logo
Medicaid Changes Get New Timeline: Who's Impacted

Medicaid Changes Get New Timeline: Who's Impacted

Newsweek20-05-2025

Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources.
Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content.
House Republicans are moving toward instituting work requirements for Medicaid recipients starting in early 2027.
This is a significant shift from prior proposals, as they rally around President Donald Trump's expansive budget package known as the "One Big Beautiful Bill."
The legislation seeks to enact sweeping tax cuts, increase border funding, and reshape social safety net programs.
Republican House Majority Leader Steve Scalise of Louisiana confirmed Monday that the GOP leadership will propose an earlier start date as part of their negotiations to advance the bill through Congress.
"We're coming to a much earlier date, early 2027, that we're going to put in the bill in the Rules Committee this week," Scalise said in an interview on CNBC's Squawk Box, referring to the work requirements for Medicaid beneficiaries.
Originally proposed for 2029, the new requirements have become a flashpoint in internal GOP negotiations, with conservative lawmakers demanding faster implementation.
The change, Scalise said, is designed to give Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services Administrator Mehmet Oz sufficient time to manage the transition while addressing concerns that the previous timeline was too slow.
House Majority Leader Steve Scalise (R-LA) speaks during a news conference following a House Republican conference meeting at the U.S. Capitol on May 6, 2025 in Washington, DC.
House Majority Leader Steve Scalise (R-LA) speaks during a news conference following a House Republican conference meeting at the U.S. Capitol on May 6, 2025 in Washington, DC.Why It Matters
The change marks a strategic shift in the GOP's approach to social program reforms and reflects Trump's tightening grip on party policy ahead of the 2026 midterms.
The bill aims to solidify key components of Trump's agenda, including permanent tax breaks, new tax exemptions, and significant cuts to Medicaid and food assistance programs.
The Congressional Budget Office has projected that the proposed Medicaid changes would result in 7.6 million fewer people having health insurance.
Meanwhile, the Committee for a Responsible Federal Budget estimates that the entire legislative package could add approximately $3.3 trillion to the national debt over the next decade.
While proponents argue that work requirements will encourage employment and reduce dependency, critics warn that the plan could result in coverage loss for vulnerable populations.
What To Know
Scalise's announcement came as GOP lawmakers prepared for a crucial vote in the House Rules Committee.
The budget bill, over 1,100 pages long, includes wide-ranging provisions: tax cuts originally passed during Trump's first term would be made permanent, the standard deduction would be increased to $32,000 for joint filers, and the child tax credit would rise to $2,500.
The legislation advanced out of the House Budget Committee during a rare late-night session on Sunday, with four Republican deficit hawks voting "present" to avoid derailing the process.
The bill still faces hurdles on the House floor and in the Senate, where moderates are voicing concerns over deep cuts to social programs and regional tax disparities.
It is very likely that the work requirement proposed in the recent adjustments to Medicaid will require that people on Medicaid between the ages of 18 and 64 work or have work-related activities for at least 80 hours per month, and the renewal process is every six months, said Chris Fong, CEO of Smile Insurance and a Medicare specialist.
"The likely impact of this would have on people who are on Medicaid or attempting apply for Medicaid would likely result in a significant decline in enrollment into the Medicaid program," Fong told Newsweek.
What People Are Saying
Chris Fong, CEO of Smile Insurance and a Medicare specialist, told Newsweek: "The staffing required to review every six months is going to push the Medicaid budget to its limits due to the higher staff requirement to review these every six month renewal application applications."
Michael Ryan, a finance expert and the founder of MichaelRyanMoney.com, told Newsweek: "The CBO is estimating that millions could lose coverage under these requirements, not because they're not working. When my cousin worked in healthcare admin, she'd tell me how most Medicaid recipients already work. They're just in low wage jobs that don't offer insurance. That's what makes this whole debate so frustrating to watch sometimes."
What's Next
The House Rules Committee is expected to finalize the revised bill language later this week.
If it passes the House, the legislation will move to the Senate, where Republicans are also proposing amendments to address concerns from moderate and high-tax state lawmakers.
"As for whether it'll pass...I'm skeptical. The House Republicans might get it through their chamber despite some internal disagreements (some think it doesn't go far enough, others worry about their constituents losing coverage), but it faces a much tougher road in the Senate," Ryan said.
"What I find most telling is that even some Trump allies are privately warning that deep Medicaid cuts could be 'politically suicidal' in swing districts. Healthcare is such a personal issue. People really notice when you mess with their access to doctors and medication."

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Grocery Outlet Sued Over False Savings, 'Fictitious' Price Comparisons
Grocery Outlet Sued Over False Savings, 'Fictitious' Price Comparisons

Newsweek

time7 minutes ago

  • Newsweek

Grocery Outlet Sued Over False Savings, 'Fictitious' Price Comparisons

Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. Grocery Outlet, a discount supermarket chain known for its "Bargain Market" branding, is facing a class-action lawsuit in Oregon over allegations of deceptive pricing practices. Newsweek contacted Grocery Outlet for comment via email outside of usual working hours on Saturday. Why It Matters Grocery Outlet Inc. is a California corporation that does business in Oregon through its branded grocery outlet locations. Since 1971, Oregon law has protected consumers from the use of unfair and deceptive reference pricing practices. The lawsuit, as reported by Grocery Dive, was filed in Multnomah County Circuit Court on Monday and claims that the retailer systematically used fabricated "elsewhere" prices to create the illusion of significant savings, violating Oregon's Unlawful Trade Practices Act. "This putative class action arises from a widespread and coordinated scheme by Grocery Outlet Inc. and its affiliated Oregon operators to mislead consumers through the use of fictitious 'elsewhere' pricing," the lawsuit states. "Defendants systematically advertised grocery items with inflated or fabricated reference prices—purportedly representing competitor pricing—without identifying the source of those comparisons, as required by Oregon law," the lawsuit adds. "These deceptive practices created the illusion of significant savings," the filing continued, "when, in fact, consumers often paid the same or more than they would have at other local retailers." The lawsuit claims that Grocery Outlet's pricing strategy violates "multiple provisions of Oregon's Unlawful Trade Practices Act and related regulations, including prohibitions against false or misleading price comparisons and requirements for transparency in advertising discounts." File photo: The exterior of a Grocery Outlet store is seen on February 25, 2025 in San Rafael, California. File photo: The exterior of a Grocery Outlet store is seen on February 25, 2025 in San Rafael, To Know The complaint has been brought by three Oregon consumers, named as Schearon Stewart, John Franz, and Roger Sullivan, and represented by OCJ Law, P.C., in partnership with Oregon Consumer Justice. The complaint alleges that Grocery Outlet advertised inflated or fictitious reference prices without identifying the source of those comparisons, as required by Oregon law. In some instances, the lawsuit claims that the "elsewhere" prices cited by the retailer were higher than the actual prices offered by nearby competitors. The filing alleges that "the violations are rampant within the stores," citing as an example: "Tide pods at Grocery Outlet in King City are sold for $12.99 with a stated 'elsewhere' price of $18.99." However, the lawsuit cites that "there is no competitor in the same geographic area called 'elsewhere' and the reference price use of that term is prohibited by Oregon law. "Second, a survey of the grocery stores in the same geographic area shows the actual prices of that same product never approached $18.99. Instead, at the nearest competitors it was priced for $12.99 (Fred Meyers) and $12.97 (Walmart)." File photos: One of the "elsewhere" signs named in the lawsuit is seen on display; and the exterior of Grocery Outlet in Salem, Oregon. File photos: One of the "elsewhere" signs named in the lawsuit is seen on display; and the exterior of Grocery Outlet in Salem, Oregon. Lawsuit/ Google street view/Lawsuit/ Google street view "These deceptive practices created the illusion of significant savings, when in fact, consumers often paid the same or more than they would have at other local retailers," the lawsuit alleges, as reported by Supermarket News. Law firm Tycko & Zavareei LLP said that the lawsuit seeks injunctive and equitable relief to stop the alleged unlawful conduct and hold Grocery Outlet accountable. Plaintiffs intend to amend the complaint to seek monetary damages on behalf of the class after the statutory notice period under Oregon law has expired. What People Are Saying F. Peter Silva II, attorney at Tycko & Zavareei LLP, said: "This case is about fairness and transparency. Oregon law is clear: if you advertise a discount, you must be honest about where that comparison comes from. Grocery Outlet's use of vague and unverifiable 'elsewhere' prices deprived consumers of the ability to make informed purchasing decisions and unfairly competed with other businesses." What Happens Next The lawsuit states the plaintiffs, "representing a class of similarly situated Oregon consumers, seek injunctive and equitable relief to halt these practices and hold Defendants accountable for the financial harm caused by their unlawful conduct." The case adds to Grocery Outlet's legal troubles, as the company is dealing with a separate lawsuit, filed earlier this year, relating to security fraud. The lawsuit is the latest in a series targeting grocers over their pricing and promotional tactics. Last year, as reported by Grocery Dive, Albertsons agreed to a $3.9 million settlement following a civil complaint that claimed the retailer unlawfully overcharged customers. More recently, Publix was hit with a class-action lawsuit alleging it overcharged shoppers for discounted items sold by weight, including meats, cheeses, and deli products.

Johnson brushes off Musk campaign spending threats: ‘It doesn't concern me'
Johnson brushes off Musk campaign spending threats: ‘It doesn't concern me'

The Hill

time8 minutes ago

  • The Hill

Johnson brushes off Musk campaign spending threats: ‘It doesn't concern me'

House Speaker Mike Johnson (R-La.) in an interview Friday brushed off Elon Musk's campaign spending threats in light of the tech billionaire's public fallout with President Trump, suggesting he isn't worried. The spat between Trump and Musk began with the latter's criticism of the president's legislative agenda making its way through Congress. Johnson said he built a closer relationship with the then-special government employee and that the tech mogul has been led astray regarding the 'big beautiful' spending package. 'Look, it doesn't concern me. We're going to win either way because we're going to win on our policies we're delivering for hardworking Americans and fulfilling those promises,' Johnson told Fox News's 'Jesse Watters Primetime.' 'But look, I like Elon and respect him. I mean, we became friends in all this process,' he continued. 'I've been texting with him even this week … in trying to make sure that he has accurate information about the bill. I think he has been misled about it.' Musk, who contributed hundreds of millions of dollars to assist in Trump's win in the 2024 presidential election, was the biggest donor during the White House race. Amid his recent spat with Trump, which broke out in public as the two traded insults and threats, Musk argued that without his political expenditures, Trump would have lost to former Vice President Harris, Republicans would lose the majority in the House and the GOP would have failed to flip the majority in the Senate. Trump then threatened to have all federal contracts associated with the billionaire's companies to be cut off. As the fight between the two intensified, the tech executive floated the idea of forming a third party and accused the president of being named in the late Jeffrey Epstein's files. Trump has denied close ties to the disgraced financier. Musk's opposition to the GOP megabill — which he called a 'disgusting abomination' — is largely tied to deficit spending. The billionaire argued the legislation would balloon the national debt and fails to slash enough spending. The package faces an uphill battle in the Senate. While Musk, who recently left his position as the top adviser to Trump's Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE), seemed open to repairing ties on Friday, the president appeared to be OK with moving on. Johnson in the interview Friday defended the spending bill and commended Trump for his handling of the squabble. 'We're going to make good on this… I like the president's attitude. You know, he is moving on. He has to,' he told the host. 'He's laser-focused on delivering for the people. And House and Senate Republicans are as well. So, we've got our hand at the wheel.' 'We're going to get this done just like we told the people,' the Speaker continued. 'And if you are a hardworking American that is struggling to take care of your family, you are going to love this legislation.' The Louisiana Republican added, 'I'm telling you, all boats are going to rise and everybody's going to be in a much better mood before we go into that midterm election in 2026.'

Republicans worry DOGE cuts will sink them in Virginia governor's race
Republicans worry DOGE cuts will sink them in Virginia governor's race

Axios

time9 minutes ago

  • Axios

Republicans worry DOGE cuts will sink them in Virginia governor's race

Republicans are increasingly worried that budget cuts by Elon Musk 's DOGE could cost them dearly in November's vote for Virginia governor — an early electoral test of President Trump 's policies. Why it matters: Virginia has one of the highest percentages of federal employees in the country — more than 5% of the state's workforce by some estimates — and Republicans' internal polls are starting to show the damage from tens of thousands of federal layoffs. Zoom in: The University of Virginia's Weldon Cooper Center has projected that 32,000 jobs could be lost in the state this year, many of them federal positions. "Northern Virginia is filled with people who suffered the consequences of the DOGE cuts, and it's hard to see them being sympathetic to a Republican candidate who supports the DOGE cuts," said Whit Ayers, a veteran Republican pollster. "I suspect this will be an albatross around the neck of every Republican candidate this year," said Virginia Republican Bill Bolling, a former lieutenant governor. By the numbers: A private poll done for the campaign of a statewide Republican candidate suggested that just 39% of voters had a favorable view of DOGE. Nearly half of voters surveyed said they knew of someone impacted by the DOGE cuts, according to results shared with Axios. The poll showed Republican Lt. Gov. Winsome Earle-Sears trailing former U.S. Rep. Abigail Spanberger (D) by single digits, outside the margin of error. Between the lines: DOGE could especially hurt Earle-Sears' campaign for governor in Northern Virginia and Norfolk, sections of the state where huge segments of the population are federal workers or have jobs tied to the government. Those areas played a role in Republican Gov. Glenn Youngkin's win in 2021, when he cut into Democratic margins and improved on the GOP's performance in 2017. (Virginia governors can't succeed themselves, so Youngkin isn't allowed to run again.) The D.C. suburbs of Northern Virginia are home to upper- and middle-income voters, many of whom have ties to the government and are particularly likely to vote. Even non-federal workers in those areas could be impacted by DOGE, given the role federal funding plays in driving the local economy. Flashback: Republicans already are comparing DOGE's potential impact on Virginia's 2025 election to that of the GOP-led government shutdown of 2013, which resulted in hundreds of thousands of government workers being placed on unpaid leave. Democrats swept the state's highest offices that year — an outcome many GOP strategists blamed on the shutdown. "Washington, D.C., politics have long shaped the outcome of Virginia off-year elections," Virginia-based GOP strategist Jimmy Keady said in a text to Axios. "With over 230,000 Virginians working in or around the federal government, especially in Northern Virginia and Norfolk, any proposal that threatens those jobs — like DOGE — turns into a high-stakes issue," he added. The other side: Democrats are making DOGE a centerpiece of their election playbook. Virginia's Democratic Party has been running ads highlighting Earle-Sears' comments accusing the media of overhyping the impact of DOGE cuts. Other Democratic commercials are linking Republican state legislative candidates to Musk. Behind the scenes: Youngkin has taken steps to try to soften the blow to the state's federal workers, launching a " Virginia Has Jobs" initiative aimed at helping laid-off workers find new positions. Reality check: Republicans say Earle-Sears has an uphill climb, even without DOGE. In every election since 1977 besides one, the state has elected a governor from the opposition party to the sitting president. Top GOP officials — including some close to Trump — have criticized Earle-Sears and her campaign. Chris LaCivita, Trump's 2024 co-campaign manager and a longtime player in Virginia politics, has called her team " amateurs." What they're saying: Peyton Vogel, a spokesperson for Earle-Sears, rejected the notion that federal cutbacks could hurt the GOP candidate.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store