SC refuses to entertain plea challenging Bodh Gaya Temple Act; asks petitioner to move HC
Supreme Court
on Monday refused to entertain a plea challenging the vires of the
Bodh Gaya Temple Act
, 1949, and asked the petitioner to approach the concerned high court.
The
Mahabodhi temple complex
in Bihar's Bodh Gaya, a
UNESCO World Heritage site
, is one of the four holy areas related to the life of
Lord Gautam Buddha
. Bodh Gaya is a place where Lord Buddha is believed to have attained enlightenment.
A plea challenging the vires of the 1949 Act came up for hearing before a bench of Justices M M Sundresh and K Vinod Chandran.
The bench asked the petitioner's counsel about the prayer sought in the plea.
"I (petitioner) have prayed that the Bodh Gaya Temple Act should be annulled as ultra vires," the counsel said.
Live Events
The bench said the petitioner should approach the concerned high court.
"Why don't you do it before the high court?" the bench asked.
"We are not inclined to entertain the petition under Article 32 of the Constitution of India. However, liberty is given to the petitioner to approach the high court," the bench said.
The 1949 Act pertains to the better management of the temple.
The Mahabodhi temple complex comprises a 50-metre high grand temple, the Vajrasana, the sacred Bodhi tree and six other sacred sites of Buddha's enlightenment, surrounded by numerous ancient votive stupas, well maintained and protected by inner, middle and outer circular boundaries.
A seventh sacred place, the Lotus Pond, is located outside the enclosure to the south. Both the temple area and the Lotus Pond are surrounded by circulating passages at two or three levels, and the area of the ensemble is 5 metres below the level of the surrounding land.
In April this year, Rashtriya Lok Morcha supremo and former Union minister
Upendra Kushwaha
demanded an amendment in the provisions of the Bodh Gaya Temple Act, 1949, so that the management of the Mahabodhi Mahavihara Temple can be handed over to the Buddhists.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Hindustan Times
24 minutes ago
- Hindustan Times
Online gaming bill gets LS approval within 7 minutes
The Lok Sabha on Wednesday passed legislation completely prohibiting online money gaming in India, seven minutes after the Union minister for electronics and information technology (Meity) introduced the bill. Online gaming bill gets LS approval within 7 minutes Cleared by the Union cabinet only a day earlier, the Promotion and Regulation of Online Gaming Bill, 2025 cleared its first legislative hurdle amid criticism from people in the gaming industry, who cited thousands of crores in revenues and investments involving the sector. The government, however, believes the benefits of banning online money games outweighs the costs, a senior government official requesting anonymity said. In Lok Sabha, where the bill sailed through amid opposition parliamentarian's protests, minister Ashwini Vaishnaw said the legislation was necessary to tackle a segment of gaming that is of significant concern. 'Over the last 11 years, digital technology has expanded on a massive scale, giving India a new identity. One sector closely tied to this growth is online gaming, which has three key segments,' Vaishnaw told Parliament. 'The first is e-sports, an emerging field that promotes strategic thinking, teamwork, and cultural exchange. The second is online social games like solitaire, chess, and sudoku that many of us have played. The third, however, is online money games — a segment that has become a serious concern for society today.' The law bans all online money games, from fantasy sports to poker, rummy and online lotteries. Facilitators face up to three years imprisonment, fines of ₹1 crore, or both. Advertising such platforms carries penalties of two years imprisonment and fines up to ₹50 lakh. Government estimates suggest 450 million Indians play online money games, with approximately ₹20,000 crore lost annually. The industry generates ₹31,000 crore in annual revenues, has attracted ₹25,000 crore in foreign investment since June 2022, and supports around 400 startups, according to the letter floated by the industry body to Amit Shah. 'Many families suffer because people in their families get addicted to online money games, and life-long savings are lost to these money games,' Vaishnaw said. The senior government official cited above added the bill was kept under wraps as it was considered too sensitive to publicise. Online gaming encompasses a broad spectrum, from casual mobile games to money-based platforms. Several states have targeted the latter, citing constitutional authority to regulate gambling. However, this approach has created legal confusion over skill versus chance games, with courts delivering conflicting rulings on platforms like rummy and fantasy cricket. At present, India has no federal regulation on online gaming. A patchwork of laws exists, with states like Tamil Nadu, Karnataka and Andhra Pradesh banning online money gaming outright, whilst Sikkim and Nagaland require licensing for operators. Industry bodies were not consulted before Tuesday's Cabinet approval, HT has learnt, though the government had held multiple rounds of conversations with stakeholders over the last three to four years. The All India Gaming Federation, E-Gaming Federation, and Federation of Indian Fantasy Sports have written to Home Minister Amit Shah calling the ban a 'death knell' for the industry. The organisations said the sector contributes over ₹20,000 crore in annual taxes and employs more than 200,000 people, with projections to double by 2028. The government official cited above added that there was recognition the industry will be affected but said companies should look at other ways to turn their platforms towards recreational games. The bill still has a long way to go before being fully operational – it needs to next be approved by the Rajya Sabha, before rules are framed for its implementation. IT secretary S Krishnan told HT the government would hold consultations with stakeholders before drafting implementation rules. 'All ministries supported the bill. The finance ministry raised concerns over payment transactions, and the Financial Intelligence Unit will keep a close watch on them,' he added. Critics argued the ban abandons a more measured regulatory approach and would benefit offshore operators while harming compliant domestic companies. The legislation effectively scraps proposed amendments to IT Rules 2023 that would have created a system where self-regulatory bodies vetted online real-money games and provided consumer complaint channels. 'The IT Rules amendment was a proportionate framework that adequately addressed consumer welfare concerns and would have created a way to signal to consumers which platforms can be trusted and which cannot. Most importantly, it gave them an opportunity for recourse,' said Megha Bal, director at Esya Centre, a tech policy think tank. 'The government has, in one fell swoop, wiped out companies that were onshore and willing to comply with a regulatory framework,' Bal added. The legislation comes amid an Enforcement Directorate investigation into celebrities promoting betting platforms, with the agency questioning film stars, cricketers and influencers over money laundering concerns. The bill, however, promotes e-Sports as legitimate competition while banning money-based gaming, marking one of the world's strictest regulatory approaches to digital gambling. Lok Sabha Speaker Om Birla urged MPs to back the bill, calling it a 'good bill,' even as opposition protests disrupted proceedings. 'I request members to return to their seats and discuss the matter. I am ready to allow a debate. Do you not want to debate this issue?' he asked amid the uproar.
The Hindu
26 minutes ago
- The Hindu
Protesting teachers in Bengal dejected after Supreme Court junks review petition
Protesting teachers dejected after the Supreme Court rejected multiple review petitions to reconsider its April 3 judgement which upheld the annulment of the appointment of nearly 24,000 school staff, including teachers and non-teaching staff. Disappointed teachers said that both the West Bengal State government and the judicial system have 'failed' them. In an order on August 5 made public on August 19, the apex court said, 'No doubt, invalidation of such untainted appointments would lead to heartburn and anguish, which the Court was fully conscious of, but protecting the purity of the selection process is paramount and necessarily has to be given the highest priority.' Several 'untainted' teachers have questioned the judgement, questioning that the top court should have heard the review petitions if it was so 'anguished' by the teachers' plight. Chinmoy Mondal, a leader of the Jogyo Shikkhok Shikkhika Adhikar Mancha (JSSAM) said that only providing age relaxation and forcing the 'untainted' candidates like him and 15,000 others to reappear for the recruitment process is disappointing. 'We got no grace marks for our years of work, no seat reservations, then what relaxation did we get?' Mr. Mondal said on Wednesday (August 20, 2025). More than 180-200 review petitions were filed at the Supreme Court urging the top judiciary to reconsider their judgement. The order also stated, 'These review petitions which, in effect, seek a re-hearing of the entire matter on merits, therefore, do not deserve to be entertained as all relevant aspects have already been examined and considered comprehensively.' The 'untainted' teachers also asked for an extension on the re-examination date which is scheduled to be held on September 7 and 14. 'We hardly have 2-3 weeks left to prepare for the exams. Even if we study for 20 hours a day, we will not make it,' Mr. Mondal said. Mehboob Mondal, another teacher and leader of JSSAM said that around 13,000 of the 'untainted' teachers filled up the new recruitment form but nearly 3,000 could not as the new recruitment rules were different from the ones they followed during the 2016 recruitment drive. 'The Indian judicial system is not working according to the constitution. If the court has all evidence of who the 'untainted' candidates are, then why did they do this to us? They are doing this to protect the real criminals and killing us in the process. Both government and the judiciary have failed us,' Mr. Mondal told The Hindu. The teachers are now preparing to reappear for the exam nine years after they appeared for the same exam conducted by the West Bengal School Service Commission in 2016. However, this time, they will have to compete with thousands of other new and young candidates despite having served in State-run public schools for the past 7-8 years. On April 3, the Supreme Court upheld the Calcutta High Court order which cancelled the appointment of all candidates in the 2016 panel. However, on April 17, the apex court allowed 'untainted' candidates to continue in service until December 31, or until a fresh selection process is completed, but the same relaxation was not given to the non-teaching staff neither have any new re-recruitment notification been issued for the non-teaching staff. The thousands of non-teaching staff have not received any salary since last April and on multiple occasions have said that their families are struggling to make ends meet.
India Today
26 minutes ago
- India Today
Brazil police find letter indicating Bolsonaro's plan to flee to Argentina
Brazilian federal police on Wednesday found a letter addressed to Argentine President Javier Milei, in which former Brazilian President Jair Bolsonaro requested political asylum, according to a Supreme Court document released document did not specify whether the letter was actually sent to revelation comes amid escalating legal troubles for Bolsonaro. According to the same document, police have formally accused Bolsonaro and his son, Eduardo Bolsonaro, of attempting to interfere in an ongoing legal process. The former president is currently on trial for allegedly plotting a coup to overturn his 2022 electoral defeat to President Luiz Inacio Lula da A five-judge panel of Brazil's Supreme Court is scheduled to begin Bolsonaro's trial on September 2, with sessions running through September 12, under the oversight of Justice Cristiano UNDER HOUSE ARREST, TRUMP CALLS IT 'WITCH HUNT'Bolsonaro was placed under house arrest earlier this month after failing to comply with restraining orders. He now faces charges of conspiring with allies to violently subvert the 2022 election results. The Supreme Court's August 4 order mandates that Bolsonaro remain confined to his residence in BrasIlia, allowing visits only from immediate family and legal counsel. Federal police were directed to seize all mobile phones at the allege that Bolsonaro sought international support for his efforts, including from US President Donald Trump. Trump recently imposed new tariffs on Brazilian exports, calling Bolsonaro's prosecution a 'witch hunt.'Meanwhile, Bolsonaro's supporters have taken to the streets. Tens of thousands rallied in Sao Paulo and Rio de Janeiro, urging Brazil's Congress to grant amnesty to Bolsonaro and others implicated in the January 8, 2023, attacks on government buildings in Brasilia.- EndsMust Watch
