In the Epstein saga, it's Trump against America
Johnson's spineless play is one more MAGA middle finger to a public that just wants Congress to keep its word. What makes this retreat truly shameful is the fact that Republicans aren't doing any of this for some lofty moral purpose. Their stop-work order doesn't represent the desires of MAGA voters, a majority of whom want the Epstein files released. It doesn't prevent a bad law from passing or draw attention to an injustice being committed on the House floor.
Rather, Johnson and his Republican colleagues have decided that whatever is in the Epstein files is worse for them than the hell they're currently catching from voters. That says a lot, because President Trump's handling of the Epstein scandal is absolutely toxic with almost every group in America.
Only 40 percent of Republicans approve of Trump's handling of the files, while some of the president's top MAGA influencers now openly wonder why he's working so hard to protect information about one of the country's most notorious pedophiles.
At just 38 percent approval, Trump is approaching a level of unpopularity he hasn't felt since early 2017, as voters struggle to make sense of his abrupt about-face. Republican lawmakers aren't having much luck figuring out Trump's motives, either. They've given up even trying to defend his bizarre claim that Epstein's crimes were a hoax financed by Democrats. Instead, they've turned off the lights on Capitol Hill and sprinted away.
Voters are right to be suspicious.
'We should get real answers on what happened to Jeffrey Epstein. All of that should be open to the public, it should be absolutely transparent,' Health and Human Services Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. told Fox News in 2023. But Kennedy, who made several trips on Epstein's private jet, now refuses to answer questions.
In 2021, future Vice President JD Vance implied that anyone fighting to keep Epstein's files secret could be a potential client. 'What possible interest would the US government have in keeping Epstein's clients secret?' he added. It's a great question that still demands an answer.
Last week, the White House introduced its latest effort to delegitimize whatever horrors are hidden in the pages it still refuses to reveal. In an Oval Office press conference, Trump authorized Attorney General Pam Bondi to release ' whatever is credible ' from files he claimed a day before didn't exist at all. By floating the idea that some of Epstein's files could be fake, Trump is setting the stage to invalidate any references to him in the documents — if those specific pages are even allowed to see the light of day.
What must be going through Johnson's head as he directs House Republicans to sink bill after bill ordering the release of Epstein's files? Johnson has long made his Christian faith a centerpiece of his public identity, to the point of questioning whether religion should even be separate from government. Yet his desire to lead Congress with Christian morality was no match for Trump, who seemingly co-opted Johnson into his cover-up scheme without a whisper of resistance from the Speaker.
Johnson's decision to walk off the job and away from the business of the American people is jarring even by the low standards of the Trump era. After whining for an entire campaign season that Democrats weren't working hard enough, Johnson's Republicans have passed fewer laws and worked less than any Congress in decades. Cornered by Epstein drama of their own making, Johnson's Republicans are no longer even pretending to do their jobs.
Congressional Republicans no longer serve the American people at large, or even their own conservative constituents. They serve — or in the case of Johnson's early recess, don't serve — in whatever way best protects Trump's personal and political interests. If that means hiding Epstein's heinous crimes from public accountability and denying closure to his many victims, so be it.
Johnson's decision to shutter the House in order to protect Trump reveals a Congress in an advanced state of decay and a Republican Party willing to rationalize any evil in the name of protecting its strongman. What other horrors will Mike Johnson bury in order to keep his morally bankrupt party afloat?
Max Burns is a veteran Democratic strategist and founder of Third Degree Strategies.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
23 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Trump's DOJ puts companies on notice: Don't evade tariffs
The Justice Department is putting American companies on notice that they could be prosecuted if they chose to evade President Trump's tariffs, even as the legality of the president's "Liberation Day" duties remain unsettled in US courts. The message came in a DOJ announcement earlier this month stipulating that prosecutors would step up investigations into suspiciously classified imports and charge those who misidentify products with fraud. 'While the DOJ has always taken some customs cases, this is a different, more aggressive, visible stance than they usually would,' said Thompson Coburn trade lawyer Robert Shapiro. Read more: 5 ways to tariff-proof your finances The plan — to be carried out by the DOJ's new Market, Government, and Consumer Fraud Unit — marks a shift in enforcement tactics from prior administrations that relied mostly on policing misconduct through administrative proceedings, even during Trump's first term in office. The new Trump administration instead wants to prioritize criminal charges against companies and individuals that try to evade US tariffs. The overarching strategy was first outlined by Matthew R. Galeotti, head of the Justice Department's Criminal Division, who wrote in a May memo that an increasing focus on white collar crime would include "trade and customs fraudsters, including those who commit tariff evasion." At the same time, the Trump administration finds itself in the unusual position of defending the legality of the duties it pledges to enforce. Oral arguments in a federal lawsuit challenging the president's tariffs are set to take place before the US Court of Appeals in Washington, D.C., this Thursday. The small business importers challenging the legal standing of the duties already proved it was possible to temporarily derail Trump's global tariffs with a lower court victory in May. In a separate challenge, two toy manufacturers are scheduled to make their own arguments against Trump's tariffs before the D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals on Sept. 30, following their own lower court victory. 'We're going to raise the ante' Tariff violations can be prosecuted under civil or criminal laws. However, even fraud cases were often handled administratively by past administrations, according to Shapiro. 'I think the administration is just saying we're going to raise the ante on this,' Shapiro said. University of Kansas School of Law professor Raj Bhala said laws against customs fraud have long been in force, but the appetite for the DOJ and US Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) to clamp down on violations has increased. Historically, Bhala and other trade lawyers said, prosecutors focused government resources on suspected tariff violations by US adversaries such as China, Iran, and North Korea, and particularly on export controls meant to keep controlled items from shipping to those countries. Producer-exporters, especially in China and other high-tariff regions, have been using evasion techniques for decades, mostly to skirt anti-dumping and countervailing duty orders, Bhala said. But now, under more imposing tariffs, incentives to evade duties have spiked 'enormously.' 'What is clear is that a lot of companies are looking for a way to limit the impact of the duties,' Shapiro said. In this new tariff and enforcement environment, trade experts suspect that corporate America and its trading partners are on high alert. Erika Trujillo, a trade attorney with customs risk management firm SEIA Compliance Technologies, said the shift toward more enforcement happening at the DOJ and less through administrative procedures could increase politically motivated targeting of companies viewed as adverse to the Trump administration's interests. 'I do think trade restrictions were used as both a sword and a shield for foreign companies, or in terms of dealing with international trade,' Trujillo said. Common tariff evasion techniques include misclassifying goods, falsely labeling a product's country of origin, making minor modifications to a product while it's in a lower-tariff jurisdiction to pass it off as manufactured there, and transhipping goods through lower-tariff jurisdictions. Read more: The latest news and updates on Trump's tariffs 'It's hard to imagine that any well-run company that has supply chains stretching across the globe — particularly in higher-tariff jurisdictions like China or Cambodia — would not be having vigorous discussions to ensure every step in the supply chain is properly documented and audited,' Bhala said. Bhala cautions that the stakes are high for importers subject to US jurisdiction. 'They're the importer of record and they're the ones who are liable for the tariffs,' he said. 'And false declarations are what we call 'go to jail stuff.'' For fraud, fines can also be assessed, up to the domestic value of the merchandise. For civil violations made based on negligent actions, maximum penalties are two times the underpayment of duties, in addition to original duties. For violations based on gross negligence, penalties increase to four times the underpayment of duties. For businesses looking to assess their risk, US Customs maintains an electronic system called the Automated Commercial Environment (ACT) that allows importers to view what their classification data looks like to customs. Small and midsize companies may find it more difficult to evaluate their compliance risks compared to multinational firms. 'If you're an SME, you probably have one or two lawyers, and they're not necessarily trade specialists,' Bhala said. Plus, there are different rules for thousands of products. For example, a typical NAFTA good, he explained, traverses the US-Canada border roughly four times. 'It's really difficult for companies of that size to be dealing with this,' Trujillo said. One major challenge is finding affordable internal expertise. 'Almost every company I know is actively hiring for both customs and export controls, and sanctions. You're basically stuck going to law firms or other external consultancy, and the small and medium-sized firms are maybe not going to have the budget to pay $1,100 an hour.' Read more: What Trump's tariffs mean for the economy and your wallet For certain suspected violations like those made by mistake, Shapiro said it doesn't make economic sense for the DOJ to get involved. 'They don't have the manpower for it,' he said. But a new enforcement policy seems to fit the Trump administration's broader tariff agenda, he added. 'If you're going to have this tariff policy, you're going to have to take a more aggressive stance, because it's a huge ocean of imports, and it's very hard for customs to enforce against everyone.' Alexis Keenan is a legal reporter for Yahoo Finance. Follow Alexis on X @alexiskweed. Click here for in-depth analysis of the latest stock market news and events moving stock prices
USA Today
25 minutes ago
- USA Today
Epstein accomplice Maxwell angles for a Trump pardon. Would she lie to help him?
Doesn't it make sense to wonder if Maxwell is willing to lie to help herself, if that also helps Trump – an old friend, who was known for hanging around with Epstein? We don't know what Ghislaine Maxwell, the convicted child sex trafficker and former paramour/accomplice to the dead pedophile Jeffrey Epstein, said during a pair of prison interviews July 24-25 with Deputy Attorney General Todd Blanche. And we don't know how Maxwell, now serving a 20-year federal prison sentence for her despicable crimes, will respond to a subpoena issued July 23 by the Republican-controlled U.S. House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform. But now seems like a good time to ask if anyone should believe anything Maxwell has to say about anything. Ghislaine Maxwell has a history of lying about Jeffrey Epstein Here's what we do know: Maxwell is in prison because she recruited girls under the age of 18, groomed them to be sexually abused by Epstein and then sometimes joined in. "The victims were as young as 14," according to the Department of Justice. Maxwell took these girls to the movies and on shopping trips. She asked them about school, while teaching them to submit to whatever Epstein desired. And then she denied all that. Here's another thing we know: The federal grand jury in New York that indicted her in July 2020 – during President Donald Trump's first term – called her a liar. That indictment included two counts of perjury for allegedly lying while testifying under oath in a civil court case about Epstein's sexual abuse of underage girls. Opinion: Republicans in Congress head home to angry voters. So much for summer break. The Department of Justice and Maxwell's lawyers mutually agreed to drop those perjury charges in 2022, soon after her conviction, if the court did not grant her a retrial. Prosecutors did that to help the victims whom Epstein and Maxwell abused avoid another public spectacle. But Maxwell's grand jury indictment cites her own words from that civil case – "I don't know what you're talking about" – as she denied the kinds of sexual abuse that the trial jury later convicted her for. It's not a stretch to think the trial jury would have convicted her for perjury, too, if those charges had not been spun off into a separate case. Why should we believe Maxwell now? So why believe what she has to say now, as she sits behind bars in a Florida prison with a projected release date of July 17, 2037? Doesn't it make more sense to wonder if Maxwell is willing to lie to help herself, if that also helps Trump, who was known for hanging around with Epstein, a politician who is again president and now is talking about how he has the power to pardon Maxwell? Trump, who once exploited conspiracy theories about Epstein's 2019 suicide in federal prison – also during his first term – for political benefit, is now trapped in a quagmire of his own making. He and the people he appointed to run the Department of Justice tried to back out of a promise to release documents about Epstein's crimes, infuriating his MAGA base and prompting a bipartisan call from Congress for more transparency. So it's worth a close look at what Trump has said over the years about Maxwell, whom he socialized with in New York and Palm Beach, along with Epstein. Trump, speaking at the White House in July 2020, just 19 days after the horrible allegations were made public in Maxwell's indictment, was asked if she might "turn in powerful men" while seeking leniency in court. Trump pretended that he didn't know much about Maxwell case while twice saying "I wish her well." Opinion: MAGA is realizing Trump lies. How can they trust anything he says on Epstein? Trump's kind regards for an accused child sex trafficker drew bipartisan rebukes from Congress. That didn't stop him from offering the same sentiment two weeks later, again offering good wishes for Maxwell in an HBO interview. Will Trump's administation protect, believe Maxwell? Five years later, Trump is still playing dumb about Maxwell – and hoping his supporters play dumb as well – as he openly floats talk of a pardon while also claiming to be out of loop in a scandal that is consuming his presidency. Trump on July 25 noted that he has the power to pardon Maxwell while also claiming "it's something I have not thought about." Three days later, on a golfing trip to Scotland, Trump repeated that he has the power to pardon Maxwell, while adding that "nobody's approached me with it. Nobody's asked me about it.' Well, check your social media feed, Mr. President, because Maxwell's lawyer, the same guy who sat with her for two full days of interviews by the Department of Justice, filed an appeal of her conviction on July 28 with the U.S. Supreme Court while making a direct appeal in a social media post aimed at you. Attorney David Oscar Markus, posting on X, wrote, "We are appealing not only to the Supreme Court but to the President himself to recognize how profoundly unjust it is to scapegoat Ghislaine Maxwell for Epstein's crimes." The appeal is based on the theory that a 2007 plea agreement that won Epstein a lenient prison sentence for soliciting minors for prostitution should have also protected Maxwell from prosecution. If Maxwell is going to win some kind of protection right now, Trump is her best bet. But this scandal has metastasized for the president, and the very people he wishes to quiet down will certainly raise another ruckus if he pardons her. This is what passes for bipartisanship now: People on the left, right and center of the political spectrum are all wondering at once why anyone would believe anything Maxwell has to say. Follow USA TODAY columnist Chris Brennan on X, formerly known as Twitter: @ByChrisBrennan. Sign up for his weekly newsletter, Translating Politics, here.
New York Post
25 minutes ago
- New York Post
Sen. John Kennedy weighs in on Park Ave skyscraper shooting: ‘We don't need more gun control, we need more idiot control'
Sen. John Kennedy dismissed the idea of tightening up gun laws — instead suggesting that the city brings back the stop-and-frisk tactic to combat gun violence. The Louisiana Republican weighed in on the discourse shortly after a crazed gunman stormed a Midtown skyscraper before killing a brave NYPD officer and three others Monday. Appearing on Fox News, Kennedy said that 'all you can do in a time like this is be sorry' for the victims, before anticipating that some of his colleagues will be advocating for increased gun control measures as a result of the massacre. Advertisement 7 Sen. John Kennedy suggested that New York City brings back the stop-and-frisk tactic to combat gun violence. Fox News 'On Capitol Hill, probably beginning in the morning, there'll be the inevitable call by some of my colleagues for more gun control laws,' Kennedy (R-La.) said on Sean Hannity's show Monday. 'We've got hundreds of gun control laws, Sean. Maybe thousands. We don't need more gun control, we need more idiot control, and I don't know exactly how to do that.' Advertisement The shooter, identified as Las Vegas resident Shane Tamura stormed into the 44-story building — which headquarters Blackstone and the NFL — armed with a rifle and opened fire at around 6:30 p.m. during the evening rush. The 27-year-old unleashed his rampage after setting foot in the lobby before ultimately turning the gun on himself. 7 'We don't need more gun control, we need more idiot control,' Kennedy said. James Keivom 7 On Monday, a crazed gunman stormed a Midtown skyscraper before killing a brave NYPD officer and three others. Obtained by NY Post Advertisement 7 The shooter stormed into the 44-story building — which headquarters Blackstone and the NFL — armed with a rifle and opened fire at around 6:30 p.m. Christopher Sadowski 'I don't want to hear anyone feeling sorry for this guy who did this,' Kennedy said of the shooter. 'I believe there's objective evil in this world, and we saw it today. I'm just sorry.' Kennedy also floated the idea of bringing back the stop-and-frisk policy. 'The other thing that, frankly, New York's going to have to face, is the issue of whether we should bring back more aggressive stop and frisk, which is a perfectly legal law enforcement tactic,' he added. Advertisement NYC Midtown shooting timeline NYPD Commissioner Jessica Tisch provided a timeline of events leading up to Monday's mass shooting: Reports of the shooting at 345 Park Avenue started coming in at around 6:28 p.m. The shooter, Shane Tamura, 27, was seen on surveillance footage getting out of a double parked black BMW between 51st and 52nd Street, with an M4 rifle. He then walks towards the skyscraper, enters the lobby and turns right, where he shot police officer Didarul Islam, 36, dead. Tamura then gunned down a woman cowering behind a pillar in the lobby, as he sprayed more bullets and walked toward the elevator bank — where he shot dead a security guard crouching at his desk. One more man reported being shot and injured in the lobby. He was in critical but stable condition. The gunman allowed a woman to walk out of the elevators unharmed, before heading up to the 33rd floor, where building owner Rudin Properties' offices are located, 'and begins to walk the floor, firing as he traveled.' One man was shot and killed on that floor. 'He then proceeds down a hallway and shoots himself in the chest,' ending his rampage. It's unclear how long the mayhem lasted. Tisch posted on X at 7:52 p.m.: 'the scene has been contained and the lone shooter has been neutralized.' Elsewhere, Hakeem Jeffries (D-N.Y.) spoke out about the 'tragic and horrifying' mass shooting. 'The murder of a brave New York City police officer and several innocent civilians is tragic and horrifying,' the House Minority Leader said in a statement. 7 Kennedy said that 'all you can do in a time like this is be sorry' for the victims. Fox News 7 The 27-year-old unleashed his rampage after setting foot in the lobby before ultimately turning the gun on himself. James Keivom 7 Front cover of the New York Post on July 29, 2025. 'We mourn their loss and stand with their families during this time of need. Our prayers and gratitude are also with those heroic law enforcement officers and first responders who put their lives on the line and selflessly rushed to the scene to save others.' 'Mass shootings are a plague. The gun violence epidemic continues to afflict our country and now has shattered lives in our great City. The time has come for decisive action,' Jeffries added.
