
Inside UK's new £15,000,000,000 nuclear attack submarines
To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video
The UK waters will soon be patrolled by 12 new 'apex predator' attack submarines.
The military's weapon arsenal includes the secretive nuclear-powered and armed submarines, which only a select few will ever set foot in due to high-level security.
The submarine arm of the Royal Navy, known as the Silent Service, operates a fleet of Trafalgar, Astute and Vanguard class vessels.
Now, an upgrade is on the horizon after the government said that 12 new SSN-AUKUS submarines will be built as part of a £15 billion programme 'in response to the rapidly increasing threats' – namely, Russia – and to 'make Britain and Nato safe for decades to come.'
Here is a recap of what the fuss around the SSN-AUKUS submarines is all about.
The Ministry of Defence has been tight-lipped about the submarines' exact specs, but they will replace the seven-strong Astute class from the late 2030s onwards.
Their deadly design allows them to patrol domestic and international waters without detection, and if needed, destroy other ships and submarines and even enforce a blockade for a long period.
The name – SSN-AUKUS – comes from the security pact between Australia, the UK and the US formed in 2021, which led to the creation of the next-generation submarines.
The new fleet will carry conventional weapons, but they will be nuclear-powered. In comparison, the Vanguard-class submarines are equipped with the controversial Trident missile system with nuclear warheads.
One of the new submarines' task will be to protect the Trident nuclear missiles, which are already undergoing a warhead modernisation programme.
The SSN system will remain the 'apex predator' for years to come, Navy Lookout said.
Official information on the design is sparse, but the Navy Lookout put together an estimated look for the new fleet.
The SSN-AUKUS subs will be largely modelled after the Dreadnought class, but they are likely to be larger than the current Astute fleet.
This will provide extra space for heavier weapons and crew. One SSN-AUKUS is estimated to be 410ft long and weigh 9,200 tonnes
Ice-strengthened and streamlined fin
PWR3 nuclear reactor is located in the rear section
Six 21-inch launch tubes for torpedoes, mines and small robot underwater vehicles near the front
Optronic sensor masts – essentially a modern-day periscope to provide ultra-high definition view at night and during the day
The weapon launch system will be based on the Virginia-class technologies developed in the US to allow advanced intelligence, surveillance, underwater warfare and strike operations, Naval Technologies said
The submarines and the nuclear systems themselves will be built in the UK
The new generation submarines are expected to carry submarine-launched cruise missiles (SLCM), which can strike inland
The weapons can penetrate protective 'anti-access and area denial bubbles,' which can be too dangerous for Navy ships, according to the Navy Lookout
The new UK submarines will be built by BAE Systems at Barrow-in-Furness, while the nuclear propulsion units are manufactured at Rolls Royce in Derby, which the government said will support 30,000 jobs.
Defence Secretary John Healey said: 'Our outstanding submariners patrol 24/7 to keep us and our allies safe, but we know that threats are increasing and we must act decisively to face down Russian aggression.
'With new state-of-the-art submarines patrolling international waters and our own nuclear warhead programme on British shores, we are making Britain secure at home and strong abroad, while delivering on our Plan for Change with 30,000 highly-skilled jobs across the country.'
The submarine plan comes after the government pledged to up the UK's defence spending to 2.5% of GDP by 2027 as the Prime Minister announced the strategic defence review.
However, he refused to confirm whether the defence spending will reach 3% by the next parliament.
The PM also announced at least six new munitions factories along with the £15 billion investment in nuclear warheads.
He said: 'First, we are moving to war-fighting readiness as the central purpose of our armed forces.
'When we are being directly threatened by states with advanced military forces, the most effective way to deter them is to be ready, and frankly, to show them that we're ready to deliver peace through strength.'
The second aim is to adopt a 'Nato-first' defence approach so that all actions strengthen the alliance. More Trending
Innovation will also be accelerated at a 'wartime pace' to mee the 'threat of today and tomorrow, as the fastest innovator in Nato,' Sir Keir said.
The UK defence announcement comes as the Russia-Ukraine war has intensified.
Ukraine said it had blasted dozens of Russian nuclear bombers in a mass drone attack over the weekend.
Meanwhile, peace talks between Russian and Ukrainian delegates concluded in Turkiye without a major breakthrough, although prisoner swaps were agreed on.
Get in touch with our news team by emailing us at webnews@metro.co.uk.
For more stories like this, check our news page.
MORE: Families still haunted by RAF Chinook crash demand truth after nearly 30 years
MORE: Royal Navy scrambled to monitor Russian ship loitering in UK waters
MORE: Keir Starmer lashes out at Nigel Farage over 'Liz Truss 2.0 experiment'

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Daily Mail
35 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
Revealed: 'Love cheat' Navy chief Sir Ben Key's affair with junior female officer was 'exposed after her husband reported them to the MoD'
An affair involving the suspended head of the Royal Navy and a junior female officer was exposed by her husband, sources have revealed. Admiral Sir Ben Key, 59, was told to 'step back from all duties' last month over claims the married father of three had an affair with a female officer. At the time, allies of the former First Sea Lord claimed the allegation was part of a 'dirty tricks campaign' against Sir Ben following months of fierce in-fighting at the top of the Armed Forces. But now it has emerged the 'consensual' relationship came to light after the officer's non-serving husband filed a complaint with the Ministry of Defence (MoD), The Telegraph reported. It is understood the husband believed Sir Ben should be held accountable to the same standards as those beneath him. He stands accused of breaching regulations barring sexual relations between commanders and those below them in rank, while endangering the marriage of a comrade is also forbidden. A source said: 'The husband was upset, because this is a man who prides himself on his Christian values and how he was raised by missionaries – but was doing this with someone else's wife.' Sir Ben, who was formerly in the running to become the next Chief of the Defence Staff, now faces a misconduct probe. Admiral Sir Ben, pictured with his wife Elly, is the subject of a misconduct probe following a complaint to the Ministry of Defence about the affair It is the first time in the 500-year history of the Navy that its First Sea Lord has come under such scrutiny. Insiders understand that he had attempted to retire 'quietly' once the affair was exposed, but General Dame Sharon Nesmith, the Vice Chief of the Defence Staff, and John Healey, the Defence Secretary, insisted on an investigation. Many female officers particularly are understood to have felt 'let down' by Sir Ben's double standards. The source said: 'The female naval workforce feels shockingly let down by his moral high stance and hypocrisy.' In March, Sir Ben appeared in Parliament to provide oral evidence on the treatment of women in the armed forces and commented on 'unwelcome sexual behaviours'. He told the defence select committee: 'We are absolutely determined to create a Royal Navy in which people are judged for their professional conduct, welcomed for the contribution that they make, and accepted for who they are. 'Behaviours that run counter to that will not be accepted, and particularly those around unwelcome sexual behaviours. 'We have removed people from the service, including those who have commanded, where we have discovered that their behaviours were not appropriate, or we have removed people from positions of responsibility before situations have got out of hand.' In March, Sir Ben appeared in Parliament to provide oral evidence on the treatment of women in the armed forces and commented on 'unwelcome sexual behaviours' Those close to Sir Ben previously told MoS that they were 'shocked' by the news of an affair. A senior Navy source said: 'Across the board he is very popular, very competent and the majority of the naval service are extremely shocked and really sad to see it potentially end like this.' Another insider added: 'He is a stand-up bloke and treats everyone well.' His wife Elly has previously told of the 'burden' being in the Navy can place on family members. Last week Sir Gwyn Jenkins became the first Royal Marine to be appointed as head of the service. An MoD spokesman said it would be inappropriate to comment while the investigation into the matter continues.


Metro
3 hours ago
- Metro
'How do I know my mum isn't dead in a ditch after Israel arrested her?'
Seren Murphy, 43, was relaxing at home on a Saturday night when she got a message on the WhatsApp family group chat from her mum. She'd been arrested by Israel. Seren's mum, Máire Ní Mhurchú, 70, flew to the occupied West Bank in early May to do what she has done for 20 years – help Palestinians. But no one heard from the mum-of-three, grandmother-of-eight and great-grandmother-of-two for days after she was detained and threatened with deportation on Saturday, an order she is fighting in the courts. Seren, a librarian in Swansea, told Metro: 'How do I know she's not dead in a ditch somewhere? 'When you look at what's happening in Gaza, the fact that they have murdered aid workers and medical staff, what's to stop them from bumping off a little old lady?' As much as Seren's phone has been 'red-hot' recently from her frantically checking it, she knows her mum will be fine. She said: 'My mum is my hero. She's got the biggest heart of anybody I've ever met – Palestine is part of her life and soul.' Almost every autumn, Mhurchú, who goes by D Murphy, goes to the West Bank to help pick olives off the terraced hillsides. But the olives were unharvested when she landed last month. Seren said: 'The joy is disappearing. They're living in fear… Some of the villages she's been to have been bulldozed to the ground. Some people she knows are dead.' One village is Khalet Al-Daba'a in Masafer Yatt, home to 14 families before Israeli forces demolished 90% of the homes and infrastructure. Murphy, from Douglas in Cork, was joined by her friend Susanne Björk on May 28 to volunteer for the International Solidarity Movement (ISM). Björk, 48, told Metro Israeli settlers she filmed 'terrorising' Palestinian villagers stole her phone on May 30. She reported them to the police. But at 6.30am the next day, masked soldiers kicked down their door and gave them 10 seconds to get out. Israeli settlers serving as reservists reportedly told them to leave as they were in a 'military area' before police arrested them. Björk said: 'But the police and soldiers the day before had not mentioned this. How are we to know we were not supposed to be there?' To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video Inside the station, they saw two Palestinian boys, aged about 13. Björk recalled: 'An officer told me: 'These are terrorists. If we don't zip-tie them, they'll run.' We were in the middle of an illegal settlement. There was nowhere for them to go.' Israel has classified the area as a military zone since the 1980s, complicating residents' ability to remain. Khalet Al-Daba'a is inactive, according to a 2022 map. At a Sunday hearing in Tel Aviv, the court accused them of being in a military zone and threatening soldiers and police. Björk said: 'Which is a ridiculous thing to say because these are heavily armed people and I'm a 48-year-old woman with a 70-year-old.' After agreeing to board the next available flight, Björk was deported. Murphy is in Givon Prison and was denied counsel on Wednesday, ISM said. Björk said: 'I fear for D. She's a 70-year-old woman in detention – we had to fight to use the toilet.' On Wednesday, Seren's aunt received a call – it was Murphy, saying she had not spoken with her lawyer since Monday. Seren said: 'I'm reassured knowing she's still alive. It's surreal to think that way about your mum. 'But alongside those feelings is also anger at the fact we're in this situation and what is happening every day in Palestine.' Hamas attacked Israel on October 7, 2023, killing 1,200 people and taking 250 people hostage. Israel has killed nearly 54,700 Palestinians, mainly women and children. ISM told Metro: 'Israel labels indigenous Palestinians, their supporters and those who tell the truth about the genocide unfolding in occupied Palestine as criminals, uses force to silence and remove them from occupied Palestine.' More Trending Ireland's Department of Foreign Affairs and Trade told Metro officials are providing consular assistance. It said: 'As with all consular cases, the Department does not comment on the details of individual cases.' The IDF, the Israel Police and Sweden's Ministry for Foreign Affairs have been approached for comment. Get in touch with our news team by emailing us at webnews@ For more stories like this, check our news page. MORE: Ireland has a US border — it could help travellers nervous about Trump's America MORE: I spent 48 hours in Ireland's rebel city — it's in the midst of a revolution MORE: US suggests Palestinian state should be in the French Riviera


Metro
6 hours ago
- Metro
Donald Trump and Elon Musk might make peace - but it will never last
By all accounts, Donald Trump and Elon Musk should be lovers for life. Both command armies of followers who mistake arrogance for authenticity. Both court chaos, despise convention, and have declared war on everything from healthcare to refugees. And both believe, with unwavering certainty, that they alone can fix it. But the honeymoon is, as literally anyone could've predicted, over. So why the fallout? And where does it go from here? It began with one man's ego being insufficiently stroked by the other. Musk, for all his anti-woke, anti-regulation bluster, couldn't back Trump's signature tax bill. Trump, who demands unwavering loyalty from anyone within his circle, responded with a tirade on Truth Social that began with musings about the end of a 'great relationship' and concluded with accusations that Musk 'just went CRAZY!' Read the recap of the full feud here To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video Musk fired back with memes and mockery. Trump doubled down. Neither man capable of silence. Neither man willing to let the other have the last word. And so, the circus goes on. But this isn't just a sideshow of bruised egos. It's yet another preview of the fracturing in the coalition that brought Trump to power: the uneasy alliance between old-school reactionaries and new-age tech billionaires. What once looked like a coordinated assault on liberal democracy is collapsing into something more personal, performative, and dangerous. Musk isn't just a billionaire with a phone addiction. He's the de facto editor-in-chief of one of the most influential news platforms in the world. Since taking over Twitter (now X), he's amplified dangerous disinformation and MAGA narratives while suppressing legitimate news and dismantling traditional media gatekeeping – all of which Trump has benefited from. But Trump sees only two categories: Loyalists and enemies. Musk, by attempting to play kingmaker rather than servant, was always destined to become the latter. Now, we're watching two of the most powerful men in America locked in a loop of pathetic pettiness. Musk will provoke. Trump will explode. Their fan bases will spin, justify, or split. To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video Having worked on the losing side of the last presidential campaign, I can't escape the bitter irony of how both Kamala Harris and Hillary Clinton were derided as too emotional, too reactive, too unstable to lead. Yet here we are, fewer than 150 days in, watching the man in charge of nuclear weapons throw memes like a toddler and call it leadership. Meanwhile, actual governance has ground to a halt, replaced by a contest of who can go viral fastest. Sure, you could call it entertaining. But it's also corrosive. This feud isn't happening in a vacuum. It's shaping the future of political discourse, global stability, and right-wing mobilisation. There are some signs this very public spat could be patched up. A likely exasperated White House official hastily confirmed the two are expected to speak today (June 6). But I doubt anyone around them seriously thinks it'll stick – because it can't. Both men are hardwired to be top dog at the expense of anything and anyone. The stakes get lower, and the consequences get higher – not just for America, but for the world. The lasting impact – whether it fizzles or erupts again – is not just the further erosion of seriousness in public life. Musk and Trump have already done that – normalising a style of leadership built on attention-seeking, grievance, and performance over policy. The real danger is the new premise that if you're loud enough, you're right, even – especially – when you're wrong. And where does that leave the rest of the world? Trump has already taken swings at Ukraine's president, threatened NATO, slapped tariffs on key allies, and undermined international institutions. If the loudest voice always wins, we shouldn't be surprised when healthcare is rolled back because it suits multi-billion-dollar insurance companies, when Ukraine loses ground because it suits Putin, when truth is drowned out by noise because it suits the algorithm. This isn't just dysfunction – it's design, powered by platforms and personalities who thrive when everything else falls apart. More Trending A president consumed with petty vendettas and algorithm-driven rage is a danger not just to democracy in the US but to stability abroad, particularly with Ukraine still at war and Europe bracing for the fallout. And the real loser? It's not Trump. It's not Musk. It's the American people — trapped in a country where the algorithm is king, the grown-ups have left the room, and the future is being decided by two men who never learned how to walk away. Well, thank God they didn't elect the woman who laughed too much instead. Do you have a story you'd like to share? Get in touch by emailing Share your views in the comments below. MORE: There's a US border at Dublin airport — here's why MORE: Donald Trump and Jeffrey Epstein's messy history amid fallout with Elon Musk MORE: Donald Trump and Elon Musk get bizarre reality TV offer after public spat