Nine denies Lattouf contempt over pro-Israel lobbyists
Antoinette Lattouf was ousted from her casual position on ABC Radio Sydney's Mornings program in December 2023.
She was awarded $70,000 for her unlawful termination in June.
Federal Court Justice Darryl Rangiah found the national broadcaster removed her from air following pressure from an orchestrated campaign by pro-Israel lobbyists.
Nine of those who complained had their names suppressed in February as the hearing started.
The group returned to court on Monday, asking Justice Rangiah to refer Nine-owned newspapers to a registrar for prosecution for alleged contempt of court.
Prominent barrister Sue Chrysanthou SC argued at an earlier hearing Nine failed to promptly take down or amend January 2024 articles published in the Sydney Morning Herald and The Age containing the names of four individuals who complained.
It took the publisher six weeks to remove the names despite repeated letters, she said.
A separate article by the Nine-owned Pedestrian TV also identifying some of the complainants was taken down in April.
There had been no apology nor a promise to not divulge the names in the future.
"All of the respondents are completely unrepentant in relation to the infringement of the order," Ms Chrysanthou said in June.
The contempt case has also been brought against journalists Michael Bachelard and Calum Jaspan, editors Bevan Shields and Patrick Elligett and Nine's in-house lawyers Larina Alick and Sam White.
Nine's barrister Tom Blackburn SC denied there was any contempt at all when the hearing continued on Monday.
His clients could not have breached the court's order suppressing any names or identities because the wording did not specify who the order related to, he argued.
'It's just impossible that there could be a wilful and contumacious contempt in this case in circumstances where we didn't know who the protected people were," he said.
The case against the two journalists was "utterly hopeless" as neither had the power to remove or amend the articles, Mr Blackburn said.
Similar submissions were made regarding the "incoherent" case brought against the two in-house lawyers.
Mr Blackburn argued the case should not be referred to a registrar and that the pro-Israel group should be made to pay his clients' legal costs.
Ms Chrysanthou urged Justice Rangiah to refer the matter on, saying the judge only needed to be convinced there was an arguable case of contempt.
Nine knew exactly who the suppression order referred to and eventually removed the precise names of the complainants from the articles, she said.
Justice Rangiah will deliver his decision at a later date.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Hill
3 minutes ago
- The Hill
Rubio acknowledges Trump-Putin summit left US ‘long ways off' peace deal
Secretary of State Marco Rubio on Sunday acknowledged the Trump administration is far away from reaching any kind of peace deal between Russia and Ukraine after President Trump's summit on Friday with Russian President Vladimir Putin. Rubio insisted progress was made at the Alaska summit, which the president declared a 10 out of 10 because of how well he got along with Putin. At the same time, Rubio in a Sunday morning interview in ABC's 'This Week' didn't mince words in discussing how much work still needed to be done. 'We made progress in the sense that we identified potential areas of agreement, but there remain some big areas of disagreement,' Rubio told ABC's Martha Raddatz. 'So we're still a long ways off. We are not at the precipice of a peace agreement. We are not at the edge of one. But I do think progress was made.' Trump is now scheduled to meet Ukraine President Volodymyr Zelensky on Monday at the White House. Zelensky will be accompanied by European leaders in a sign of their support for Ukraine. Trump's talk of land being swapped between Ukraine and Russia has raised alarms in European capitols, where his words have been seen as a sign that Ukraine might need to give up territory to Russia to reach a peace deal. Rubio brushed off the fact that Trump has not announced tougher actions against Russia after the summit, telling Raddatz that wasn't the aim of the meeting after she noted that Trump had suggested tougher penalties for Moscow could be coming without progress. Rubio, one of two U.S. officials who was in attendance for the Trump-Putin meeting, also said it would not be possible to reach a deal between Russia and Ukraine without Zelensky being at the table. The secretary of State suggested there is much people on the outside do not know about the talks, suggesting Putin could have signaled some concessions to Trump. 'I think we made some real progress. You talked about not knowing what was discussed. These peace deals, these peace agreements and negotiations, they don't work when they're conducted in the media, either through leaks or through lies,' he said. 'And usually, they're both the same thing, lying leaks. Okay? They don't work if you do it that way.' Responding in part to criticism that Trump was too friendly toward Putin at the summit and afterwards, Rubio also said peace would not be realized through insults. Peace deals don't work out, Rubio said, 'if you go out and say aggressive and abrasive things about one side or the other, because then they just walk away.' Asked specifically if Putin had offered any concessions, Rubio said he would not name any publicly but suggested there would need to be a give and take on both sides. He also made it clear that Trump had asked Putin for concessions. 'So, of course, concessions were asked. But what utility would there be of me going on a program and tell you, we've wagged our finger at Putin and told him, you must do this and you must do that. It's only going to make — it's only going to make it harder and less likely that they're going to agree to these things,' he said. 'So, these negotiations, as much as everyone would love it to be a live, pay-per-view event, these discussions only work best when they are conducted privately in serious negotiation in which people who have to go back and respond to constituencies, because even totalitarian governments have constituencies they have to respond to, people have to go back and defend these agreements that they make.'
Axios
2 hours ago
- Axios
Rubio says peace agreement "a long ways off" after Putin summit
Secretary of State Marco Rubio said Sunday that "we're not at the precipice" of a peace agreement after President Trump's Alaska summit with Russian President Vladimir Putin ended without a deal on Russia's war in Ukraine. The big picture: Trump, who Axios previously reported set a ceasefire as the goal of the talks, said "we didn't get there" after the meeting. Rubio on Sunday said both sides would have to make concessions, but refused to name any that Putin agreed to. Now, Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky, joined by several European leaders, will travel to Washington for a potentially difficult meeting with Trump on Monday. Driving the news: Rubio, who made appearances across the Sunday political show lineup, told ABC's Martha Raddatz a ceasefire was not the aim, arguing, "You're not going to reach a ceasefire or peace agreement in a meeting" without Ukraine present. If an agreement isn't reached, Rubio said, there will be consequences — but he emphasized the administration is trying to avoid such measures. Late last month, Trump threatened to shorten Putin's deadline to agree to a ceasefire in Ukraine or face heavy sanctions, which he said would include "secondary sanctions and tariffs." Yes, but: Rubio on Sunday argued that if the U.S. levies additional sanctions, the "talking stops." "If this morning the president woke up and said, 'I'm putting these terrible ... strong sanctions on Russia,' that's fine — [it] may make people feel good for a couple hours," he said on Fox's "Sunday Morning Futures." "But here's what you're basically saying ... talks are over for the foreseeable future." He reiterated that view on NBC's "Meet the Press," saying that he doesn't believe new sanctions would force Putin to accept a ceasefire. "We may very well wind up in that place," he said of new sanctions. "I hope not. Because that means that peace talks failed." The other side: Democrats on Sunday blasted the president over the meeting, which began with a red carpet rollout, and denounced the lack of immediate consequences for Russia. Sen. Chris Murphy (D-Conn.) described the summit as a "great day for Russia" in an interview with NBC's Kristen Welker, saying Putin left with "his photo op with zero commitments made and zero consequences." His Democratic colleague, Sen. Chris Van Hollen (Md.), said on ABC's "This Week" that Trump "got played" by Putin and that "[a]ll the threatened sanctions ... apparently have been set aside." Van Hollen called for the Senate to move ahead on bipartisan legislation that would impose new sanctions on Russia. Catch up quick: Trump, in a Truth Social post after the summit, said the meeting — and a subsequent phone call with Zelensky and European leaders — went "very well." He wrote that it "was determined by all" that a peace agreement, rather than a "mere Ceasefire Agreement" would be the best solution. Zelensky had been adamant that there must be a ceasefire before peace talks, Axios' Barak Ravid reports. The terms that Putin laid out in the summit included that Ukraine cede two of the four regions to which Russia has laid claim and freeze the front lines in the other two, Axios' Barak Ravid and Dave Lawler reported, citing two sources briefed on a call U.S. officials held with other allied leaders. Flashback: Zelensky's Monday trip to Washington comes around six months after Trump's February Oval Office meeting with the Ukrainian leader boiled over into a heated argument. European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen, German Chancellor Friedrich Merz and NATO Secretary General Mark Rutte are all expected to attend the meeting with Zelensky. Friction point: On CBS News' "Face the Nation," Rubio denied that those leaders were joining Zelensky as backup to protect him from being bullied into a deal. "This is such a stupid media narrative; that they are coming here tomorrow because Trump is going to bully Zelensky into a bad deal," he said. "We invited them to come," he added. "The president invited them to come."
The Hill
3 hours ago
- The Hill
Rubio on Trump-Putin summit: No peace agreement ‘unless both sides make concessions'
Secretary of State Marco Rubio said there wouldn't be a peace agreement between Ukraine and Russia 'unless both sides make concessions.' During an appearance on ABC's 'This Week' on Sunday, host Martha Raddatz asked whether Rubio could name any concessions Russian President Vladimir Putin made during his meeting with President Trump in Alaska on Friday, which Rubio was in attendance for. 'I wouldn't name them on your program,' Rubio responded. When Raddatz pushed back, asking where the 'pressure' was, Rubio said there can't be a peace agreement 'unless both sides give and get.' 'You can't have a peace agreement unless both sides make concessions. That's a fact,' he said. 'That's true in virtually any negotiation. If not, it's just called surrender. And neither side is going to surrender. So both sides are going to have to make concessions.' He added that 'of course' concessions were asked, but argued that providing the specific concessions on the program would 'make it harder and less likely that they're going to agree to these things.' 'So, these negotiations, as much as everyone would love it to be a live pay-per-view event, these discussions only work best when they are conducted privately in […] serious negotiations in which people who have to go back and respond to constituencies,' he added. His comments come after Trump met with Putin on Friday at a historic summit in Alaska, alongside Rubio and special envoy Steve Witkoff, and two Russian aides. While no agreement emerged from the meeting, Trump touted it as 'productive.' 'I believe we had a very productive meeting. There were many, many points that we agreed on. Most of them, I would say a couple of big ones that we haven't quite gotten there, but we've made some headway. So, there's no deal until there's a deal,' Trump said after the meeting.
