logo
How snacks changed the British way of life

How snacks changed the British way of life

Telegraph18-03-2025

Remember a time when your only treat was an orange-wrapped Breakaway after school, and eating between meals signified the decline of civilisation? If so, you grew up before the golden (wonder) age of the snack.
The sad news is that your Breakaway was finally taken away in February 2024 when Nestle took the 'difficult decision' to discontinue the biscuit after 54 years. There is no shortage of new snacks to throw into your trolley, however. In the latest figures from YouGov, 34% of us eat one sweet treat a day, while 12% admit to consuming multiple every day.
That's a hell of a mountain of Twixes, KitKats and Dorito packets to be left scrunched up on the train seat opposite.
We Brits have always been a nation of snackers – but the first snack foods were actually boiled peas sold on the streets of Victorian England.
The origin of the word 'snack' is thought to come from the Middle Dutch word 'snacken', which meant 'to bite.' 'We started to use the term 300 years ago to mean a small piece of something, such as a 'snack of cake'', says Annie Gray, food historian and the author of The Bookshop, The Draper, The Candlestick Maker: A History of the High Street. 'In the late 19th century, we had the first 'snack bars', which sold oysters, cheese, baked potatoes or pies to passers-by. These were often cheap substitute meals.'
Back then – as it arguably has now – snacking had class connotations. 'People in the upper classes had four meals a day – breakfast, lunch, tea and dinner,' says Gray. 'But the poor didn't have time for this: in many cases they didn't have ovens or even kitchens, so workers would grab things on the go. These days, people who are on their feet all day, or who work shifts, have a similar need for convenience food.'
But whatever your net worth or occupation, we all occasionally have a hankering for a snack – be it a Greggs apple Danish, or a pistachio, lemon and rose cake from Gail's Bakery.
Why our favourite snacks are sweet
Modern day snacks have mutated significantly since the days of oysters and peas. The McVities chocolate digestive was born in 1899, 14 years after the Jacob's Cream Cracker. The late 1980s saw the advent of the Kettle Chip: these days, the shelves groan with protein bars and salted caramel chocolate.
According to 2025 research from Statista, our favourite snacks these days are sweet. Chocolate biscuits make up the largest sales category, with people consuming them at four to five times the rate of savoury biscuits or crackers. The faithful pack of crisps – first sold in pubs just before the First World War – isn't far behind. In 2022, consumers purchased 66 grams of crisps per person per week (the equivalent of two bags), a rise of 18 per cent from the previous five years.
The road to Snacksville began after World War II. 'We already had 'elevenses' and the tradition of stopping for tea and biscuits,' says Gray. 'But in the middle of the 20th century, snacking was rebranded as 'grazing' – which sounds better but actually turned out to be worse for our health.'
Pen Vogler is a food historian, and the author of S tuffed: A Political History of What We Eat and Why it Matters. 'There's nothing intrinsically wrong with snacking and it's perfectly possible to do this healthily on apples or nuts,' she says. 'The problem is that over the past hundred years or so, the ingredients in our snacks have become less good for us. After the war, our snacks became made from extruded (or high fructose) corn syrup,' says Vogler. 'They were cheap to make and incredibly full of sugar.'
It will come as no surprise to learn that the snack invasion started in America. 'From the 1950s onwards, this was driven by marketing people creating new, segmented audiences,' says Gray. 'So, for example, we suddenly had the teenager, the 'tired mum', and the parents of children who got their way through 'pester power'.'
Vogler agrees. 'Food advertising wasn't particularly new, but by the 1970s, we had a 'surround sound' of advertising,' she says. 'This coincided with the rise of affordable luxury, the 'little treat' which was often full of sugar, because sugar is cheap. And so, snacking was rebranded as socially acceptable.' (To illustrate, the basket of snack foods on the table in the photo accompanying this article came to £30 in total from Tesco.)
The advertising campaigns were legendary: from Flake adverts of girls in baths (below) and on gypsy caravans, to Toffos: 'a man's gotta chew, what a man's gotta chew'.
Somehow, Mars persuaded us their Milky Way was 'the sweet you can eat between meals without ruining your appetite.' Only Yorkie Bars were manly enough for lorry drivers, and in 2023, Gary Lineker celebrated 30 years selling Walkers Crisps by driving around Battersea Power Station as 'Father Crispmas' in a sleigh full of salt and vinegar.
'We also had the rise of snacking in the office, as colleagues rolled Maltesers to one another across the floor,' says Gray.
The rise of convenience snacking
With the rise of the supermarket, it became easier to load up on snacks to have 'for later'. 'From the 1960s onwards, you no longer had to queue in a shop and be served over a counter,' says Vogler. 'In the past, this had served as a useful break when people were buying snacks, it made them think harder about what they were eating. A child could go into a supermarket and load up on crisps and chocolate now.'
Midlifers may complain that Wagon Wheels have got smaller, and Curly Wurlies have been retracted, but the range of foods available has exploded and this shows no signs of slowing down. 'The supermarkets have to sell more food to grow their businesses, so we have to eat more food,' says Vogler. 'Products got bigger, and then we had multi-packs of crisps. And don't even get me started on the meal deal.' (The supermarket meal deal typically consists of pre-packaged sandwiches, crisps and sugary drinks.)
This is before we mention the explosion of vending machines, which first sold chewing gum on the streets of New York in the late 19th century. But in 1972, the first glass-fronted vending machine was invented: now these mobile confectioners spew out crisps and chocolate bars day and night, in our stations and hospitals and schools.
'Snacking is a fast fix, like the equivalent of a social media post,' says Gray. 'You just can't get away from snacks – even Weight Watchers has branded bars now. The newest thing in the past 10 to 20 years is evening snacking – caused by home-working and the erosion of the nine to five work-life. All this together is really leading to a public health problem.'
A 2019 study published in the British Medical Journal showed that snacks made up a fifth of all calories we eat at home – around 370 calories per day. And this figure doesn't include snacks consumed outside the home, so the true figure is likely to be closer to an extra 500 calories per day.
A round-the-clock obesity crisis
All the experts concur that round-the-clock snacking is leading to an obesity crisis. In 2022, 27 per cent of children between two and 15, were overweight or obese, compared with 19 per cent in 2004 and 12 per cent in 1995. In the early 1970s, only five per cent of children were obese.
The evidence suggests we underestimate the calorific content of our snacks. For example, in a 2022 study from think tank Nesta, 75 per cent of respondents underestimated the calories in a sausage roll, with an average guess of 228 calories. And 95 per cent of respondents underestimated the calories in half a sharing bag of tortilla chips. The average guess was 214 calories, less than half the true value of 447 calories.
And with this extra weight comes serious health problems such as type 2 diabetes and heart disease. 'The problem of the eternal snacking is that your body doesn't have a chance to recover,' says Vogler. 'Your insulin response is constantly triggered. Snacking may have short-term enjoyment but it can also lead to long-term illness.' The new science looking into ultra-processed foods (UPFs) is young, but it seems these are having a deleterious effect on our microbiome, or gut bacteria.
'There's also a school of thought that snacking leads to anxiety and mental health problems,' says Vogler. 'The emotion of guilt is part of the snacking market. 40 per cent of people say they feel 'guilty' when they have a pack of crisps or a bar of chocolate. Why is this a guilty pleasure? Pleasure shouldn't make you feel guilty.'
But this could all be about to change. According to a survey published in The Grocer magazine, 40 per cent of adults in the UK are now motivated to make healthier life choices and six in 10 consumers are actively trying to choose healthy snacks to hit their fitness goals.
'This is seen in the value of the healthier snacking market which has seen 15 per cent growth in the last 12 months, taking it to £148 million,' says The Grocer. The protein bar area is the fastest growing – up 31 per cent in the past 12 months.
'It's certainly true that the Zoe app discourse around snacking – where people track their blood sugar after eating – puts an emphasis on quality,' says Gray. 'There are encouraging signs that people are turning to satsumas, apples or nuts, rather than a muffin mid-morning.'
Experts believe that the solution lies in a change to the 'food environment' – offering consumers healthier choices when travelling, or an alternative to fish and chips or pies at a football match.
'It's also important to realise that anything that comes with a list of health claims on the packet is not healthy,' says Gray. 'The healthiest foods come without a list of ingredients: indeed, without a packet at all.'
And yet, there will be moments in all our lives where only a pack of Quavers or a HobNob (or two) will do. 'The manufacturers are entirely open about their intentions,' says Vogler. 'Look at the Pringles slogan: 'once you pop, you can't stop.' It's an acknowledgement that we will snack until we die. But at least they are hiding in plain sight.'

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Major supermarket giving away free BBQ food to customers this summer worth £25 – here's how to get yours
Major supermarket giving away free BBQ food to customers this summer worth £25 – here's how to get yours

Scottish Sun

time7 hours ago

  • Scottish Sun

Major supermarket giving away free BBQ food to customers this summer worth £25 – here's how to get yours

Scroll down for a full list of what BBQ items you could be sent GRILL THRILL Major supermarket giving away free BBQ food to customers this summer worth £25 – here's how to get yours Click to share on X/Twitter (Opens in new window) Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window) A MAJOR supermarket chain is offering free grill food to customers who share their barbecue fail stories this summer. Iceland is offering regular prize draws over the coming months - and all you need to do is outline your own barbecue fiascos. 4 One lucky winner will be selected weekly throughout the competition period Credit: Getty 4 Brits can enter the prize draw by simply outlining how their past barbecues have gone wrong Credit: Getty As summer approaches, many Brits will be hoping to dust off their grills to make the most of the warmer weekends. But many will no doubt have plenty of barbecue disasters to laugh about later too. Britain's ever temperamental summer weather can see plans quickly turned on their heads. Not only this, but some 60 percent of Brits have admitted to burning food on their grill, according to an Atomik Research survey. What's more, seven in 10 respondents said they would go on to eat the food, even if it was burnt. Iceland is now offering grill enthusiasts a chance to cash in on their barbecue fail stories. The supermarket chain has launched a BBQ SOS (Save Our Summer) Service to help Brits fully enjoy their summer grills. It is offering a free barbecue food bundle to people who share their stories over the next few months. Starting from June 7 and ending on August 17, Brits can enter the prize draw by simply outlining how their past barbecues have gone wrong. All you need to do is tell Iceland your barbecue woes in up to 100 words. Expert's warning over common barbecue myths that pose 'dangerous health risk' as Brits' grilling blunders revealed One lucky winner will be selected weekly throughout the competition period. The lucky few selected will get a stack of barbecue grill food worth £23.50 in total. Paul Dhaliwal, chief commercial officer at Iceland Foods, said: "We know how unpredictable the British summer can be, one minute it's cloudy, the next it's perfect BBQ weather. "People want to seize the moment and get grilling without all the hassle. 4 The supermarket chain has launched a BBQ SOS (Save Our Summer) Service Credit: KennedyNews/Iceland "That's why we've launched our SOS BBQ Service, so no one has to miss a single sausage this summer." The free food package for the lucky winners will include the following: Iceland 4 Chicken & Vegetable Kebabs – 300g (£4.00) Iceland 8 BBQ Beef Koftas – 320g (£4.00) Iceland Extra Thin BBQ Chicken Sizzle Steaks – 450g (£4.00) Iceland 4 100% Beef Quarter Pounders – 454g (£3.50) Iceland Sticky BBQ Pork Belly Slices – 300g (£4.00) Iceland Ready Cooked Salt and Pepper Chicken Skewers – 340g (£4.00) A total of 11 bundles, which is one per week, will be given out over the promotion period. Winners will be selected by a random computer process on the Monday of each week.

Straight men are using gay dating apps for ego boosts
Straight men are using gay dating apps for ego boosts

Metro

time10 hours ago

  • Metro

Straight men are using gay dating apps for ego boosts

Less than an hour before a hookup, I was hit with that most dreaded of texts: 'Sorry but I can't come today.' Wanting to give the benefit of the doubt, I replied asking if he wanted to rearrange. Only, this time, my message went undelivered. There was no mistaking what that meant – I'd been blocked. I had met 32-year-old Jimmy* on Grindr, and we had spent half of the night exchanging nudes and compliments. He told me he was just looking for a casual hookup early on into our conversation, so while I never expected much to come from meeting him, it still stung to realise I was just his 3am bit of fun. Then again, I suppose I should have seen it coming. He did tell me he was straight, after all. Finding a straight man on a gay dating app is like spotting a cloud in the sky these days – they're everywhere. In fact, to a certain extent, it feels like our platforms have been infested by them. But what, I hear you ask, are heterosexual men doing on these platforms? Why go through these interactions if there's nothing to gain? The simple answer: They're in it for the ego boost. With thousands of members from all over the world, our vibrant LGBTQ+ WhatsApp channel is a hub for all the latest news and important issues that face the LGBTQ+ community. Simply click on this link, select 'Join Chat' and you're in! Don't forget to turn on notifications! It's no secret that the way we date has evolved in recent years. As a key example, digital platforms continue to dominate the modern dating world with 72% of Brits meeting through apps. However, research shows that some people are using these digital spaces not to date, but to seek validation, and to be liked and affirmed. And I for one have been stung by this on more than one occasion. When I matched with 20-something Harry*, we had a lot of virtual fun. We spent two weeks entertaining each other online exchanging intimate photos and several flirty conversations, until eventually we set a time and place for a date. On the day we were supposed to meet, he became unresponsive, so I chased him down, asking if we were still on. That's when he admitted he was straight. At that moment, a weird feeling erupted in my chest; it wasn't heartbreak, more a question of how I could have got it so wrong and I knew I wanted, and deserved, answers. 'What was the point?' I asked, to which he blurted out something about how it 'felt good' and how he'd liked it when I'd 'gassed him up' – GenZ for 'giving compliments'. Suddenly I started thinking back to conversations I'd had with other men who I'd thought had ghosted me. If my conversations with Harry had given him a sense of validation all from a few compliments, then maybe other men who never followed through were in the same position – straight and seeking an ego boost. While I tried to get my head around that, one question remained: If these men seek validation, why not turn to their heterosexual counterparts? Once upon a time, I suppose straight men could have expected to get their egos inflated by straight women. But from what I've gathered, mostly through conversations with the women in my life, many women aren't here to stroke men's egos anymore. It's like they've developed a no nonsense attitude towards attention-seeking men. While I applaud that, it means these men are then left searching for new places to feel validated – and that's why they've turned to our queer spaces. And sadly, in a world where queer people still desire to be seen, these men are able to easily take advantage, hit us up and later neglect us. They'll flirt, chat, flood us with dick pics, waiting for us to praise the size of their cocks, and tease us with the idea of meeting up, then, when they've had their fun, they ghost us like we were a blip. The flirting followed by the cancelling of plans, blocking and dismissiveness has a profound effect on queer people. It's one thing if the guy is still struggling with his sexuality, but it's another when he's just using queer men for his midnight pleasure, a fleeting ego boost with no care behind it. We're left feeling invisible and disposable, questioning what's real or not. As a community we already face discrimination, sometimes from these very men in the outside world. So when we're exploited for their ego boosts online, it feels casually cruel. More Trending Though they might not be snapping heartstrings, they're manipulating them, which feels like the worst betrayal of all. If you're a straight man after some online fun, queer people just have one request: Be honest. We already struggle to find intimacy, so false promises on meeting up just deepens wounds. Using us as a source to boost your ego won't get you anywhere, but being upfront with your intentions might just score you a cheeky bum pic. View More » *Names have been changed Do you have a story you'd like to share? Get in touch by emailing Share your views in the comments below. MORE: I've been revising for my son's GCSEs – I'm more stressed than him MORE: I won't sleep with anyone else until I figure out my sexuality MORE: Two people stabbed and one shot during World Pride parade

June warning that gardeners who cut hedges could 'face jail and unlimited fine'
June warning that gardeners who cut hedges could 'face jail and unlimited fine'

Daily Mirror

time10 hours ago

  • Daily Mirror

June warning that gardeners who cut hedges could 'face jail and unlimited fine'

If gardeners are cutting hedges and a bird's nest is damaged or destroyed - intentionally or otherwise - then they're breaking the law and could face a fine or jail time Green-fingered Brits are being warned against falling foul of the law this June as they spruce up their gardens, with warnings that illegal hedge trimming could land them in hot water – including potential jail time and an 'unlimited fine'. With the sun making a welcome return recently, albeit punctuated by showers, gardening enthusiasts have been eagerly tending to their outdoor spaces, keen to ensure their greenery is looking shipshape. However, those reaching for the shears to neaten up their hedges might not just be impacting the plant's health during its blooming period but could also inadvertently breach environmental regulations. ‌ Strict rules prohibit the cutting of farm hedgerows from April 1 to August 31, barring exceptional circumstances which would necessitate a licence. ‌ While domestic garden hedges can be legally trimmed during this period, any harm caused to bird nests, whether deliberate or accidental, constitutes a legal infringement. With many birds still in the midst of nesting and rearing chicks in June, specialists at Husqvana highlight the legal implications: "Under Section 1 of the Wildlife and Countryside Act 1981, it's an offence to intentionally damage or destroy a wild bird's nest while it is being built or in use. "That includes consciously using a hedge trimmer when there is a bird's nest in your hedge, and in the process of doing so, causing the nest to be damaged or destroyed." This stance is backed up by the Royal Society for the Protection of Birds, reports the Express. According to the RSPB, anyone who intentionally damages a bird's nest while it is in use or under construction is in breach of the law, and this includes trimming hedges. The charity states: "The moment it becomes active, it is illegal to destroy it." Violating this law may lead to an unlimited fine and up to six months in prison. The RSPB adds: "The consequences for the above, even in the event of harm to a single bird, nest or egg, is an unlimited fine, up to six months in jail or both. Suffice to say, it is certainly not a risk worth taking." ‌ Wildlife specialists Arbtech provide insight into how the legislation is enforced in practice. They state: "Pieces of environmental legislation such as the Wildlife and Countryside Act 1981 as amended are regulated by a combination of the police, Natural England/Natural Resources Wales/Scottish Natural Heritage (based on location), the Environment Agency, the Joint Nature Conservation Committee, the Food, Farming and Countryside Commission (FFCC), the local authorities, the Partnership of Action against Wildlife Crime (PAW), various public bodies, and relevant organisations based on the endangered species in question. "Once an action breaking the rules of the Act has been carried out, the offence will inevitably result in a police investigation. ‌ "The police will enforce part 1 of the Act, as it focuses on the fundamental wildlife protection over wildlife species and what exactly necessitates a breach of the rules. "In fact, dedicated departments of the police specialise in breaches of environmental and wildlife laws, such as the National Wildlife Crime Unit (NWCU) and Wildlife Crime Officers (WCOs). "Any law relating to the environment and wildlife are taken just as seriously as any other piece of active legislation. "Even in respect of a breach of the Act involving a single animal or habitat, the person responsible would be liable to pay a potentially unlimited fine, spend up to six months in prison, or possibly even both."

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store