
‘Keep seeking care. Take your meds.' With Trump's budget now law, Mass. officials prepare for major Medicaid cuts
Advertisement
The new law is
projected to increase the number of uninsured in the country by
Advertisement
To keep coverage, most able-bodied adults between 19 and 64 years old without dependent children will eventually have to document they are either working, in school, or volunteering at least 80 hours a month.
That provision is intended to weed out people shirking employment. In reality, the vast majority of the millions of able-bodied adults on Medicaid are either working, attending school, or have other limiting conditions, according to the
The
The law also scales back the state's ability to generate revenue for Medicaid through assessments on health care providers. State officials have not yet calculated the full cost of those limitations but said such assessments generated $2.4 billion in fiscal year 2025.
In Massachusetts, those at risk of losing coverage include about 200,000 people on Medicaid and another 100,000 who buy insurance
through the Massachusetts Health Connector, the health insurance marketplace set up under the Affordable Care Act.
The new law raises premiums, increases paperwork, and requires consumers to do more to maintain their coverage, the health policy analysis organization
Advertisement
'It doesn't make those individuals ineligible for coverage writ large, but it takes away the primary subsidy that makes the coverage affordable,' said Audrey Gasteier, executive director of the Massachusetts connector.
Massachusetts Health Connector Executive Director Audrey Morse Gasteier.
Leah Willingham/Associated Press
MassHealth hopes to conduct extensive background checks on many Medicaid enrollees to prove their eligibility without having to
directly request information, Levine said. That will include reviewing Department of Revenue records to confirm employment or past claims for references to exempting conditions.
Those whom the state cannot confirm on its own will be notified their coverage is at risk and will need to prove their eligibility. But MassHealth's previous experience with mass mailings suggests many will slip through the cracks. So the agency expects to conduct an outreach effort similar one after the pandemic that could include door-to-door canvassing and partnering with community organizations.
Massachusetts has some time, Levine emphasized. Most of the new Medicaid requirements won't begin to take effect until after the 2026 midterm elections.
'Keep seeking care,' Levine advised the roughly 2 million MassHealth enrollees. 'Take your meds. You don't need to hoard them. You are not losing coverage tomorrow.'
Amy Rosenthal, executive director of the Boston nonprofit Health Care for All that helped coordinate the previous outreach, said similar efforts could help many keep their coverage. The organization hopes to be involved in the coming effort.
'Some of these red-tape barriers are ones that Massachusetts is uniquely positioned to help people overcome,' said Rosenthal.
New requirements, though, will be be costly for states that will have to update software and add staff, Adrianna McIntyre, assistant professor of health policy and politics at Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, said at a Harvard-hosted media briefing Tuesday.
Advertisement
'There is more opportunity for people to fall through the cracks,' she said. 'When things can't be done on an automated basis, you need case workers.'
The state of Georgia implemented a work requirement as part of a Medicaid expansion that cost $92 million, much of it for tech upgrades, according to the
The Massachusetts Health & Hospital Association said Monday the new law will have 'staggering implications' for health care and would lead to 'millions of uninsured people seeking care at underfunded hospitals.'
The hospital association said the state's Health Safety Net fund, which helps cover medical care for uninsured patients, will have a shortfall of $290 million in fiscal 2026, $10 million more than the year before. The association is lobbying state officials to funnel more money into the fund, arguing the current number of uninsured and underinsured people in Massachusetts is already straining resources, 'never mind another 300,000 or more people without coverage.'
Dr. Michael VanRooyen, chair of the emergency departments at Mass General Brigham's 10 hospitals, said he is worried patients who lose insurance will put off routine care until they have health crises. Then they will end up in already crowded emergency rooms.
'We can expect that some people will lose coverage or have lapses in coverage,' said VanRooyen, who is also a professor of emergency medicine at Harvard Medical School. 'When that happens, emergency departments become the safety net.'
A high number of patients who end up in emergency rooms don't speak English, VanRooyen said. Many are already afraid to seek treatment because of the Trump administration's efforts to deport undocumented immigrants. Some need treatment for mental illness or substance abuse.
Advertisement
Meanwhile, the increased strain will be accompanied by a loss of important revenue MassHealth relies on to support Medicaid: taxes on health care providers. The new law limits taxes on providers to 3.5 percent, far less than what Massachusetts now imposes.
Levine said the state doesn't have enough information yet to determine how hard Massachusetts will be hit financially. He acknowledged the state will likely be forced to cut access to some services, though it was too soon to say what would be affected.
'The math is pretty straightforward,' Levine said. 'You need to take a hard look at what we do with the dollars we have available to us.'
Jason Laughlin can be reached at
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


CBS News
6 hours ago
- CBS News
140,000 Minnesotans could lose health care coverage over federal Medicaid cuts, analysis shows
A new state analysis found that up to 140,000 Minnesotans could lose health care coverage due to federal Medicaid spending cuts. The Minnesota Department of Human Services said Monday that Minnesota will also lose nearly $1.5 billion in federal funds over the first four years of implementation of President Trump's so-called "big, beautiful bill." According to state officials, people not on Medicaid could see higher health care costs, too. "The loss in coverage within Medicaid will contribute to more uncompensated care for providers and raise costs more broadly in the system for people who are privately insured," John Connolly, deputy commissioner of the Department of Human Services, said. "Because providers will feel that stress and not have a source of payment for people who lose Medicaid coverage and need to cover their costs broadly, and so that means more out-of-pocket costs, potentially, for consumers." Even though Mr. Trump signed the bill into law earlier this month, many of the Medicaid provisions will kick in over the next few years.


The Hill
8 hours ago
- The Hill
RFK Jr. lashes out at vaccine injury program, pledges changes
Health and Human Services Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. on Monday said he is working to overhaul the Vaccine Injury Compensation Program (VCIP), which is aimed at compensating people who have been injured by vaccines. 'The VICP is broken, and I intend to fix it. I will not allow the VICP to continue to ignore its mandate and fail its mission of quickly and fairly compensating vaccine-injured individuals,' Kennedy wrote in a lengthy post on X. Kennedy has long targeted the VCIP, and his X post echoed many of his previous arguments. He has previously said he wants to expand the program, making it easier for claimants to qualify for awards based on adverse events he claims are associated with vaccines but are not currently part of the program. Congress created the VCIP in 1986 as part of a law that required health providers and manufacturers to report vaccine adverse events to the Department of Health and Human Services. The program is designed to provide fair and quick payouts for children and pregnant women who suffer rare but serious side effects from shots. It also provides a liability shield to manufacturers to encourage them to continue making vaccines. The VCIP is 'no fault' so families can get compensation without having to prove that drugmakers were negligent. Plaintiffs petition a special court system where government officials known as special masters, who operate like judges, rule on cases without juries. Successful plaintiffs get money from the federal government, not vaccine manufacturers. The compensation trust fund comes from an excise tax on recommended vaccines, but the amount of money plaintiffs can win is capped. The program also makes it easier to sue manufacturers in other courts. Kennedy, who founded a prominent anti-vaccine group, has pushed the debunked claim that vaccines cause autism and has been involved in suing vaccine makers over patient injury claims, has said the VCIP removes any incentive for drug companies to make safe shots. 'The VICP no longer functions to achieve its Congressional intent,' Kennedy wrote. 'I will not allow the VICP to continue to ignore its mandate and fail its mission of quickly and fairly compensating vaccine-injured individuals.' Kennedy did not elaborate on what changes he is making, but said he is working with Attorney General Pam Bondi. Earlier this month, during an interview with Tucker Carlson, Kennedy said he has a team at HHS working on expanding the VCIP. 'We just brought a guy in this week who is going to be revolutionizing the Vaccine Injury Compensation program,' Kennedy said. 'We're looking at ways to enlarge the program so that COVID vaccine-injured people can be compensated … we're looking at ways to enlarge the statute of limitations,' Kennedy added.


The Hill
9 hours ago
- The Hill
Planned Parenthood Medicaid funding restored, as Dems seek BBB rollback
U.S. District Judge Indira Talwani on Monday expanded a decision she handed down last week in which she issued a temporary injunction restoring Medicaid for 10 Planned Parenthood affiliates. Talwani found the law retaliated against Planned Parenthood in violation of its First Amendment rights. 'Patients are likely to suffer adverse health consequences where care is disrupted or unavailable,' Talwani wrote in the Monday ruling. 'In particular, restricting Members' ability to provide healthcare services threatens an increase in unintended pregnancies and attendant complications because of reduced access to effective contraceptives, and an increase in undiagnosed and untreated STIs.' Separately, Democrats, spearheaded by Reps. Laura Friedman (Calif.), Nikema Williams (Ga.), Chris Pappas (N.H.) in the House and Sens. Tina Smith (Minn.) and Patty Murray (Wash.) in the Senate, plan to introduce legislation that would repeal that provision of the law. The measure won't advance in the GOP-controlled Congress, but it highlights how Democrats are continuing to mobilize and message around reproductive rights. 'We're fighting to ensure people can continue getting the essential care they count on, no matter who they are or where they live,' Friedman said in a statement shared with The Hill. Trump's tax and spending package includes a provision that bars health care providers from being able to reimburse Medicaid for a year if they provide abortions and received more than $800,000 in federal funding in 2023. The lawsuit challenges that provision, because there's almost no other organization that meets the $800,000 threshold. Talwani ruled it is 'easily ascertainable' that Planned Parenthood was specifically targeted, despite the law not mentioning the organization by name. The Trump administration already appealed a temporary restraining order that Talwani imposed just after the lawsuit was filed. But pending any action from the appeals court, Monday's ruling will stand while the case plays out. Taxpayer money is already prohibited from covering most abortions. Instead, the new law cuts reimbursement for other health services provided by Planned Parenthood and other health centers, such as cancer screenings and treatment for sexually transmitted infections. For more legal coverage, sign-up for The Hill's courts newsletter The Gavel, written by Ella Lee and Zach Schonfeld. It publishes every Wednesday. Click here to sign up & get it in your inbox.