Jasprit Bumrah To Play, Massive Vice-Captaincy Change Expected In Asia Cup For India: Report
There will be some tricky selection calls but the Indian selectors would certainly like to maintain continuity which has given them a lot of success from the time Suryakumar took over as T20 captain.
While Axar was the designated vice-captain during India's last series against England at home, Gill was the deputy when Suryakumar was first appointed full-time skipper of the T20 squad in Sri Lanka last year.
It is understood that the selection committee won't be too keen to tinker with the set-up as Abhishek Sharma, Sanju Samson, Suryakumar, Tilak Varma and Hardik Pandya form a solid top five.
"Abhishek Sharma is world's No. 1 T20 batter in last ICC rankings. Sanju Samson has been fantastic last season with both bat and gloves. So it will certainly be a tough call but Shubman in current form (although in Tests) can't be ignored. He had a good IPL also. Problem for selectors is, there are too many performers at the top of the order," a BCCI source privy to developments told PTI.
With so many players in top-order, it would be very difficult to find a slot for Yashasvi Jaiswal and Sai Sudharsan.
Even KL Rahul, who is now the first choice keeper in ODIs, is unlikely to be considered as he doesn't bat in the middle-order.
Second keeper's slot
While Samson is all but certain to be the first keeper, the choice for the second keeper's slot will be between Jitesh Sharma and Dhruv Jurel. While Jurel was a part of the last T20 series, Jitesh had been impressive for RCB during their IPL winning campaign. He has also revelled in the role of a finisher.
Reddy unlikely to be fit in time
While Hardik Pandya remains India's first choice white ball seam bowling all-rounder, Nitish Kumar Reddy, who suffered injury during the England series, is unlikely to get fit in time. Shivam Dube, who made a good comeback against England, is likely to find his place in the squad.
Axar and Washington Sundar are set to be the other two spin-bowling all-rounders in the squad.
Who will be third seamer, Prasidh Krishna or Harshit Rana?
The main bone of contention will be the seam-bowling attack where Bumrah and Arshdeep Singh have locked their slots. The third slot is a fight between Prasidh Krishna, who has 25 wickets in last IPL, and the burly Harshit Rana, who has ability to bowl some really heavy deliveries.
Likely contenders: Suryakumar Yadav (capt), Shubman Gill, Abhishek Sharma, Sanju Samson (wk), Tilak Verma, Shivam Dube, Axar Patel, Washington Sundar, Varun Chakravarthy, Kuldeep Yadav, Jasprit Bumrah, Arshdeep Singh, Harshit Rana/Prasidh Krishna, Hardik Pandya, Jitesh Sharma/Dhruv Jurel.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
&w=3840&q=100)
First Post
30 minutes ago
- First Post
Chennai Grand Masters 2025: Vincent Keymer leads despite being held by Arjun Erigaisi in Round 6
Round 6 of the Chennai Grand Masters 2025 featured intense battles in both Masters and Challengers sections. Vincent Keymer is still ahead in the Masters section despite a draw against second-placed Arjun Erigaisi on Tuesday. Day six of the Chennai Grand Masters 2025 saw some exciting battles as the players fought hard in Round 6 on Tuesday, August 12. Indian Grandmaster Arjun Erigaisi and Germany's Vincent Keymer played a tough game in the Masters section that ended in a draw. Keymer continues to lead the tournament with 4.5 points. Another thrilling match was between Vidit Gujrathi and Anish Giri, which ended in a draw, keeping both players tied with three points each. Dutch GM Jorden van Foreest won against Nihal Sarin with black pieces. American GM Awonder Liang also scored an important win with black pieces against India's V Pranav. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD In another game, Karthikeyan Murali and Ray Robson faced off, which ended in a draw. So, three games ended in a draw in the Masters section in Round 6. Round 6 – Masters Summary Precision play and creative tactics defined Round 6, keeping fans on the edge of their seats. Every board tells a new story, and the fight for the lead intensifies. 🔥 Who's turning momentum into victory? 📍 Chennai | 🗓️ 12 Aug 2025@ChessbaseIndia… — Quantbox Chennai Grand Masters (@Chennai_GM) August 12, 2025 In the Challengers section, M Pranesh won his game against Abhimanyu Puranik, while Leon Luke Mendonca defeated Aryan Chopra. Harika Dronavalli beat Vaishali Rameshbabu, and Adhiban Baskaran also scored a win over Diptayan Ghosh. The only draw was between Pa Iniyan and Harshavardhan GB. Chennai Grand Masters 2025: Masters standings after Round 6 Rank Player Country Points 1 GM Vincent Keymer Germany 4.5 2 GM Arjun Erigaisi India 3.5 3 GM Awonder Liang USA 3.5 4 GM Anish Giri Netherlands 3.0 5 GM Karthikeyan Murali India 3.0 6 GM Vidit Gujrathi India 3.0 7 GM Jorden van Foreest Netherlands 3.0 8 GM Ray Robson USA 2.5 9 GM Nihal Sarin India 2.0 10 GM V Pranav India 2.0 Chennai Grand Masters 2025: Challengers standings after Round 6 Rank Player Country Points 1 M Pranesh India 4.5 1 Abhimanyu Puranik India 4.5 1 Leon Luke Mendonca India 4.5 4 Adhiban Baskaran India 3.5 4 Diptayan Ghosh India 3.5 4 Pa Iniyan India 3.5 7 Harshavardhan GB India 2.0 8 Aryan Chopra India 1.5 8 Harika Dronavalli India 1.5 10 Vaishali Rameshbabu India 1.0
NDTV
an hour ago
- NDTV
When MS Dhoni Lost His Cool On Ambati Rayudu - Untold Story About CSK Legend Revealed
Former Indian cricket team batter Ambati Rayudu revealed an incident where 'Captain Cool' MS Dhoni lost his patience and gave him an ultimatum. The incident took place during Indian Premier League (IPL) 2019 when Dhoni was left irritated by Ratudu's temper during a match. Dhoni sternly told Rayudu to control his anger and focus on the game. 'Sometimes, Mahi bhai would tell me — just like a tin roof heats up quickly, I also tend to lose my cool quickly," he said on JioHotstar show 'Cheeky Singles.' This was the not only time that Rayudu received warnings from Dhoni as the former India star revealed that his temper often got him into trouble. 'Just focus on batting, don't raise your hand. I don't want to lose Fair Play points because of you'," Rayudu added when asked about the incidents. Rayudu, however, did not miss the opportunity to poke fun at the CSK legend as he pointed out that it was the same year that Dhoni was fined after entering the field following a controversial decision. During the match between Chennai Super Kings and Rajasthan Royals, Dhoni was left fuming over a controversial no-ball decision and he entered the field to challenge the call. The gesture led to Dhoni being fined 50 per cent of match fees. "Interestingly, that same year, he himself walked onto the field — not because of me, but because we were losing,' Rayudu said. Meanwhile, Chennai Super Kings (CSK) veteran spinner Ravichandran Ashwin has asked CSK for clarity on how they intend to use him in the Indian Premier League (IPL) 2026, as per ESPNcricinfo. According to ESPNcricinfo, Ashwin has told the franchise he doesn't mind parting ways with them if he doesn't fit their plans. Ashwin was picked by CSK at the mega auction 2025 for Rs 9.75 crore. He played nine fixtures for Chennai Super Kings in IPL 2025, taking seven wickets and conceding runs at an economy rate of 9.13. This IPL was also his costliest year as he went for 9.12 runs an over, the first time that his economy went past 8.49. The deadline for releasing players usually depends on when the auction takes place, which hasn't been finalised for IPL 2026 yet. Although there is a mini auction every year, the mega auction happens only once every three years. Anytime between November and February is when it is typically held. As Ashwin jokingly stated during his interview with Sanju Samson, a player trade can occur no more than a week prior to the auction. Ashwin is the fifth-highest wicket-taker in the IPL with 201 scalps in 239 matches at an average of 30.94. Before rejoining CSK in 2025, he played for the now-defunct Rising Pune Supergiant, Kings XI Punjab (now Punjab Kings), Delhi Capitals, and Rajasthan Royals.
The Hindu
an hour ago
- The Hindu
Injuries are a part of the game; injury substitutes are unnecessary
Had England won the final Test at the Oval, it is possible that without facing a single delivery, their No.11 might have emerged as hero. Chris Woakes walking out gingerly, his left arm in a sling hidden under his sweater was already one of the heroic sights of the series; at Old Trafford Rishabh Pant had dragged his fractured foot to the crease. Pant swung Pant-like, and played the shot of the series when he appeared to push Ben Stokes delicately to cover only for the ball to race to the boundary like a tracer bullet, as Ravi Shastri would say. Players injured during the course of a match returning to the action are the stuff of folklore. Colin Cowdrey, arriving at the crease with his arm in a sling, Anil Kumble bowling to and dismissing Brian Lara with his jaw wired up are justly in that pantheon. Substitute fielders were always allowed in the laws of the game, and till recently substitute runners too for injured batters. Then, following the death of Phil Hughes on the cricket field, a concussion substitute was allowed to bat or bowl. The runner for batters, however, was not allowed. Following the heroics of Pant and Woakes, there has been a cry for substitutes who could replace players injured. Contrasting views Former England captain Michael Vaughan has called cricket a 'dinosaur' game for not allowing injury substitutes, claiming this 'devalues the product'. He went on to say — and this may be the nub — 'It cost England the series because England got to within six runs of beating India with ten players.' On the other hand, current captain Ben Stokes argues that the injury substitute is unnecessary. If someone gets injured, its tough luck. Deal with it, he says, adding that there may be room for manipulation if an injury substitute is allowed. Few international cricketers go through a career without injuries. These are part of the game, like sixes and dogs running onto the field. Wicketkeepers finish with crooked fingers, fast bowlers' backs rebel within a few years, and often in only their 40s, players develop dodgy knees, and carry other evidence of their harsh sporting life. The law on substitutes (Law 2) is one of the trickier ones. It has been manipulated in the past. In his autobiography, Imran Khan has written about a match in Pakistan in the 1980s, where one of the teams, realising the nature of the wicket substituted players after lunch and a whole session of play had been gone through! Nearly a century before that, when the Lancashire captain Archie Maclaren allowed Sussex to substitute a fast bowler who fell ill after three overs, he was berated by Wisden for setting up a 'very dangerous precedent.' Cricket is a tough game. The intriguing case of a substitute who took a wicket occurred in 1982. After fast bowler Gladstone Small had already bowled 15 over for Warwickshire against Lancashire, he was called up for England duty as standby. Manager David Brown (who was 40 and had played 26 Tests for England) was given special permission to take Small's place in the eleven. Brown dismissed wicketkeeper Christopher Scott. The story doesn't end there. Small was not needed by England, then returned to bat, and bowled eleven overs in the second innings. This may not have been the manipulation Stokes had in mind when he said he was against the idea of an injury substitute (or, as in this case, a 'national call' substitute). But he has a point. Would England have won the Lord's Test if Vaughan's Law had existed, and Shoaib Bashir (who got the last wicket bowling with a fractured finger) had made way for an injury substitute? Cricket is a game of pressure, and injuries add to the degree of difficulty. It is not just the romance of the fallen hero rising to a challenge — although as Pant and Woakes showed, there is that too. There is too the danger of batters and fielders becoming that bit more reckless in their approach knowing if they are injured, a substitute will do their job. The modern player (Stokes) I think is right, while the ex-player (Vaughan), who sees cricket as a 'product' has got it wrong.
