
Tariff impact: Donald Trump's new import duties could push US factory costs up to 4.5%, economists warn; flag risks to jobs, AI growth and margins
As President Donald Trump prepares to implement a sweeping set of new import tariffs starting August 1, a new analysis suggests these policies could significantly strain US manufacturers by raising their costs between 2% and 4.5%.
The research, conducted by the Washington Center for Equitable Growth, warns that such increases may crimp already-thin profit margins, potentially leading to stagnation in wages, layoffs, or even plant closures.
'There's going to be a cash squeeze for a lot of these firms,' said researcher Chris Bangert-Drowns, quoted AP. 'Those seemingly small changes could lead to stagnation of wages, if not layoffs and closures of plants."
Trump has unveiled new trade frameworks with the EU, Japan, the Philippines, Indonesia, and the UK, each featuring import duties ranging from 15% to 50%. The administration argues these tariffs will reduce the budget deficit and bolster domestic manufacturing. 'The 'Made in USA' label is set to resume its global dominance under President Trump,' White House spokesperson Kush Desai said.
However, the new analysis highlights how manufacturers are also bearing the brunt.
'We're getting squeezed from all sides,'' said Justin Johnson, president of Jordan Manufacturing Co. in Michigan, which has seen steel coil prices rise 5–10% despite not using imported steel. Trump's tariffs on foreign steel and aluminium — now at 50% — have allowed US producers to hike prices due to reduced competition, Johnson said, AP reported.
A June survey by the Atlanta Fed found that companies planned to pass half of the new tariff burden onto consumers.
The Labor Department reported a loss of 14,000 US manufacturing jobs following the April tariff rollout.
In Michigan and Wisconsin, more than 1 in 5 jobs are in sectors exposed to Trump's trade duties, including construction, manufacturing, and oil. Even AI investments — which Trump recently promoted as America's economic future — face hurdles, with 20% of electronics inputs reliant on imports.
The Budget Lab at Yale University estimates that households could lose up to $2,400 annually due to the tariffs.
Economist Ernie Tedeschi disputed the Trump administration's claim that inflation is under control, stating that import prices have been accelerating despite contrary conclusions by the Council of Economic Advisers.
Small business owners such as Josh Smith of Montana Knife Co. said the tariffs are affecting expansion plans. Smith paid $77,250 in import duties on a $515,000 German machine he needs for knife production — enough to hire a new worker, he said.
With no American alternative, Smith said tariffs are 'the difference between hiring people and standing still.'
Trump's legal justification for the new tariffs under "emergency" powers is now being challenged in court, even as Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent claimed the global community is 'willing to pay a toll' to maintain access to US markets.
But for small firms like Smith's, the toll may be too steep. 'I want to buy more equipment and hire more people. That's what I want to do,' he said.
Stay informed with the latest
business
news, updates on
bank holidays
and
public holidays
.
Discover stories of India's leading eco-innovators at Ecopreneur Honours 2025
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Economic Times
25 minutes ago
- Economic Times
Harvard University under fire as US Congressional probe exposes deep ties to Chinese Communist Party
Harvard University, once revered as a bastion of academic excellence and intellectual freedom, is now facing a growing scandal that threatens its reputation and integrity. A congressional investigation has revealed that the Ivy League institution maintained formal partnerships with Chinese Communist Party (CCP)-controlled entities for over a decade, relationships that critics say directly assisted in the training of future CCP leadership. According to a letter obtained by the Washington Free Beacon, Reps. John Moolenaar (R-MI), Tim Walberg (R-MI), and Elise Stefanik (R-NY) accused Harvard of actively collaborating with organisations under the control of the CCP's Central Organisation Department. This department is responsible for indoctrinating officials with "Xi Jinping Thought" and selecting leaders for key positions within China's authoritarian regime. Of particular concern is the Harvard Kennedy School's long-standing cooperation with the Chinese Executive Leadership Academy Pudong, an institution controlled by the CCP. Whistleblower testimony indicates that cadres from China's party and government institutions were sent to Harvard as part of their official training, raising alarms about foreign influence on American soil. "Harvard's formal partnership with a CCP-controlled school to train their future leaders raises serious concerns about the CCP's influence in American institutions," said Rep. Moolenaar. "We are committed to uncovering the full extent of these relationships to ensure transparency and protect national interests." The revelations come at a time when Harvard is already under scrutiny. The university is reportedly considering a USD 500 million payout to resolve a standoff with the Biden administration over campus anti-Semitism complaints and controversial DEI policies. But lawmakers argue that financial settlements cannot undo the damage caused by Harvard's entanglement with entities implicated in human rights abuses. In April, The Free Beacon exposed Harvard's past training of members from the Xinjiang Production and Construction Corps, a CCP paramilitary group sanctioned by the U.S. for its role in the genocide of Uyghur Muslims. That report prompted congressional leaders to threaten Harvard's tax-exempt Harvard faces a deadline of August 7 to provide Congress with all records relating to its interactions with CCP-affiliated bodies, including any financial or material pressure mounts, the question isn't just whether Harvard broke federal laws or ethical boundaries, but whether one of America's most prestigious universities has willingly served the interests of a foreign authoritarian power.
&w=3840&q=100)

First Post
27 minutes ago
- First Post
Trump influence? US museum receives backlash for removing Potus's impeachment display
The parent organisation of a top-visited history museum in the United States denied that political pressure played a role in the removal of a display about the impeachment of US President Donald Trump, during his first term in office read more Signage for the exhibition, titled "The American Presidency: A Glorious Burden", is displayed at the National Museum of American History in Washington, DC, on August 1, 2025. Reuters The parent organisation of a top-visited history museum in the United States denied that political pressure played a role in the removal of a display about the impeachment of US President Donald Trump, during his first term in office. The Smithsonian Institution, which runs the National Museum of American History in Washington, DC, said on Sunday that it removed the 'temporary' placard for failing to meet the museum's standards in 'appearance, location, timeline, and overall presentation'. 'It was not consistent with other sections in the exhibit and blocked the view of the objects inside its case. For these reasons, we removed the placard,' the institution said in a statement. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD 'We were not asked by any Administration or other government officials to remove content from the exhibit," the statement further reads. The American institution runs around 21 museums and the National Zoo. In the statement, the Smithsonian Institution made it clear that the museum would be updating the impeachment section in the coming weeks to 'reflect all impeachment proceedings in our nation's history'. What led to the clarification? The statment came after The Washington Post on Thursday reported that the museum removed an explicit reference to Trump's impeachment last month. This resulted in the exhibit about impeachment incorrectly reading that 'only three presidents have seriously faced removal'. The Post cited an unnamed source familiar with the exhibit plans and reported that the display was taken down following a 'content review that the Smithsonian agreed to undertake following pressure from the White House to remove an art museum director'. The museum's decision to remove the display swiftly drew backlash, with critics of Trump calling the development the latest capitulation to the whims of an authoritarian president. 'You can run, but you cannot hide from the judgment of history,' Democratic Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer said on Friday. 'So, here's my message to the president: no matter what exhibits you try to distort, the American people will never forget that you were impeached – not once, but twice," he added. Since the start of his second term, Trump has been seeking greater control over political, cultural and media institutions as part of his transformative 'Make America Great Again' agenda. In March this year, the US President signed an executive order to remove 'improper ideology' from the Smithsonian Institution's properties and deny funding for exhibits that 'degrade shared American values' or 'divide Americans based on race'. It is pertinent to note that during his first term in the White House, Trump was impeached by the House of Representatives twice, in 2019 and 2021. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD However, he was eventually acquitted by the US Senate on both occasions. Trump was the third US president to be impeached, after Andrew Johnson and Bill Clinton, and the only US president to be impeached twice. Interestingly, former US President Richard Nixon faced a near-certain impeachment before his resignation in 1974 following the Watergate Scandal.


Time of India
27 minutes ago
- Time of India
‘If tariff pain continues for months, we will have to let go of workers'
'If tariff pain continues for months, we will have to let go of workers' Satviki SanjaySwati Gupta Bloomberg Aug 3, 2025, 15:52 IST IST Indian businesses are scrambling to cope with the fallout of Trump's tariff shock as New Delhi weighs options to placate the White House, including boosting US imports Shock, dismay and angst swept across India as businesses, policymakers and citizens digested US President Donald Trump 's sharp remarks and a surprise 25% tariff rate last week. While government officials weighed a response and business groups tallied the cost of the trade barrier, the local social media flared up with users protesting Trump's comments and criticising Prime Minister Narendra Modi for not speaking up.