Sarwar: Dewar would be disappointed at devolution progress
While Secretary of State for Scotland in Tony Blair's government, Mr Dewar began the devolution process. It resulted in Scotland's first parliament in almost 300 years.
Mr Sarwar praised Mr Dewar, adding he was politician who 'believed politics was bigger than himself and bigger than his own party'.
He also had to persuade the country – and many within his own party – of the importance of devolution, the Scottish Labour leader said.
Mr Sarwar said: 'Donald had to do something that I think others hadn't had to do which is he had to first of all win a referendum to get the Parliament.
Read more:
'He then had to build credibility for an institution and he had to persuade people on devolution. He didn't have to persuade just his own country, he had to persuade people in his own political party, in his own political movement.
I also think he was a person of immense stature, and also someone that believed politics was bigger than himself and bigger than his own political party.
'He was genuinely a politician that wanted to pull people together. To be honest, and perhaps we will look back on this and think it was a naïve view he had given everything that's happened in the last two decades in particular, but I think Donald genuinely believed that once you've got a parliament together with different people in different parties, we would do politics differently from how we did it in Westminster, and that we'd find common ground and that's what drives us, rather than finding differences.'
The Herald's editor Catherine Salmond asked the Scottish Labour leader whether Mr Dewar would be 'disappointed' at the Scottish Parliament's progress since it was re-established in 1999.
The Scottish Parliament celebrated its 25th year in September last year.
Mr Sarwar said: 'I think he would still be a believer of devolution. I think he would still be a defender of the institution but I think he would feel as if progress and story of devolution in 25 years has not lived up to the opportunity and potential that the Scottish people demanded.'
The Scottish Labour leader warned there was a 'real risk' that Scotland's debate would 'suit people who want to live their lives constantly in a constitutional arguments mode'.
He added: 'I think it's safe to say that we have to change the drive for leadership, the back stories, and also the level of engagement and intent for ministers in the Scottish Government.
'I too often see ministers looking like they're there to fill a space rather than to drive outcomes. We've got to get back to being an outcome driven country. We've got to get back to being a can-do country, not a can't-do country.
'I honestly believe our people are there I just think – people often say does Scotland lack ambition? Scotland doesn't lack ambition or imagination, they don't lack talent. They lack a leadership that shares that amount of imagination and ambition.
'I want to start with a government that meets the aspirations of the people of Scotland.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Powys County Times
21 minutes ago
- Powys County Times
Angela Rayner calls on China to explain redacted images in super-embassy plans
Angela Rayner has told China to explain why parts of its plans for a new super-embassy in London are redacted. The Deputy Prime Minister, who as Housing Secretary is responsible for overseeing planning matters, has given Beijing two weeks to explain why areas of its plans for the sprawling new embassy site in central London are blacked out. China hawks in Westminster have raised alarm that the embassy site could be used to conduct surveillance from British soil. Pro-democracy campaigners from Hong Kong, as well as Uighurs and Tibetans, meanwhile, fear that intimidation and reprisals from the Chinese state could result from the embassy going ahead. This follows reports that bounties have been issued by China for dissident Hong Kongers now living in the UK. In a letter seen by the PA news agency, Ms Rayner's Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government asks planning consultants representing the Chinese embassy to explain why drawings of the planned site are blacked out. The letter gives two weeks, until August 20, for an explanation to be provided. It also suggests that a final planning decision on the embassy site, at Royal Mint Court, just east of London's financial district, will be made by September 9. Copies of the letter were also sent to the Home Office and the Foreign Office by email. It notes that the Home Office requested a new 'hard perimeter' be placed around the embassy site, to prevent 'unregulated public access', and acknowledges this could require a further planning application. Plans for the super-embassy were previously rejected by Tower Hamlets Council in 2022, with the Chinese opting not to appeal. However, Beijing resubmitted the application a fortnight after Sir Keir Starmer's election victory last year, believing Labour may be more receptive to the application. Since entering office Sir Keir's Government has sought closer links with Beijing after a cooling during the final years of Conservative Party rule. The final decision will be made by Mr Rayner in her role as Housing Secretary. Alicia Kearns, the shadow national security minister, said: 'No surprises here – Labour's rush to appease Xi Jinping's demands for a new embassy demonstrated a complacency when it came to keeping our people safe. Having deluded themselves for so long, they've recognised we were right to be vigilant. 'The disturbing bounty notes urging British citizens to kidnap and deliver their Hong Kong neighbours to the current CCP embassy laid bare the risks – yet the Foreign Secretary didn't even summon the Chinese ambassador in the face of direct threats to those seeking refuge in our country. 'CCP ambitions for a larger embassy would only amplify opportunities for espionage and transnational repression.'
Telegraph
an hour ago
- Telegraph
A long-term plan is needed to get the country out of its financial hole
SIR – Whether by raising income tax rates, a wealth tax or through less overt measures, the Government will try to extract more money from the people that it serves ('Reeves facing £50bn black hole as tax pressure mounts ', report, August 6). However, such measures risk being self-defeating. Those who are unable or unwilling to leave the country will bear the brunt of the tax rises. That includes standard and higher-rate taxpayers. Every pound the Government extracts from their bank accounts is a pound that cannot be spent on businesses that provide goods and services. Thus, businesses will take another hit which, in turn, will reduce their tax payments. Since the failure of the Truss administration, there has been no long-term plan to get the country out of its financial hole. Eventually, there will have to be one and it will likely involve curbing the insatiable appetite of government to control and spend. When such a plan sees the light of day we may be surprised at the boost it gives to confidence and investment. David Porter Plymouth, Devon SIR – Labour dug itself a financial hole when it pledged not to increase National Insurance (NI), VAT or income tax rates. Instead of imposing VAT on private schools and possibly even on private health, a simple 1 or 2 per cent rise on NI and/or the basic rate of income tax would have solved the Chancellor's problems. Now she is having to cast her net wider – and creating more problems as a result. John Tilsiter Radlett, Hertfordshire SIR – Taxing jobs and taxing capital is not going to result in economic growth. Is it too much to expect a former Bank of England economist to grasp this? Patrick Loxdale Aberystwyth, Ceredigion SIR – There is a limit to which any economy can be taxed. The UK is at that limit. The British public understands this. It is plain that public sector expenditure must be cut to balance the books. Given the Government throws billions around like confetti – on the Chagos Islands, the immigration fiasco, welfare, public sector pay rises, excessive numbers of civil servants – there is much low-hanging fruit. The economy is being badly managed as never before. Enough is enough. Please can we have some economic sanity. Stuart Moore Bramham, West Yorkshire SIR – Having continually criticised the Conservatives for the last 12 months for creating a £22bn black hole in the public finances, I trust Labour will now be constantly criticising itself for doubling the deficit. Paul Webster Dyserth, Denbighshire
Spectator
2 hours ago
- Spectator
Motherland: how Farage is winning over women
On the campaign trail in the Midlands ahead of May's local elections, a journalist asked Nigel Farage: 'Do you have a woman problem?' The twice-married, twice-separated father of four laughed and said: 'God, yes. I've had 40 years of it.' His response was characteristic of Reform UK's leader – a determination not to take things too seriously and a tacit acknowledgement that every political cause he has espoused has been more popular with men than women. 'Around me there's always been a perception of a laddish culture,' he says. 'Ukip was the rugby club on tour.' In last year's general election, 58 per cent of Reform voters were men. Since May, when Reform seized 700 seats and ten councils, that has begun to change. It may now be Keir Starmer with the woman problem while Farage is leading a march of the mums. Polling from More in Common shows that, since the general election, Reform has gained 14 percentage points among women, while Labour has lost 12, but with every cohort over the age of 45 the swing is even bigger. It is most pronounced in the Generation X group, aged 45 to 60, where Reform tops the polls. They also lead among Boomer women, aged 61 to 75. Among the over-75s, where the Tories still win, more women support Reform than the Lib Dems, Labour and the Greens combined. Farage's party also wins the support of one in five women in the younger age groups, putting them second to Labour on 22 per cent among millennials aged 29 to 44 and on 19 per cent among the 18- to 28-year-olds of Generation Z (just four points behind Labour). Luke Tryl of More in Common says: 'Among all other age groups, women have been moving towards Reform more than any other party.' So what has been happening? These are not votes Reform has chased. There has been no policy announcement on childcare, designed to appeal to female voters. 'We haven't forced this,' says Farage. 'It's something which has evolved.' One explanation is that women in general are more likely than men to have a downbeat view of Britain's future, to worry that the country is broken. Only 17 per cent of Gen X women, one in six, think Britain is on the 'right track', compared with 23 per cent of Gen X men. Sixty-four per cent of Gen X women think the country is on the wrong track. Across all age groups, women are far more likely than men to report feeling sad, angry, lonely or stressed. Sixty-two per cent of Baby Boomer women say the world is getting more dangerous, compared with 48 per cent of the general population. 'Our conversations with Gen X women find them among the most disillusioned with the status quo,' says Tryl. 'Some are struggling to make ends meet at a time when they thought they would be winding down. 'Not living but surviving,' as one put it, and often dealing with double care challenges – looking after elderly relatives, but with adult kids still at home who can't get a foot on the housing ladder. As this group have become dis-appointed in Starmer's ability to bring about the 'change' they voted for, the appeal of Reform is starting to grow.' Another explanation is that Reform has begun to attract high-profile women to its ranks, which is helping to change the old perception that Farage leads a red-trousered gammon brigade. Andrea Jenkyns, the mayor of Lincolnshire, and Sarah Pochin, the MP for Runcorn, have been joined in recent weeks by the former Tories Laura Anne Jones, Reform's first member of the Welsh Senedd, and the London councillor and prosecutor Laila Cunningham, a mother of seven. Cunningham and Pochin flanked Farage at the launch of his party's summer campaign on crime. This week he was joined by Vanessa Frake, a former prison governor. Senior figures in the party believe that Cunningham would be a formidable candidate for mayor of London in May 2028. 'A moderate Muslim mother who can communicate very effectively and talks sense,' one says. 'She could win.' The issue on which Labour is most conspicuously losing support to Reform is migration, where the government's policy of housing asylum seekers in local communities has led to widespread protests. Farage began to notice the difference during the run-up to the Runcorn by-election in May. There, women voiced concerns about migrants in HMOs, Houses in Multiple Occupation. 'Runcorn was an awakening for me,' he says. 'We started getting women, not just mums, much older women too, saying, 'Have you heard what's happening in that street? There's 15 of them in there.' In Runcorn I began to get this sense that HMOs are worse than hotels because they're just plonked in communities. And it led to great fear.' Since then, women have led the protests across the country. In Epping, they protested outside the Bell hotel after a 14-year-old girl was allegedly assaulted by an Ethiopian asylum seeker. Another group of women and girls gathered outside the four-star Britannia International hotel in Canary Wharf, London, wearing pink clothing, held up England flags and chanted 'stop the boats'. The Epping protest was partly coordinated by Orla Minihane, a Reform candidate and mother of three. 'I know a few of these women. They're Reform members and they frighten the life out of me,' jokes Farage, channelling the Duke of Wellington's observation about his own troops. 'I think there is grave concern, particularly among mothers about their teenagers, whether they can let them out. This issue has changed the perception of how people view Reform.' Again the numbers back this up. Just 18 per cent of women now support temporary accommodation for asylum seekers in their local communities, down 36 per cent since 2003. Among men it is 22 per cent, down 30 per cent. Two thirds of Baby Boomer women and those over 75 say they think Britain cares more about immigrants than its citizens (compared with just half of the overall population). 'Support for housing asylum seekers locally in temporary accommodation has fallen most with women,' says Tryl. 'And our polling finds a great willingness to say protests against the hotels are appropriate.' New polling has found that voters back the Epping protests by 41 per cent to 32 per cent. More than seven out of ten voters say they expect rioting over asylum issues, a stunning normalisation of political violence. The proportion who think violent protests are accept-able has risen from 7.7 per cent to 12.2 per cent – the equivalent of two million adults since August last year, when More in Common last conducted the poll. The number of women who think violent protest is justified has doubled from 5 to 10 per cent; among men it has risen from 11 per cent to 15 per cent. Mothers are two points more likely to say that violence is justified than other women. Mothers of children under 16 are more likely to cite concerns about sexual violence as a reason for opposing asylum hotels. There is a global tradition of protests by women having great potency. Mothers of soldiers killed in Russia's war in Chechnya caused trouble for Vladimir Putin in the early 2000s. The Mothers of the Disappeared were key in eroding the authority of the Argentinian junta in the 1970s. But it also seems to be the case that women feel able to say things that men don't. It was striking that when the Lionesses won the Euros last month, Chloe Kelly, who scored the winning penalty, said: 'I'm so proud to be English.' Hannah Hampton, the England goalie, added: 'We've got that grit, that English blood in us.' Contrast that with the men's team, which has leapt on every woke bandwagon. Farage watched with glee: 'It was a Mo Farah moment, like where an interviewer talked about his culture and he said: 'Listen, mate, I'm British.' I loved it.' It is not all plain sailing for Farage. Tryl explains: 'There are a couple of significant Achilles heels when it comes to support among women – firstly they are most likely to cite Nigel Farage's closeness to Donald Trump as the top barrier to voting Reform. They are also nervous about Reform's stance on Ukraine, and sceptical of plans to make renewables more expensive.' But the march of the mums has the other parties worried. It explains why Kemi Badenoch rushed to make an attack video this week when Farage ducked a question about Vanessa Frake refusing to rule out trans women in women's jails, forcing him to clarify his position. 'Only Conservatives will protect women-only spaces,' Badenoch said. It explains why Bridget Phillipson, the education secretary, is working on a new childcare offering for voters, expected to be unveiled in the autumn. In Downing Street, Starmer's team believes the only way to win back voters of all sexes is to 'lift the sense of doom and decline' by dealing with the country's deep structural problems. He has been heard to say: 'I will not just be another PM who left this for someone else to sort.' The Prime Minister has been at Chequers this week summoning aides for crunch discussions. Senior figures say Starmer has been warned he has just six months to turn things around or be 'timed out'. Speechwriter Alan Lockey and head of strategy Paul Ovenden are working on a party conference speech which will warn voters there has to be 'profound change to the way we do things', but also spell out a more optimistic vision of what Britain looks like if Labour gets it right. He will pitch the government as the friend of those who work hard and earn their money. Insiders say Starmer is 'furious' about the lack of progress on deregulation and building. Expect a new planning bill to combat that. The PM also wants the autumn Budget to be bold rather than simply plug gaps in the government's spending plans. He met Rachel Reeves last week. His argument against Reform will be that he is plotting a revolution for the quiet majority, while a vote for Farage means 'decline and grievance'. For his part, Farage says that while he is 'not going to pander to anyone', his new audience of women supporters 'will demand' policies of their own. But ultimately his pitch is that the main parties have failed. At Goodwood last Friday he was approached in the betting ring by punters. 'They're not supporting us because they want to stick two fingers up. They agree with our analysis that it's really bad, but they actually have great faith in us to sort it out.' If we get to 2029 and the public believes Farage is more likely to solve Britain's ills than Starmer or Badenoch, the other parties will have both a man and woman problem.
