Western Sydney support officer returns to school after student protest over response to posts
Sheikh Wesam Charkawi, who works at Granville Boys high school, posted a video on his social media platforms on 16 February where he spoke about the public reaction to two nurses who allegedly claimed in a social media video they wouldn't treat Israelis and boasted of sending them to hell.
In his video, Charkawi said the nurses' comments were 'never meant to be literal or intended to be a threat to patient care' and criticised people who had spoken out about them but remained silent on Israel's actions.
'We refuse to accept a political and media landscape where Muslims are only visible when are being condemned, but invisible when they are being killed,' he said in the video.
Sign up for Guardian Australia's breaking news email
The education department first asked Charkawi to remove the posts from TikTok and Instagram at a meeting on 18 February, as the department believed the posts did not comply with departmental and government policies.
He refused, so the department asked him to work from home until the matter was resolved, Guardian Australia understands.
On 24 February, the department issued a directive, instructing him to remove the posts by 26 February. The video was removed from his Instagram and TikTok but remains on his Facebook and LinkedIn profiles.
In a meeting between senior department officials, Charkawi and his legal representative on Thursday, it was agreed he could return to his role at the school on Friday morning, the sheikh's lawyer said.
The decision came after students at the school staged protests on Wednesday and Thursday against the directive. The NSW education department was contacted for comment.
Charkawi's lawyer, Majed Kheir, told Guardian Australia the posts did not breach the department's social media policy. He raised concerns about the 'validity' and 'legal basis' of the directive that formally instructed Charkawi to remove the video.
'Our feeling was that there's a level of ambiguity and uncertainty in what is required of public servants and that the department has capitalised upon that level of ambiguity and uncertainty to place pressure on the sheikh to remain silent in this instance.'
Kheir questioned whether a similar directive would be issued to teachers expressing opinions on the war in Ukraine or the voice referendum.
'The ambiguity here is extremely concerning because there is more scope within that to silence certain views. And that is what we say has occurred here.'
Guardian Australia understands media reporting on the video led the department to issue the directive instructing Charkawi to remove it.
In the directive, the department referred to its social media policy, associated social media procedures and code of ethics and conduct.
The education department also referred to a letter issued by the NSW premier's department in mid-February which said public servants 'have a duty to uphold the reputation of your department and the government sector as apolitical, impartial and professional'.
'This includes also in a private capacity in public forums, on social media, or when engaging in political or social issues.'
Sign up to Morning Mail
Our Australian morning briefing breaks down the key stories of the day, telling you what's happening and why it matters
after newsletter promotion
Charkawi has worked as a support officer at Granville boys school for 13 years and is well known to parents and the wider community.
Charkawi is one of the leaders of the grassroots political group the Muslim Vote, which was established in response to community anger at Labor's handling of the war in Gaza. It plans to back candidates in Watson, Blaxland and Werriwa in western Sydney in this year's federal election.
Charkawi recently signed a community statement alongside a number of Muslim groups and leaders that argued the 'speed, intensity and uniformity of responses from certain political leaders and media outlets' to the Bankstown nurses video was 'revealing'.
Chris Breen, from the group Teachers and School Staff for Palestine, said the NSW premier's department letter left teachers and school staff feeling 'fearful' and 'silenced'.
'There are many schools where people are fearful to talk about Gaza, to express a desire for the horrors there to stop. There are staff who won't wear a Keffieyeh [traditional Palestinian scarf] or a pro-Palestine badge because they are fearful about the consequences for their employment,' he said. 'And this letter just reinforced that fear.'
He said the letter was 'intended to tell teachers that some human rights are not up for discussion'.
'Teachers, in general, think this, and what has happened to Sheikh Wesam, is outrageous. There is a worry of the slippery slope here that teachers won't be able to comment on politics outside of school soon.'
An education department spokesperson said on Wednesday that all public servants needed to remain 'apolitical'.
'All NSW Department of Education employees have been reminded of their duty to uphold the reputation of the department as apolitical and impartial.'
One of the Bankstown nurses, Sarah Abu Lebdeh, has been charged over the video in relation to the allegedly anti-Israeli video.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Spectator
3 hours ago
- Spectator
Hamas is using Israel's protests as a weapon of war
Israel is caught in a tragic paradox: the finest qualities that define its national character – its compassion, solidarity, and moral responsibility – are exploited by adversaries who recognise in these virtues not strength, but vulnerability. As over half a million Israelis joined a nationwide strike yesterday, demanding a ceasefire and the return of hostages from Gaza, it was impossible not to be moved by the depth of feeling, the urgency of the appeals, and the sheer moral weight of the demand. Yet what moves one side to tears hardens the heart of the other, moving them to ruthless calculation. The protests are genuine, justified, and born of unbearable grief, but to Hamas they are confirmation that its strategy is working. For nearly 700 days, hostages have languished in tunnels beneath Gaza, held by a group that has no humanitarian interest in their fate. The Israeli families who protest for their return are not protesting because they are weak, but because they care. That is the unbearable truth of the dilemma: love, in the hands of a cynical enemy, becomes a lever. And over and over again, when Israel shows signs of internal dissent, Hamas hardens its position. In November 2023, May 2024, and again in early 2025, the group escalated its demands or walked away from negotiations whenever it sensed either international pressure on Israel or domestic fracture within it. Each protest, each demonstration, is interpreted not as a plea to save the hostages but as a signal to Hamas that it need not concede. The more Israelis protest, the more its enemies are taught to take hostages in future. That this distortion exists is not a reason to suppress protest, but it is a reason to understand its consequences. In a different world, the moral clarity of the protesters would move international actors to increase pressure on Hamas. In our world, the images feed into a narrative of Israeli weakness, not Hamas culpability. The tragic result is that a natural democratic process becomes, in enemy hands, a psychological weapon. That is not the fault of the protesters. But it is a risk to be managed. The Israeli government, meanwhile, has failed to manage that risk. Rather than embracing hostage families with empathy and unity, key ministers chose alienation and suspicion. Netanyahu accused them of helping Hamas. Finance Minister Smotrich claimed they were 'burying hostages in tunnels'. The rhetoric has been vicious, contemptuous, and politically self-destructive. By treating desperate families as political enemies, the government abandoned its most basic duty: to bind the nation together in a time of war. In doing so, it squandered the moral high ground without gaining any strategic advantage. And yet, the government is not wrong about Hamas. Hamas has no intention of returning the hostages simply out of pity or moral appeal. It never did. Its entire logic is predicated on holding leverage, preserving its arsenal, and remaining in power. That is why the core dilemma remains unresolved: Hamas will not release the hostages unless it can claim victory. But releasing them on such terms would strengthen Hamas, vindicate 7 October, and endanger Israel's future. This is the trap. And it is a trap with no obvious exit. The government cannot simply acquiesce to protesters' demands, not because it is heartless, but because no act of goodwill or political will can unilaterally extract hostages from Hamas tunnels. Even the most far-reaching Israeli concessions would not guarantee the return of all those still held. At best, they would secure partial releases under conditions amounting to a political defeat. At worst, they would signal capitulation while yielding nothing. Everyone understands this, including, deep down, the protesters. The demonstrations are not naïve demands for the impossible. They are desperate expressions of anguish from a people that has no other way to cry out in public. To some extent, then, the protests are performative. Not in the sense of being disingenuous, but in the older sense of ritual: an enactment of grief, of outrage, of helpless love. They are how a free society resists despair. But they are also how it exposes itself. Protest in Israel is sacred. It is also, in this war, a signal, seen by the enemy not as a cry for justice, but as a confirmation of weakness. What is read internally as moral courage is interpreted externally as operational restraint. What is, domestically, a sign of vitality becomes, in the eyes of Hamas and its sympathisers, evidence of vulnerability. This dissonance is not a theoretical concern. Throughout the war, Arab media outlets, foremost among them Al Jazeera, have framed internal Israeli protests as proof that Hamas is winning. For them, every sign of dissent in Israel is not an indictment of Hamas's cruelty but a validation of its strategy. A democratic protest is presented as a referendum on defeat. Israel's soul-searching becomes, in translation, self-destruction. The tragedy is not that Israelis protest, but that their most authentic expressions of democratic anguish are perceived by their enemies as weapons of psychological warfare. And in that perception, those expressions do become weapons, though not the ones the protesters intend. That is why, amid the cries for release, a different voice has also emerged. The Tikvah Families Forum, a group of hostage families aligned more closely with the government, issued an open letter calling for national resilience, denouncing those who, in their view, weakened Israel's posture during war. Their message was not a dismissal of grief but a warning against its misdirection. In their eyes, strength lies not in protest but in perseverance. Their stance reflects a genuine moral and strategic fear: that the country's emotional power might become its strategic undoing. What remains is a performance of loyalty, anger, and love, enacted in the full knowledge that it may change little on the ground, but affirms something essential about who they are. But that affirmation comes at a cost. Hamas is watching. And the more it sees Israel in torment, the more it believes it can outlast, outmanoeuvre, and outbleed its enemy. To resist this requires not silence but awareness. Israel alone may not be able to escape this trap. The international community, so quick to find fault with Israel, should redirect its moral clarity toward those who hold civilians underground while demanding immunity above. Israel fights with its heart exposed. That is its glory – and its danger.
BBC News
4 hours ago
- BBC News
New Forest Park Authority at 'crossroads' as it marks 20 years
An organisation caring for the New Forest is "at a crossroads", its chairman has Bence said the New Forest National Park Authority, which was set up 20 years ago, faced "serious challenges" over the next two said post-Brexit farming schemes were not suited to the commoning system of grazing and there had been a decline in cattle numbers due to reduced support payments and rising Bence said: "Without urgent action, we risk losing the conservation benefits commoning provides - not just for the forest, but for the nation." The New Forest remains one of the few lowland areas where commoners release animals on to the open free-roaming ponies, cattle and pigs help shape the forest's landscapes, which are home to rare flora and out its priorities for the next 20 years, the authority said housing and development pressures were testing the balance between conservation and community need. Under government plans, Hampshire's councils will also become a single devolved authority, and Mr Bence called for the forest's unique needs to be recognised when budgets and financial settlements are drawn said: "Twenty years ago we were entrusted with a responsibility - to protect, preserve, and enhance this special place for generations to come. "Now we stand at a crossroads - with devolution, local government reorganisation, climate transition, and agricultural reform all converging at once."These bring serious challenges, but also rare opportunities - to reinforce protections for the forest, formally recognise its unique culture, support a vibrant green economy, and shape a resilient future for both nature and people."At the heart of this future must be the protection of the forest's integrity... its landscapes, ecosystems, communities and traditions. "This must be the guiding test for any new proposals that arise from policy change." You can follow BBC Hampshire & Isle of Wight on Facebook, X (Twitter), or Instagram.
The Guardian
7 hours ago
- The Guardian
Israel protests erupt nationwide to demand end of Gaza war
Tens of thousands of Israelis protested in Tel Aviv amid a nationwide strike in support of the families of hostages held in Gaza. Demonstrations around the country called on Israel's government to reach an agreement with Hamas to release the remaining captives. The Tel Aviv protest is one of the largest in Israel since fighting began in October 2023. Prime minister Benjamin Netanyahu criticised the protesters, saying their actions 'ensure that the horrors of 7 October will reoccur'
