do it,' said Blumenthal. Zelensky said the proposed bill 'is exactly the kind of leverage that can bring peace closer and make sure diplomacy is not empty'. The Kremlin has previously said that sending arms to Ukraine would only prolong the conflict. Putin launched the full-scale invasion of Ukraine in 2022 and has shown little appetite for ending the conflict despite pressure from Trump. Over the summer, Russia has escalated its offensive and advanced the frontline, launching some of the largest missile and drone attacks of the war.
