logo
US neighborhoods filled with 'for sale' signs as homes flood market

US neighborhoods filled with 'for sale' signs as homes flood market

Daily Mail​23-07-2025
Homes for sale have completely flooded the US real estate market, with more listings now than any time since 2019. Slower demand from buyers is one contributor, according to Zillow's latest market report. Homes are lingering on the market and there is less competition for them, making it a great market for buyers if they care to move.
In June, 1.36 million homes were for sale - the most since November 2019. A record-high 26.6 percent of listings dropped prices in June, as sellers desperately tried to entice buyers. The cuts were most common in the Sun Belt and Mountain States, specifically Denver.
The share of listings with a price cut for June was the highest it has been in that month since 2018, according to Zillow records. The numbers were also closing in on an all-time high of 27 percent - a record held by September 2022. Price cuts are most common among Sun Belt and Mountain State markets that witnessed massive appreciation early in the pandemic.
According to the Zillow Home Value Index - which measures typical home values in cities - Denver had the highest share of price cuts at 38.3 percent of the homes listed. The average home price there is $586,433. Raleigh, North Carolina, where the average home is worth $446,622, saw 36.4 percent of listings slash prices. In Nashville, Tennessee, where the average singe-family home is worth $457,836, 35.5 percent of listings had to cut their prices.
Phoenix, which has an average home price of $453,381, saw 35.5 percent of sellers lower the price. And in Dallas, where the average home price is $372,023, 35.5 percent of sellers were forced to cut their listing prices. Other cities that saw home price cuts were Tampa, Florida, Salt Lake City, Indianapolis and Austin, Texas.
Sellers had the upper hand through most of the past five years as demand for homes far outweighed the options available. But affordability for buyers is still a major challenge. Home value growth is at a standstill and mortgage costs have ticked down ever so slightly from a year ago. But high prices and borrowing costs are still big hurdles for buyers, especially first-timers.
Inventory is still roughly 21 percent below pre-pandemic averages for June, but that deficit is expected to continue shrinking. Zillow forecasts inventory to approach pre-pandemic levels by the end of the year. For buyers, this is all good news.
They have more options to choose from, more time to decide on a house and more bargaining power than in prior years. Sellers need to price realistically and set their listing apart from the crowd. But something else experts are seeing is that buyers are not in a rush.
Listings that sell do so in 19 days - just one day faster than before the pandemic. That's compared to 15 days in 2024 and 11 in 2023. Zillow studied the housing market nationwide. In 22 of the 50 largest metropolitan areas, the markets are now labeled neutral, where neither buyers nor sellers have the upper hand. That's compared to 15 markets that were neutral in May and just eight at this time a year ago.
New listings stepped down significantly from May to June, dropping 10.9 percent. Some of that is likely seasonal, since new listings peaked in May in 2018, 2019 and 2024. But some potential sellers are also seeing slower sales in many markets and deciding to hold off.
Before having to lower listings, home prices had skyrocketed across the US since the pandemic, and it has become increasingly difficult for average Americans to purchase properties (according to 2024 Pew research, the middle class income range falls between $54,009 and $161,220). From March 2019 to March 2025, home values jumped an alarming 39 percent, according to the National Association of Realtors (NAR).
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

ICE entices new recruits with patriotism pitch and promise of $50,000 signing bonuses
ICE entices new recruits with patriotism pitch and promise of $50,000 signing bonuses

The Independent

time2 minutes ago

  • The Independent

ICE entices new recruits with patriotism pitch and promise of $50,000 signing bonuses

The agency responsible for carrying out President Donald Trump 's mass deportations is launching a recruiting campaign to entice 'brave and heroic Americans' to serve as new deportation officers, lawyers and investigators as the government gears up for a major expansion of immigration enforcement thanks to a recent infusion of money from Congress. The U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement campaign, which rolled out late Tuesday, recalls recruiting posters from World War II with images of Uncle Sam and the words 'AMERICA NEEDS YOU.' There also are photos of Trump and top homeland security officials with the words 'DEFEND THE HOMELAND' across the images. 'Your country is calling you to serve at ICE,' said Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem in a news release. 'This is a defining moment in our nation's history. Your skills, your experience, and your courage have never been more essential. Together, we must defend the homeland.' In addition to appealing to prospective applicants' patriotic fervor, Homeland Security is making a pocketbook pitch. The agency is promising up to $50,000 in signing bonuses, the potential for lots of overtime for deportation officers and other benefits such as loan repayment or forgiveness options. Lots of money is coming to ICE All of this is made possible by a big infusion of money to ICE. The package of tax breaks and spending cuts that Trump signed into law this month includes about $170 billion for border security and immigration enforcement, spread out over five years. ICE is set to get $76.5 billion, nearly 10 times its current annual budget. Some $45 billion will go toward increasing detention capacity. Nearly $30 billion is for hiring 10,000 more staff so the agency can meet its goal of 1 million annual deportations. New hires include deportation officers responsible for tracking down, arresting and removing people who the administration determines no longer have the right to remain in the United States. Under the Republican president, those officers are high-profile roles, making arrests at immigration courts, in the streets and at businesses. They often are criticized by immigration activists and Democratic lawmakers for wearing masks while carrying out their duties. On the recruitment webpage, the link to learn more about applying to be a deportation officer shows a photo of an armored vehicle rolling down a street with officers in military gear hanging onto the sides of the vehicle. The government is also seeking criminal investigators and lawyers who will prosecute immigration cases. The agency said it will advertise at college campuses, job fairs and law enforcement networks, starting this week. But the recruiting drive has raised concerns about what happens if the agency grows too fast. Staffing is a long-standing challenge ICE staffing has long been an issue, said Jason Houser, a former agency chief of staff during the Biden administration. At the beginning of the Trump administration there were roughly 6,000 officers within ICE tasked with monitoring noncitizens in the country, then finding and removing those not eligible to stay. Those staffing numbers remained largely static over the years even as the caseload ballooned. During the Biden administration, when the number of people arriving at the U.S.-Mexico border skyrocketed, ICE workers were often pulled from their regular duties to go to the border. 'ICE does need more employees to handle the volume of what they're handling,' Houser said. But he is concerned about whether the rush to increase staffing could mean lower standards for recruits and training. The Border Patrol's rapid expansion during the early 2000s serves as a cautionary tale. To meet hiring goals, hiring and training standards were changed. Arrests for employee misconduct rose. 'If they start waiving requirements there like they did for Border Patrol, you're going have an exponential increase in officers that are shown the door after three years because there's some issue," he said. At the same time, Houser noted the Department of Homeland Security has dismantled some of the key agencies that have provided some level of oversight over ICE and other DHS arms. Houser estimated it would take three years to four years to actually hire and train that number of new ICE staffers. In the meantime, he worries that ICE will rely on private contractors, National Guard troops and other federal law enforcement officers to meet the administration's goal of 3,000 arrests a day.

Fed keeps rates steady despite Trump's pressure, with two governors dissenting
Fed keeps rates steady despite Trump's pressure, with two governors dissenting

Reuters

time3 minutes ago

  • Reuters

Fed keeps rates steady despite Trump's pressure, with two governors dissenting

WASHINGTON, July 30 (Reuters) - The Federal Reserve held interest rates steady on Wednesday in a split decision that gave little indication of when borrowing costs might be lowered and drew dissents from two of the U.S. central bank's governors, both appointees of President Donald Trump who agree with him that monetary policy is too tight. "The unemployment rate remains low, and labor market conditions remain solid. Inflation remains somewhat elevated," the central bank said in a policy statement after the Federal Open Market Committee voted 9-2 to keep its benchmark overnight interest rate steady in the 4.25%-4.50% range for the fifth consecutive meeting. The statement noted that economic growth "moderated in the first half of the year," possibly bolstering the case to lower rates at a future meeting should that trend continue. But it also said "uncertainty about the economic outlook remains elevated," with risks to both the Fed's inflation and employment goals, language that has anchored its reluctance to cut rates until the path of inflation and jobs becomes clearer. Fed Chair Jerome Powell was careful to keep his options open on monetary policy. "We have made no decisions about September" and have time to take in a wide range of data before the central bank next meets in mid-September, he said in a press conference after the end of the two-day policy meeting. Powell noted current monetary policy is appropriately set at "modestly restrictive" levels, as some risks to the outlook have risen. This week's meeting marks the first time in more than 30 years that two members of the Fed's seven-person Washington-based Board of Governors voted against a rate decision at the consensus-driven central bank, and it will likely stoke debate about how Trump's public pressure to cut rates is playing out at an institution designed to set monetary policy independent of demands from elected officials. Both Vice Chair for Supervision Michelle Bowman and Governor Christopher Waller, who has been mentioned as a possible nominee to replace Fed Chair Jerome Powell when his term expires next May, were appointed to the board by Trump and "preferred to lower the target range for the federal funds rate by one quarter of a percentage point at this meeting," the Fed's policy statement said. Powell, a bipartisan figure who was appointed to the Fed's board by former President Barack Obama and later promoted to the top job by Trump, voted to hold rates steady, as did three other governors and the five Fed regional bank presidents who currently hold a vote on the rate-setting FOMC. The Fed's regional bank presidents are hired by local boards of directors who oversee the Fed's 12 regional institutions. Governor Adriana Kugler was absent and did not vote. Dissenting members of the FOMC often release statements explaining their vote on the Friday following Fed meetings. Treasury yields were up in late-afternoon trading after the Fed's policy decision while stocks were on track to close the session down. Futures markets lowered the odds of a rate cut at the central bank's September 16-17 policy meeting. The data since the Fed's June 17-18 meeting has given policymakers little reason to shift from the "wait-and-see" approach they have taken on interest rates since Trump's January 20 inauguration raised the possibility that new import tariffs and other policy shifts could put upward pressure on prices. The unemployment rate is still low at 4.1%, and recent inflation data showed faster increases for some heavily imported goods - a development policymakers will watch in the coming weeks. The Commerce Department earlier on Wednesday reported that U.S. growth rebounded more than expected in the second quarter, but declining imports accounted for the bulk of the improvement and domestic demand rose at its slowest pace in 2-1/2 years. Trump has berated Powell in particular for not cutting rates to try to lower the government's borrowing costs, a concern outside the Fed's congressionally-mandated goals of maintaining stable inflation and maximum employment.

US yields advance as Fed's Powell says not sure about September cut
US yields advance as Fed's Powell says not sure about September cut

Reuters

time3 minutes ago

  • Reuters

US yields advance as Fed's Powell says not sure about September cut

NEW YORK, July 30 (Reuters) - U.S. Treasury yields rose on Wednesday after Federal Reserve Chair Jerome Powell said it's too soon to say whether the central bank will cut its interest rate target in September. "We have made no decisions about September, we don' that in advance," Powell said at a press conference after the Fed held interest rates steady at the end of a two-day policy meeting, as widely expected. He said going forward, "we'll be taking that information" about the economy in the run-up to the next central bank gathering. In standing pat for a fifth straight policy meeting, the Fed cited low unemployment and solid labor market conditions. But it noted that economic growth "moderated in the first half of the year," boosting the case to lower rates at a future meeting should that trend continue. The Fed kept its benchmark overnight interest rate tethered in the 4.25%-4.50% range. Wednesday's Fed decision, however saw two dissenting votes by governors, the most in more than three decades. In afternoon trading, the benchmark U.S. 10-year yields were last up 4.4 basis points (bps) at 4.372% , while the two-year yield, which reflects interest rate expectations, was up 5.7 bps at 3.932% . "There's enough evidence to suggest that the Fed should be cutting right do think that beneath the surface economic activity has slowed down and that's true whether you're looking at consumption or it's true whether you're looking at labor," said Tom Porcelli, chief U.S. economist, at asset manager PGIM in Newark. "In many ways the Fed is haunted by the ghost of transitory past. That gives them an element of pause...I think because of the transitory mistake, it slows down their reaction function," he said, referring to the Fed's slow response to inflation during the pandemic years on views it would be short-lived. Both Vice Chair for Supervision Michelle Bowman and Governor Christopher Waller, who has been mentioned as a possible nominee to replace Powell when his term expires next May, were appointed to the board by Trump and "preferred to lower the target range for the federal funds rate by one quarter of a percentage point at this meeting," the Fed's policy statement said. Treasury yields briefly ticked lower after the disclosure of the two dissenting votes. Federal funds futures, which are tied to the U.S. central bank's monetary policy, are implying lower odds of a rate cut in September with a 50% probability, according to LSEG calculations. That was 65% before the Fed statement. U.S. rate futures also reduced the expected pace of easing this year to just 39 bps. That was 44 bps before the Fed decision.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store