logo
Trump's tariffs cannot stop clean energy revolution – but they will hurt American businesses

Trump's tariffs cannot stop clean energy revolution – but they will hurt American businesses

Independent03-04-2025

President Donald Trump 's sweeping new tariffs have rattled global markets and sparked fears of trade wars that could affect everything from consumer prices to climate goals.
As economists warn of inflation and industry leaders brace for higher costs, there are fears that the ripple effects could show in sectors like clean energy, where supply chains depend heavily on global trade.
The new Trump policy imposes a universal 10 per cent tariff on almost all imported goods, with higher 'reciprocal' rates targeting some of the biggest trading partners of the US.
China faces a 34 per cent rate, South Korea 25 per cent, Japan 24 per cent, and India 26 per cent. These countries happen to be the world's leading exporters of solar panels, batteries, wind components, and electric vehicles.
In the US, business leaders and economists warn that these tariffs will fuel inflation and raise prices on everything from food and toys to wine and solar panels.
Former vice president Mike Pence called the tariffs "the largest peacetime tax hike in US history", estimating that the new measures could cost American families over $3,500 a year.
Tariffs imposed during Mr Trump's first term were largely passed on to consumers and analysts said they were expecting a similar outcome this time.
"Trump's tariffs won't slow the transition to renewables, they'll only hurt ordinary people, particularly Americans," Andreas Sieber, associate director of policy and campaigns at 350.org, told The Independent.
"His record tells a different story than his claims: tariffs are tanking US stocks and fueling inflation."
The renewable energy sector is already facing headwinds in the US, with developers lately reporting shortages of critical equipment like transformers, switchgear and circuit breakers.
The new tariffs are expected to worsen the shortages and push up the costs of infrastructure such as wind turbine towers and transmission lines, many of which rely on imported steel and components.
Albert Gore, executive director of the Zero Emission Transportation Association, told the Associated Press that the tariffs introduce "uncertainty and risk into an industry that is creating jobs and bringing new economic opportunities across the country."
The cost pressures come at a time when US power demand is climbing, driven by electrification and data centre growth.
While US industries may struggle to absorb the shock, the global clean energy transition is expected to continue largely unaffected.
That's because the US is no longer central to the international clean tech trade. China, which dominates the manufacturing of solar, wind and EV components, sends only 4 per cent of its clean tech exports to the US, down from much higher levels a decade ago.
"The global clean energy landscape has undergone a seismic shift," Sieber told The Independent. "A decade ago, developed economies dominated solar and wind installations. Today, the US is just 7 per cent of the global solar market. In this global surge, the US is increasingly a footnote."
On the other hand, emerging and developing economies are expected to account for 70 per cent of solar PV deployment, 60 per cent of wind, and 60 per cent of battery storage by 2030, according to the International Energy Agency. Many countries have already adjusted their supply chains to minimise exposure to US policy volatility.
India, for instance, may see short-term benefit from the tariff differential with other Asian peers.
"There are multiple layers of impacts that need to be factored, domestic markets, export effect, and currency effect. India is currently still better positioned compared to Asian peers. While short term, there may be some impact on the GDP and local currency, in the long term, we expect businesses to adapt and continue innovating to build further resilience,' Nakul Zaveri, partner and co-head of Climate Investment Strategy at LeapFrog Investments, said.
'The country's energy demand will be at an all-time high and we see that as an opportunity for further accelerating the adoption of domestic non-fossil energy sources within the energy mix. Overall we see India continue to be a bright spot among EMs and present policy stability in a volatile environment."
Some analysts warned that Mr Trump's tariffs could have secondary effects in developing economies. 'The US is pressuring India to raise tariffs on Chinese green tech as part of ongoing trade negotiations,' Alicia García-Herrero, chief economist for Asia-Pacific at Natixis, said. 'If that happens, it could make clean energy imports more expensive for India.'
Although global supply chains are unlikely to be fundamentally disrupted, there is a potential for ripple effects if countries retaliate or if prices of certain goods rise due to a reshuffling of demand. But most analysts agree that the transition is well underway, and no single country can hold it back.
Mr Trump has framed the tariffs as an act of economic self-defence, arguing that for decades, allies and rivals alike have taken advantage of the US. But critics across the political spectrum have voiced concerns that the move will isolate their country and undermine its economic and climate ambitions.
"Trump likes to say he gets economic policy, but his record during his first term and the first weeks of his second term speak a very different language," Mr Sieber said.
"He cannot stop the energy transition, he will mostly harm ordinary people in the US having to pay higher prices."

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

For Trump, solving Ukraine won't be as easy as Iran
For Trump, solving Ukraine won't be as easy as Iran

Spectator

time24 minutes ago

  • Spectator

For Trump, solving Ukraine won't be as easy as Iran

For the moment, at least, the world seems to be going Donald Trump's way. Instead of setting the Middle East ablaze, Trump's air strikes on Iran's nuclear facilities have been met by a single, casualty-free Iranian counterstrike on the US's al-Udeid Air Base in Qatar. And though Tehran described the attack as 'mighty and successful', it emerged that Iran had actually warned the Qatar authorities in advance of the strikes – a message that they immediately passed on to the Americans. At the Nato summit in the Hague this week, European leaders lined up to support Trump's demand that they 'pay their way' and boost their defence spending to 5 per cent of GDP. European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen hailed the new defence bonanza as an opportunity to boost European innovation and announced a 'Rearm Europe' plan to mobilise €650 billion (£554 million) in defence investment. Every Nato member state (except for Spain) signed up to the new 5 per cent target – even though for most members that figure entails doubling, or in some cases tripling, defence budgets. Trump came to office promising to be a peacemaking president Nato's secretary-general Mark Rutte even sent Trump an effusive note praising his strikes on Iran. 'Mr President, dear Donald, Congratulations and thank you for your decisive action in Iran, that was truly extraordinary, and something no one else dared to do,' gushed Rutte in language apparently intended to mirror Trump's own bombastic tweeting style. 'Donald, you have driven us to a really, really important moment for America and Europe, and the world,' continued Rutte. It was not easy but we've got them all signed onto 5 per cent! You will achieve something NO American president in decades could get done. Europe is going to pay in a BIG way, as they should, and it will be your win. It was a very different reaction to the last time Trump addressed a Nato summit in London back in 2019. Then, a hot-mike moment caught Canadian prime minister Justin Trudeau, British premier Boris Johnson, French President Emmanuel Macron and – yes – Mark Rutte, then-Dutch prime minister sniggering over Trump's lateness. Trump was so incensed by the mockery that he flew home early, but not before blasting Trudeau as being 'two faced' and criticising him for failing to meet Nato's spending benchmark – then a mere 2 per cent of GDP. Remarkably, Trump's order to both Israel and Iran to cease fire after twelve days of massive bombardments seems to be holding. More impressive still is that both sides immediately began to violate the ceasefire but were immediately brought to heel by hard words from the White House. That leaves just one major fire on Trump's foreign policy horizon that's still burning: Ukraine. As he was campaigning for the presidency, Trump vowed that he would stop the conflict 'within 24 hours'. In practice, three months of intensive negotiations both by Trump envoys and by phone direct with Putin have yielded nothing but weasel words from the Kremlin. At the same time, the White House's relationship with the Ukrainians reached rock bottom after Volodymyr Zelensky's train wreck meeting with Trump and Vice President J.D. Vance in the Oval Office in February was followed by a freeze on US arms and funding to Kyiv. But the Nato summit seemed to yield some positive news for Ukraine, too. Trump was photographed, beaming, beside Macron and Zelensky – whom he described as 'a nice guy'. When a Ukrainian reporter asked Trump about the US providing air defence systems, the President asked her about where her husband was – and on learning that he was a soldier, he said, 'I wish you a lot of luck, I can see it's very upsetting to you.' He also promised to send 'some' Patriots to Kyiv, noting that the US needed them and so did Israel. But most significantly, Trump blocked Putin's attempt to pivot away from Ukraine by publicly squashing the Kremlin's offers to mediate between Washington and Iran. 'I've spoken to Putin. I said no, I don't need help on Iran,' Trump told reporters. 'Do me a favour, help with Russia.' Trump's hard words for Putin were a welcome sign to Ukrainians that the White House does retain some scepticism about Putin's hollow claims to be serious about peace. At the same time, though, Trump's team made it clear that they saw talks, not military aid, as the only solution to the conflict. '@POTUS has been abundantly clear the Russia-Ukraine war must end,' tweeted Secretary of State Marco Rubio. 'There is no military solution, only a diplomatic one.' But there were hopeful words for the Kremlin too. Rubio added that the US would not be imposing additional sanctions against Russia because if 'we come in and crush them with more sanctions, we probably lose our ability to talk to them about the ceasefire and then who's talking to them?' In the space of a few days, Trump went from bombing Iran to being bombed to a ceasefire, allowing all sides to claim victory. Trump also succeeded in not only persuading recalcitrant Europeans to massively increase their defence spending but also in making them enthusiastic about doing it. Vice President Vance also articulated what he called the 'brutally simple' Trump Doctrine: Define a clear American interest. Push hard through diplomacy. If that fails, strike fast, win quick, and get out – before it becomes another endless war. Trump came to office promising to be a peacemaking president. After three months in office, he's fought his first short, victorious war. But it will be achieving a lasting peace in Ukraine – and wrangling the notoriously stubborn and duplicitous Putin into a deal – that will be the Trump's true foreign policy test. This article was originally published in The Spectator's world edition.

Trump official in 'line of fire' for leaked Iran bombing intel as they're left out of major security briefing
Trump official in 'line of fire' for leaked Iran bombing intel as they're left out of major security briefing

Daily Mail​

time33 minutes ago

  • Daily Mail​

Trump official in 'line of fire' for leaked Iran bombing intel as they're left out of major security briefing

Tulsi Gabbard is rumored to be in Donald Trump ' 'line of fire' as she is set to miss out on the first intelligence briefing between the administration and Congress over strikes on Iran 's nuclear facilities. Gabbard, Trump's Director of National Intelligence, had to do a dramatic U-turn last week after the president said she was 'wrong' when she testified Tehran was not close to getting a nuclear weapon. Now, she is missing out on the Thursday meeting that will offer Congress a chance to see how successful the strikes were, as Trump has angrily insisted CNN and The New York Times were wrong in saying they had minimal effect. Gabbard was originally supposed to join members of Trump's inner circle - CIA Director John Ratcliffe, Secretary of State Marco Rubio and Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth - in the briefing. A person familiar with Gabbard's schedule told the Associated Press said she was originally going to attend but no longer. 'The media is turning this into something it's not,' a senior Trump administration official told The Washington Post, adding that Ratcliffe will represent the intelligence community. However, controversial Trump biographer Michael Wolff said that Trump now sees Gabbard as a 'stooge' who will take the blame for the leaks. 'It's always important in the Trump script, the fallback is always who to blame, who to blame. Just have to have someone to blame. Tulsi is in the line of fire,' Wolff told The Daily Beast. Wolff added: 'There is an investigation that is going on. They will try to find someone to blame. Within the White House, within the West Wing, what they are saying as of this morning, who this is being pinned on, is Tulsi.' Trump and much of his administration have raged at the media's reports based on anonymous sources that the damage to Iran's nuclear facilities from Saturday night's bombing was not as severe as they had hoped. The leaked report from the Pentagon's Defense Intelligence Agency (DIA) reportedly states that the U.S. strikes only delayed Iran from getting a nuclear weapon by a couple of months. An investigation has begun and many in the White House have said the person who leaked incomplete intel should be jailed. Gabbard fiercely backed the president in his rivalry with the press and said the U.S. troops eliminated Iran's nuclear capabilities. 'New intelligence confirms what @POTUS has stated numerous times: Iran's nuclear facilities have been destroyed. If the Iranians chose to rebuild, they would have to rebuild all three facilities (Natanz, Fordow, Esfahan) entirely, which would likely take years to do,' Gabbard wrote on social media. 'The propaganda media has deployed their usual tactic: selectively release portions of illegally leaked classified intelligence assessments (intentionally leaving out the fact that the assessment was written with 'low confidence') to try to undermine President Trump's decisive leadership and the brave servicemen and women who flawlessly executed a truly historic mission to keep the American people safe and secure,' she added. White House Communications Director Steven Cheung backed Gabbard in a statement. Gabbard fiercely backed the president in his rivalry with the press and said the U.S. troops eliminated Iran's nuclear capabilities Gabbard was originally supposed to join members of Trump's inner circle - CIA Director John Ratcliffe (pictured right), Secretary of State Marco Rubio and Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth (pictured center left) - in the briefing 'President Trump's Peace through Strength foreign policy is a tried-and-true approach that keeps America safe and deters global threats,' he said. 'Efforts by the legacy media to sow internal division are a distraction that will not work. President Trump has full confidence in his entire exceptional national security team. DNI Gabbard is an important member of the President's team and her work continues to serve him and this country well.' Cheung has previously called Wolff 'a lying sack of s***.' Last Friday, Gabbard reversed course and admitted that Iran actually does have the ability to create nuclear weapons after a public rebuke by her boss as Israel continued to wage war against the country. The director of national intelligence originally blamed the 'dishonest media' for a week of confusion about whether the administration believes the Persian country can develop a weapon of mass destruction. 'America has intelligence that Iran is at the point that it can produce a nuclear weapon within weeks to months, if they decide to finalize the assembly,' she wrote on X. 'President Trump has been clear that can't happen, and I agree.' Trump warned that Tehran has a 'maximum' of two weeks to avoid possible American air strikes if they don't abandon their nuclear ambitions. In New Jersey on Friday, however, the president dismissed Gabbard's testimony in March that the intelligence community 'continues to assess Iran is not building a nuclear weapon.' The president responded, 'Well then, my intelligence community is wrong. Who in the intelligence community said that?' Informed that it had been Gabbard, Trump said, 'She's wrong.' Gabbard responded on X Friday that 'The dishonest media is intentionally taking my testimony out of context and spreading fake news as a way to manufacture division.' She included video of her testimony that claims Iranians appear clearly to have 'enriched uranium stockpiles at its highest levels and is unprecedented for a state without nuclear weapons.' She also noted that Iran 'contains a wide range of threats' to the United States and Israel. The next day, Trump celebrated the strikes on Tehran by American forces. Now, Congress will get its first inside look at the bombings as the president rages against a leak regarding its success rate. The administration has rubbished reports by both CNN and the New York Times that the damage to Iran's nuclear facilities from Saturday night's bombing was not as severe as they had hoped, while simultaneously demanding the person who leaked incomplete intel be jailed. The leaked report from the Pentagon's Defense Intelligence Agency (DIA) reportedly states that the U.S. strikes only delayed Iran from getting a nuclear weapon by a couple of months. Trump called for the CNN reporter who broke the story, Natasha Bertrand, to be fired and 'then thrown out like a dog' on Truth Social Media, drawing an enraged response from colleague Jake Tapper. Tapper went off on Trump during his Wednesday show: 'Today, President Trump and his administration are going after shooting the messengers in an increasingly ugly way.' He also defended Bertrand, saying: 'They're calling journalists 'fake news' for true stories. They're calling for an excellent CNN reporter, Natasha Bertrand, to be fired, which is preposterous — and to which a CNN statement today reads, 'we stand 100 percent behind Natasha Bertarnd's journalism, as they should.' Tapper went into a dissection of CNN's reporting on the matter, saying that the Defense Intelligence Agency's assessment of the bombing was 'low confidence... meaning that the DIA is far from sure about it.' 'It was described to CNN by seven people briefed on the DIA assessment, and our reporting stressed that the assessment's conclusion could evolve as new information comes to light,' he said. Tapper claimed that CNN reached out to the White House before broadcasting the story and that the administration 'attacked the assessment but confirmed it exists.' 'Even President Trump himself today confirmed it,' he said. Tapper said he was not criticizing the troops who executed the strikes, saying they 'honor and respect' them. Trump ripped into CNN again after Tapper defended the network's reporting and slammed the president for his 'ugly attack' on the press' coverage of the Iran bombings. Defense Secretary Hegseth said the FBI has taken the lead on conducting the probe after CNN, the New York Times and other outlets disclosed the report's findings. 'We're doing a leak investigation with the FBI right now, because this information is for internal purposes, battle damage assessments, and CNN and others are trying to spin it to make the president look bad,' he said during a NATO meeting alongside Trump and other top officials on Wednesday. The Pentagon chief defended the president like an attack dog, claiming the Fordow nuclear enrichment site was 'obliterated.' Flanked by Trump, Secretary of State Rubio, NATO Secretary General Mark Rutte and White House Chief of Staff Susie Wiles, Hegseth also mentioned how the classified document was only a preliminary assessment. 'It was a top secret report, it was preliminary, it was low confidence,' the Pentagon secretary explained. 'Given the 30,000 pounds of explosives and capability of those munitions, it was devastation underneath Fordow, and the amount of munitions, six per location, any assessment that tells you something otherwise is speculating with other motives.' He added that the preliminary DIA battle damage assessment indicated 'moderate to severe' damage was done to the facility. The administration, Hegseth continued, believes it was 'far more likely severe and obliterated.' Secretary of State Marco Rubio, who was sitting next to Hegseth, argued the leakers had an agenda. 'This is what a leaker is telling you the intelligence says,' he said of the report. 'That's the game these people play. They read it and then they go out and characterize it the way they want it characterized.' He added it was 'against the law' to leak the information and told the media the leakers 'characterize it for you in a way that's absolutely false.' Israeli military spokesperson Brig. Gen. Effie Defrin similarly said Wednesday that 'it is still early to assess the results of the operation.' Though he added, 'I believe we have delivered a significant hit to the nuclear program, and I can also say that we have delayed it by several years.' In a Truth Social post on Wednesday afternoon, Trump revealed Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth would address the public at 8am Thursday morning to provide 'both interesting and irrefutable' proof about the success of the mission. Trump said the purpose of the conference is to 'fight for the Dignity of our Great American Pilots. 'These Patriots were very upset,' he said. 'After 36 hours of dangerously flying through Enemy Territory, they landed, they knew the Success was LEGENDARY, and then, two days later, they started reading Fake News by CNN and The Failing New York Times. 'They felt terribly!' Trump reminded them that the doubts about the success of the mission were 'as usual, solely for the purpose of demeaning PRESIDENT DONALD J. TRUMP.' His comments come after the CIA confirmed Ira n's nuclear facilities suffered 'severe damage' after the devastating airstrikes Saturday night. Trump had earlier suggested Hegseth's title should be changed to the 'Secretary of War' given the deteriorating situation in the Middle East, and kicked off meetings at the NATO summit on Wednesday by comparing Saturday's precision airstrikes to the two atomic bombings on Japan that ended World War II. 'I don't want to use an example of Hiroshima. I don't want to use an example of Nagasaki. But that was essentially the same thing. That ended that war,' he told reporters at The Hague. Seven B-2 bombers flew from the U.S. to Iran on Saturday to carry out what Pentagon officials have said is the most sophisticated stealth airstrike in decades. Each B-2 carried two 30,000 pound bunker buster bombs aimed at Fordow's nuclear labs hundreds of feet underground. The 14 bunker busters dropped on Fordow weighed a total of nearly 420,000 pounds combined, Pentagon chief spokesman Sean Parnell has said. 'Fake news, CNN and MSDNC, all of these terrible people, you know, they have no credibility,' Trump slammed the outlets reporting on the intel leak.

Trump will look at giving Ukraine more Patriot missiles as he calls on Putin to end war
Trump will look at giving Ukraine more Patriot missiles as he calls on Putin to end war

The Independent

timean hour ago

  • The Independent

Trump will look at giving Ukraine more Patriot missiles as he calls on Putin to end war

Donald Trump said he is considering sending more Patriot missile systems to Ukraine, as he renewed calls on Russian leader Vladimir Putin to end the war. The president added that he isn't ruling out a new defense assistance package, when he spoke to reporters at the Nato summit in the Netherlands on Wednesday. Trump, who has surrounded himself with isolationist-minded advisers who've publicly opposed continued support for Kyiv, responded, 'We'll see what happens' when asked whether the U.S. would contribute anything on top of the $8 billion pledged by NATO allies as part of the 32-member bloc's continued support for Ukraine's war effort. Click here for the latest updates on the war in Ukraine Speaking at a press conference on the heels of a closed-door sit-down with Ukrainian president Volodymyr Zelensky, Mr. Trump said there has been 'a lot of spirit' in Ukraine's fight against the invasion Putin ordered in February 2022. Trump also appeared to shift blame for the continuation and escalation of the war to Putin, marking a dramatic reversal from how he characterized the situation during a contentious Oval Office meeting with Zelensky earlier this year. 'Vladimir Putin really has to end that war,' the president said. 'People are dying at levels that people haven't seen before for a long time.' He recounted to reporters how he'd rebuked Putin during a recent phone call after the Russian leader offered to mediate an end to hostilities between Israel and Iran, stressing he would rather he brought an end to the conflict in Ukraine. He later added that Putin has been 'more difficult' than Zelensky, with whom Trump has had a contentious relationship dating back to his first term, when a phone call with the Ukrainian leader launched a scandal that led to the first of his two impeachment trials in the Senate. Trump's relationship with Putin has long been far friendlier, but even that has appeared to sour in recent months as the Russian dictator has continued to pound civilian targets in Ukraine with drones and missiles, killing thousands and complicating efforts by Trump to cajole both sides to the negotiating table. In April, he became so irate over Putin's attacks on civilians that he took to Truth Social to exhort the Russian leader to halt the attacks and get to the negotiating table, writing: 'Vladimir, STOP! 5,000 soldiers a week are dying. Let's get the Peace Deal DONE!' Since then, he has floated the possibility of imposing harsh new sanctions on Moscow if Putin refuses to cooperate in the U.S.-led efforts to bring about a settlement in the three-year-old conflict. The president's changed view of the war and Putin's culpability also became evident when he had an emotional exchange with a reporter for the BBC's Ukrainian service, who asked whether the U.S. was prepared to sell more Patriot anti-air missiles to Ukraine. Last year, the Biden administration announced they would prioritize deliveries of Patriot interceptors to Ukraine on account of Russia's accelerated pace of aerial attacks against civilians and infrastructure, but Kyiv has had to expand their use of the missiles and has been running low on them. Trump asked the reporter if she was currently living in Ukraine, at which point she replied that she was based in Warsaw with her children while her husband has remained in Ukraine. The president responded: 'That's rough stuff.' He asked the journalist again to confirm that she was living outside of Ukraine and working as a reporter, replying 'good' when she answered in the affirmative. 'Let me just tell you, they [Ukraine] do want to have the anti-missile missiles, as they call them, the Patriots, and we're going to see if we can make some available,' he said. Trump added that such weapons were 'very hard to get' and 'very effective', while admitting that the U.S. had been prioritizing supplies for Israel amid that country's ongoing wars. 'They do want that more than any other thing, as you probably know,' he said before praising her 'very good question' and telling her to 'say hello' to her husband for him. Trump's apparent openness to sending more American aid to Ukraine comes as NATO's 32 member nations pledged to 'reaffirm' what they described as 'enduring sovereign commitments to provide support to Ukraine,' calling Ukrainian security efforts a contribution to NATO's own security. The alliance also pledged to include 'direct contributions to Ukraine defense' as part of efforts to have each country meet a threshold of spending five percent of gross domestic product on defense.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store