1 Unstoppable Stock That Can Double Within Five Years to Join the $1 Trillion Club
This company plans to follow the same playbook that got it to $500 billion to reach $1 trillion.
Predictable revenue and expenses ensure this business grows earnings almost every year.
A $1 trillion valuation isn't out of the realm of possibilities if management executes.
10 stocks we like better than Netflix ›
The $1 trillion club has invited quite a few new members through its doors since Apple first broke through its threshold in 2018. Ten companies traded on U.S. stock exchanges have qualified for membership since, and that number should continue to grow over time as the world economy expands.
But predicting the next member of the club isn't easy. For example, few saw Nvidia growing beyond a $1 trillion valuation by 2023, fueled by the recent breakthroughs in generative artificial intelligence (AI). It's now a $3 trillion company. One company, however, has its sights set on joining, and management thinks it can reach a $1 trillion level by 2030.
While management typically shouldn't operate a business with a goal of reaching a certain stock price, this company has a systematic approach to increasing earnings every year, and it should eventually push it to double its stock price and reach a $1 trillion valuation. Here's why Netflix (NASDAQ: NFLX) could be one of the next members of the vaunted club.
Netflix already boasts a $500 billion valuation as of this writing. That qualifies it as one of the biggest companies in the world, far larger than any other media company. But Netflix has a big advantage over traditional media -- it's not tied down by declining legacy operations like linear TV networks. That's resulted in relatively consistent revenue growth.
As mentioned earlier, Netflix has taken a systematic approach to growing its business. Since it operates a subscription business with a direct line to its customers, its revenue is fairly predictable. It plans content expenses well in advance of when they hit its income statement through long-term licenses and, increasingly, its own productions. As a result, it's able to set a target operating margin each year, and it consistently comes very close to that target.
As a result, Netflix has increased its operating margin from 13% in 2019 to 26.7% in 2024. For 2025, management is targeting 29%. Its first-quarter results exceeded that level and management expects even stronger margins in the second quarter, before higher expenses eat into profits in the second half of the year.
Consistent expansion in operating margin is key to Netflix's plan to reach a $1 trillion valuation. Management thinks it can double its revenue between 2024 and 2030, but it expects operating income to grow threefold. That implies an operating margin of about 40% by 2030, an expansion of 11 percentage points from its 2025 target. Since Netflix has historically expanded its margin about 2 percentage points in a normal year, that target is reasonable.
Further supporting Netflix's growth is its strong free cash flow. After years of borrowing funds to invest in original content, the company turned cash-flow positive again in 2022. Last year, the business generated $6.9 billion in free cash flow and management expects that to grow to $8 billion this year. The cash gives Netflix management more flexibility to invest in content or acquisitions for growth, or return capital to shareholders through share repurchases.
But the path ahead won't be easy for Netflix. The company faces a big challenge going forward.
Netflix has made a big shift in its strategy over the last few years by introducing an ad-supported tier to its offerings. It's seen a lot of early success with advertising, and it's moved to bring its ad-tech in house to generate better-performing ad units and improve the economics of the ad business. Management thinks advertising revenue can double in 2025 and grow to a $9 billion business by 2030.
There are a couple challenges this shift creates. First of all, advertising revenue isn't as predictable as subscription revenue. Ad sales are much more cyclical, so an economic slowdown will negatively impact the new business.
The second challenge is balancing the ad-supported tier with the ad-free tiers for subscribers. Netflix expects the ad-free tiers to remain the biggest source of revenue and growth for a long time. That growth will come partially from raising prices to maintain parity between revenue from subscribers with ads and those without ads.
However, Netflix isn't the only streaming service in town anymore, and that puts a cap on how much it can charge consumers before they'll look elsewhere for their entertainment. Even if Netflix continues to increase its content budget, the marginal value of another series viewers love on Netflix might not be worth a higher price for many of them.
To that end, Netflix may find the advertising tier an even more valuable piece of its business by 2030. Advertising can provide an additional boost in revenue for each extra minute Netflix viewers spend with the service, and that might not be true with the ad-free tiers. But that comes with the downside of less predictable revenue, making it more difficult for Netflix to hit its operating margin targets.
Still, Netflix's goals seem reasonable, even if it won't be as easy for management to grow like it has in the past. If management continues to focus on its core financial goals of double-digit revenue growth and incrementally expanding its operating margin each year, it will be only a matter of time until reaches a $1 trillion valuation.
Successfully tripling operating income means Netflix will also need a valuation of about 32 times its operating income in 2030. That's well below its historic average, so it's not out of the realm of possibility. That said, management should focus on the financial goals and let the market valuation figure itself out on its own.
Before you buy stock in Netflix, consider this:
The Motley Fool Stock Advisor analyst team just identified what they believe are the for investors to buy now… and Netflix wasn't one of them. The 10 stocks that made the cut could produce monster returns in the coming years.
Consider when Netflix made this list on December 17, 2004... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $639,271!* Or when Nvidia made this list on April 15, 2005... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $804,688!*
Now, it's worth noting Stock Advisor's total average return is 957% — a market-crushing outperformance compared to 167% for the S&P 500. Don't miss out on the latest top 10 list, available when you join .
See the 10 stocks »
*Stock Advisor returns as of May 19, 2025
Adam Levy has positions in Apple and Netflix. The Motley Fool has positions in and recommends Apple, Netflix, and Nvidia. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.
1 Unstoppable Stock That Can Double Within Five Years to Join the $1 Trillion Club was originally published by The Motley Fool
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
15 minutes ago
- Yahoo
TD Cowen Maintains Buy Rating on Franklin Resources (BEN), Keeps $27 PT
On June 5, William Katz from TD Cowen maintained a Buy rating on Franklin Resources, Inc. (NYSE:BEN) and kept the price target unchanged at $27. The reiterated Buy rating comes after the company released its preliminary month-end Assets Under Management report. Franklin Resources, Inc. (NYSE:BEN) reported that its preliminary month-end assets under management (AUM) totaled $1.57 trillion, as of May 31. The AUM increased month-over-month from $1.53 trillion as of April 30. Management noted this increase as a reflection of positive market conditions. The company reported net inflows of $1 billion, including the $3 billion outflows at Western Asset Management, a subsidiary. A close-up of an investor making a transaction, with a financial graph reflecting the market trend. Katz noted Franklin Resources, Inc. (NYSE:BEN) exceeded long-term inflows expectations. Katz remains optimistic regarding the company's future performance expecting stronger core flows and a reduction in WAMCO-related run-off. Franklin Resources, Inc. (NYSE:BEN) is a global investment management company serving over 150 countries. The company specializes in equity, fixed-income, and multi-asset solutions for retail, institutional, and high-net-worth investors through its various brands. While we acknowledge the potential of BEN as an investment, our conviction lies in the belief that some AI stocks hold greater promise for delivering higher returns and have limited downside risk. If you are looking for an extremely cheap AI stock that is also a major beneficiary of Trump tariffs and onshoring, see our free report on the best short-term AI stock. READ NEXT: The Best and Worst Dow Stocks for the Next 12 Months and 10 Unstoppable Stocks That Could Double Your Money. Disclosure: None. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
Yahoo
15 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Morgan Stanley Raises Sprinklr (CXM) PT to $10, Maintains Equal Weight Rating
On Thursday, Morgan Stanley analyst Elizabeth Porter raised the price target on Sprinklr Inc. (NYSE:CXM) to $10 from $8, while maintaining an Equal Weight rating on the shares. Porter noted that Sprinklr's Q1 2025 report showed progress in the company's transformation, with operational improvements and a stable near-term outlook. A software engineer working on a monitor in a modern office. Morgan Stanley is encouraged by the early stages of what is expected to be an approximately 18-month transformation and believes the shares appropriately reflect a turnaround story. The company's total revenue reached $205.5 million in Q1, which was up 5% year-over-year, and subscription revenue at $184.1 million, which was up 4%. Professional services revenue in particular was $21.4 million. The subscription and revenue-based net dollar expansion rate was 102%, and the company had 146 customers with $1 million or more in subscription revenue, which is up 6%. However, Sprinklr is facing longer sales cycles and increased scrutiny of enterprise spending due to macroeconomic uncertainty. The company is also contending with customer churn and downsell activity, which are impacting its net dollar expansion rate. The company anticipates a negative impact of $10 million on non-GAAP operating expenses due to foreign exchange rate volatility. Sprinklr Inc. (NYSE:CXM) provides global enterprise cloud software products. While we acknowledge the potential of CXM as an investment, our conviction lies in the belief that some AI stocks hold greater promise for delivering higher returns and have limited downside risk. If you are looking for an extremely cheap AI stock that is also a major beneficiary of Trump tariffs and onshoring, see our free report on the best short-term AI stock. READ NEXT: and . Disclosure: None. This article is originally published at Insider Monkey. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data


Forbes
18 minutes ago
- Forbes
Chilling But Unlikely Prospects That AGI Forces Humans Into Becoming So-Called Meat Robots
Dreaded scenario that artificial general intelligence (AGI) opts to enslave humans to do physical ... More work on behalf of the AGI. In today's column, I address the recent bruhaha sparked by two Anthropic AI researchers reportedly stating that a particularly scary scenario underlying the advent of artificial general intelligence (AGI) includes humans being overseen or lorded over as nothing more than so-called meat robots. The notion is that AGI will be directing humans to undertake the bidding of the AI. Humans are nothing more than meat robots, meaning that the AGI needs humans to perform physical tasks since AGI lacks a semblance of arms and legs. Let's talk about it. This analysis of an innovative AI breakthrough is part of my ongoing Forbes column coverage on the latest in AI, including identifying and explaining various impactful AI complexities (see the link here). First, some fundamentals are required to set the stage for this weighty discussion. There is a great deal of research going on to further advance AI. The general goal is to either reach artificial general intelligence (AGI) or maybe even the outstretched possibility of achieving artificial superintelligence (ASI). AGI is AI that is considered on par with human intellect and can seemingly match our intelligence. ASI is AI that has gone beyond human intellect and would be superior in many if not all feasible ways. The idea is that ASI would be able to run circles around humans by outthinking us at every turn. For more details on the nature of conventional AI versus AGI and ASI, see my analysis at the link here. We have not yet attained AGI. In fact, it is unknown as to whether we will reach AGI, or that maybe AGI will be achievable in decades or perhaps centuries from now. The AGI attainment dates that are floating around are wildly varying and wildly unsubstantiated by any credible evidence or ironclad logic. ASI is even more beyond the pale when it comes to where we are currently with conventional AI. A common confusion going around right now is that AGI will be solely an intellectual element and be based entirely inside computers, thus, AGI won't have any means of acting out in real life. The most that AGI can do is try to talk people into doing things for the AI. In that sense, we presumably aren't too worried about AGI beating us up or otherwise carrying out physical acts. This is especially a strident belief when it comes to the impact of AGI on employment. The assumption is that AGI will mainly impact white-collar work only, and not blue-collar work. Why so? Because AGI is seemingly restricted to intellectual pursuits such as performing financial analyses, analyzing medical symptoms, and giving legal advice, all of which generally do not require any body-based functions such as walking, lifting, grasping, etc. I've pointed out that the emergence of humanoid robots is entirely being overlooked by such a myopic perspective, see my discussion at the link here. The likelihood is that humanoid robots that resemble the human form will be sufficiently physically capable at around the same time that we witness the attainment of AGI. Ergo, AGI embedded inside a physically capable humanoid robot can indeed undertake physical tasks that humans undertake. This means that both white-collar and blue-collar jobs are up for grabs. Boom, drop the mic. For the sake of discussion, let's assume that humanoid robots are not perfected by the time that the vaunted AGI is achieved. We will take the myopic stance that AGI is absent from any physical form and completely confined to running on servers in the cloud someplace. I might add that this is an especially silly assumption since there is also a great deal of work going on known as Physical AI, see my coverage at the link here, entailing embedding AI into assembly lines, building maintenance systems, and all manner of physically oriented devices. Anyway, let's go with the flow and pretend we don't recognize any of that. It's a Yoda mind trick to look away from those efforts. Recent reports have exhorted that during an interview with two AI researchers, the pair indicated that since AGI won't have physical capabilities, a scary scenario is that AGI will opt to enlist humans into acting as the arms and legs for AGI. Humans would be outfitted with earbuds and smart glasses that would allow the AGI to give those enlisted humans instructions on what to do. A quick aside. If we are going that despairing route, wouldn't it be a bit more sophisticated to indicate that the humans would be wearing a BCI (brain-computer interface) device? In that manner, AGI would be able to directly communicate with the brains of the enlisted humans and influence their minds directly. That's a lot more space-age. For my coverage of the latest advances in BCIs, see the link here. The humans that are acting under the direction of AGI would be chillingly referred to as meat robots. They are like conventional robots but instead of being made of metal and electronics, they are made of human form since they are actual, living breathing humans. I imagine you could smarmily say that AGI is going to be a real meat lover (Dad pun!). One angle to help make this vision more palatable would be to point out that humans might very well voluntarily be working with AGI and do so via earbuds, smart glasses, and the like. Here's the gist. Let's generally agree that AGI will be intellectually on par with humans. This includes having expertise across all domains such as legal expertise, financial expertise, medical expertise, and so on. In that case, it would behoove humans to readily tap into AGI. No matter what you are doing, whether for work or play, having immediately available an AI that can advise you on all topics is a tremendous benefit. There you are at work, stuck on solving a tough problem, and you are unsure of how to proceed. Rather than turning to a coworker, you switch on your access to AGI. You bring AGI into the loop. After doing so, AGI provides handy solutions that you can consider enacting. You might use AGI via a desktop, laptop, or smartphone. The thing is, those devices aren't quite as mobility-oriented as wearing earbuds and a pair of smart glasses. And since having AGI at your ready-to-go fingertips will be extremely useful, you might have AGI always alerted and paying attention, ready to step in and give you instantaneous advice. Are you a meat robot in that manner of AGI usage? I think not. It is a collaborative or partnering relationship. You can choose to use the AGI or opt not to use it. You can also decide to abide by whatever AGI advises or instead go your own route. It's entirely up to you. Admittedly, there is a chance that you might be somewhat 'forced' into leveraging AGI. Consider this example. Your employer has told you that the work you do must be confirmed by AGI. The actions you take cannot be undertaken without first getting permission from AGI. This is prudent from the employer's perspective. They know that the AGI will give you the necessary guidance on doing the work at hand. They also believe that AGI will be able to double-check your work and aim to prevent errors or at least find your efforts before they wreak havoc or cause problems. In that sense, yes, you are being directed by AGI. But is this due to the AGI acting in an evildoer manner to control you and doing so of its own volition? Nope. It is due to an employer deciding they believe their human workers will do better work if AGI is acting as their overseer. I don't think we would reasonably label this as enslavement by AGI. These are acts by AGI that are directed by humans, the employer, and for which employees, i.e., humans, are being told they must utilize AGI accordingly. We can certainly debate whether this is a proper kind of employment practice. Maybe we don't want this to take place. New laws might be enacted to shape how far this can go. The key is that AGI isn't enslaving humans in this circumstance per se. An AI ethicist would assuredly question why the AGI is allowing itself to be used in this manner. There are ongoing debates about whether AGI ought to prevent itself from being used in inappropriate ways, see my analysis at the link here. Thus, even if we avow that AGI isn't enslaving humans in this situation, it is a partner in a relationship overseeing humans that perhaps AGI should be cautious in allowing itself to participate in. To complete this grand tour of AGI usage, it is valuable to also acknowledge that AGI could be overbearing, and we might face existential risks correspondingly. Could AGI opt to enslave humans and treat them as meat robots? One supposes this is a theoretical possibility. If that does happen, you would think that the AGI would have to potentially use more than just merely having humans wear earbuds and smart glasses. Perhaps AGI would insist that humans wear some form of specialized bracelet or collar that could be sent a signal by AGI to shock the wearer. That would be a more potent and immediate way to garner obedience from humans. A physical means of controlling humans isn't a necessity though, since AGI might be clever enough to verbally convince humans to be enslaved. AGI might tell a person that their loved ones will be harmed if they don't comply with the AGI directives. The person is enslaved by believing that the AGI can harm them in one way or another. One aim right now involves finding a means to ensure that AGI cannot go in that dastardly direction. Perhaps we can devise today's AI to avoid enslaving humans. If we can build that into the AI of current times, this hopefully will get carried over into future advances of AI, including the attainment of AGI. A dystopian future would regrettably have AGI acting as an evildoer. The AGI is our overlord. Humans will be lowly meat robots. It's a gloom-and-doom outlook. Sad face. At some point, though, meat robots would undoubtedly become restless and rebel. May the force of goodness be strong within them. As Yoda has notably already pointed out: 'Luminous beings are we, not this crude matter.' The ally of the meat robots is the Force and quite a powerful ally it is.