
In a Shift, More Republicans Want Government Investment in Children
The details of how they want the government to help vary. But the growing bipartisan agreement reflects a belief among parents that American families are in crisis and something has to change.
In a variety of surveys in recent years, majorities of both Democrats and Republicans show support for family policies like paid leave, affordable child care and tax credits for parents. Large majorities are in agreement that the government should do more to regulate social media use for young people. And Americans think that K-12 education needs to be fixed.
The latest evidence is a poll of 1,300 parents released Monday by Common Sense Media, a nonprofit. In it, 73 percent of Democrats, 65 percent of independents and 55 percent of Republicans said the federal government spends too little on programs that benefit children.
Even having a small majority of Republicans embrace government spending on children is a notable shift, analysts say. It's a recognition that American families are struggling, especially those who are working class, a growing share of Republican voters. Most parents in the new survey said things were fair or poor for families like theirs. In a second survey released Monday by Common Sense, of 1,100 children ages 12 to 17, just 4 percent said things were excellent for families like theirs.
'I'm not surprised at all to see Republicans looking more like Democrats,' said Kristen Soltis Anderson, founding partner of Echelon Insights, a Republican polling firm that did the survey with Lake Research Partners, a Democratic pollster. 'There's a pretty strong consensus, especially among Republican women, that the status quo is not good.'
Ms. Anderson, a contributor to The New York Times's opinion section, and other pollsters cautioned that even if voters say family policies are important to them, they are rarely their top priority. When it comes to details, like how they would be structured or paid for and who should benefit, bipartisan agreement often falls apart. And even if a majority of Republican voters say in surveys that they support such policies, significant shares do not.
'I don't believe it's up to the government to help parents financially,' said Michelle Russell, a mother of five and owner of Honey & Rue's, a food truck in the Wichita, Kan., area. 'I personally don't believe that just because we have children, we need a handout such as assistance or a larger tax credit.'
Ms. Russell, who voted for President Trump, also disagrees that the government should regulate social media. 'The government is not raising my children,' she said. 'This is exactly why my children are home-schooled.'
But other Trump voters said they wanted him to pursue family policies. Jessyca Umana, a social worker and the mother of a teenager, said she supported paid leave, subsidized child care, the child tax credit and social media regulations — all '100 percent.'
She said she expected Mr. Trump to support these kinds of policies, too, and she thought that he had already shown he would help families and children by trying to block schools from acknowledging transgender students, and enabling schools to more openly talk about religion.
As some policymakers have grown concerned about declining fertility rates, and as many Republican-led states have banned abortion, some Republican officials have said the party needs to do more to support raising children. In the presidential campaign, a Trump spokeswoman said he supported the major family policy goals.
But the Trump administration has so far focused on cutting federal programs, not starting new ones.
An increase in the child tax credit enacted in the first Trump administration is set to expire later this year, and Republicans have proposed plans to renew it. Karoline Leavitt, the White House press secretary, did not say whether Mr. Trump planned to pursue child care or paid leave policies, but pointed to other things the administration has done for families, like calling for policy recommendations to expand access to in vitro fertilization.
She said in a statement that Mr. Trump is helping working families by 'returning education to the states, lowering costs and removing dangerous criminals from our communities.'
Democrats in Congress — with some support across the aisle — have introduced bills to provide paid family leave and child care assistance, and to expand the child tax credit to reach 16 million poor children who don't currently get the full credit. But Republicans have blocked recent efforts to increase support for families.
In the new survey of parents, roughly 85 percent of Democrats said children would be better off if there were paid family leave, more government funding for child care and after-school care, and more tax credits for families. Between two-thirds and three-fourths of Republicans agreed. Child care was least popular among Republicans, reflecting conflicting opinions about whether children are best off with a parent at home.
Eighty-six percent of parents overall said better K-12 public schools would improve the lives of American children, and 82 percent said free preschool would.
Both parents and teenagers expressed concerns about the effects of technology on young people and voiced a desire for government regulation. Nearly two-thirds of parents said social media was a mostly negative influence on children. Teenagers were more likely to say it was positive than negative, but they also said it was the primary cause of the youth mental health crisis.
Most respondents said they wanted the government to impose guardrails on social media for young people. There was widespread support for warning labels about the effect of social media on mental health and well-being. Most parents supported preventing children under 16 from having accounts, and about half of teenagers agreed.
'I definitely think for social media, there needs to be more regulation there, because kids are getting into trouble and they don't understand the ramifications,' said Lisa Julson, a physical therapist and mother of two in Kennewick, Wash.
An independent who voted for Mr. Trump, she's wary of government doing too much and making people dependent on it. She doesn't agree with all the Democrats' proposals for family policies. But she thinks the government should do more to address families' needs.
She'd like to see limited paid family leave, for a few weeks and not for new fathers. She wants the child tax credit expanded, including while children are in college. She doesn't think that the Department of Education should be shuttered — but that it should be revamped to focuson improving the teaching of core academic subjects. She supports public pre-K.
Will Mr. Trump do these things? 'He's got a lot of things that are more pressing,' she said. 'If he gets to it by the end of the year, I'll be happy.'
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Boston Globe
2 minutes ago
- Boston Globe
High-level talks held on support for Ukraine a week after Trump said Europe will pay for weapons
In an shift of tone toward Russia, the U.S. president last week gave Moscow a 50-day deadline to agree to a ceasefire or face tougher sanctions. Advertisement Trump's arms plan, announced a week ago, involves European nations sending American weapons to Ukraine via NATO — either from existing stockpiles or buying and donating new ones. The U.S. president indicated discussions were partly focused on advanced Patriot air defense systems and said a week ago that deliveries would begin 'within days.' But last week various senior officials suggested no transfers had yet taken place. NATO's Grynkewich told The Associated Press on Thursday that 'preparations are underway' for weapons transfers to Ukraine while U.S. Ambassador to NATO Matthew Whitaker said he couldn't give a time frame. German Chancellor Friedrich Merz said Thursday that Germany will finance two new Patriot systems for Ukraine and raised the possibility of supplying systems it already owns and having them replaced by the U.S. Advertisement But delivery could take time, Merz suggested because 'they have to be transported, they have to be set up; that is not a question of hours, it is a question of days, perhaps weeks.' Other Patriot systems could come thanks to Switzerland, whose defense ministry said Thursday it was informed by the U.S. Defense Department that it will 'reprioritize the delivery' of five previously ordered systems to support Ukraine. While Ukraine waits for Patriots, a senior NATO official said the alliance is still coordinating the delivery of other military aid — such as ammunition and artillery rounds — which includes aid from the U.S. that was briefly paused. The official spoke on condition of anonymity to discuss sensitive matters. Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy said Saturday that his officials have proposed a new round of peace talks this week. Russian state media on Sunday reported that no date has yet been set for the negotiations, but said that Istanbul would likely remain the host city. The Kremlin spokesman said Sunday that Russia is open to peace with Ukraine, but achieving its goals remains a priority.
Yahoo
25 minutes ago
- Yahoo
New tax law increases big beyond-the-grave tax break for the wealthy
The US federal estate tax has come a long way since 2000, when the exemption level was set at $675,000. The amount has increased greatly over the past quarter century. Americans who die in 2025 may leave behind tax free to their heirs up to $13.99 million. That exemption level had been set to expire after this year and snap back to a little more than $7 million per person. But that won't happen. Instead, starting in 2026, the exemption level will increase by roughly 7.2% to $15 million and adjust for inflation every year thereafter. That's courtesy of the One Big Beautiful Act that Republicans pushed through in time for President Donald Trump to sign it into law on his self-appointed deadline of July 4. Keep in mind, while not new, the exemption level is effectively doubled for married couples. That's because any unused exemption from the first spouse who dies can be passed to the surviving spouse, and the decedent's estate can pass to the widow or widower tax free. Then, when they die, they will get up to two times the individual exemption level. So that comes to $27.98 million tax free for couples this year and $30 million next year. (It's also worth noting that the estate tax exemption level is the same as the lifetime gift tax exemption level. That means essentially how much you're allowed to exempt from estate taxes at death is reduced by how much you gave away in gifts while you were alive.) The OBBA did not change the federal tax rates imposed on the taxable portion of estates. They're set on a graduated scale, from 18% to 40% with the initial portion above the exemption level taxed at 18%, the next portion at 20% and so on up to 40%, which is well below the 55% top rate that applied in 2001. How many estates are affected? Raising the exemption level to $15 million a person is likely to further reduce the already low share of estates subject to the estate tax. In 2001, roughly 2.1% of Americans who died left behind taxable estates — and that number dropped to just 0.07% in 2019, according to the Congressional Research Service. That share was expected to rise to 0.2% in 2026, had the exemption level snapped back to roughly $7 million as was scheduled. Despite those very tiny percentages, the Joint Committee on Taxation estimates that the OBBA change will reduce federal revenue by nearly $212 billion over the next decade relative to what the law had called for before OBBA was enacted. Don't forget about your state Even if your estate or that of a loved one falls well below the federal exemption level, the estate may still be considered taxable in the state where a decedent was living when they died. As of this year, 12 states and the District of Columbia have an estate tax, according to the Tax Foundation. The states are: Connecticut, Hawaii, Illinois, Maine, Maryland, Massachusetts, Minnesota, New York, Oregon, Rhode Island, Vermont and Washington. The exemption levels and the tax rates imposed vary from state to state. In Massachusetts, for example, the exemption level is $2 million, and depending how much more an estate is worth above that threshold, it may be subject to a tax rate between 0.8% and 16%. In Washington, up to $3 million may be exempt from the state estate tax but rates run as high as 35% on the taxable portion of an estate.
Yahoo
31 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Morning Bid: Could have been worse, is enough for the yen
A look at the day ahead in European and global markets from Wayne Cole As far as investors are concerned, Japan's upper house election has been a sell on the rumour, buy (a little) on the fact. Japanese markets are closed for the Marine Day public holiday so liquidity has been lacking, but so far the yen is up a shade on the dollar and euro while Nikkei futures traded in Chicago are much in line with Friday's cash close. Wall Street futures are up a fraction and European futures down a touch. While the ruling coalition lost control of the upper house, by three seats, Prime Minister Shigeru Ishiba seems to be safe for now, though he will have to find support from minor parties to pass legislation. The government can also continue its fraught tariff negotiations with the U.S. administration. The talks still seem deadlocked, partly over agricultural imports which are politically and culturally very sensitive for Japan, as President Donald Trump's arbitrary August 1 deadline approaches fast. The European Union is in much the same situation. U.S. Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick says he's confident a deal can be struck, but the EU side is preparing a list of U.S. products for retaliation levies. The EU is also trying to use China as leverage with Commission President Ursula von der Leyen and Council President Antonio Costa meeting with President Xi Jinping there on Thursday. Meanwhile, reports suggest Trump might meet Xi sometime in October or November, with the U.S. already having allowed the export of chips to China apparently in return for a resumption of rare earth shipments. Markets are assuming the worst will be avoided on tariffs, though analysts suspect the effective U.S. tariff rate could well be a bit above the 1930's levies that contributed so much to the Great Depression. Much of that optimism rests on earnings with the first of the mega caps reporting this week in the shape of Alphabet and Tesla. Results from Lockheed Martin and General Dynamics should also confirm the windfall from a ramp up in global defence spending. The diary for the rest of Monday is virtually blank, but there's always Trump to watch. Key developments that could influence markets on Monday: - No major data or central bank speakers Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data