Inside UK's new £15,000,000,000 nuclear attack submarines
The UK waters will soon be patrolled by 12 new 'apex predator' attack submarines.
The military's weapon arsenal includes the secretive nuclear-powered and armed submarines, which only a select few will ever set foot in due to high-level security.
The submarine arm of the Royal Navy, known as the Silent Service, operates a fleet of Trafalgar, Astute and Vanguard class vessels.
Now, an upgrade is on the horizon after the government said that 12 new SSN-AUKUS submarines will be built as part of a £15 billion programme 'in response to the rapidly increasing threats' – namely, Russia – and to 'make Britain and Nato safe for decades to come.'
Here is a recap of what the fuss around the SSN-AUKUS submarines is all about.
The Ministry of Defence has been tight-lipped about the submarines' exact specs, but they will replace the seven-strong Astute class from the late 2030s onwards.
Their deadly design allows them to patrol domestic and international waters without detection, and if needed, destroy other ships and submarines and even enforce a blockade for a long period.
The name – SSN-AUKUS – comes from the security pact between Australia, the UK and the US formed in 2021, which led to the creation of the next-generation submarines.
The new fleet will carry conventional weapons, but they will be nuclear-powered. In comparison, the Vanguard-class submarines are equipped with the controversial Trident missile system with nuclear warheads.
One of the new submarines' task will be to protect the Trident nuclear missiles, which are already undergoing a warhead modernisation programme.
The SSN system will remain the 'apex predator' for years to come, Navy Lookout said.
Official information on the design is sparse, but the Navy Lookout put together an estimated look for the new fleet.
The SSN-AUKUS subs will be largely modelled after the Dreadnought class, but they are likely to be larger than the current Astute fleet.
This will provide extra space for heavier weapons and crew. One SSN-AUKUS is estimated to be 410ft long and weigh 9,200 tonnes
Ice-strengthened and streamlined fin
PWR3 nuclear reactor is located in the rear section
Six 21-inch launch tubes for torpedoes, mines and small robot underwater vehicles near the front
Optronic sensor masts – essentially a modern-day periscope to provide ultra-high definition view at night and during the day
The weapon launch system will be based on the Virginia-class technologies developed in the US to allow advanced intelligence, surveillance, underwater warfare and strike operations, Naval Technologies said
The submarines and the nuclear systems themselves will be built in the UK
The new generation submarines are expected to carry submarine-launched cruise missiles (SLCM), which can strike inland
The weapons can penetrate protective 'anti-access and area denial bubbles,' which can be too dangerous for Navy ships, according to the Navy Lookout
The new UK submarines will be built by BAE Systems at Barrow-in-Furness, while the nuclear propulsion units are manufactured at Rolls Royce in Derby, which the government said will support 30,000 jobs.
Defence Secretary John Healey said: 'Our outstanding submariners patrol 24/7 to keep us and our allies safe, but we know that threats are increasing and we must act decisively to face down Russian aggression.
'With new state-of-the-art submarines patrolling international waters and our own nuclear warhead programme on British shores, we are making Britain secure at home and strong abroad, while delivering on our Plan for Change with 30,000 highly-skilled jobs across the country.'
The submarine plan comes after the government pledged to up the UK's defence spending to 2.5% of GDP by 2027 as the Prime Minister announced the strategic defence review.
However, he refused to confirm whether the defence spending will reach 3% by the next parliament.
The PM also announced at least six new munitions factories along with the £15 billion investment in nuclear warheads.
He said: 'First, we are moving to war-fighting readiness as the central purpose of our armed forces.
'When we are being directly threatened by states with advanced military forces, the most effective way to deter them is to be ready, and frankly, to show them that we're ready to deliver peace through strength.'
The second aim is to adopt a 'Nato-first' defence approach so that all actions strengthen the alliance. More Trending
Innovation will also be accelerated at a 'wartime pace' to mee the 'threat of today and tomorrow, as the fastest innovator in Nato,' Sir Keir said.
The UK defence announcement comes as the Russia-Ukraine war has intensified.
Ukraine said it had blasted dozens of Russian nuclear bombers in a mass drone attack over the weekend.
Meanwhile, peace talks between Russian and Ukrainian delegates concluded in Turkiye without a major breakthrough, although prisoner swaps were agreed on.
Get in touch with our news team by emailing us at webnews@metro.co.uk.
For more stories like this, check our news page.
MORE: Families still haunted by RAF Chinook crash demand truth after nearly 30 years
MORE: Royal Navy scrambled to monitor Russian ship loitering in UK waters
MORE: Keir Starmer lashes out at Nigel Farage over 'Liz Truss 2.0 experiment'
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The National
10 hours ago
- The National
What would nuclear attack on Scotland look like?
We must remember them, and the horrors endured by the hibakusha – the survivors of the bombings – who lived through the single most violent acts in human history. And in remembering today, we must also recommit to ensuring that nuclear weapons are never used again. That begins with understanding both what happened in 1945, and what might happen if nuclear weapons are ever used again – especially in a context closer to home. The UK's nuclear arsenal is based on the Clyde, placing Scotland on the frontline of any future nuclear crisis involving the UK. So what would nuclear war in Scotland look like? What would be hit? Could the country survive? READ MORE: Glen Rosa ferry leaves dry dock to return to shipyard The bombs dropped on Hiroshima and Nagasaki had the equivalent explosive force of 15 and 21 kilotons of TNT, respectively. These are now considered small, or 'low yield' nuclear weapons. In contrast, each of the 40 nuclear warheads currently deployed by the UK on each Trident submarine has an explosive yield of 100 kilotons – around six times more powerful than the Hiroshima bomb. The American B61-12 nuclear bombs that will be carried by the UK's new F-35A fighter jets have variable yields of up to 50 kilotons. It's hard to predict who would start a nuclear war, but the UK Government considers Russia to be the most serious nuclear threat. Since the 2022 invasion of Ukraine, Russia has repeatedly issued nuclear threats and revised its doctrine to allow the use of nuclear weapons against any 'critical threat' to its sovereignty and territorial integrity. Most of Russia's warheads have a yield of 100 kilotons, but the second most common type ranges from 500 to 800 kilotons. That's up to 53 times more powerful than the bomb that devastated Hiroshima. Likely targets in Scotland include the naval base at Faslane and the nearby warhead facility at Coulport. Recently leaked Russian military nuclear training documents show plans to target Rosyth shipbuilding facilities, and RAF Lossiemouth in Moray (one of the UK's two quick reaction air alert stations) is also a likely target. These are what's known as 'counterforce' targets in the language of nuclear strategy – military sites to be targeted to prevent the UK from responding. If Russia adopted a 'countervalue' strategy that targeted population centres too, then cities like Edinburgh, Glasgow, Aberdeen and Dundee would be at risk. A single 800 kiloton detonation in each of those cities and aforementioned military sites could cause an estimated 836,240 deaths and more than 1.2 million injured people. READ MORE: Ian Blackford to give shock return in Kate Forbes seat 'careful consideration' Survivors would then face radioactive fallout that would sweep across Scotland, varying in impact depending on complex factors such as the weather and the altitude of detonation. Medical help would be scarce. Scotland's four major trauma centres – in the same four cities above – would likely be destroyed, as would six of Scotland's seven specialist burn units. But even if these hospitals survived, NHS Scotland only has around 13,000 hospital beds. At the same time, essential infrastructure for things we take for granted like transport, food and water supplies, and communication would be gone, and social order would likely collapse. While this is a staggeringly bleak picture, it is also a conservative estimate, as it is unlikely that just one warhead would be used against each place. Russia's long-range missiles typically carry multiple independently targetable re-entry vehicles (what strategists refer to as MIRVs), meaning one missile can deploy four to 10 warheads and hit multiple locations simultaneously. In short, the use of even just a few nuclear weapons in Scotland would be catastrophic. At a time when the UK is being put on a war footing, as arms control treaties are collapsing, and as nuclear weapon states seem increasingly content to use violence to achieve their goals, Scotland must take steps to reduce the risk of nuclear war and show leadership in making a world without nuclear weapons a reality. We must demand diplomacy, an end to nuclear coercion and threats to unleash unparalleled violence. We must push for dialogue, renewed arms control and support serious disarmament efforts, including through the NPT, the TPNW and other bilateral/multilateral endeavours. This is the only pathway to long-term security for Scotland and for the planet. Research shows that it is largely through sheer luck, not through smart strategies or effective nuclear command and control, that we have avoided a world-ending disaster to date. As tensions increase across the globe, our luck may be running out. Our survival demands action, and Scotland should lead the way. Dr Rhys Crilley is reader in international relations at Glasgow University and the author of Unparalleled Catastrophe: Life And Death In The Third Nuclear Age, available now in paperback
Metro
a day ago
- Metro
Trump shouts about 'nuclear missiles' to press from White House roof
To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video President Donald Trump shouted from a rooftop of the White House down at reporters and joked that he was installing 'nuclear missiles' there. Trump emerged on a roof of the West Colonnade flanked by Secret Service agents and went for a stroll as the press gathered below and across a lawn on Tuesday morning. When journalists asked what he was trying to build, Trump seemed to say 'nuclear missiles'. The president wasn't wearing a microphone, so his response was not entirely clear. 'Did you say more missiles?' one reporter asked. Another yelled: 'Are you building missiles?' Another member of the media said with a laugh, 'Did he say missiles?' Trump appeared to confirm that, by making gestures with his hands that mimicked projectiles shooting off of the balcony. The president first said he was 'just taking a little walk'. Then he shouted at Fox News senior White House correspondent Peter Doocy about finding more ways to spend his money for the US. More Trending Trump also made a circular hand gesture and yelled, 'Anything I do is financed by me!' On Thursday, Trump unveiled his plans to build a ballroom in the East Wing of the White House, that he said he will personally fund along with private donors. His nuclear missiles joke came four days after he announced on his Truth Social platform that he ordered two nuclear submarines 'to be positioned in the appropriate regions, just in case these foolish and inflammatory statements' from Russia 'are more than just that'. The tone of that post was much more serious than his joke on Tuesday. It was the first time that he mentioned the US's nuclear arsenal and that he deployed it. Get in touch with our news team by emailing us at webnews@ For more stories like this, check our news page. MORE: Search for missing 'body' in river turns up life-size sex doll MORE: When the world 'likely' ends you can blame these three people, expert says MORE: Donald Trump gives major update on if he'll run for president again
Metro
a day ago
- Metro
UK and France's migrant deal comes into force - here's what it means
A deal to return migrants who arrived in the UK illegally in small boats back across the Channel to France is coming into force today. The 'one in, one out' agreement was announced during a state visit from French President Emmanuel Macron last month, as a new means of deterring people from taking the hazardous journey over the water. Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer said at the time it would begin 'within weeks' – and today is the first day it is fully in effect, after it gained the blessing of the European Commission and other EU countries. However, no returns will be made straight away. Instead, detentions are expected the start within the next few days in preparation for the next step. By the end of July, more than 25,000 people had made the crossing over the English Channel in flimsy small boats. That's almost 50% more than the number who had crossed by the same time last year. Craig Munro breaks down Westminster chaos into easy to follow insight, walking you through what the latest policies mean to you. Sent every Wednesday. Sign up here. The government hopes the risk of being sent straight back across to continental Europe will put people off risking their lives to reach the UK. The logic behind the deal is simple – adult migrants who arrive here illegally will be sent back across the Channel, and for every person returned, the UK will take in an asylum seeker from Europe. Those asylum seekers must not have attempted to come over illegally, and will be subject to security and eligibility checks. To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video It doesn't take a degree in maths to realise this would result in the same number of people coming over to the UK, on the face of it. But the Home Office believes fewer people will make the journey if they think they might not end up being able to stay, and this will end up bringing down the numbers. That could depend on how many people are impacted, though, as not every arrival will be sent back immediately. Reports suggest the initial phase of the scheme could return 50 people each week – meaning just one in 17 would be affected, at the current rate of crossings. The question of whether would-be migrants might think those figures are worth the gamble remains. Government figures on both sides of the Channel are, unsurprisingly, keen to sing the praises of the new agreement. Starmer said it was the 'product of months of grown-up diplomacy', and would 'strike at the heart of these vile gangs' business model'. The PM added: 'The days of gimmicks and broken promises are over – we will restore order to our borders with the seriousness and competence the British people deserve.' Home Secretary Yvette Cooper said the UK would 'always be ready to play its part alongside other countries in helping those fleeing persecution and conflict', but it must be done 'in a controlled and managed legal way'. Her French counterpart Bruno Retailleau wrote in a post on X that the agreement is 'a first step in addressing a challenge that calls for the mobilization of the entire European Union'. Opposition politicians, on the other hand, have been scathing. Shadow Home Secretary Chris Philp argued: 'Returning just 50 illegal immigrants a week, and probably less, will make no difference whatsoever. This amounts to just 6 per cent of illegal arrivals. 'Allowing 94 per cent to stay in the UK will be no deterrent at all. This is a gimmick which won't work.' Charity Freedom from Torture has also raised reservations over the plan, which will result in the detention of arrivals. Natasha Tsangarides, the group's Associate Director of Advocacy, said: 'We know from our therapy rooms how profoundly harmful any time in detention is for people who've been through the unimaginable horrors of torture. 'Many survivors were tortured in detention, so locking them up again reopens deep psychological scars and can set them back significantly on their road to recovery.' The deal with France is a central pillar of a wider government effort to 'smash the gangs' who are behind the small boats. More Trending In the past couple of days, the Home Office has also revealed a £100 million boost in funding for border security specifically to tackle small boats crossings. At the weekend, the creation of a new offence was announced targeting people who promote the crossings on social media. They now face up to five years in prison. When Germany's Chancellor Friedrich Merz visited the UK the week after Macron, he committed to a change in German law aiming to prevent people in the country facilitating illegal migration to the UK. According to statistics from the Home Office, 898 migrants arrived on 13 boats on July 30, but none at all arrived in the four days afterwards. Get in touch with our news team by emailing us at webnews@ For more stories like this, check our news page. MORE: Truth revealed about why farmers sprayed manure on 'illegal campers' MORE: 'I create fake IDs of your MP so you can get round Online Safety Act' MORE: Risk and reward, Trump's Mini-Me and planting trees for the planet
