Syed Saddiq declines immediate return as Muda president, cites family and constituency commitments
FMT reported that the Muar MP said he needs more time before deciding.
'I have informed the party leadership that I need a little more time,' he said at an event here yesterday, as quoted by the news portal.
'I want to spend time with my family, focus on my constituency work in Muar, and continue fundraising for local needs.
I've already relayed my decision to the party leadership, and I will leave it at that.'
Syed Saddiq stepped down as Muda president in 2023 during his corruption trial, saying he wanted to show that holding the presidency required being 'whiter than white.'
In November that year, the former youth and sports minister was convicted of abetting criminal breach of trust, misappropriation of party funds, and money laundering, and sentenced to seven years' jail, a RM10 million fine, and two strokes of the rotan. The sentences were stayed pending appeal.
On June 25, the Court of Appeal unanimously acquitted him, with Justice Noorin Badaruddin stating that the prosecution had failed to prove the elements of the charges and that Syed Saddiq should have been acquitted without his defence being called.
A three-judge panel led by Datuk Ahmad Zaidi Ibrahim overturned the conviction, prison sentence, fine, and rotan punishment.
Following the acquittal, acting Muda president Amira Aisya Abd Aziz, on behalf of the party's central executive committee, offered to return the presidency to Syed Saddiq.
She said the decision was aimed at strengthening the party, particularly in garnering support ahead of the next general election.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
New Straits Times
3 hours ago
- New Straits Times
Malaysia hopes cross-border e-hailing with Singapore can be implemented, says Loke
KUALA LUMPUR: Malaysia is open to introducing cross-border e-hailing services with Singapore, but the initiative must be pursued jointly by both countries, said Transport Minister Anthony Loke. "In principle, we hope that cross-border e-hailing can be implemented," he told the Dewan Rakyat today. He was responding to Tebrau member of parliament Jimmy Puah's question on cross-border traffic congestion and e-hailing drivers. Loke said that the government was ready to discuss the matter further with Singapore, but cautioned that it could not be a unilateral decision. "As a matter of principle and policy, we are ready to discuss with Singapore to enhance cross-border connectivity, but this cannot be carried out unilaterally. Both parties must agree before it can be implemented," he added. The minister explained that any proposal to allow cross-border e-hailing required in-depth discussions at the government-to-government level. "We hope to continue these discussions and hope that Singapore will respond positively so that this idea can become a reality," he said. On Aug 3, it was reported by a news portal that cross-border e-hailing services were one of the matters discussed between Johor Menteri Besar Datuk Onn Hafiz Ghazi and Singapore Acting Transport Minister Jeffrey Siow on Aug 1. However, the island state's Land Transport Authority (LTA) clarified that no decision was made on the issue and that it has no plans to fully liberalise Singapore-Malaysia cross-border point-to-point transport via ride-hail services.
Malaysiakini
3 hours ago
- Malaysiakini
Hanipa backs Muda's Zahid re-indictment push, Umno leaders cry foul
Former deputy law minister Hanipa Maidin has thrown his weight behind Muda's campaign to reopen corruption charges against Deputy Prime Minister Ahmad Zahid Hamidi, while Umno leaders accuse the party of judicial interference and opportunism. In a statement today, Hanipa said that Muda has 'every right' to launch its re-indictment campaign, citing the legal principle that a prima facie case had already been established against Zahid before he was granted a discharge not amounting to an acquittal (DNAA) in September 2023.
Free Malaysia Today
3 hours ago
- Free Malaysia Today
Widows of Elmina crash victims sue aircraft operator for negligence
In August 2023, a business jet with eight people on board crashed off the Guthrie Corridor Expressway in Bandar Elmina, Selangor, killing 10 including former Pelangai assemblyman Johari Harun and two road users. PETALING JAYA : The wife of former Pelangai assemblyman Johari Harun, who died along with two others in a plane crash near Elmina, Selangor, in August 2023, has filed a negligence suit against the operator of the light aircraft. In a statement of claim filed at the Kuala Lumpur High Court last Friday, the plaintiffs named Jet Valet Sdn Bhd and its parent entity, Koperasi Amanah Pelaburan Bhd, as defendants. The plaintiffs are Johari's wife, Maziah Sudin, as well as Tengku Erina Ungku Abdul Malek and Nizatul Akmar Nasir, the spouses of the two other victims, Naim Muaidi and Khairil Azwan Jamaluddin. They are seeking special, general, aggravated and/or exemplary damages, in addition to costs related to their husbands' funerals and bereavement. The business jet with eight people on board crashed off the Guthrie Corridor Expressway in Bandar Elmina on Aug 17, 2023, killing 10 including Johari and two road users. The aircraft, a Beechcraft Premier 1, was flying from Langkawi to Subang airport. It had been cleared to land at 2.48pm, but crashed two minutes later. The plaintiffs claimed that the defendants breached their duty of care and statutory obligations, including by failing to take adequate steps to ensure that the passengers arrived safely at Subang airport. They alleged that the defendants failed to register the plane with the Civil Aviation Authority of Malaysia and did not obtain the required approval for non-scheduled air services or for carrying passengers, as mandated by law. The defendants are also accused of exploiting regulatory grey areas to avoid stringent oversight and necessary approvals. The plaintiffs further alleged that the defendants allowed the pilot to occupy the right seat of the plane, contrary to flight manual requirements, and permitted an unqualified second-in-command to occupy the left seat and perform critical pre-landing checklist duties. The plaintiffs claimed the defendants breached contract by failing to ensure the aircraft's airworthiness and passenger safety, and violated Article 5(1) of the Federal Constitution guaranteeing the right to life. The widows additionally claimed losses related to funeral arrangements for their spouses, including RM5,000 in burial expenses and RM30,000 in bereavement costs for each of the three deceased, as well as loss of dependency to be determined by the court. The statement of claim was filed by Messrs. Tanes, Khoo & Paulraj. In August last year, the Air Accident Investigation Bureau in its final report on the crash found that the primary cause of the plane crash was the inadvertent extension of the lift dump spoilers. It said the action caused a sudden loss of lift, resulting in catastrophic loss of control and the subsequent crash, adding that it believed the co-pilot had committed the fatal error.
