
Controversial tobacco tax cut extended
The tax break for Heated Tobacco Products (HTPs) made by Phillip Morris has been extended for an extra two years.
In July 2024, the government cut the tax on HTPs in half, in what it said would be a one-year trial subject to an evaluation.
But NZ First Associate Health Minister Casey Costello told RNZ the evaluation would now be done in July 2027 and the reduced tax rate would apply to HTPs at least until then.
Labour's health spokesperson Ayesha Verrall said the extension of the tax cut was striking, given the strain on the health system.
"This government has the wrong priorities. It is giving tax breaks to tobacco companies now valued at over $300 million and the evaluation they promised, to check that it was helpful, is a total sham."
Costello cut the HTP tax rate by 50 percent last year, with the aim that cheaper prices may encourage people to switch from cigarettes to HTPs.
The cut was made despite health officials telling Costello there was no evidence HTPs worked to stop people smoking or were significantly safer than cigarettes.
Costello told Cabinet she had her own "independent advice" which, when she released it later, turned out to be five articles that were either about different products, outdated, or offered only weak support for her view.
Treasury said Philip Morris had a monopoly in the HTP market in New Zealand and would be the main beneficiary of the move.
Costello's office told RNZ the tax cut trial would be extended because Philip Morris had to pull its IQOS device from sale last year, as it did not comply with requirements for vaping devices to have a removable battery. Last week, Costello ditched the requirement for removable batteries, saying Cabinet was advised this was the best way to resolve legal action from Mason Corporation, which owns the Shosha vape store chain.
A spokesman for the Minister said with HTPs off the market for months last year, the original plan for an evaluation after one year did not make sense.
"There wasn't an evaluation because of the withdrawal of HTPs from the market. Any report back would be meaningless as the cheaper HTPs were only available for two months," the spokesman said.
"Cabinet agreed to extending the HTP review to July 2027 as there will be more market data available."
The spokesman said the evaluation would then be able to show whether "a sustained price reduction encouraged uptake by smokers" and if it had helped reduce smoking.
The assessment would also look at whether HTP use "encouraged smokers away from vapes" and the extent of "unintended uptake by young people".
A March 2025 Ministry of Health (MOH) briefing to Costello, focused on how to evaluate the HTP tax cut, said Philip Morris had not initially passed on the excise reduction to consumers.
"There was no price change passed through to customers for the first month, though this is an observation of value in and of itself," the MOH said.
The briefing, obtained by RNZ under the Official Information Act, said Philip Morris had to pull its IQOS device just three months into the tax cut trial.
"All HTP devices were removed from the market in New Zealand due to not meeting new safety regulations. This has meant there have been no HTP devices available for purchase for at least 5 months of the 12-month trial period."
Costello has said that HTPs "have a similar risk profile to vapes", but officials from Treasury and Ministry of Health advised her they were much more harmful than vaping.
In its March briefing, the MOH told Costello it would be difficult to assess whether people using HTPs had decreased their harm or not.
"While we will be able to assess whether the percentage of current or recent smokers who use HTPs increases, we will not be able to track whether those same people were previously using, or likely to use vapes, for example, whether they moved from a safer alternate product to a more harmful one."
Verrall said the onus should be on Philip Morris to prove its product was safe.
"There is no reason why the government should be running a study for Philip Morris to help get its products used," she said. "This product is not a health product. It is a harmful product."
Verrall said the latest update from the Treasury showed the HTP tax cut was forecast to cost up to $293 million if continued until 2029.
"It's deeply worrying when our health system is underfunded that the government is giving away $300 million to the benefit of a single company with links to one of the coalition partners," Verrall said.
The extension of the tax break for the Philip Morris products comes after RNZ published documents alleging a close relationship between NZ First and the tobacco giant.
The documents, released in litigation against US vaping company JUUL, allege Philip Morris pitched draft legislation to NZ First as part of a lobbying campaign for its HTPs.
The documents claim Philip Morris corporate affairs staff "reached out to NZ First to try and secure regulation to advantage IQOS".
A lobbying firm advising JUUL claimed that NZ First leader Winston Peters had a relationship with Philip Morris and also that "any regulation he champions is likely to be very industry friendly and highly geared towards commercial interests in the sector".
Peters did not address the allegations that NZ First received material from Philip Morris, but said RNZ's story was a "tissue of baseless accusations" and that engagement with the tobacco industry was legitimate.
"Multiple government departments have themselves proactively reached out to, and met with, 'big tobacco' for direct feedback and advice on tobacco legislation," he said, in a post on X.
Health Coalition Aotearoa and Vape-Free Kids want Prime Minister Christopher Luxon to strip NZ First of the tobacco and vaping portfolio but he says Costello is doing a great job.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Otago Daily Times
5 hours ago
- Otago Daily Times
Call for inquiry after collusion revealed
Public health researchers across New Zealand are calling for an independent public inquiry after it was revealed New Zealand First has been colluding with international tobacco giants. Initially, public health authorities called on the Prime Minister to show some leadership and remove the tobacco and vaping portfolio from New Zealand First. But now the Public Health Communication Centre Aotearoa (PHCC) wants to go another step further, and have a full investigation into the tobacco industry's influence on public health policy, and it wants the inquiry to report to the Governor-General — not a minister. PHCC member, University of Otago Aspire Aotearoa co-director and public health researcher Prof Janet Hoek said the aim of the inquiry was to strengthen regulation of corporate lobbying, to end tobacco companies' ability to influence public health policy. She said a recent cache of thousands of documents released following lawsuits against American vaping company Juul raised important questions about the influence tobacco and vaping companies have exerted on public health policy in New Zealand. The documents suggested there was evidence New Zealand First had engaged "inappropriately" with tobacco companies. Prof Hoek said the Tobacco Industry Interference Index scored New Zealand highly in 2023, which implied the nation had been able to withstand tobacco industry interference. However, recent analyses now suggested otherwise, and the Juul documents provided further evidence that reinforced these concerns. She said the Juul collection contained market surveys and stakeholder maps that discussed strategic business opportunities within New Zealand. The documents also commented on the politicians or political parties that could enable these opportunities. One of the documents from August 2018 mentioned New Zealand First leader Winston Peters, in his capacity as acting prime minister during prime minister Jacinda Ardern's maternity leave. "[He] randomly criticised how the increases in the tobacco excise tax over the years contributed to the rise in illicit trade in tobacco as well as violence and thefts in 'dairies' ... using talking points from Imperial [Imperial Tobacco New Zealand]," the document said. "This clearly shows that Imperial has worked to solidify its relationship with NZ First." Another document from February 2019 said Philip Morris International had allegedly "given [a] draft piece of regulation to the government's coalition partner New Zealand First", and the party had "undertaken to put that draft into the policy mix. This is supposed to be secret". Another document described Mr Peters as "very powerful. Has a relationship with [Philip Morris International]. Positively disposed. Spoken out against tobacco taxes. Lifetime smoker, now on HEETS [the tobacco sticks used in Philip Morris' IQOS product]. "Any regulation he [Mr Peters] champions is likely to be very industry friendly and highly geared towards commercial interests in the sector." The allegations come after NZ First list MP and Associate Health Minister Casey Costello led the repeal of the Smokefree Environments and Regulated Products (Smoked Tobacco) Amendment Act 2022. It effectively scrapped laws aimed at slashing tobacco retailers, removing 95% of the nicotine from cigarettes and creating a smoke-free generation by banning sales to those born after 2009. Prof Hoek said the documents suggested tobacco companies viewed New Zealand's small market as an opportunity to plant policy proposals and talking points at the highest levels of government. "Aotearoa's reputation for policy-making integrity is at risk unless we investigate these interactions and improve transparency around lobbying. "At a minimum, transparency rules must be strengthened so New Zealanders can clearly see when and how industry voices enter the policy arena. "We owe it to our communities to ensure public health decisions are made in the open, free from the influence of industries that cause health harm." A PHCC briefing said NZ First's responses to these claims raised questions that required further investigation. Last week, Mr Peters said the documents referred to were more than six years old, and the attempt to "attack" NZ First was "old, stale, repetitive and utterly baseless". Prof Hoek said public health advocates supported the call for an independent inquiry. "I think there's actually a real question about integrity of the political process here, and what people want to feel is that politicians are acting in the best interest of the country, not the best interest of the tobacco company," she said.

RNZ News
5 hours ago
- RNZ News
Government touts scholarships as nurse workforce strike over pay and lack of staffing
Health Minister Simeon Brown. Photo: RNZ / REECE BAKER The government is taking expressions of interest for nurse practitioner scholarships as the nursing workforce strike over pay and lack of staffing. The coalition is funding up to 120 nurse practitioner training places in primary care each year from 2026. Health Minister Simeon Brown said the scholarship applications are part of a coordinated plan to boost the workforce and ease pressure on doctors. "Too often, patients wait longer than they should to see a health professional. Expanding the nurse practitioner workforce means faster, more consistent care for those who need it most." It comes as thousands of nurses walked off the job over deadlocked contract negotiations. Brown said there were currently 897 nurse practitioners registered in New Zealand, including 339 working in primary care. "We're committed to growing this workforce and enabling more nurses to work in the nurse practitioner advanced scope of practice." Primary care scholarships will open for nurses who want to undertake advanced practice education, such as registered nurse prescribing, next month. Applications were also open for primary care employers to recruit and support up to 400 graduate nurses each year. Funding includes $20,000 for each graduate registered nurse employed by rural primary and community health providers and $15,000 for those employed by urban providers. Sign up for Ngā Pitopito Kōrero , a daily newsletter curated by our editors and delivered straight to your inbox every weekday.


Otago Daily Times
14 hours ago
- Otago Daily Times
Jackson accuses govt of rigging next election
By Craig McCulloch of RNZ Labour MP Willie Jackson has accused the government of trying to rig next year's election through its move to block people from being able to enrol for 12 days before voting day. The claim - made during Parliament's general debate today - goes further than Labour's official position which has been that electoral changes would make it harder to vote. Jackson also used his speech to criticise Deputy Prime Minister David Seymour as the "biggest dropkick of all" following Seymour's use of the term to disparage late enrollers. "I don't know what's more offensive," Jackson told MPs. "The gerrymandering of our voting rules to rig the election, or the deputy prime minister referring to 600,000 people as dropkicks." Seymour last week told reporters he was "sick of dropkicks that can't get themselves organised to follow the law". More than 600,000 people enrolled or updated their enrolment details after writ day in 2023, including 110,000 on election day itself. In a fiery speech today, Jackson poured contempt on the "disgraceful, rotten, useless government", accusing it of actively suppressing the vote and "vandalising democratic participation". He pointed to official advice which noted that young people, Māori, Pasifika and Asian communities would be disproportionately affected by the changes. "It's racist disenfranchisement," Jackson said. "It's a breach of democracy... this government risks being accused of rigging the next election." Jackson commended Attorney-General Judith Collins as "one of the most principled National Party members" for standing up to her "weak and useless leader" by warning that the voting changes breached human rights. "She's had the courage to call these voter suppression powers what they are: discriminatory." Jackson concluded his speech by taking at aim at Seymour, calling on him to apologise for his "disgraceful" description of some voters as dropkicks. "He's the most dangerous politician of the last generation... not only a disgrace as the deputy prime minister, but surely the biggest dropkick of all." Ministers brush off Jackson comments Speaking to RNZ, Seymour laughed off Jackson's description of him as a dropkick: "To be honest, I was always an open side flanker. Didn't really do a big drop kick, although, on a good day, I could nail one from just outside the 22." Seymour said Jackson's claims were "wrong and insane" but he could not help but like the man because "you know he doesn't mean it". "He's more a figure of fun for me," Seymour said. "Although I do worry a little bit about - you know - a man of his age - the old ticker can give out if he hyperventilates too much at work in the House." In a statement to RNZ, a spokesperson for Justice Minister Paul Goldsmith said Jackson was prone to "hyperbole and mangling of the facts". "People are not being disenfranchised, they are merely being required to enrol," the spokesperson said. The government's legislation banning same-day voter enrolment passed its first reading in Parliament on Tuesday and will now be considered by select committee. During the debate, Goldsmith told MPs the change was required because the increasing number of special votes was delaying the final vote count. "The final vote count used to take two weeks. Last election, it took three," Goldsmith said. "The advice I received is that if we leave things as they are, it could well take even longer in future elections." Goldsmith flatly rejected the claim that people were being disenfranchised, saying the 110,000 people who updated their details on election day in 2023 only did so because they had been told they could. "The message will be different this election. People will be told they need to be enrolled well before voting starts. It's not that hard, and people are capable of doing these things." Justice officials, however, recommended against the move and warned it could result in lower turnout and reduce confidence in the electoral system. "Its impact on reducing special votes is uncertain, while its impact on democratic participation could be significant," officials said. The move has also been criticised by the Chief Human Rights Commissioner and electoral law experts Andrew Geddis and Graeme Edgeler. Since 2019, voters have been able to turn up to the booth at any time during the advance voting period and enrol at the same time, as well as on election day, with their vote being counted as a special vote.