Call for inquiry after collusion revealed
Initially, public health authorities called on the Prime Minister to show some leadership and remove the tobacco and vaping portfolio from New Zealand First.
But now the Public Health Communication Centre Aotearoa (PHCC) wants to go another step further, and have a full investigation into the tobacco industry's influence on public health policy, and it wants the inquiry to report to the Governor-General — not a minister.
PHCC member, University of Otago Aspire Aotearoa co-director and public health researcher Prof Janet Hoek said the aim of the inquiry was to strengthen regulation of corporate lobbying, to end tobacco companies' ability to influence public health policy.
She said a recent cache of thousands of documents released following lawsuits against American vaping company Juul raised important questions about the influence tobacco and vaping companies have exerted on public health policy in New Zealand.
The documents suggested there was evidence New Zealand First had engaged "inappropriately" with tobacco companies.
Prof Hoek said the Tobacco Industry Interference Index scored New Zealand highly in 2023, which implied the nation had been able to withstand tobacco industry interference.
However, recent analyses now suggested otherwise, and the Juul documents provided further evidence that reinforced these concerns.
She said the Juul collection contained market surveys and stakeholder maps that discussed strategic business opportunities within New Zealand.
The documents also commented on the politicians or political parties that could enable these opportunities.
One of the documents from August 2018 mentioned New Zealand First leader Winston Peters, in his capacity as acting prime minister during prime minister Jacinda Ardern's maternity leave.
"[He] randomly criticised how the increases in the tobacco excise tax over the years contributed to the rise in illicit trade in tobacco as well as violence and thefts in 'dairies' ... using talking points from Imperial [Imperial Tobacco New Zealand]," the document said.
"This clearly shows that Imperial has worked to solidify its relationship with NZ First."
Another document from February 2019 said Philip Morris International had allegedly "given [a] draft piece of regulation to the government's coalition partner New Zealand First", and the party had "undertaken to put that draft into the policy mix. This is supposed to be secret".
Another document described Mr Peters as "very powerful. Has a relationship with [Philip Morris International]. Positively disposed. Spoken out against tobacco taxes. Lifetime smoker, now on HEETS [the tobacco sticks used in Philip Morris' IQOS product].
"Any regulation he [Mr Peters] champions is likely to be very industry friendly and highly geared towards commercial interests in the sector."
The allegations come after NZ First list MP and Associate Health Minister Casey Costello led the repeal of the Smokefree Environments and Regulated Products (Smoked Tobacco) Amendment Act 2022.
It effectively scrapped laws aimed at slashing tobacco retailers, removing 95% of the nicotine from cigarettes and creating a smoke-free generation by banning sales to those born after 2009.
Prof Hoek said the documents suggested tobacco companies viewed New Zealand's small market as an opportunity to plant policy proposals and talking points at the highest levels of government.
"Aotearoa's reputation for policy-making integrity is at risk unless we investigate these interactions and improve transparency around lobbying.
"At a minimum, transparency rules must be strengthened so New Zealanders can clearly see when and how industry voices enter the policy arena.
"We owe it to our communities to ensure public health decisions are made in the open, free from the influence of industries that cause health harm."
A PHCC briefing said NZ First's responses to these claims raised questions that required further investigation.
Last week, Mr Peters said the documents referred to were more than six years old, and the attempt to "attack" NZ First was "old, stale, repetitive and utterly baseless".
Prof Hoek said public health advocates supported the call for an independent inquiry.
"I think there's actually a real question about integrity of the political process here, and what people want to feel is that politicians are acting in the best interest of the country, not the best interest of the tobacco company," she said.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Scoop
10 hours ago
- Scoop
Northland New Zealand's Economic Powerhouse
Rt Hon Winston Peters Minister for Rail Hon Shane Jones Minister for Regional Development Associate Minister for Energy Northland's economic future is on display with significant developments either underway or on the near horizon, Rail Minister Winston Peters and Regional Development Minister Shane Jones say. 'The burgeoning energy, export and economic powerhouse of Marsden Point means New Zealand will prosper with much-needed jobs, trade, manufacturing and economic development,' Mr Peters says. 'A refurbished tank, a collaboration between Channel Infrastructure and Z Energy, will soon help power the country's aviation sector by suppling jet fuel to Auckland Airport through the pipeline spanning Marsden Point to Wiri,' Mr Jones says. 'A commercial dry dock will bring specialist skills and international customers to New Zealand, maintaining large ships in a manner that a maritime nation desperately needs,' Mr Peters says. 'We are getting closer to finalising procurement of a provider for the Regional Infrastructure Fund part-funded drydock at Northport, which offers the best harbour in New Zealand as it is deep, there is plenty of land, and transport connectivity is only going to get better. 'As an exporting nation, we need strong connections for shipping lines and Northport offers the efficient shipping connections to bolster port services in Tauranga and Auckland. 'We are pleased to confirm that KiwiRail will open discussions, under commercial agreements, on its Marsden Point Rail Link design data for investors and builders – informing the best approach for building and funding this project,' Mr Peters says. 'While this on its own is great news for New Zealand's fuel resilience, other initiatives being undertaken here such as the potential development of sustainable aviation fuel (SAF), the upcoming construction of a bitumen import terminal, diesel peaker and biorefinery make Marsden Point a world-class proposition,' Mr Jones says. 'As I announced earlier this year, I am particularly interested in how we, as a country, develop these areas further and attract investment into our regions. I will be taking a paper to Cabinet soon on the use of special economic zones (SEZs) to do just that. With attractive regulatory regimes and tax treatment, SEZs could be the fuel that really gets New Zealand's economic engine roaring.'
1News
21 hours ago
- 1News
China hits back at FBI director's 'groundless assertions' in Wellington
China says it strongly opposes any "groundless assertions" after comments made by the head of the FBI at its new office in Wellington. The US Federal Bureau of Investigation is opening a dedicated attaché office in the capital to investigate threats, including terrorism, cyber crime, money laundering and child exploitation. Director Kash Patel also said it would counter China's influence in the Pacific. Jose Sousa-Santos from the University of Canterbury said the move will bring New Zealand law enforcement up to speed with modern threats. (Source: Breakfast) The Chinese Embassy hit back, saying it took note of the comments and described them as part of a "Cold War mentality". ADVERTISEMENT "Transnational crime is a common challenge encountered by all countries requiring cooperation to tackle," a spokesperson said. "On the opening of a new FBI office in Wellington with a permanent Legat (legal attaché) position, we have taken note of the assertions by the American side, as well as the remarks by relevant New Zealand ministers in response to the media. "We believe that relevant cooperation should not target any third party. And we strongly oppose any attempt to make groundless assertions or vilification against China out of the Cold War mentality. Such acts are against people's will and are doomed to fail." The government has pushed back on suggestions that the FBI's new office in Wellington aimed to counter China. Foreign Minister Winston Peters said China was not raised in his meeting with Patel, and the minister responsible for the spy agencies GCSB and NZSIS, Judith Collins, said it was up to Patel what he wanted to say. A Chinese national flag is raised at the Chinese embassy in London. (Source: Associated Press) "When we were talking, we never had raised that issue," Peters said. "We talked about the Pacific, what we could do to improve the law and order situation and the great concern that Pacific countries had and that they needed help, and that we need to be part of the solution." ADVERTISEMENT Collins said the US was "very focused on fentanyl" and knew New Zealand was focused on disrupting the methamphetamine trade. "We know that we do have international criminals ... let's just understand that our security agency is also involved in this. We're not going to single out any particular country." The morning's headlines in 90 seconds, including fleeing driver hits house, severe turbulence hits US flight, and massive new bug found in Australia. (Source: 1News) University of Otago lecturer Dr Peter Grace said drug and human trafficking was "spiralling out of control" in the region, and New Zealand had limited resources to fight it. "New Zealand is a small state, and we just don't have the kind of resources that are going to help solve these problems… So the fact that you've got somebody with much deeper pockets coming down and cooperating can be a particularly good thing." Opposition parties expressed surprise at the announcement, Labour saying it had come without explanation and Greens saying the office should not exist and New Zealand should exit the Five Eyes arrangement altogether.
NZ Herald
a day ago
- NZ Herald
Aaron Smale: Why politicians don't take the Māori vote seriously
Listening to articles is free for open-access content—explore other articles or learn more about text-to-speech. Christopher Luxon's indifference reflects the larger issue of the major parties ignoring Māori as a voting bloc. Photo / Getty Images Whoever the press secretary is for Christopher Luxon these days, they might want to have a weekend bootcamp teaching him how to keep his foot out of his mouth. Apart from when he uses corporate gibberish to masquarade as an answer, on the rare occasion Luxon says something pithy, it often turns out to be an absolute clanger. Luxon tossed off one such clanger when he questioned whether the September 6 by-election for the Māori electorate seat of Tāmaki Makaurau would be a real fight or 'a pillow fight'. (Kind of ironic given the real pillow fight is in the Epsom seat, which National hands to Act every three years.) A by-election will be held in Tāmaki Makaurau because the person who held the seat, Takutai Tarsh Kemp, recently died. And she held the seat because the voters of that electorate put her there, unlike some party list mediocrity like, well, take your pick. Luxon's comment was flippant at best and disrespectful to both the late MP and her constituents. So, no, it's not a pillow fight, it's a vote in the largest Polynesian city in the world. But Luxon's indifference to Māori voters in the coming by-election reflects the larger issue of the major parties mostly ignoring Māori as a voting bloc. One of the underlying reasons for this was first pointed out to me by my sixth form history teacher at Edgecumbe College, Gerry Rowlands, an American originally from Florida, a southern state with all the history that entails. Mr Rowlands posed a hypothetical idea that Māori would be better off all going on the general roll and getting rid of the Māori seats altogether. His rationale was that the electorate we were in was often held by National because of the high number of Pākehā farmers. But if Māori all went on the general roll, then National – and Labour, for that matter – would actually have to compete for the Māori vote to win. The then-named Eastern Māori seat went from the Bay of Plenty all the way around the East Coast and down to Wairarapa and Wellington. This area has one of the highest Māori populations in the country and the election campaigns in the general electorate seats would look completely different if all Māori went on the general roll. Mr Rowlands didn't say this but I don't think he'd disagree – the Māori seats are acting as a passive version of what Americans call gerrymandering. That is, Māori are being electorally contained – or at least split – and thereby robbed of their actual voting power by the Māori seats. The Māori vote has been ghettoised; every Māori who goes on the Māori roll is a Māori the candidates and the elected MPs in the general seats can ignore. And they do. Back to Auckland and the present day. One of Luxon's long catalogue of gaffes since taking up National's leadership was encouraging women to have babies to boost the flagging population. He quickly backtracked. Women have fought long and hard to have control over their fertility and some male politician telling them to start banging out babies for the national cause wasn't landing well. But what Luxon dimly recognised was that Pākehā numbers are in the early stages of decline, and this decline will only accelerate as the 34% of the Pākehā population that is over the age of 55 falls off the perch at an increasing rate. Luxon doesn't seem to recognise, even dimly, that Māori and Polynesian populations are rising steadily. Listen to Luxon's political messaging and it's as if Māori don't exist in his calculations. Labour's Chris Hipkins isn't any better, and in some respects he's worse. When Māori became a political target, he, like Helen Clark before him, dropped them like a hot hāngī rock so he could appear non-threatening to old, white people. The coalition government has had a free run in its attack on Māori because Hipkins does little to stand up for them, or articulate in any coherent way why what's good for Māori is good for everyone. He'd rather let Te Pāti Māori take the flak. Te Pāti Māori has become a convenient – and, it must be said, easy – political target. But those who bear the brunt of the political attack are actually their voters. Their interests get drowned out in all the posturing from across the political spectrum. The merits of the Tāmaki Makaurau candidates – Peeni Henare for Labour, Oriini Kaipara for Te Pāti Māori and Hannah Tamaki for Vision New Zealand – are open to serious question. But National, NZ First, Act, and even the Greens, have disqualified themselves from any part in the conversation, because they haven't bothered to put up candidates. Māori are at the pointy end of issues that concern everyone, particularly those of a younger generation: the cost of housing, the cost of living, the environment and the future of employment. The economic and social direction of South Auckland and other regions of the country with high Māori populations is the direction of the country as a whole. It's a bare-knuckle fight for the future of the nation. Mr Luxon is just too scared to even get in the ring.
