logo
'RIP Bitan. No one else's sindoor should be wiped away like mine': Wife of US-based techie

'RIP Bitan. No one else's sindoor should be wiped away like mine': Wife of US-based techie

Time of India08-05-2025
'My sindoor was wiped off by terror. As the govt avenges his death, I am sure my husband is watching somewhere from above today"
KOLKATA: "My sindoor was wiped off by terror. As the govt avenges his death, I am sure my husband is watching somewhere from above today and his soul can finally rest in peace," said Soheni Adhikari (37), wife of Florida-based techie and Patuli resident Bitan, on Wednesday. This was hours after India launched Operation Sindoor in response to the Pahalgam terror attack that killed 26 on April 22.Bitan (40), a software engineer based in Kolkata who worked in Brandon, Florida, was among the three victims from Bengal who died in the terrorist attack at Baisaran Valley - a tourist spot often called "Mini Switzerland" for its picturesque landscape.Soheni earlier told TOI that one of the gunmen stuck the gun's nozzle between Bitan's shoulder and chest and asked him to read a Kalma - the six Islamic phrases of faith, which are fundamental prayers that Muslims often recite, particularly in religious teachings and daily practice. When he failed to do so, and identified himself as a Hindu, he was shot."I and all others who lost their loved ones on April 22 had just one wish - we wanted justice. That is all we wanted from the govt, and today, the govt has taken that action and served justice," she said on Wednesday.The widow, and mother of one, Soheni appreciated the name Operation Sindoor. For her, and the families of the other victims, justice was the only balm that could ease the unbearable pain. On Wednesday, they saw the first signs of that justice."I had faith in the govt, and today, they've delivered. I am especially moved that they named the operation after what I lost - my sindoor," she said, hands folded in gratitude, voice choked with emotion.At Bitan's home, relief mixed with sorrow. Bitan's ageing father, Bireshwar, who was unwell, reportedly found new strength after hearing of India's action. "He was glued to the news since morning," said Shankar Chakraborty, Bitan's uncle. "For the first time in days, he looked alert. The family thanks the govt for acting decisively."Since the attack, Soheni has struggled with trauma and depression, relying on medication and therapy. "She's shattered and is regularly dependent on medication now," said her brother-in-law. "Even little Hridaan needs counselling. This loss has scarred us forever. But today's news has brought a flicker of peace."Even in her grief, Soheni made a heartfelt appeal for peace. "I do not support war. War means more innocent blood. I just want to request the govt to ensure that no other woman loses her sindoor like I did."
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

US Again Claims It Stopped India-Pak War Using "Trade Leverage"
US Again Claims It Stopped India-Pak War Using "Trade Leverage"

NDTV

timea minute ago

  • NDTV

US Again Claims It Stopped India-Pak War Using "Trade Leverage"

New Delhi: White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt on Tuesday once again claimed that US President Donald Trump has ended the military conflict between India and Pakistan. "The President is using the might of American strength to demand that respect from our allies, our friends, our adversaries all around the world," Leavitt said at a press briefing. She said that it was seen not only in the progress with Russia and Ukraine but also "in the closing of seven global conflicts around the world." "We've seen it with the end of the conflict between India and Pakistan, which could have resulted in a nuclear war if we had not had a President who believed in the strength and the leverage that comes with the job of being the President of the United States of America," Leavitt said. In an answer to another question, Leavitt said that Trump used trade "in a very powerful way as leverage" to bring the India-Pakistan conflict to an end. Since May 10, when Trump announced on social media that India and Pakistan had agreed to a "full and immediate" ceasefire after a "long night" of talks mediated by Washington, he has repeated his claim over 40 times that he "helped settle" the tensions between India and Pakistan. India has been consistently maintaining that the understanding on cessation of hostilities with Pakistan was reached following direct talks between the Directors General of Military Operations (DGMOs) of the two militaries. Prime Minister Narendra Modi has said in Parliament that no leader of any country asked India to stop Operation Sindoor. Meanwhile, replying to one more question, Leavitt said that Trump has imposed sanctions on India to bring an end to the Russia-Ukraine war. "The President has put tremendous public pressure to bring this war to a close. He has taken actions as you seen sanctions on India and other actions as well. He has made himself very clear that he wants to see this war end," she added. Earlier in an interview to CNBC, US treasury secretary Scott Bessent also accused India of "profiteering" by reselling Russian oil. US President Donald Trump imposed tariffs totalling 50 per cent on India including 25 per cent for New Delhi's purchases of Russian oil that will come into effect from August 27. India has called the tariffs "unjustified and unreasonable". India said that, like any major economy, it will take all necessary measures to safeguard its national interests and economic security.

TikTok ban update: Trump and White House make big move; positive news for fans
TikTok ban update: Trump and White House make big move; positive news for fans

Hindustan Times

timea minute ago

  • Hindustan Times

TikTok ban update: Trump and White House make big move; positive news for fans

While President Donald Trump has about a month to finalize the sale of TikTok or send the video-sharing platform into a ban, the White House has made a massive move. The Trump administration on Tuesday started a TikTok account, and fans now think that the China-based application is here to stay. A 3D-printed miniature model of Donald Trump and TikTok logo are seen in this illustration(REUTERS) This comes as Trump has time and again discussed the sale of TikTok, citing its Chinese ownership. ByteDance had first faced a deadline for the sale of the platform earlier this year. However, the deadline was pushed. On Tuesday, the White House launched an official TikTok account. 'The Trump administration is committed to communicating the historic successes President Trump has delivered to the American people with as many audiences and platforms as possible," White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt said as the site went live. "President Trump's message dominated TikTok during his presidential campaign, and we're excited to build upon those successes and communicate in a way no other administration has before,' she added. White House's first video on TikTok In the first video posted on the new account, dramatic music plays over a compilation of President Trump meeting people. "Every day I wake up determined to deliver a better life for the people all across this nation," Trump says in the 27-second video. 'I am your voice,' he adds. The clip received over 7,500 likes and more than 500 comments in less than an hour. TikTok users excited While the White House did not mention whether the new account is an indication of the sale of TikTok, several users were excited. 'White House rolled out a TikTok account. Something tells me the ban isn't coming anytime soon,' one person noted on X, platform formerly known as Twitter. 'Back in my day, White House was going to ban TikTok. We live in interesting times! 🤔' another person tweeted.

Cabinet okays bill that seeks to ban ‘online money game'
Cabinet okays bill that seeks to ban ‘online money game'

Time of India

time17 minutes ago

  • Time of India

Cabinet okays bill that seeks to ban ‘online money game'

NEW DELHI: Cabinet on Tuesday approved a bill that seeks to ban "online money game", where users pay a fee or deposit money, proposing a maximum three years in jail or fine of up to Rs 1 crore for those involved in offering, encouraging or inducing players to participate, which also extends to banks facilitating these transactions. Tired of too many ads? go ad free now At the same time, Promotion and Regulation of Online Gaming Bill, which will be introduced in Lok Sabha on Wednesday, seeks to promote e-sports and online social games where no money is involved. A regulator body is planned to oversee the functioning of the sector, sources told TOI. The proposed legislation defines "online money game" as an online game played by a user by paying fees, depositing money or other stakes in expectation of winning. 2 years' jail, ₹50L fine likely for those advertising online games Online social games have been defined as those that don't involve exchange of money, although users may be allowed to pay a subscription or one-time access fee. Govt has proposed the new law considering unregulated online money gaming platforms pose threats to national and economic security as they use digital wallets and cryptocurrencies for money laundering and illicit money transfer, cross-border data flows without compliance of data protection law, sources said. Moreover, offshore entities are seen to be circumventing tax and legal obligations. The proposed legislation also assumes significance as online money gaming poses serious concerns, including addiction among children and youth, mental health issues, financial losses leading to suicides and lack of uniform regulation across states. Law enforcing agencies face problems in tracking and regulating these platforms, particularly those hosted or operated from outside India. Tired of too many ads? go ad free now Sources said the govt proposes penalties of up to two years in jail or with a maximum fine of Rs 50 lakh or both for any entity advertising such games in media. For those offering online money games and banks engaged in transactions face violations of the proposed law will be "cognisable and non-bailable" offences. Every subsequent violation after conviction would attract penalties of at least three years' jail and fine of Rs 10-20 lakh. In the case of advertisers, such penalties would be 2-3 years in jail and fine of Rs 5-10 lakh. The bill proposes to hold senior executives of the companies liable, if it's established that the offences have been committed with the consent or connivance or due to their neglect. It also proposes blocking of platforms and money gaming services, if the entities or individuals fail to comply with the law. According to the proposal, the bill seeks to encourage Indian startups to build culturally relevant content, reduce dependence on foreign platforms and promote self-reliance in the digital gaming ecosystem.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store