
Motherland: how Farage is winning over women
His response was characteristic of Reform UK's leader – a determination not to take things too seriously and a tacit acknowledgement that every political cause he has espoused has been more popular with men than women. 'Around me there's always been a perception of a laddish culture,' he says. 'Ukip was the rugby club on tour.' In last year's general election, 58 per cent of Reform
voters were men.
Since May, when Reform seized 700 seats and ten councils, that has begun to change. It may now be Keir Starmer with the woman problem while Farage is leading a march of the mums. Polling from More in Common shows that, since the general election, Reform has gained 14 percentage points among women, while Labour has lost 12, but with every cohort over the age of 45 the swing is even bigger. It is most pronounced in the Generation X group, aged 45 to 60, where Reform tops the polls. They also lead among Boomer women, aged 61 to 75. Among the over-75s, where the Tories still win, more women support Reform than the Lib Dems, Labour and the Greens combined.
Farage's party also wins the support of one in five women in the younger age groups, putting them second to Labour on 22 per cent among millennials aged 29 to 44 and on 19 per cent among the 18- to 28-year-olds of Generation Z (just four points behind Labour). Luke Tryl of More in Common says: 'Among all other age groups, women have been moving towards Reform more than any other party.'
So what has been happening? These are not votes Reform has chased. There has been no policy announcement on childcare, designed to appeal to female voters. 'We haven't forced this,' says Farage. 'It's something which has evolved.'
One explanation is that women in general are more likely than men to have a downbeat view of Britain's future, to worry that the country is broken. Only 17 per cent of Gen X women, one in six, think Britain is on the 'right track', compared with 23 per cent of Gen X men. Sixty-four per cent of Gen X women think the country is on the wrong track. Across all age groups, women are far more likely than men to report feeling sad, angry, lonely or stressed. Sixty-two per cent of Baby Boomer women say the world is getting more dangerous, compared with 48 per cent of the general population.
'Our conversations with Gen X women find them among the most disillusioned with the status quo,' says Tryl. 'Some are struggling to make ends meet at a time when they thought they would be winding down. 'Not living but surviving,' as one put it, and often dealing with double care challenges – looking after elderly relatives, but with adult kids still at home who can't get a foot on the housing ladder. As this group have become dis-appointed in Starmer's ability to bring about the 'change' they voted for, the appeal of Reform is starting to grow.'
Another explanation is that Reform has begun to attract high-profile women to its ranks, which is helping to change the old perception that Farage leads a red-trousered gammon brigade. Andrea Jenkyns, the mayor of Lincolnshire, and Sarah Pochin, the MP for Runcorn, have been joined in recent weeks by the former Tories Laura Anne Jones, Reform's first member of the Welsh Senedd, and the London councillor and prosecutor Laila Cunningham, a mother of seven.
Cunningham and Pochin flanked Farage at the launch of his party's summer campaign on crime. This week he was joined by Vanessa Frake, a former prison governor. Senior figures in the party believe that Cunningham would be a formidable candidate for mayor of London in May 2028. 'A moderate Muslim mother who can communicate very effectively and talks sense,' one says. 'She could win.'
The issue on which Labour is most conspicuously losing support to Reform is migration, where the government's policy of housing asylum seekers in local communities has led to widespread protests. Farage began to notice the difference during the run-up to the Runcorn by-election in May. There, women voiced concerns about migrants in HMOs, Houses in Multiple Occupation. 'Runcorn was an awakening for me,' he says. 'We started getting women, not just mums, much older women too, saying, 'Have you heard what's happening in that street? There's 15 of them in there.' In Runcorn I began to get this sense that HMOs are worse than hotels because they're just plonked in communities. And it led to great fear.'
Since then, women have led the protests across the country. In Epping, they protested outside the Bell hotel after a 14-year-old girl was allegedly assaulted by an Ethiopian asylum seeker. Another group of women and girls gathered outside the four-star Britannia International hotel in Canary Wharf, London, wearing pink clothing, held up England flags and chanted 'stop the boats'.
The Epping protest was partly coordinated by Orla Minihane, a Reform candidate and mother of three. 'I know a few of these women. They're Reform members and they frighten the life out of me,' jokes Farage, channelling the Duke of Wellington's observation about his own troops. 'I think there is grave concern, particularly among mothers about their teenagers, whether they can let them out. This issue has changed the perception of how people view Reform.'
Again the numbers back this up. Just 18 per cent of women now support temporary accommodation for asylum seekers in their local communities, down 36 per cent since 2003. Among men it is 22 per cent, down 30 per cent. Two thirds of Baby Boomer women and those over 75 say they think Britain cares more about immigrants than its citizens (compared with just half of the overall population). 'Support for housing asylum seekers locally in temporary accommodation has fallen most with women,' says Tryl. 'And our polling finds a great willingness to say protests against the hotels are appropriate.'
New polling has found that voters back the Epping protests by 41 per cent to 32 per cent. More than seven out of ten voters say they expect rioting over asylum issues, a stunning normalisation of political violence. The proportion who think violent protests are accept-able has risen from 7.7 per cent to 12.2 per cent – the equivalent of two million adults since August last year, when More in Common last conducted the poll. The number of women who think violent protest is justified has doubled from 5 to 10 per cent; among men it has risen from 11 per cent to 15 per cent. Mothers are two points more likely to say that violence is justified than other women. Mothers of children under 16 are more likely to cite concerns about sexual violence as a reason for opposing asylum hotels.
There is a global tradition of protests by women having great potency. Mothers of soldiers killed in Russia's war in Chechnya caused trouble for Vladimir Putin in the early 2000s. The Mothers of the Disappeared were key in eroding the authority of the Argentinian junta in the 1970s.
But it also seems to be the case that women feel able to say things that men don't. It was striking that when the Lionesses won the Euros last month, Chloe Kelly, who scored the winning penalty, said: 'I'm so proud to be English.' Hannah Hampton, the England goalie, added: 'We've got that grit, that English blood in us.' Contrast that with the men's team, which has leapt on every woke bandwagon. Farage watched with glee: 'It was a Mo Farah moment, like where an interviewer talked about his culture and he said: 'Listen, mate, I'm British.' I loved it.'
It is not all plain sailing for Farage. Tryl explains: 'There are a couple of significant Achilles heels when it comes to support among women – firstly they are most likely to cite Nigel Farage's closeness to Donald Trump as the top barrier to voting Reform. They are also nervous about Reform's stance on Ukraine, and sceptical of plans to make renewables more expensive.'
But the march of the mums has the other parties worried. It explains why Kemi Badenoch rushed to make an attack video this week when Farage ducked a question about Vanessa Frake refusing to rule out trans women in women's jails, forcing him to clarify his position. 'Only Conservatives will protect women-only spaces,' Badenoch said.
It explains why Bridget Phillipson, the education secretary, is working on a new childcare offering for voters, expected to be unveiled in the autumn. In Downing Street, Starmer's team believes the only way to win back voters of all sexes is to 'lift the sense of doom and decline' by dealing with the country's deep structural problems. He has been heard to say: 'I will not just be another PM who left this for someone else to sort.'
The Prime Minister has been at Chequers this week summoning aides for crunch discussions. Senior figures say Starmer has been warned he has just six months to turn things around or be 'timed out'. Speechwriter Alan Lockey and head of strategy Paul Ovenden are working on a party conference speech which will warn voters there has to be 'profound change to the way we do things', but also spell out a more optimistic vision of what Britain looks like if Labour gets it right. He will pitch the government as the friend of those who work hard and earn their money.
Insiders say Starmer is 'furious' about the lack of progress on deregulation and building. Expect a new planning bill to combat that. The PM also wants the autumn Budget to be bold rather than simply plug gaps in the government's spending plans. He met Rachel Reeves last week. His argument against Reform will be that he is plotting a revolution for the quiet majority, while a vote for Farage means 'decline and grievance'.
For his part, Farage says that while he is 'not going to pander to anyone', his new audience of women supporters 'will demand' policies of their own. But ultimately his pitch is that the main parties have failed. At Goodwood last Friday he was approached in the betting ring by punters. 'They're not supporting us because they want to stick two fingers up. They agree with our analysis that it's really bad, but they actually have great faith in us to sort it out.'
If we get to 2029 and the public believes Farage is more likely to solve Britain's ills than Starmer or Badenoch, the other parties will have both a man and woman problem.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Daily Mail
17 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
Starmer has lost 10 ministers after rent hike row departure
Keir Starmer has recorded another unwanted distinction after a tenth minister quit the government. Rushanara Ali resigned as homelessness minister last night saying she did not want to be a 'distraction'. She had faced claims she ejected tenants from one of her properties, before putting it back on the market for an extra £700 a month rent. In a letter to the PM, Ms Ali insisted that she had followed 'all relevant legal requirements' and took her 'responsibilities and duties seriously'. The departure heaps more woe on Sir Keir, who has seen a significantly faster rate of attrition than his predecessors. Since Labour won the general election in July 2024, the premier has lost 10 ministers. They include former Transport Secretary Louise Haigh and international development minister Annelise Dodds - previously a close ally of Sir Keir. In contrast, Rishi Sunak lost nine Government members in the first 13 months - two of whom were ministerial aides. The equivalent figure for Boris Johnson was six and Theresa May three, not including reshuffles. Liz Truss's premiership lasted only a month and a half, during which there were three departures. Ms Ali's resignation came after it emerged that she had hiked rent on a property she owns by hundreds of pounds just weeks after the previous tenants' contract ended. The MP has repeatedly cast herself as a voice for hard-up tenants, and spoke out against private renters 'being exploited and discriminated against'. And she championed the Renters' Rights Bill, currently going through Parliament, which will ban landlords who evict tenants from re-listing a property for a higher rent until at least six months after the occupants have left. Her actions would have been illegal under this law. In a round of broadcast interviews this morning, energy minister Miatta Fahnbulleh said Ms Ali had 'not broken any rules or any laws' when asked by Sky News if the allegations about her colleague were a 'good look'. Ms Fahnbulleh added: 'She's chosen to resign, and that is a personal decision for her. What we care about as a Government is that we are levelling the playing field for renters. 'So we absolutely recognise that across the country. I hear stories all the time of people who are not getting a fair deal as a tenant. 'In the end, if you're a renter, you want security in the thing that is your home and so that is what the Renters' Rights Bill is trying to do. I think that is absolutely right.' Tory leader Kemi Badenoch had led the calls for Ms Ali to be sacked, telling the Daily Mail: 'I warned that Labour's Renters' Rights Bill was a mess. Now we find out the minister responsible is doing the opposite of the what the Bill proposed – the homelessness minister is making people homeless. 'Rushanara Ali's hypocrisy is shameful.' Conservative Party chairman Kevin Hollinrake added: 'I think it shows staggering hypocrisy. Rushanara Ali has been somebody who's obviously a government minister in charge of homelessness. She's spoken out about exploiting tenants, about providing more protections to tenants. 'You can't say those things, then do the opposite in practice, as a landlord.' He said the conduct appeared to be 'unethical, not illegal' but 'we can't just say one thing and do another'. Ms Ali is the third Labour minister to have resigned over a personal matter. Tulip Siddiq resigned as City minister in mid-January, 26 days after the Mail revealed she was facing a major corruption probe in Bangladesh, which she denies. Louise Haigh stepped down as Transport Secretary in November last year following media revelations that she had pleaded guilty to a fraud charge a decade ago. Ms Ali is alleged to have told four tenants to move out of the £900,000 four-bedroom home in east London, only to relist the property at a rent of £4,000 a month – a £700 increase – amid suggestions she failed to find a buyer for the property. Laura Jackson, a 33-year-old self-employed restaurant owner, was one of those who rented out the house – roughly a mile from the Olympic Park – in March 2024 at £3,300 a month. She then received an email in November telling her the lease would not be renewed this year, and that she and her housemates would need to move out, giving them four months notice, taking them to March. The current occupants are said to have moved in 'four to five months' ago on the increased terms.


Wales Online
17 minutes ago
- Wales Online
Swansea politician 'incandescent' at west Wales colleagues' St Helen's objections
Swansea politician 'incandescent' at west Wales colleagues' St Helen's objections 'I'm absolutely astounded that they've done this," said the Labour MP Harris said she was 'absolutely astounded' by her west Wales colleagues' intervention (Image: ITV News) Neath and Swansea East MP Carolyn Harris says she is "incandescent" with rage after a cross-party group of politicians from Carmarthenshire called on the Welsh Government to intervene in the Ospreys' planned redevelopment of St Helen's. Earlier this week, the region were granted permission by Swansea Council's planning committee for redevelopment work to start at the famous old ground, which they are hoping to move into before the end of the year as they leave their current home at the Stadium. However, the following day, three Carmarthenshire politicians - Plaid Cymru MP Ann Davies, MS Cefin Campbell and Labour MP Nia Griffith - voiced concerns over the plans, while the planning committee also heard an objection from the Scarlets Supporters' Trust. Sign up to Inside Welsh rugby on Substack to get exclusive news stories and insight from behind the scenes in Welsh rugby. The politicians raised their fears over the potential impact the redevelopment could have on regional rugby in west Wales, with Davies claiming that it "would clearly pose a threat to the viability of Parc y Scarlets". As a result, they have asked for the Welsh Government to step in on the matter and call it in. However, Harris - who is also deputy leader of Welsh Labour - has hit out at her west Wales colleagues' intervention, branding it as "absolutely astounding" and "not appropriate" in a furious interview with ITV News. "I see no reason why any politician decides to interfere in the business of, not only a different constituency, but a different region with a different local authority," she said. "I'm absolutely astounded that they've done this." Article continues below Asked if she was given any prior warning to their intervention, the MP replied: "I wasn't, which has made things a lot worse. As a politician, if I ventured into somebody else's constituency or patch, it's common courtesy to inform the person that you intend to be on their territory. "To actually come on to our turf and try to do something as underhand as this, is absolutely astounding." When asked about her strong language, Harris said: "It reflects my anger. I am upset, I cannot tell you. "I am incandescent that anyone thinks it is appropriate to interfere in the process and the workings of one constituency or in this case, one region, one local authority which has has nothing to do with them, in defence of an argument. "I understand the argument, what I don't understand is why interfere in that process. It is not appropriate and I am really cross that they've done this. I have tried to contact one [of the MPs] and I have not had any success." She added: "I think the WRU need to take responsibility for the fact that we are in this position. "But the blame for what happened over the last 24 hours with the planning permission lies solely with the politicians who thought they would take things into their own hands and try to undermine a fair process, which is absolutely nothing to do with them." It comes after Ospreys chief Lance Bradley admitted he was "quite surprised" by the concerns raised by the group of politicians, as he offered a confident response to their claims and stressed the benefits that a redeveloped St Helen's could bring not just for rugby but for the wider community. "I'm flattered that he should think that we should have such a huge impact on our friends in Llanelli," said Bradley, "The fact is St Helen's isn't a new stadium, St Helen's is actually a very old stadium where Wales played their first international game, and we're very conscious of the fact that when we move there it's the redevelopment of an iconic ground. "It isn't something new, and we will be fully respecting the heritage of the place and the history of the place to provide a top-class facility not just for the Ospreys but for Swansea RFC, Swansea University and a big part of the plans and something Swansea Council were very keen on is the community use as well. So I can't see it will have an impact on Parc y Scarlets." He added: "We haven't been tipped a wink at all. There is a process going on with the WRU that all the clubs are involved in and as far as I'm aware we've all had the same amount of information, the same opportunities to input what we think, so that's certainly not the case. "Were we surprised? Yes, we were a bit surprised because this isn't something that suddenly got announced yesterday, this is something we announced we were planning over a year ago. Article continues below "So it was slightly surprising that some of the MPs and Senedd members from Carmarthenshire should wait until now to raise a concern. But that's their right to do that if that's what they want to do."


Reuters
19 minutes ago
- Reuters
Romania proposes pension reforms as it moves to join OECD
BUCHAREST, Aug 8 (Reuters) - Romanians will be limited to withdrawing a quarter of their private pension funds upon retirement and will receive the rest in monthly payments under a draft reform of the system unveiled on Friday that aims to boost the country's OECD candidacy. The EU member state overhauled its communist-era pension system in 2008, making it compulsory for working Romanians under 35 to contribute to a so-called "second pillar" of private pension schemes in addition to their state pension. Under the scheme, more than 8 million Romanians contribute to seven private pension funds, which have become the largest institutional investors on the Bucharest Stock Exchange. Those funds held assets worth 166.2 billion lei ($38 billion) at the end of May, up 19% on the year, data from Romania's financial supervision authority ASF showed. Romanians are currently allowed to withdraw the entirety of their private pension assets as a lump sum when they reach the retirement age of 65. ASF president Alexandru Petrescu said the draft payments bill released by the government would ensure the stability of the system, giving fund managers more predictability. The payment bill is also a requirement under Romania's accession path to the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. Romania became an OECD accession country in 2022 and hopes to join the club of wealthy nations in early 2026. The OECD will assess Romania's private pension system next month. The draft bill will allow Romanians to choose scheduled withdrawals for up to 10 years or lifelong monthly installments. It will now be submitted for public consultations before approval by the government and a final vote in parliament on its implementation. Romanians will increasingly rely on private pensions, particularly after 2030 when just under 2 million people - a 10th of the population - born under a communist-era abortion ban will reach retirement age, increasing the burden on the pay-as-you-go state pension system. The seven pension funds have so far made payments worth 3.8 billion lei to some 238,000 people but will begin to face larger withdrawals from 2030. ($1 = 4.3554 lei)