Tory MP claims £1,100 for purchase of freely available Who's Who books
Mark Pritchard's claim for the index, which lists the biographies of notable people, cost the taxpayer £321.17 in January this year.
He has also claimed for three previous years of editions in May 2022, and was granted expenses to cover the 2022 version for £264.54, the 2021 version for £300.82 and the 2020 version for £279.92
Versions of Who's Who tend to be largely similar but each year contains an update with biographical details about 'noteworthy and influential people who impact British life'.
It is available for free in the House of Commons library. If every MP claimed for copies of the reference book in the same way, it would have cost the taxpayer more than £750,000.
Pritchard is a backbench MP who once served as a trade envoy to Armenia and Georgia. He has an entry in Who's Who, which gives his history as a parliamentary researcher and founder of a communications firm, lists his roles in politics, and his recreations as 'writing comedy, trainee birdwatcher, jazz, skiing, animal welfare'.
The House of Commons scheme is not fully prescriptive about what MPs can claim under their 'business costs', and allows a degree of discretion for members to say what is necessary for their parliamentary work.
The Independent Parliamentary Standards Authority (Ipsa)'s Funding Handbook states 'newspapers, journals, magazines, or relevant books' are allowable business costs, providing they are not for personal use. Pritchard's expenses were approved and within the rules.
Pritchard and Ipsa have been approached for comment.
Several MPs have had their expenses criticised over the years. The Labour MP Taiwo Owatemi was found to be claiming £900 in 'pet rent' so her dog could live with her, while Angela Rayner claimed Apple AirPods worth £249 on expenses rather than buying a cheaper headphones model. Both claims were within the rules.
MPs' expenses have been subject to greater transparency since it emerged in 2009 that some had been claiming for luxury and non-essential items, such as moat cleaning, a duck house, and heating for their stables.
Sign up to Headlines UK
Get the day's headlines and highlights emailed direct to you every morning
after newsletter promotion
Earlier this week Ipsa, which regulates expenses and prefers to call them 'business costs', launched an investigation into the Labour MP Tahir Ali.
It said in a statement: 'The compliance officer for Ipsa has opened an investigation to determine whether Mr Tahir Ali MP has breached spending rules under Ipsa's Scheme of MPs' Staffing and Business Costs. The investigation relates to the MP's spending on office costs, travel and accommodation. No further information will be published until the investigation has concluded.'
Ali claimed about £59,000 in expenses in the 2023-24 financial year, including £12,651.77 on accommodation, £9,850.54 on travel, £685.20 on dependents' travel, £35,691.63 on office costs and £326.33 on staff travel.
He has previously said: 'I am confident that I have been compliant with Ipsa rules and will fully cooperate with the investigation.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Independent
22 minutes ago
- The Independent
TUC in call for gender equality over pensions
Retired women effectively go more than four months every year without getting a pension because of a gender gap, according to research. The TUC estimated women were losing the equivalent of £7,600 a year on average. The union organisation said compared to men, retired women effectively stop receiving pension income from today. The income gap between men and women in retirement is now 36.5%, according to research from the Prospect union. The Government has revived the Pension Commission, which will bring together unions, employer and independent experts to look into the causes of the gap. TUC general secretary Paul Nowak said: 'Everyone deserves dignity and security in retirement, but too many retired women have been left without enough to get by. 'We must make sure that these inequalities are addressed for future generations. 'That's why reviving the Pensions Commission – bringing together unions, employers and independent experts – is a vital step forward. 'We now have a chance to make sure everyone, including women, receive the decent retirement income that all workers need.' A Government spokesperson said: 'We're determined to close the gender pensions gap, and the new state pension has already reduced historic inequalities faced by women and low earners. 'Alongside this, the Pensions Commission will tackle barriers to close the gender pensions gap in private pensions to ensure women have the dignity and security they deserve in retirement.'
The Independent
22 minutes ago
- The Independent
How Arsenal silently hijacked Spurs' Eberechi Eze transfer well before anyone knew
Just hours before Arsenal clinched a deal for Eberechi Eze, somewhat cruelly, Tottenham Hotspur finally put in the offer they felt would be acceptable to Crystal Palace. There had been a verbal agreement. Spurs just never got a proper answer. After days of difficult and painstaking negotiations between Daniel Levy and Steve Parish, Arsenal had appeared to steal in within a matter of mere hours. That has already seen this move cast as the mother of all transfer hijackings, especially with how it is another North London derby victory. Except, it wasn't really a hijacking at all. The Independent can now reveal that Arsenal had actually struck the principles of an agreement with Palace as early as the morning of Sunday 10 August. They managed to keep it extraordinarily quiet, as illustrated by how it was only after Wednesday evening's sensations that multiple sources were willing to talk about it. There was also the fact that, in those nine days, it didn't look like Arsenal would follow through on that agreement. The word put out was that they wanted to sell before any other purchase, and that they preferred a left winger. Interest in Eze was repeatedly played down. There had been a lot of mixed messages, which fit with the whole summer as regards Arsenal and the Palace star. Levy might certainly feel that now. The situation has led to some surprising sympathy for the Spurs chairman within the game. Their own negotiations for Eze had encountered repeated difficulties, as first reported by The Independent on Saturday night. The problems actually preceded that. Talks almost collapsed the Thursday before, and there were constant hold-ups over issues like add-ons and how much was being paid up front. Just when one issue was solved, another would arise. One description over the last few days was that 'the deal is both almost done and constantly at the point of collapse'. There is now a belief, especially within Spurs, that Palace were stalling. They were waiting for Arsenal to come back. It nevertheless looked so remote by Saturday that Eze himself had accepted Arsenal wasn't going to happen. He even spoke to Parish to try and get his move sorted, as Levy and the Palace chairman met on Monday morning. Eze was genuinely excited about joining Tottenham. It just wasn't the one he really wanted. His dream was a move to Arsenal. That suddenly looked like it would become a reality on Wednesday morning. Arsenal finally acted on that deal. That shift will be linked to Kai Havertz's injury but there is actually hope the German's absence won't be that long, maybe less than three months. The Havertz development just accelerated everything. Arsenal wanted to make sure they didn't miss out. Parish and Arsenal executive vice-chairman Tim Lewis have a closer relationship than Parish and Levy, even if they often bicker. They WhatsApp a lot about regulations and other in-game issues. That helped by Wednesday, especially given that Sunday 10 August agreement. Arsenal also have more players they can offer who Palace need. It is possible a deal is next done for Jakub Kiwior, given how Oliver Glasner's side need a centre-half on that side. Everything could happen very quickly. Arsenal, for their part, still had to pay more than the initial agreement. That was to ensure it actually got done over Spurs. Whereas the previous deal had been for £50m plus £10m in add-ons, this is for £60m and £7.5m in add-ons – pretty much exactly Eze's release clause, which expired for this window on Thursday. It is understood to have been superior to Spurs' offer. Parish played that part masterfully. He got the best possible deal for his club, which was the best-case scenario if you're forced to lose one of the greatest legends in your club history. Eze did just deliver the first major trophy in the club's trophy. Queens Park Rangers will also be celebrating, since they stand to receive 15 per cent of any deal. The Loftus Road hierarchy are now aiming to complete more business of their own, as they are set to receive more money than they've had in years. Eze has ultimately preferred Arsenal because they offer better opportunities for more trophies than the FA Cup – that he can prove a missing piece for – but also because of that dream. The connection was there. When Eze posted on instagram on 26 May celebrating Palace's FA Cup success, the fifth and last picture was a conspicuous image of Ian Wright. It is still to be confirmed whether Eze will play in the Europa Conference League play-off against Fredrikstad on Thursday. There would obviously be romance in this club hero putting in the performance that properly delivers Palace to Europe, while also getting the opportunity for an emotional goodbye. Except, amid all this talk of dreams, a realism must exist. This is a huge transfer, with a lot of money at stake. Levy knows the cost of that now. He will face even greater questions having lost out on two big transfers late on this summer, after Morgan Gibbs-White. Fan protests at Spurs are likely to heat up again. Arsenal have meanwhile signed a game-changer, in the way that some felt might be missing against Liverpool's and Manchester City's business. They've now pulled off the deal of the summer. It could be hugely significant in the season.
Daily Mail
23 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
Ukraine's 'Iron General' refutes rumours he is 'quietly preparing to run for president' to replace Zelensky
Ukraine 's ambassador to the UK on Wednesday denied rumours he 'is quietly preparing a run for President' from his London HQ should peace break out. General Valerii Zaluzhnyi's team were forced to play down the claims stating that 'there is no talk of any campaign headquarters'. It followed posts by a journalist that 'his HQ is already active in London and recruitment is underway'. They claimed sources had told them his campaign had 'effectively begun' after Volodymyr Zelensky told Donald Trump that elections may be coming soon. Zaluzhnyi, known affectionately as the Iron General, would be a front-runner to defeat Mr Zelensky as he is remembered fondly for marshalling the heroic defence of Kyiv in 2022. He was then replaced by Oleksandr Syrskyi as Commander-in-Chief and sidelined as Ukrainian Ambassador to the UK in July last year. Freelance journalist Katie Livingstone said sources had told her the Ukrainian opposition MP Viktoria Siumar would run any campaign with former BBC Ukraine reporter Oksana Torop handling his press. Kyiv Post Correspondent Jason Jay Smart said he had confirmed the claims, adding: 'Sources indicate that he gave the go-ahead to his team, over a month ago, to start planning his campaign.' But Ms Torop last night denied the rumours. She told the New Voice of Ukraine: 'There is no talk of any campaign headquarters. 'Valerii Zaluzhnyi has stated his position more than once, and as far as I know, it has not changed: while the war continues, we need to work to preserve the country, not think about elections.' Zaluzhnyi is Ukraine's most trusted public figure with recent polling finding 73 per cent of Ukrainians trust him compared with 67 per cent for Zelensky.
