The consequences of not banning AI in schools
I am truly grateful for the engagement that I received from the readers because this shows the importance as well as the alertness that the society has in store for the subject. Some shared their strong agreement and warned that unchecked AI could surely affect our children (the students) in schools.
This includes but is not limited to their thinking, creativity, and problem-solving skills, to name a few. Others, however, have expressed concern that banning AI in schools might limit their technological literacy, suggesting instead that schools should focus on teaching responsible and ethical use.
My personal feedback that I continue to stand by is putting a framework and policy in place on the usage of AI in schools. This will help ensure AI is used correctly, potentially making it a powerful tool for personalised training. The situation today, however, is that there is not readily a policy and framework in place, and hence, the impact is inevitable. Let me focus this week on the consequences of not banning AI in schools.
First, the students' critical thinking skills will be impacted. Why? The student simply uses a generative AI app (like ChatGPT) by asking a question (in the form of a prompt), and the answer arrives instantly (merely in seconds). The student doesn't struggle nor work hard but simply copies the answer/output and presents AI's work (not theirs). In the pre-AI era, a student would be required to critically think by searching and analysing different possibilities before finally presenting and solving a problem/question.
Second, generative AI will be like a drug (an addiction) for the students. Without it, students will not be able to work on any assignment/problem due to being dependent on AI. Imagine tomorrow there is no connectivity and/or a plug is pulled off from ChatGPT and the like apps. Trust me, there will be zombies walking around the schools.
Third, with dependency and addiction comes also a form of laziness. Students will see no reason to learn or work if AI can do everything for them. The mental resilience that the pre-generative AI era lived in will be shattered, trust me.
Last but not least, originality (in terms of thoughts and creativity) will be lost. Outputs of an AI app are generated based on patterns in and from existing data. Students that depend on AI will ultimately lose the ability to create original content. We will eventually find the same generic work submitted by everyone, for they all rely on the same source, the AI machine.
To conclude my article this week, I would like to emphasise that if this matter is not taken seriously, then the majority of the students (and no thanks to the continuous advancement of AI) will graduate without ever having written an essay, solved a math problem on their own, or struggled through a difficult assignment.
Students will not only not have the skills that are required to join the workforce but also not have the basic knowledge to operate as well. Mark my words, quality education built on hard work will be erased in schools gradually.
Diplomas and degrees will lose credibility, as no one can be certain whether the work was produced by the student or by a machine. We will create a new generation of graduates that knows where and how to find information but cannot function without constant access to AI.
Until we catch up again next week, stay positive and upbeat, and never be too reliant on AI, as it may replace or break you too.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Observer
a day ago
- Observer
Passwords under threat as tech giants seek tougher security
Paris - Fingerprints, access keys, and facial recognition are putting a new squeeze on passwords as the traditional computer security method, but are also running into public hesitancy. "The password era is ending," two senior figures at Microsoft wrote in a July blog post. The tech giant has been building "more secure" alternatives to log in for years -- and has, since May, been offering them by default to new users. Many other online services -- such as artificial intelligence giant OpenAI's ChatGPT chatbot -- require steps like entering a numerical code emailed to a user's known address before granting access to potentially sensitive data. "Passwords are often weak and people reuse them across different online services, said Benoit Grunemwald, a cybersecurity expert with Eset. Sophisticated attackers can crack a word of eight characters or fewer within minutes or even seconds, he pointed out. And passwords are often the prize booty in data leaks from online platforms, in cases where "they are improperly stored by the people supposed to protect them and keep them safe," Grunemwald said. One massive database of around 16 billion login credentials amassed from hacked files was discovered in June by researchers from media outlet Cybernews. The pressure on passwords has tech giants rushing to find safer alternatives. - Tricky switchover - One group, the Fast Identity Online Alliance (FIDO) brings together heavyweights including Google, Microsoft, Apple, Amazon, and TikTok. The companies have been working on creating and popularising password-free login methods, especially promoting the use of so-called access keys. These use a separate device like a smartphone to authorise logins, relying on a pin code or biometric input such as a fingerprint reader or face recognition instead of a password. Troy Hunt, whose website Have I Been Pwned allows people to check whether their login details have been leaked online, says the new systems have big advantages. "With passkeys, you cannot accidentally give your passkey to a phishing site" -- a page that mimics the appearance of a provider such as an employer or bank to dupe people into entering their login details -- he said. But the Australian cybersecurity expert recalled that the last rites have been read for passwords many times before. "Ten years ago we had the same question... the reality is that we have more passwords now than we ever did before," Hunt said. Although many large platforms are stepping up login security, large numbers of sites still use simple usernames and passwords as credentials. The transition to an unfamiliar system can also be confusing for users. Passkeys have to be set up on a device before they can be used to log in. Restoring them if a PIN code is forgotten or a trusted smartphone is lost or stolen is also more complicated than a familiar password reset procedure. "The thing that passwords have going for them, and the reason that we still have them, is that everybody knows how to use them," Hunt said. Ultimately, the human factor will remain at the heart of computer security, Eset's Grunemwald said. "People will have to take good care of security on their smartphones and devices, because they'll be the things most targeted" in the future, he warned.
Observer
3 days ago
- Observer
The consequences of not banning AI in schools
I received an overwhelming amount of response in the form of feedback via social media networks, instant messages (WhatsApp) and even direct calls on last week's article on banning AI in schools. I am truly grateful for the engagement that I received from the readers because this shows the importance as well as the alertness that the society has in store for the subject. Some shared their strong agreement and warned that unchecked AI could surely affect our children (the students) in schools. This includes but is not limited to their thinking, creativity, and problem-solving skills, to name a few. Others, however, have expressed concern that banning AI in schools might limit their technological literacy, suggesting instead that schools should focus on teaching responsible and ethical use. My personal feedback that I continue to stand by is putting a framework and policy in place on the usage of AI in schools. This will help ensure AI is used correctly, potentially making it a powerful tool for personalised training. The situation today, however, is that there is not readily a policy and framework in place, and hence, the impact is inevitable. Let me focus this week on the consequences of not banning AI in schools. First, the students' critical thinking skills will be impacted. Why? The student simply uses a generative AI app (like ChatGPT) by asking a question (in the form of a prompt), and the answer arrives instantly (merely in seconds). The student doesn't struggle nor work hard but simply copies the answer/output and presents AI's work (not theirs). In the pre-AI era, a student would be required to critically think by searching and analysing different possibilities before finally presenting and solving a problem/question. Second, generative AI will be like a drug (an addiction) for the students. Without it, students will not be able to work on any assignment/problem due to being dependent on AI. Imagine tomorrow there is no connectivity and/or a plug is pulled off from ChatGPT and the like apps. Trust me, there will be zombies walking around the schools. Third, with dependency and addiction comes also a form of laziness. Students will see no reason to learn or work if AI can do everything for them. The mental resilience that the pre-generative AI era lived in will be shattered, trust me. Last but not least, originality (in terms of thoughts and creativity) will be lost. Outputs of an AI app are generated based on patterns in and from existing data. Students that depend on AI will ultimately lose the ability to create original content. We will eventually find the same generic work submitted by everyone, for they all rely on the same source, the AI machine. To conclude my article this week, I would like to emphasise that if this matter is not taken seriously, then the majority of the students (and no thanks to the continuous advancement of AI) will graduate without ever having written an essay, solved a math problem on their own, or struggled through a difficult assignment. Students will not only not have the skills that are required to join the workforce but also not have the basic knowledge to operate as well. Mark my words, quality education built on hard work will be erased in schools gradually. Diplomas and degrees will lose credibility, as no one can be certain whether the work was produced by the student or by a machine. We will create a new generation of graduates that knows where and how to find information but cannot function without constant access to AI. Until we catch up again next week, stay positive and upbeat, and never be too reliant on AI, as it may replace or break you too.
Observer
3 days ago
- Observer
Tariffs spark calls to boycott American goods
NEW DELHI - From McDonald's and Coca-Cola to Amazon and Apple, US-based multinationals are facing calls for a boycott in India as business executives and Prime Minister Narendra Modi's supporters stoke anti-American sentiment to protest against U.S. tariffs. India, the world's most populous nation, is a key market for American brands that have rapidly expanded to target a growing base of affluent consumers, many of whom remain infatuated with international labels seen as symbols of moving up in life. India, for example, is the biggest market by users for Meta's WhatsApp, and Domino's has more restaurants than any other brand in the country. Beverages like Pepsi and Coca-Cola often dominate store shelves, and people still queue up when a new Apple store opens or a Starbucks cafe doles out discounts. Although there was no immediate indication of sales being hit, there's a growing chorus both on social media and offline to buy local and ditch American products after Donald Trump imposed a 50% tariff on goods from India, rattling exporters and damaging ties between New Delhi and Washington. McDonald's, Coca-Cola, Amazon, and Apple did not immediately respond to Reuters queries. Manish Chowdhary, co-founder of India's Wow Skin Science, took to LinkedIn with a video message urging support for farmers and startups to make "Made in India" a "global obsession," and to learn from South Korea, whose food and beauty products are famous worldwide. "We have lined up products from thousands of miles away. We have proudly spent on brands that we don't own, while our makers fight for attention in their own country," he said. Rahm Shastry, CEO of India's DriveU, which provides a car driver on call service, wrote on LinkedIn: "India should have its own home-grown Twitter/Google/YouTube/WhatsApp/FB -- like China has." To be fair, Indian retail companies give foreign brands like Starbucks stiff competition in the domestic market, but going global has been a challenge. Indian IT services firms, however, have become deeply entrenched in the global economy, with the likes of TCS and Infosys providing software solutions to clients worldwide. On Sunday, Modi made a "special appeal" for becoming self-reliant, telling a gathering in Bengaluru that Indian technology companies made products for the world but "now is the time for us to give more priority to India's needs." He did not name any company. Even as anti-American protests simmer, Tesla launched its second showroom in India in New Delhi, with Monday's opening attended by Indian commerce ministry officials and U.S. embassy officials. The Swadeshi Jagran Manch group, which is linked to Modi's Bharatiya Janata Party, took out small public rallies across India on Sunday, urging people to boycott American brands. "People are now looking at Indian products. It will take some time to fructify," Ashwani Mahajan, the group's co-convenor, told Reuters. "This is a call for nationalism, patriotism." He also shared with Reuters a table his group is circulating on WhatsApp, listing Indian brands of bath soaps, toothpaste, and cold drinks that people could choose over foreign ones. On social media, one of the group's campaigns is a graphic titled "Boycott foreign food chains", with logos of McDonald's and many other restaurant brands. In Uttar Pradesh, Rajat Gupta, 37, who was dining at a McDonald's in Lucknow on Monday, said he wasn't concerned about the tariff protests and simply enjoyed the 49-rupee ($0.55) coffee he considered good value for money. "Tariffs are a matter of diplomacy, and my McPuff, coffee should not be dragged into it," he said.
