Debt-Limit Dynamics Could Disrupt Money Markets, Says Fed's Perli
(Bloomberg) -- The current debt-ceiling impasse could threaten the Federal Reserve's ongoing balance-sheet runoff causing gyrations in the central bank's liabilities that create volatility in money-market rates, according to Federal Reserve Bank of New York's Roberto Perli.
Republican Mayor Braces for Tariffs: 'We Didn't Budget for This'
Trump Administration Plans to Eliminate Dozens of Housing Offices
How Upzoning in Cambridge Broke the YIMBY Mold
NYC's Finances Are Sinking With Gauge Falling to 11-Year Low
Remembering the Landscape Architect Who Embraced the City
Once the debt ceiling is resolved the Treasury Department tends to rapidly rebuild its cash pile — the biggest liability on the Fed's balance sheet — resulting in a fast decline in other liabilities. This may especially affect bank reserves since the overnight reverse repo facility is 'largely depleted,' Perli, who oversees the central bank's securities portfolio, said Wednesday at an event hosted by the Money Marketeers of New York University.
'The longer the balance-sheet runoff continues while the debt ceiling situation persists, the higher the risk that, upon the resolution of the debt ceiling, reserves could rapidly decline to levels that could result in considerable volatility in money markets,' Perli said.
A key House Republican said Wednesday the US could hit the debt ceiling as soon as mid-May, earlier than estimates from Wall Street strategists. The level of outstanding US debt hit its statutory limit in January. The Treasury has since been using special accounting maneuvers and drawing down its cash reserves to prevent a payments default.
For several months officials said very little publicly about when they might stop reducing the Fed's balance sheet, a process known as quantitative tightening, or QT. However, minutes of the January Federal Open Market Committee meeting revealed policymakers had discussed the potential need to pause or slow the process until lawmakers can strike a deal over the government's debt ceiling.
Repo Pressures
Perli, who runs the System Open Market Account, said indicators are showing that reserve conditions are still abundant, noting that it's not clear at what point reserves will become scarce.
Perli, however, acknowledged that the repo market — a bellwether for showing that quantitative tightening has gone too far — pressures have been gradually increasing, citing the increased share of interdealer market transactions taking place above the interest rate on reserve balances, which is 'notably higher than it was this time last year.'
The Fed has been shrinking its holdings of debt since June 2022. It's currently allowing up to $25 billion in Treasuries and $35 billion in mortgage-backed securities to mature each month without reinvesting the returned principal. It slowed to that pace in June, after initially allowing up to $60 billion in Treasuries to run off its balance sheet each month.
Minutes from the January gathering also showed that policymakers were briefed on possible ways to structure secondary-market Treasury purchases after the end of the balance-sheet runoff. Many officials expressed support for structuring purchases in a way that moved the portfolio's composition closer to that of outstanding Treasury debt.
Currently, the SOMA Treasury portfolio is 'significantly underweight' bills and 'significantly overweight' coupon securities with 10 to 22.5 years remaining to maturity, according to Perli. He suggested the discrepancy could be addressed by allocating secondary-market purchases to T-bills, yet at a gradual pace in order to avoid impacting the markets, though this would likely take a number of years.
Portfolio Composition
Federal Reserve Bank of Dallas President Lorie Logan, a former SOMA manager, said last week it would be appropriate, in the medium term, for the US central bank to purchase more shorter-term securities than longer-term ones so that its portfolio can more quickly mirror the composition of Treasury issuance.
'The strategy I just sketched does not lock policymakers into a particular portfolio structure for the longer term — it just moves the SOMA portfolio toward a more proportionate composition in the nearer term,' Perli said. 'In the future, the committee will have the flexibility to adjust and achieve any desired portfolio composition to best support its policy objectives.'
On the Standing Repo Facility, Perli acknowledged that the addition of a morning operation on the days spanning the end of the year may have contributed to a relatively smooth conclusion to 2024 in the funding markets. He also said there's a chance the New York Fed could offer a technical exercise at the end of March, another period when short-term rate markets tend to be volatile.
According to the latest FOMC minutes, several Fed officials supported looking for ways to improve the efficacy of the Standing Repo Facility. The New York Fed has been conducting a series of small-value exercises to take place at the beginning of the trading session.
(Updates with background on debt-limit in fourth paragraph.)
The Mysterious Billionaire Behind the World's Most Popular Vapes
Rich People Are Firing a Cash Cannon at the US Economy—But at What Cost?
Greenland Voters Weigh Their Election's Most Important Issue: Trump
Trump's SALT Tax Promise Hinges on an Obscure Loophole
Snack Makers Are Removing Fake Colors From Processed Foods
©2025 Bloomberg L.P.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
12 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Jim Chanos Sees Big Short in Saylor's Strategy, But Others Aren't So Sure
(Bloomberg) -- Buy Bitcoin, short Michael Saylor's Strategy. That's the latest call from legendary short-seller Jim Chanos, who sees the arbitrage play as a no-brainer. Others aren't so sure. ICE Moves to DNA-Test Families Targeted for Deportation with New Contract Next Stop: Rancho Cucamonga! The Global Struggle to Build Safer Cars US Housing Agency Vulnerable to Fraud After DOGE Cuts, Documents Warn NYC Residents Want Safer Streets, Cheaper Housing, Survey Says The trade has long been on the radar of Wall Street hedge funds, drawn to the premium Strategy's shares enjoy relative to the value of the company's Bitcoin holdings — a gap that topped 200% last year. The discrepancy stems from Saylor's self-styled Bitcoin treasury strategy, through which he has tapped capital markets to buy more and more of the world's biggest cryptocurrency, in turn attracting billions of dollars from retail investors. In the eyes of many arbitrage specialists, the yawning spread is unsustainable — in fact, it's already begun to narrow, but they see further opportunity to profit. 'I haven't seen an arbitrage like this in this size in years, years and years,' Chanos said during a recent interview on the Risk and Return podcast, referencing the trade he disclosed on CNBC in early May. It's one of a series of sophisticated trading strategies around the complex capital structure of Saylor's firm, formerly known as MicroStrategy, and the growing ecosystem of crypto investment vehicles. Some market players see parallels to the once-popular 'widow-maker' pair trade involving Bitcoin and the Grayscale Bitcoin Trust, but with fewer constraints. There are still risks involved, though. Chanos, known for his prescient bet against Enron Corp. 20 years ago, emphasized that his current favored trade isn't a wager against Bitcoin or Strategy, but rather a mirror of Saylor's own playbook: selling equity and raising capital to buy more digital assets. The core opportunity, he said, lies in the divergence between Strategy's market price and the company's Bitcoin-adjusted book value. 'The fact of the matter is, this is a Bitcoin holding company,' Chanos said on the podcast explaining the premium dislocation. Buying Strategy shares at their current price of around $400, he said, is effectively equivalent to buying Bitcoin at about two times its value — 'paying around $220,000 for Bitcoin that trades at $110,000. But the company is doing everything it can to close that spread, which is great — there's a catalyst.' A growing number of copycats have also started pursuing similar crypto-treasury strategies, further shifting supply-demand dynamics, Chanos added on the podcast. The investor didn't respond to a request for comment, nor did representatives for Strategy. On a basic level, the premium as measured by Strategy's market capitalization relative to its Bitcoin holding value stands at 70%, according to Bloomberg calculations. Taken a step further — adding in other dilutive securities the company has employed in its massive capital raising in the last year and removing the value of Strategy's legacy software business — and investors are paying a premium for the stock that's nearly double the value of the firm's Bitcoin holdings. If Bitcoin rises but Strategy's premium compresses — or if share dilution outpaces gains— Chanos' trade would turn a profit. Yet like any arbitrage, the spread may widen before it narrows, as seen in the GBTC trade around 2021. Premium Warranted? Some analysts and retail believers argue that a substantial premium in Saylor's firm is warranted, placing it in a unique category. First of all, Strategy offers investors exposure to a zero-fee Bitcoin vehicle, offering an edge over comparable exchange-traded funds. What's more, the company demonstrated an ability to use leverage to grow Bitcoin per share over time, an added value for investors buying the stock instead of the ETFs or underlying crypto, according to TD Cowen analyst Lance Vitanza, who believes Strategy's Bitcoin per share will increase by 26% this year. 'I expect MSTR will trade around its recent historical premium, either side of 100%, for the foreseeable future,' he said, referring to Strategy's ticker. Timing — when to enter and exit the wager— remains a key variable around returns, given the spread's ongoing volatility. In March 2024, Kerrisdale Capital Management promoted a similar pair trade in a letter titled 'Know When to HODL, Know When to FODL,' in a nod to crypto lingo. The firm still stands by its thesis, but 'I don't have the trade on now,' said founder Sahm Adrangi. 'When we put out the report, the premium was much higher and it made sense at that point. Is it going to zero? I don't really know,' he said, declining to specify when the firm closed the position. To Chanos and other fans of the trade, Strategy's ample market capitalization — now over $100 billion — and deep float make it relatively easy to maintain the short leg. For hedge funds, new borrows are being priced at a fee of 0.3 percentage point, according to data from S3 Partners. This helps to keep the cost of carry manageable while waiting for the spread to narrow. The inexpensive terms are likely to persist, given the stock's roughly 250 million free floating shares, and that only 11% is currently sold short, said Sam Pierson, director of research at the firm. But that doesn't eliminate the risk that the borrowing dynamics could change — potentially becoming more expensive and less stable, especially for individual investors, said Victor Haghani, chief investment officer of Elm Wealth and founding partner of Long Term Capital Management. There's a lot of demand for borrowing shares related to convertible arbitrage wagers and leveraged short ETFs, he added. Another source of uncertainty is the potential for an unexpected corporate event, such as a merger that might shift the company's fundamental business, complicating premium estimates and muddying the existing trade. 'Say if all of a sudden Strategy is part of something that is twice as big — then when you try to look at the valuation relative to the Bitcoin it holds, you can't really say that much anymore because now there's a business with revenues,' Haghani said. Still, he is confident of the spread's long-term convergence. 'My expectation is that in four or five years at the longest, the premium will be zero or even negative,'he said. 'I think this is a good trade, a good one possibly for hedge funds, but it's not one I'd want to put on in my personal account for the risks involved and my disadvantaged position relative to hedge funds in running the trade.' --With assistance from Tom Contiliano. Cavs Owner Dan Gilbert Wants to Donate His Billions—and Walk Again YouTube Is Swallowing TV Whole, and It's Coming for the Sitcom Millions of Americans Are Obsessed With This Japanese Barbecue Sauce Is Elon Musk's Political Capital Spent? Trump Considers Deporting Migrants to Rwanda After the UK Decides Not To ©2025 Bloomberg L.P.
Yahoo
21 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Rand Paul Rips Lindsey Graham Over Gargantuan Budget Bill
Kentucky Senator Rand Paul threw shade at his South Carolinian colleague Lindsey Graham while excoriating Donald Trump's 'big beautiful bill' on Fox Business. In an appearance Wednesday night, Paul argued that Graham had his own reasons for rubber-stamping Republicans' gargantuan budget bill, which will add $2.4 trillion to the national debt over the next 10 years, according to an estimate from the Congressional Budget Office. The bill is expected to cut $1.3 trillion in spending but also cut $3.7 trillion in total revenue, leading to the massive deficit. 'This bill is really a vehicle for Lindsey Graham to secretly explode beyond on the military budget,' Paul said. 'They want to explode the military budget beyond the caps. That's really what the bill is about. So there is a lot of new spending in this bill. If the new spending weren't in there, it truly would be a bill that would be saving money.' The legislation would dramatically increase military and border spending, bringing $150 billion to the Pentagon over the next 10 years. Graham, a longtime war hawk, has urged the Trump administration to take a tougher stance on Iran. Paul also said he didn't think Congress was mature enough to raise the debt ceiling. 'If you have teenage children and you gave them a credit card and they maxed out $2,000 on booze and gambling, would you give them a bigger credit line or a smaller credit line?' the Kentucky Republican said. 'Congress is worse than a bunch of drunken teenagers. They have a history of not being fiscally responsible. You should give them a very short debt ceiling increase and say, 'Show me and prove to me you'll act responsibly, and I'll give you more money.'' Paul told CNN Wednesday that he could understand Elon Musk's frustration with the gargantuan spending bill. 'The new spending in this bill actually exceeds all the work he did to try to find savings, so I can understand his disappointment,' he said. Earlier that day, Paul had quote-tweeted Musk, arguing that Congress knows adding another $5 trillion to the national debt would be a 'huge mistake.'
Yahoo
21 minutes ago
- Yahoo
China says Trump and Xi hold telephone call amid tariffs spat
US President Donald Trump has spoken by telephone with his Chinese counterpart Xi Jinping, China's state news agency Xinhua said on Thursday. No specific details about the content of the conversation have been disclosed but it comes amid the ongoing trade spat between the two countries. The White House has yet to confirm the phone call. On Wednesday, Trump stated on his online platform Truth Social: "I like President XI of China, always have, and always will, but he is VERY TOUGH, AND EXTREMELY HARD TO MAKE A DEAL WITH!!!" This is the first known phone call between the two presidents since Trump took office again in January. In recent months, Trump has been non-committal when asked about any potential conversations with Xi, leaving open the possibility of direct exchanges that may not have been disclosed. But typically, governments publicly announce such calls between heads of state. Since retaking office, Trump has pursued a hard-line trade policy against China, significantly escalating the long-standing dispute. The US president has imposed punitive tariffs on Chinese imports, raising them in several steps to a 145%. Beijing has responded with counter-tariffs. Although both sides agreed in mid-May to pause the escalation and temporarily lower some tariffs, tensions have recently flared again, and the underlying disagreements remain unresolved. Meanwhile, the US Senate is preparing a new sanctions package against Russia, which, according to Republican Senator Lindsey Graham, is aimed at countries that continue to purchase Russian oil, gas, and other energy products. China would be particularly affected by the proposed measures, which come after Moscow failed to stop its over three-year war on Ukraine.