
Waiting, Often in the Dark, for Frozen E.P.A. Funds
To keep the lights on in her residential mental health clinic outside of San Juan, Liomarie Oyola Pérez needs money.
Ms. Oyola Pérez and her staff already go to extraordinary lengths during the blackouts that have become increasingly common in Puerto Rico, juggling three generators or waiting hours in line to get gas to power them. Her facility has solar panels, but she wants to add batteries that would store energy for use when the sun isn't shining. For that, she needs a loan.
This year, her lender was awarded millions through a federal program that would provide low-interest loans to candidates like Ms. Oyola Pérez.
But the money is frozen, part of $20 billion committed to finance climate and clean energy projects that was abruptly halted at the request of the Trump administration. Several nonprofit groups that were promised funds have sued; a court hearing is scheduled for Monday.
At stake is funding for projects across the United States meant to assist people like Ms. Oyola Pérez and reduce their energy costs while also cutting the pollution that is driving climate change. They range from efforts to add geothermal energy to affordable housing in Iowa to energy efficiency upgrades for a senior housing community in Massachusetts.
Nationwide, the federal program could finance enough new solar arrays to power up to 2.2 million homes by 2031, according to a recent analysis from Energy Innovation, a research organization, and the University of New Hampshire.
For months, the Environmental Protection Agency has been trying to claw back the money, which had been authorized by Congress under the 2022 Inflation Reduction Act during the Biden administration.
Since taking office, Lee Zeldin, the agency's administrator, has repeatedly called the money a 'green slush fund' and said it was vulnerable to waste, fraud, and abuse, though the agency has failed to produce evidence backing up those claims, despite a judge's request.
On the ground in Puerto Rico, 38 credit unions are waiting for $147 million committed under the program, which is known as the Greenhouse Gas Reduction Fund. They estimate it would support 88,000 solar, electric-vehicle and energy efficiency projects by 2030.
Contrary to Mr. Zeldin's claims, these loans are vetted, supplemented by private capital and, for many recipients, are simply about keeping the lights on.
When the electricity flickers off inside a mental health clinic run by Ms. Oyola Pérez, the staff follow a protocol: First, they wait two hours to see if the power comes back. Then, they fire up a gas-powered generator, then a second, then a third. If the outage persists, someone has to go wait in line for more gas, sometimes for hours.
Inside the cheerful single-story building, where 22 residents include her aunt, her 106-year-old grandmother, and a shot-putter who competed in the 2023 Berlin Special Olympics, Ms. Oyola Pérez was clear about her long-term goal for avoiding blackouts.
'The plan is to stay off the grid,' she said.
Leaving the island's notoriously rickety electric grid is the dream for many in Puerto Rico. Two large-scale blackouts have hit the island in the last six months, and the average resident lost power eight times last year. After Hurricane Maria in 2017, many homes were without electricity for months.
Even without the threat of storms, local officials have warned that the power supply will not be sufficient to meet peak demand this summer. At the same time, Puerto Ricans have the fourth-highest electricity costs in the nation.
The E.P.A. declined to comment for this article, citing a policy against discussing pending litigation.
It took a six-year search for Ms. Oyola Pérez to find a loan with an affordable monthly payment to install the $75,000 panels for her solar system. After seeing an advertisement at Costco, she found a cooperativa, or a local credit union owned by community members, that could help. She installed the panels in 2023 and the savings on her electric bill now cover the full cost of her $697 monthly payments. In about 13 years, she would own the system outright.
But the power outages haven't stopped.
Solar Lenders Left Waiting
Credicentro-Coop, one of the biggest cooperativa solar lenders in Puerto Rico, was slated to receive $5.5 million in federal funds to expand its efforts under the now-frozen grant program.
'We are a living example of the benefits of the transition to clean energy,' said Miguel Ortiz Santos, executive president of the cooperativa, as he showed off solar arrays that shade two parking lots and power 80 percent of its office and branch building.
Credicentro-Coop was promised the E.P.A. funds in February through the national credit union network Inclusiv, which was awarded a total of $1.87 billion from the E.P.A.
Sitting in his office, flanked by a large collection of colorful Three Kings figurines, Mr. Ortiz Santos rattled off his credit union's statistics. More than 90 percent of members live in low-income areas. Most home solar loans hover around $25,000, and a household's typical monthly payment is $260 to $280. Cooperativa lenders throughout the program plan to use the federal funds to offer green loans at rates as low as 2 or 3 percent, a significant discount on market rates.
Credicentro-Coop, which worked with Ms. Oyola Pérez on her first solar loan, sends staff members to inspect each installed system. It withholds the last 10 percent of each installer's payment until the homeowner confirms that the system is working. Loan officers check applicants' solar plans against past electric utility invoices, sometimes recommending that customers buy fewer panels.
The credit union's default rate on green energy loans is about half of 1 percent, which is lower than the national average commercial bank default rate across all loan categories last year.
This is the kind of green lending Congress intended to support when it passed the Inflation Reduction Act. The initiative was intended to attract an influx of private investment and make financing for clean energy projects less risky for lenders and more affordable for borrowers.
Frozen Funds
By the time Credicentro-Coop's $5.5 million award was publicly announced, Inclusiv's funding had already been frozen, without any explanation from the E.P.A. or the bank where the money was held.
Mr. Zeldin began drawing attention to the $20 billion in climate funds soon after he entered office. He linked them to a hidden-camera video taken in the final weeks of the Biden administration and produced by the right-wing group Project Veritas, which is known for trying to embarrass political opponents with covert recordings. In the video, an E.P.A. employee likened last-minute efforts to spend federal money to tossing 'gold bars' off the Titanic.
Most of the money was held in accounts at Citibank when President Trump took office, and Mr. Zeldin called for its return to the federal government. Citibank froze the funds at the administration's request, prompting several nonprofit groups, including Inclusiv, to sue.
Despite investigations by the Department of Justice, the F.B.I. and the E.P.A.'s acting inspector general, no evidence of waste or fraud has materialized to substantiate Mr. Zeldin's concerns. The E.P.A. has also argued that it can cancel the grants because the agency's priorities have changed.
Mr. Zeldin has criticized 'extreme lack of qualifications' among the nonprofit groups, arguing that they are unprepared to distribute the funds. But some cooperativas, including Credicentro-Coop, have been financing solar systems for Puerto Rican homeowners and small businesses for the last 10 years.
With the funding he was promised, Mr. Ortiz Santos estimates he could finance solar power for 500 households, offering low interest loans. A 6.95 percent rate might come down to 3.95 percent, for example, reducing monthly payments.
'The lower the payment, the more people qualify,' he said.
On the southern coast of the island in the beach town of Salinas, Wanda Ríos Colorado, the president of a neighborhood association, was sitting at a local cooperativa, SaliCoop, counting the days until hurricane season and wondering if she could get solar systems installed for 50 residents on a waiting list before the storms.
She pulled out her phone to show a picture of flooding in her own home after Hurricane Fiona in 2022. The water crept up the legs of her sofa.
Over the years, Ms. Ríos Colorado's neighborhood had been promised financial aid for solar power from various government agencies, but some grants had been canceled by the Trump administration and others had failed to materialize. Her hopes now rested on an affordable loan.
'We cannot stop,' she said, 'and the only choice we have right now is the green bank.'
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Forbes
13 minutes ago
- Forbes
Why We're Dodging These 3 Gold CEFs (Even With Gold Soaring)
A lump of gold on a stone floor getty Here's a surprise from a die-hard closed-end fund (CEF) fan like me: Sometimes CEFs aren't your best bet. I'll admit, that's tough for me to say—especially when the average CEF yields a historically high 9.1%. (CEF yields are usually around 8.5%). That high yield partly reflects the fact that many CEFs are trading at steep discounts to their net asset value (NAV). Translation: The fund is trading for less than what its underlying portfolio is worth. That, in turn, has resulted in lower prices among some CEFs, along with higher yields (as yields and prices move in opposite directions). All of this simply means that CEFs are generally out of favor right now, which is an opportunity for us. But not every CEF is ripe for buying. We especially want to avoid the three top performers among CEFs with market caps over $200 million: ASA Gold and Precious Metals (ASA), the Sprott Physical Gold Trust (PHYS) and the Sprott Physical Gold and Silver Trust (CEF). The fact that these funds have booked strong runs this year shouldn't come as a surprise: They're all gold funds, and gold has taken off due to rising economic uncertainty (the usual fuel for the yellow metal). Even so, as you can see, there are some clear differences in performance here, and those are worth unpacking. Gold Funds Ycharts Above we see that the Sprott Physical Gold and Silver Trust—with the somewhat confusing 'CEF' ticker, not to be confused with CEFs in general (in purple)—and PHYS (in blue) have similar returns to the benchmark SPDR Gold Shares (GLD) ETF (in green), at around 25%. Then there's ASA (in orange), which has more than doubled even the best of these three other funds. There is some logic at work here. For starters, PHYS and GLD really should track each other, since they both devote almost 100% of their portfolios to physical gold (both own gold bars that are locked up in vaults), and both have similar expense ratios (0.4% for GLD, 0.41% for PHYS). The lower performance of 'CEF' is also not surprising, given that the fund also holds silver, and the 'poor man's gold' hasn't done as well as its yellow counterpart this year. ASA, however, is the clear outperformer. That's thanks in part to its ownership of several gold-mining stocks. Its largest position, G Mining Ventures Inc., a Canadian firm that explores for precious metals, has nearly doubled year to date. ASA's fast short-term gain is, of course, great, but it's unlikely to last. Here's why. Note that, if we go back to 2010, the year the last of these funds, PHYS, launched, we see that GLD (again in green) outran all three of the CEFs. This shows that CEFs were poor options in the case of gold. Moreover, ASA (again in orange) was actually the worst performer, returning just 53% over 15 years, and being in the red for most of that time. ASA Underperforms Ycharts In terms of key takeaways, there are a few here. First, if you want to hold gold, this is a rare case where an ETF, not a CEF, is the better choice. Second, gold is not a great play for income, given that the highest yielder among these funds is ASA, with a puny 0.2%. Third, gold itself is a poor play for the long term, no matter how you invest in it. To see why, all we need to do is splice the S&P 500's performance (in pink below) into that last chart. Gold Underperforms Ycharts It doesn't get much clearer than that! This, however, is where the good news ends for ETF investors. Because when it comes to investing in stocks (or pretty well any other asset class, for that matter), you're far better off with CEFs. Let's take a look at the Adams Diversified Equity Fund (ADX), a CEF we've held in my CEF Insider service since its earliest days: We bought ADX in July 2017, just a few months after CEF Insider's launch. Here's how the fund—current yield: 9% (and in orange below)—has done since, as compared to the S&P 500 index fund SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust (SPY), in purple, with dividends reinvested: ADX Outperforms Ycharts This chart says it all: CEFs like ADX can crush the S&P 500 and pay us generously while doing so. Plus they give us access to top-notch management and upside-generating discounts to NAV, too. Those are strengths no index fund can match. Michael Foster is the Lead Research Analyst for Contrarian Outlook. For more great income ideas, click here for our latest report 'Indestructible Income: 5 Bargain Funds with Steady 10% Dividends.' Disclosure: none
Yahoo
17 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Judge approves NCAA House settlement, changing the landscape of collegiate athletics
Very late on Friday afternoon, we got a massive end-of-the week news dump when a judge officially approved a settlement in the NCAA v. House case. With the ruling, the landscape of college athletics will soon look very different than it has prior. The goal of the settlement is to provide structure to the NIL landscape in college football, which is currently effectively a free-for-all. Following the ruling, On3 discussed some of the ramifications of the ruling. 'Since the NCAA was founded in 1906, institutions have never directly paid athletes, On3's Pete Nakos wrote. 'That will now change with the settlement ushering in the revenue-sharing era of college sports. Beginning July 1, schools will be able to share $20.5 million with athletes, with football expected to receive 75%, followed by men's basketball (15%), women's basketball (5%) and the remainder of sports (5%). The amount shared in revenue will increase annually. Advertisement 'Power Four football programs will have roughly $13 to $16 million to spend on rosters for the 2025 season. Many schools have front-loaded contracts ahead of the settlement's approval, taking advantage of contracts not being vetted by the newly formed NIL clearinghouse . . . ' . . . The settlement also imposes new restrictions on college sports. An NIL clearinghouse will be established, titled 'NIL Go' and run through Deloitte. All third-party NIL deals of $600 or more must be approved by the clearinghouse. If not approved, the settlement says a new third-party arbiter could deem athletes ineligible or result in a school being fined. In a gathering at the ACC spring meetings last week, Deloitte officials reportedly shared that 70% of past deals from NIL collectives would have been denied, while 90% of past deals from public companies would have been approved.' It remains to be seen exactly how the new rules will affect USC specifically. Given the Trojans' recent hire of Chad Bowden and the subsequent revamping of their recruiting operation, USC seemingly has the right people in place to bring the program into college football's new era. This article originally appeared on Trojans Wire: NCAA House settlement approved, as college sports braces for impact
Yahoo
18 minutes ago
- Yahoo
WWDC to focus on redesigns as Apple remains sidelined on AI, Bloomberg says
Apple's (AAPL) upcoming Worldwide Developers Conference will do little to assuage fears that the iPhone maker is a laggard in AI, Blomberg's Mark Gurman reports. Instead, the event will focus on design and productivity enhancements for its long-established operating system franchises. The company's keynote address will introduce redesigned software interfaces for the iPhone, iPad, Mac, Apple TV and Apple Watch, in addition to more minor tweaks to the Vision Pro headset. As part of the end-to-end overhaul, the company is also making a sweeping change to its software branding, which will shift from version numbers to a year-based system. That means Apple will introduce iOS 26, iPadOS 26, tvOS 26, visionOS 26, macOS 26 and watchOS 26 – named for 2026. Internally, the operating systems are known as Luck, Charisma, Discovery, Cheer and Nepali, respectively, the author notes. The AI changes will be surprisingly minor are unlikely to impress industry watchers, especially considering the rapid pace of innovation by Alphabet's (GOOG) (GOOGL) Google, Meta Platforms (META), Microsoft (MSFT) and OpenAI, the publication adds. Easily unpack a company's performance with TipRanks' new KPI Data for smart investment decisions Receive undervalued, market resilient stocks right to your inbox with TipRanks' Smart Value Newsletter Published first on TheFly – the ultimate source for real-time, market-moving breaking financial news. Try Now>> See the top stocks recommended by analysts >> Read More on AAPL: Disclaimer & DisclosureReport an Issue Apple's growing list of issues hinders AI reboot, WSJ says Apple expands partnership in India with Tata, Reuters reports Morning News Wrap-Up: Thursday's Biggest Stock Market Stories Apple says App Store ecosystem facilitated $1.3T in developer sales in 2024 This Is How Much Analysts Expect Apple's (AAPL) EPS to Fall after Court Ruling