Israeli settlers kidnap two Palestinian children, tie them to a tree
The incident occurred in the afternoon, as a group of children were playing near their homes on the outskirts of Beit Furik, east of Nablus. A group of settlers approached and abducted the two children.
Local residents managed to catch up with the settlers and rescue the children. However, the boys remain in a distressed psychological state.
Mohammed Hanani, the children's uncle, told Middle East Eye that his two daughters and their cousins were playing outside their home when a group of settlers arrived from a newly established outpost built on the town's land.
The settlers kidnapped 13-year-old Maryam and her three-year-old brother Ahmed, taking them to a remote area where they tied them to an olive tree. One of their cousins tried to intervene but settlers attacked him with stones.
New MEE newsletter: Jerusalem Dispatch
Sign up to get the latest insights and analysis on Israel-Palestine, alongside Turkey Unpacked and other MEE newsletters
"My two little girls came crying and screaming, so we chased after the settlers. We eventually found the children unconscious and tied to a tree," he said, "The settlers had fled to the outpost on an ATV. We untied the children and rushed them to the health centre," he added.
While the children did not sustain physical injuries, they remain in a state of extreme terror and psychological distress.
"My daughter, who witnessed the incident, still refuses to leave the house and cries all the time."
Alarm bells
This is the first reported incident of settlers kidnapping children in the town, which has faced repeated attacks since the establishment of the new settlement outpost following the start of the war on Gaza.
Hanani said that in recent months, settlers had torched his car and the truck he uses for work, set fire to his crops and repeatedly attacked his home with stones.
Israel is arbitrarily jailing Palestinian children in record numbers. This must stop Read More »
"All of this material damage is being compensated, but kidnapping and assaulting children sets off alarm bells and puts our lives in direct danger," he said.
According to Hanani, the aim of these attacks is to force Palestinians off their land and out of their homes, clearing the way for settlers to take over the area.
The Israeli army was not present at the scene at any point during the incident, residents said, though it responds quickly if settlers are threatened anywhere in the West Bank.
In July 2014, Israeli settlers kidnapped Palestinian teenager Mohammed Abu Khdeir from the town of Shuafat in occupied East Jerusalem. They took him to a forested area, where they tortured him before burning him alive.
Settler attacks on Palestinians and their property in the West Bank have intensified under the current extreme right-wing government. The highest rates of land confiscation, assaults on landowners, livestock theft and the establishment of settlement outposts have been recorded since this government took office in 2022.
What sets this government apart is the level of support and encouragement it provides to settlers, whether through supplying them with weapons or funding the creation of new outposts. This backing has enabled and emboldened settlers to carry out attacks on Palestinians, with the aim of displacing communities and annexing their land.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The National
an hour ago
- The National
Gaza aid ship with 1,200 tonnes of food nears Israeli port
Israel demands release of all 50 hostages in any Gaza deal, Israeli broadcaster says Katz approves Israel's takeover of Gaza City Ceasefire proposal 'almost identical' to Witkoff's plan, says Qatar At least 62,004 Palestinians killed and 156,230 wounded in Gaza since war began
The National
an hour ago
- The National
Hamas seeks Israeli pullback of 800 metres from homes in Gaza truce deal
Hamas said on Wednesday that its main proposed amendment to the latest draft of a ceasefire agreement is for Israeli forces to withdraw more than 800 metres from residential areas in Gaza. The announcement followed Israel's demand for the release of all 50 hostages held in the Palestinian territory, contradicting the current proposal for a phased release and dimming hopes for a last-ditch truce. Israel has yet to formally respond to the ceasefire proposal put forward by Qatar and Egypt, which Hamas has agreed to. A senior official in the Palestinian militant group told The National Hamas thinks Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu 'will not agree' to the new draft. He said the previous terms 'proposed withdrawals to a depth less than what the movement demanded, but Hamas insisted on Israeli withdrawal of more than 800 metres from residential areas'. The official confirmed that Hamas has also accepted that it won't govern Gaza, but insisted that the Palestinian Authority cannot rule the Strip alone. 'Hamas does not object to Gaza being administered by a body of local professionals, and governing the Strip is not a priority for Hamas. But the Palestinian Authority has not engaged positively, and if it seeks to rule Gaza alone, that will not succeed,' he said. Qatar on Tuesday urged Israel to accept a 60-day truce to avert a 'humanitarian catastrophe' in the strip. Hamas accepted the proposal, which would provide for the initial release of 10 hostages. Local media reports say Israel will give a formal response by Friday. 'What Netanyahu is doing in Gaza is an attempt to humiliate Hamas, to break the movement, and to force it to accept his terms,' said the official, adding that 70 per cent of Gaza is now under Israeli occupation. Comprehensive agreement Qatar said the proposal that Hamas has agreed to is 'almost identical' to an earlier plan put forward by US special envoy Steve Witkoff. Israel had previously agreed to the outline of the Witkoff plan, but withdrew negotiators from Qatar last month and blamed Hamas for the failure to reach a deal. Since then, it has approved plans for a new offensive to seize Gaza city, forcing renewed efforts to stop the war. On Wednesday, Israeli Defence Minister Israel Katz approved the Gaza city occupation plan. 'We received the response, as we said, from Hamas. It was a very positive response,' Qatari Foreign Ministry spokesman Majed Al Ansari said on Tuesday. 'However, we are still, of course, awaiting the Israeli side's response to this proposal.' He added that while there was no time frame for a response, Israel was looking into the matter and 'we hope for a quick and positive response'. The proposal includes a path to a comprehensive agreement to end the war, Mr Al Ansari said. According to sources close to the negotiations, Hamas has agreed to lay down and store its weapons under international supervision. It has also agreed to the deployment of an Arab force in Gaza under UN supervision to maintain security. The sources said Hamas told Qatari and Egyptian mediators that it has dropped its condition for a written US guarantee on negotiations with Israel over a complete withdrawal from Gaza, and for the ceasefire to continue until such an agreement is reached. Of the 251 hostages taken during the Hamas-led attacks on Israel that sparked the war, 50 are still in Gaza. Hamas and other factions killed 1,200 Israelis in the assault on October 7, 2023, according to Israeli authorities. Since then, Israel has killed more than 62,000 Palestinians in its war on Gaza, mostly women and children, according to the enclave's health authorities.
The National
4 hours ago
- The National
Normality on the streets, anxiety in the air: Tehran's people fear peace is illusory, renewed war inevitable
As the smoke of war clears over Iran, the scent of saffron once again fills the aisles of Tehran's Tajrish bazaar, where life appears to be back to normal almost two months after the conflict with Israel ended. The capital's jammed streets, bustling malls, reopened cafes and renewed festivals paint a picture of recovery. Yet, under the skin, Iranians are grappling with jitters of a conflict that could reignite at any moment. 'Yes, things are very much normal. We travel, we work, and listen to music. But every day I check the news with my heart in my throat,' Fereshteh Naeemi, a 34-year-old shopkeeper in the Tajrish bazaar, told The National. 'One day Israel threatens; the other day Iran says something. I try to stay away from the news, but it's inevitable. Everyone's talking about it. We live with this stress every day.' Iranians are not only faced with the continuous war of words between Israel and Iran, but also the economic pressures and security reshuffles that reflect Tehran's efforts to regroup and prepare for a possible return to fighting. Meanwhile, the country's leadership is doing everything to project normality. State broadcaster IRIB has dropped its wartime analysis shows and resumed routine programming. The supreme leader's latest address was delivered standing – rather than seated as usual – to symbolise resilience and survival. And perhaps most strikingly, the absence of morality police on the streets is seen as an attempt to rally different voices under the banner of national unity. But to many Iranians, these moves feel staged rather than organic. 'It feels like the 1980s' When Iranians woke up on June 13 to massive blasts in the heart of Tehran – scenes they had only seen in Syria, Lebanon and Gaza – they concluded it was finally Iran's turn. Israel, which for years had branded Iran as the 'head of the snake' of the so-called Axis of Resistance, had unleashed its strikes. It was over, many thought. Iran was caught off guard – not just its air defences, but people's psyche and above all, the economy. Prices skyrocketed. Food inflation surged by 50 per cent and some items, including bottled water, vanished off supermarket shelves as families scrambled to flee big cities, especially Tehran. The government moved quickly to stabilise prices and prevent unrest. It worked, and the focus rapidly shifted back to the war itself. Fast-forward to after the war, as Tehran's residents trickled back and were confronted by new prices. Bread and rice had doubled, gold soared and the rial collapsed past 900,000 to the US dollar. Meanwhile, property sales across the capital slumped amid fears that the conflict would resume. 'It feels like the 1980s again,' Hossein Javanzadeh, a 63-year-old taxi driver who remembers the Iran-Iraq war, told The National. 'Back then, too, everyone stopped buying houses. All they wanted was dollars and gold. It's the same now. Nobody knows what's coming next.' Iran's nuclear policy reflects the same duality. Its leaders maintain deliberate ambiguity – projecting their programme's resilience while simultaneously signalling an openness to dialogue. Military reshuffle Deep underground, uncertainty is even greater. Key atomic sites, including Natanz with its 60 per cent enrichment capacity and the heavily fortified Fordow facility, were struck by Israel and the US. While surface damage is visible in satellite imagery, the impact on underground infrastructure remains unclear. Both Iran and the US agree the strikes slowed enrichment, but Iran says it had removed its 400kg of highly enriched uranium beforehand. Since the end of the conflict, no media, even state outlets, have been allowed access to the underground facilities. Observers say this ' strategic ambiguity ' allows Iran to shield itself from war while keeping diplomacy on the table. 'Iran's playing a skilful game of shadowboxing with its nuclear plans,' Iran-based journalist and commentator Amir Jaber says. 'It talks about surviving the strikes but hides its wounds, telling the west: 'Come talk, but don't expect to peek inside yet.' 'It buys Tehran time to rebuild and maybe push its nuclear programme further, but it's risky. If Israel and the US think Iran's too close to dangerous enrichment levels, they might skip talks and decide to strike again.' In the wake of unprecedented losses among Iran's top brass, the fiery anti-Israeli speeches once delivered by commanders have fallen silent, giving way to a new rhetoric that mixes defiance with pragmatism. Tehran has also moved to reshuffle its command structure. The creation of a Supreme National Defence Council, chaired by President Masoud Pezeshkian, shows that Iran's security architecture needed reshaping. The decision to reappoint Ali Larijani as head of the Supreme National Security Council further underscores a push for synergy in command should war reignite. Overall, Iran's military movements are silent, but they carry the unmistakable scent of war, which is detected not only on military bases but also mingles in the saffron-scented streets of Tehran. 'We must be prepared at every moment for confrontation. Right now, we are not even in a ceasefire [agreement]; we are in a cessation of hostilities,' said First Vice President Mohammad Reza Aref this week.
