Guatemalan judge finds six people guilty over deaths of 41 girls in 2017 fire
The sentencing is a step towards closure in one of the most horrific and deadly events in Guatemalan history. The tragedy drew international attention and highlighted pervasive abuse in the government's shelter system.
The six sentenced on Tuesday – two former police officers and four former child protection officials – were found guilty of homicide, mistreatment of minors, breach of duties and abuse of authority. All pleaded not guilty.
Judge Ingrid Cifuentes also ordered the investigation of former president Jimmy Morales for his role in ordering police to work at a facility where minors who had not committed crimes were held.
Former social welfare secretary Carlos Rodas was sentenced to 25 years in prison.
Earlier, Rodas told those gathered in the courtroom, including relatives of the victims, that he had not caused 'any harm to their daughters and the survivors'.
Also among those convicted was ex-police officer Lucinda Marroquín, who held the key to the room where the girls were locked up and didn't open it when the fire started. She was sentenced to 13 years in prison.
The judge said that through phone records, investigators were able to establish that at the time of the fire Marroquín was talking on her phone. The judge said a witness had testified that when told about the fire, Marroquín responded with profanity and said 'let them burn.'
A former government prosecutor assigned to the protection of children was acquitted.
The fire occurred on 8 March 2017, at the Virgin de la Asunción Safe Home outside Guatemala City, when 56 girls and teenagers were padlocked in a classroom allegedly for bad behavior.
About 700 children – nobody knew exactly how many – lived in a home with a maximum capacity for 500. The majority had committed no crime. They were sent there by the courts for various reasons: they had run away, they were abused, they were migrants.
The night before the fire, a group of girls had escaped. Hours later, the police returned them to the home. They were locked in a room that had no access to a bathroom and guarded by police. They were given foam mattresses to sleep on.
After hours of demanding to be let out, one girl lit the fire.
After spending hours locked inside, one of the girls lit a match to a mattress, thinking it might force police to let them out. Smoke and flames quickly filled the room, but despite cries for help, police refused to open the doors for nine minutes, witnesses said.
Forty one girls and teenagers died, and 15 more survived with serious burns.
Cifuentes said that the fire was the culmination of a series of abuses, some of which had been reported to authorities but not acted on. She said autopsies confirmed the presence of drugs in some of the girls that supported their complaints that they were given sleeping pills that were among the reasons they had tried to escape the facility.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
BBC News
29 minutes ago
- BBC News
Anger and confusion as Meta overturns more Instagram account bans
Instagram users have told the BBC of their confusion, fear and anger after having their accounts suspended, often for being wrongly accused by parent company Meta of breaching the platform's child sex abuse months, tens of thousands of people around the world have been complaining Meta has been banning their Instagram and Facebook accounts in say they have been wrongly accused of breaching site rules - including around child sexual than 500 of them have contacted the BBC to say they have lost cherished photos and seen businesses upended - but some also speak of the profound personal toll it has taken on them, including concerns that the police could become acknowledged a problem with the erroneous banning of Facebook Groups in June, but has denied there is wider issue on Facebook or Instagram at has repeatedly refused to comment on the problems its users are facing - though it has frequently overturned bans when the BBC has raised individual cases with are some of the stories users have shared with BBC News. 'I put all of my trust in social media' Yassmine Boussihmed, 26, from the Netherlands, spent five years building an Instagram profile for her boutique dress shop in April, she was banned over account integrity. Over 5,000 followers, gone in an instant. She lost clients, and was devastated."I put all of my trust in social media, and social media helped me grow, but it has let me down," she told the week, after the BBC sent questions about her case to Meta's press office, her Instagram accounts were reinstated."I am so thankful," she said in a tearful voice note. Five minutes later, her personal Instagram was suspended again - but the account for the dress shop remained. Lucia, not her real name, is a 21-year-old woman from Austin, Texas. She was suspended from Instagram for just over two weeks for breaching Meta's policy on child sexual exploitation (CSE), abuse and with all the other cases, she was not told what post breached the platform's has left wondering if a picture she posted of herself and her 21-year-old friend wearing bikini tops somehow triggered the artificial intelligence (AI) moderation tools, as she thinks they "look a little bit younger".She also uses her account to interact with under 18s, such as sending Reels to her younger sister."It is deeply troubling to have an accusation as disgusting as this one," she told BBC News."Given that I have a desire to work in juvenile justice as an attorney and advocate on behalf of children, I am appalled to have been suspended for something I know I did not do and would never do."She appealed, and then about seven hours after the BBC highlighted Lucia's case to Meta's press office, her account was restored with no explanation. Over 36,000 people have signed a petition accusing Meta of falsely banning accounts; thousands more are in Reddit forums or on social media posting about central accusation - Meta's AI is unfairly banning people, with the tech also being used to deal with the appeals. The only way to speak to a human is to pay for Meta Verified, and even then many are has not commented on these claims. Instagram states AI is central to its "content review process" and Meta has outlined how technology and humans enforce its policies. A community torn away Duncan Edmonstone, from Cheshire, has stage four ALK+ lung cancer. The 55-year-old finds solace in the support network he has on private Facebook 12 days at the end of June, he was banned for breaking cybersecurity guidelines before being reinstated."The support groups are my lifeline, and there are actual examples of where advice from group members has made a difference to other patient's treatment," he said."I draw satisfaction and meaning, in a life that is probably going to be cut short, from helping other people in that group." Banned, unbanned - then banned again Ryan - not his real name - has been banned, reinstated, and banned again from Instagram over the past few former teacher from London was thrown off the platform in May after he was accused of breaching the CSE spent a month appealing. In June, the BBC understands a human moderator double checked and concluded Ryan had breached the his account was abruptly restored at the end of July."We're sorry we've got this wrong," Instagram said in an email to him, adding that he had done nothing was left flabbergasted. "'Sorry we called you a paedophile for two months - here is your account back,'" is how he characterised the tone of the that wasn't the end of the story. Hours after the BBC contacted Meta's press office to ask questions about his experience, he was banned again on Instagram and, for the first time, Facebook."I am devastated and I don't know what to do," he told the BBC."I can't believe it has happened twice."His Facebook account was back two days later - but he was still blocked from Instagram. Ryan says he has been left feeling deeply isolated - and worried the police are going to "knock on the door".His experiences mirrors those of other Instagram users who told the BBC of the "extreme stress" of having their accounts banned after being wrongly accused of breaching the platform's rules on CSE. What has Meta said? Despite taking action on Yassmine, Lucia and Ryan's accounts, Meta has not made any comment to the common with all big technology firms, it has come under pressure from authorities to make its platforms July, Meta said it was taking "aggressive action" on accounts breaking its rules - including the removal of 635,000 Instagram and Facebook accounts over sexualised comments and imagery in relation to wide-ranging policy on child sexual exploitation has changed three times since Boxing Day last year, with all amendments occurring since 17 July. It has not said what impact, if any, these changes had on the cases the BBC has raised with it. Sign up for our Tech Decoded newsletter to follow the world's top tech stories and trends. Outside the UK? Sign up here.
Daily Mail
29 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
US deploys spy planes, a warship and submarine in escalating response to massive threat in Southern Caribbean Sea
The United States has ordered the deployment of spy planes, a warship and even a submarine to the Southern Caribbean Sea to address the growing threat posed by Latin American drug cartels. The directive marks yet another escalation by President Donald Trump, who has long wanted to use the military to go after the drug gangs that he has designated as global terrorist organizations. Just last week, he had ordered the Pentagon to prepare military options in the region, and the Department of Defense has now ordered the deployment of US air and naval forces, two sources briefed on the decision told Reuters. The Trump administration has also previously deployed at least two warships to help in border security efforts and drug trafficking - an issue that the president focused on in his campaign. The US military has also already increased its airborne surveillance of Mexican drug cartels to collect intelligence to determine how to best counter their activities. Trump has even offered to send US troops to Mexico to help combat drug trafficking, an offer Mexico refused. Mexican President Claudia Sheinbaum even declared that the country will never accept the presence of the United States Army in their territory. 'This deployment is aimed at addressing threats to U.S. national security from specially designated narco-terrorist organizations in the region,' one of the sources explained. The US military has already increased its airborne surveillance of Mexican drug cartels to collect intelligence to determine how to best counter their activities. A drone operator of a UAS (Unmanned Aircraft System) platoon of the U.S. Army 3rd Brigade, 10th Mountain Division, stands near a Ghost-X helicopter surveillance drone during the Combined Resolve 25-1 military exercises at the Hohenfels Training Area in Bavaria on February 3, 2025 in Germany In February, the State Department designated several cartels as foreign terrorist organizations. They include notably Mara Salvatrucha (also known as MS-13) and Tren de Aragua along with others. The department said the gangs constituted a 'national security threat beyond that posed by traditional organized crime.' The Trump administration added a few more to the list in July; the Venezuelan Cartel de los Soles, or Cartel of the Suns, explaining that the cartels were run by the President of Venezuela, along with other leaders on his staff. The Treasury Department also accused Cartel de los Soles of giving material help to other cartels, like the Sinaloa Cartel in Mexico and Tren de Aragua, asserting they were 'threatening the peace and security of the United States.' Secretary of State Marco Rubio put out a statement days after, blasting Nicolas Maduro, saying his regime is 'not a legitimate government' and that he is 'not the president of Venezuela'. He added that Maduro, 'has corrupted Venezuela's institutions to assist the cartel's criminal narco-trafficking scheme into the United States.' In an interview last week, Rubio explained that designating these cartels as terrorist groups would permit the US to use all the tools in their toolbox, like intelligence agencies and the Department of Defense. 'We cannot continue to just treat these guys as local street gangs. They have weaponry that looks like what terrorists, in some cases, armies, have,' Rubio said. 'Drug dealing is the kind of terrorism they're doing, and it's not the only.' But legal experts have questioned whether strikes against cartels could violate international law if forces kill members who don't pose an 'imminent threat' at the time of the attack. Brian Finucane, senior advisor to the International Crisis Group and former legal adviser at the State Department, told the Daily Mail that unilateral US drone strikes in another country would likely violate the United Nations charter and possibly even US law on assassinations. 'To the extent the US military would be taking detainees, there are significant questions of the authority for detention outside of the civilian criminal justice system,' he said. Brandon Buck, a foreign policy research fellow at the Cato Institute, also told the Daily Mail that Trump is on his weakest legal ground to use unilateral force in Mexico. 'Unlike the prolonged conflicts of the Middle East, where multiple presidents cited authorizations for the use of military force, such legal avenues are not present' for Mexico operations, Buck explained. He then warned Trump that he may risk significant diplomatic fallout with Mexico.
The Independent
2 hours ago
- The Independent
Moment $167 million Powerball jackpot winner is tased after kicking Florida deputy in the face
This is the moment a $167 million Powerball jackpot winner was tased after kicking a Florida sheriff's deputy in the face. James Farthing of Georgetown, Kentucky, was reportedly involved in an altercation with another man at the Island Grand at Tradewinds on April 29. Body cam shows a Pinellas County deputy rushing to break up the fight. Farthing, 50, attempted to kick the other man, but kicked the deputy instead, police said. When deputies ordered Farthing to get on the ground, he tried to flee the scene. One deputy deployed their taser while the other tackled him to the ground, restraining him. Farthing, who won the jackpot on April 28, was charged with resisting an officer without violence, battery on a law enforcement officer, battery, and parole violation.
