Japan's love hotels, Tom Hanks' daughter, and the double life of Gordi
EA Hanks grew up with a very famous father – 'not just the Hollywood Everyman, but America's Dad,' Emine Saner writes, after speaking with the daughter of Tom Hanks about her upcoming memoir. The author has explored the Hollywood side of her childhood, but what she's really trying to make sense of is her late mother's life.
'A lifetime spent on very thin ice': One half of Hanks' early life was spent with her mother, Susan, suffering with addiction and mental health problems, which contributed to an abusive relationship.
The other half: EA spent with her father, Tom, on film sets and in a house full of love and structure.
She tells Saner about her road trip back into her complicated past – recreating a fraught 1996 journey with Susan nearly 20 years after her death.
How long will it take to read: Six minutes.
In Australia, support is available at Beyond Blue on 1300 22 4636, Lifeline on 13 11 14, and at MensLine on 1300 789 978. In the UK, the charity Mind is available on 0300 123 3393 and Childline on 0800 1111. In the US, call or text Mental Health America at 988 or chat 988lifeline.org
The French photographer François Prost has been on a '3,000km pilgrimage of passion', driving south from Utsunomiya, north of Tokyo, to the island of Shikoku, to document the eye-catching architecture of Japan's love hotels in his new book.
But could the hotels be getting too seedy, wonders Oliver Wainwright? Prost's images don't venture inside. They do, however, capture the 'dazzlingly imaginative' range of visions.
Traditional teahouses to themed palaces: Dating as far back as the 1600s, 'lovers' teahouses' were traditionally discreet from the outside – then, as Wainwright explains, a postwar economic boom saw them 'blossom into elaborate sexual amusement parks in the 1970s and 80s, with themes ranging from fairytale to sci-fi to medieval cosplay'.
For babymaking? Yep, Wainwright reckons a good chunk of the country's population could've been 'conceived on a rotating bed, or inside a fantastical tropical grotto surrounded by model dinosaurs'.
How long will it take to read: Three minutes.
Further reading: Speaking of dinosaurs … check out Australia's best small museums: celebrating apples, bottles, country music, and – yes – dinosaurs.
Sophie Payten has been living a double life. 'In one, she is Gordi, the Aria-nominated singer-songwriter who has worked with Bon Iver and Troye Sivan, and made Chris Martin cry,' writes Giselle Au-Nhien Nguyen. In the other, somehow, she has time to be a doctor.
Fate: When Payten's second studio album came out, she quit her job to tour and focus on music. But when Covid hit, she was back in the hospital.
'I am an intensely emotional person … but in the hospital, you have to really learn how to disassociate in a way, because you're surrounded by suffering, and if you take all that on, you would explode.' – Sophie Payten
Silver lining? Her latest album, Like Plasticine, merges both lives.
How long will it take to read: Three minutes.
Sign up to Five Great Reads
Each week our editors select five of the most interesting, entertaining and thoughtful reads published by Guardian Australia and our international colleagues. Sign up to receive it in your inbox every Saturday morning
after newsletter promotion
Further reading: He's one of Gordi's collaborators, and a favourite of mine … Bon Iver on romance, retirement and his rapturous new record.
The Guardian has been reporting on a new space online – the 'womanosphere'. Like its manosphere counterpart (a section of the internet promoting masculinity, misogyny … and the awful list goes on), this online corner is all about pushing anti-feminist ideas on to young women. So, what does it have to do with Blake Lively?
Remember Johnny Depp v Amber Heard? Blake Lively's situation is a new level ugly, says Steve Rose, who has looked into how conservative personalities such as Candace Owens and the American right declared war on the actor after she sued her director, co-star and co-producer Justin Baldoni, and he sued her back.
Candace Owens' view: 'She has proven herself not to be a kind person,' the US commentator said in January. 'And that's largely due to the fact that she is a modern feminist.'
How long will it take to read: Five and a half minutes.
More tabs to open: Anna Silman's 'womanosphere' deep dive, and Van Badham on the question of whether the 'womanosphere' will succeed.
'Self-checkouts, drive-throughs, hotdog stands, drug stores, and a bottled water stall at a jazz festival' are all places where Americans have told the Guardian they are being asked to tip, Jem Bartholomew writes. 'Before, tipping was considered generosity,' Garrett Petters, a 29-year-old architect in Dallas, says. 'Now, it's about guilt.'
Is US tipping culture here to stay? For some consumers, it's the least they can do for workers during tough times. But others are pushing back.
A 33-year-old from Massachusetts: Ellen has been avoiding the 'suggested tip' starting at 25%, and instead selects 'the lowest option, or not tipping at all for workers covered by regular minimum wage laws'.
A 62-year-old from Florida: Sandra has increased her tip percentage 'from 15% to 20% or 25% recently' for her local workers who have suffered through Covid, and three major storms.
How long will it take to read: Three minutes.
Enjoying the Five Great Reads email? Then you'll love our weekly culture and lifestyle newsletter, Saved for Later. Sign up here to catch up on the fun stuff with our rundown of must-reads, pop culture, trends and tips for the weekend.
And check out the full list of our local and international newsletters.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Sun
14 minutes ago
- The Sun
Sports legend ‘new favourite for I'm A Celeb' after admitting he's ‘desperate' to do show
A DARTS legend is being tipped to star on this year's I'm A Celebrity after making no secret of his desire to be on the show. Phil 'The Power' Taylor has noted for years his hope to appear in the Australian jungle reality show, and if the bookies are anything to go by. 5 5 5 The 16-time world champion, 65, has had odds of him joining this year's contestants slashed down to 3/1 by Ladbrokes, who believe he could be vying for the jungle crown. Cal Gildart of Ladbrokes said: 'With a record number of world championships, Phil Taylor knows all about stealing the spotlight at the back end of the year. 'But Ally Pally is a long way from the jungle, so it remains to be seen whether that success translates if he pitches up in the camp this winter.' Phil has been making his interest in joining the show clear since at least 2017, with him noting how much he would love to take on the challenge. At the time, he said: 'I would do the jungle. Strictly I am not sure, though it would do me the world of good as it would get me fit. 'I have been asked to do the jungle but was always busy.' But I'm a Celebrity – known for its gruesome challenges that include munching on 'delicacies' such as kangaroo testicles and fish eyes – has so far not given him the call. The series typically films towards the end of each year, starting in October, which for Phil would have been the height of the darts season ahead of the World Championships. In 2023, Phil, who scooped a record 85 major titles in his career, shared again he was up for the task, believing there was 'no challenge he couldn't do'. "I know they're not going to put anything in there that's going to hurt you,' he said. Watch I'm A Celeb's most terrifying trials from 1,000ft drop to Table Of Terror "I know you can get bitten, and something can go up your nose or whatever but we'll just have to see. Do you know what I mean? It would be a challenge and something I've never done before. So I would quite enjoy it I think." Yet he did admit he "can't keep his mouth shut" - which could spell danger for his fellow campmates. Last year, after confirming his retirement from darts at the age of 64, he stated again how he was desperate to give the series a go. Taylor shut down the rumours of his participation for that year, but did not rule out the possibility of doing it in the future. He said: "I'd be interested but not this year, it's too late. "Someone mentioned I was the favourite in the bookies but I said 'I have no idea how'." 5 5
The Independent
44 minutes ago
- The Independent
Why a quarter of total Love Island complaints came in one night
Ofcom has rejected over 14,000 complaints concerning the latest series of ITV 's reality show, Love Island. A total of 14,167 complaints were received, with the highest number on July 24 relating to alleged bullying behaviour towards contestant Shakira Khan. Further complaints included concerns over contestants' mental health, the behaviour of Dejon Noel-Williams, and alleged race and gender-based discrimination. Ofcom stated that negative behaviour in the villa was not shown in a positive light, and contestants were seen supporting each other, adding that viewers would expect highs and lows from the established format. The 12th series of Love Island ran from June 9 to August 4 and was won by Toni Laites and Cach Mercer.
The Independent
an hour ago
- The Independent
‘Financial companies shouldn't be in this position': How more than 20,000 NSFW video games fell under censorship
A critically lauded horror game about the consequences of rape was among more than 20,000 titles caught up in a sweeping purge of adult video games from online storefronts. The furor started in April when an Australian anti-porn group called Collective Shout asked the video game marketplaces Steam and to ban an incest-themed rape simulator game. The game No Mercy urged players to 'never take 'no' for an answer' and caused an international outcry, with just under 70,000 people signing an online petition to ban it. It was swiftly blocked from sale in Australia, the UK and Canada; banned by Itch; and removed from Steam by its creators. Yet the backlash to that one extreme game caused thousands of others with general themes of sex, gender and LGTBQ experiences to also be removed — but not by any governmental action. The censorship came from the marketplace itself, due to pressure from payment providers such as Mastercard, Visa, PayPal and Stripe — some of which allegedly threatened to stop processing transactions altogether if swift action wasn't taken. 'The situation developed rapidly, and we had to act urgently,' wrote Itch founder Leaf Corcoran on July 28. "Unfortunately, this meant it was not realistic to provide creators with advance notice before making this change." And as a result, many video game users and creators saw the campaign as unfairly targeting anything that is beyond the mainstream, with gaming often a creative outlet for people to explore complicated topics. 'For many LGBTQ+ developers, Itch is one of the very few places left on the internet for us to express our gender and sexuality,' game developer and scholar Robert Yang, whose erotic triptych Radiator 2 was apparently deindexed, told The Independent. According to veteran digital rights activist Rainey Reitman, there is a longstanding pattern of financial censorship by payment providers — who have every reason to yield to such campaigns and little impetus to resist. "These are companies that specialize in securing payments and preventing fraud,' Reitman, author of the upcoming book Transaction Denied: Big Finance's Power to Punish Speech, told The Independent. 'They don't have the expertise or the incentives to consider the societal and ethical ramifications of silencing certain voices and certain types of content.' 'It was critical that we acted as fast as possible' The spark for this crackdown came in May, when Collective Shout — a relatively small anti-porn group little known outside Australia — turned its attention to payment companies after allegedly being ignored by Steam. Though No Mercy had been pulled, the group said it found 'hundreds' of other such games, many of which were "too distressing to make public". On July 10 the group wrote an open letter asking payment companies to suspend all transactions on Steam and Itch until things changed. It was ambiguous about what exactly should be censored, referring sometimes to games that "endorsed" sexual violence and sometimes to games that "featured" or were "themed" after it. "There is of course a big difference between merely depicting something, or exploring a topic for the purpose of social commentary or critique, and promoting or endorsing it," Collective Shout's campaign manager Caitlin Roper told The Independent. "Our objection is to content that promotes sexualized violence, primarily against women... the intention was never to target NSFW content generally, or LGBT+ artists and creators." But, speaking to the gaming news site Aftermath, Itch founder Corcoran said Visa had issued a "policy notice" against the marketplace — which focuses on indie and arthouse games — that made middlemen such as PayPal and Stripe question doing business with it. Paypal and Stripe wouldn't comment on individual companies, but Stripe noted that it does not support adult content. Visa did not respond to a request for comment. Meanwhile, Steam's parent company, Valve, alleged that Mastercard had leaned on its (unnamed) payment middlemen to demand that Steam change its existing rules — although Mastercard gave a different account. Steam's purge was relatively small, according to the tracking service SteamDB. Most banned games were explicitly pornographic and incest-themed, with titles such as Interactive Sex: Mom Son Incest and Sex Adventures: Incest Family. But Itch is a more hands-off platform, with less ability to judge case by case, so its purge was far less discriminate. The industry newsletter Game File reported that more than 20,000 games were unable to be found. Among the casualties was Mouthwashing, a widely praised indie horror game about the aftermath of sexual abuse aboard a space freighter, and SABBAT, a 2013 text adventure in which the player can transform into a weird giant monster creature and destroy capitalism. By July 31, all free NSFW games had been re-indexed, but Itch said it was still in talks about reinstating paid games. 'If had been moderating its platform properly, then these games would never have been impacted," Roper said. Still, some gamers and creators are suspicious of Collective Shout's politics, given its reported conservative connections. 'The right wing already routinely bans us and chases us off all the other websites! So [this] really does feel personal and anti-LGBTQ,' game developer Yang said. 'Sexuality is complicated, but Collective Shout and their right-wing allies exploit that complexity in bad faith. Do not believe them.' Payment companies have every reason to censor — and scarce motive not to To those who follow these payment companies, the speed and scale of the situation was unusual but not unprecedented. "I have heard of other situations in which websites received a very short window to address the concerns of the payment company," said Reitman, In 2022, a nude yoga website called True Naked Yoga was suddenly given "mere days" by Stripe to find a new payment processor, after operating for years without any problems, says Reitman, who founded the Financial Censorship Project. Since 9/11, financial institutions have increasingly been held responsible for stopping illegal or objectionable activity. Though initially targeted at money laundering and terrorist financing, these efforts have gradually expanded, with payment processors claiming broad discretion to refuse any legal transaction that might damage their brand. "Financial companies don't get a lot of benefit out of any one account," Reitman says. "It's often cheaper to close an account that's garnering attention than to pay the staff time to resolve issues with it," Reitman said. This is exacerbated by the role of reputation management companies that scour headlines and online marketplaces to flag risky e content. But the great adult videogame purge of 2025 shows reputational damage goes both ways. Payment companies have been swamped by calls from angry gamers, reportedly leading to desperate tactics such as hanging up on callers immediately or putting them on hold for 17 hours. "Financial companies shouldn't be in the position of reviewing and censoring online speech,' Reitman says. 'They don't have the expertise to do it, there is no transparency or accountability around their decisions, and nobody elected them to be the arbiters of morality online."
