US Diversity Visa 2026 results are out: How to check status, and what's next
This portal will remain accessible until at least September 30, 2026.
Understanding the
Diversity Visa Program
Up to 55,000 immigrant visas are granted each year under the Diversity Visa Program to citizens of nations with historically low immigration rates to the US. The registration period for the DV-2026 cycle ran from October 2 through November 7, 2024. No late or paper entries were accepted during this window; applicants had to submit their entries electronically.
Operation Sindoor
Amid flare-up hours after thaw, officials say things will settle down with time
Ceasefire on, but pressure stays: Key decisions by India against Pak that still stand
'Will work with India & Pakistan to seek solution on Kashmir': Trump
Read more:
7 national parks that are not only about wildlife and safaris
How to check your DV-2026 status
To determine if you've been selected:
Visit the official Entrant Status Check portal: dvprogram.state.gov/ESC/.
Enter your unique confirmation number, last/family name, and year of birth.
Complete the CAPTCHA verification to access your status.
It's crucial to note that the US Department of State does not send selection notifications via email, phone, or postal mail. The only official method to check your status is through the Entrant Status Check portal.
by Taboola
by Taboola
Sponsored Links
Sponsored Links
Promoted Links
Promoted Links
You May Like
AI guru Andrew Ng recommends: Read These 5 Books And Turn Your Life Around in 2025
Blinkist: Andrew Ng's Reading List
Undo
Next steps for selected applicants
Being selected in the DV Lottery does not guarantee a visa. Selected individuals must:
Submit the DS-260 immigrant visa application form.
Attend a visa interview at a US Embassy or consulate.
Provide necessary documentation and undergo medical examinations.
Applicants are advised to prepare thoroughly and ensure all requirements are met to increase their chances of a successful visa issuance.
Read more:
10 places not to miss on a Kerala trip
Beware of scams
With the announcement of DV-2026 results, there's an increased risk of fraudulent schemes.
Applicants should be cautious of:
Unsolicited emails or messages claiming selection and requesting payment.
Websites mimicking the official DV Lottery portal.
Always rely on the official dvprogram.state.gov website for accurate information and updates.
For people all throughout the world, the DV Lottery is a singular chance to live the American dream. For those chosen, it marks the start of their path to permanent residency in the United States. To effectively navigate the procedure, keep yourself informed, be on the lookout for scammers, and adhere to established standards.
Get the latest lifestyle updates on Times of India, along with
Mother's Day wishes
,
messages
, and
quotes
!
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Hindustan Times
27 minutes ago
- Hindustan Times
Hell hath no fury like Donald Trump scorned
Trump has not threatened China and Turkey, the largest and third largest importers of Russian oil. Nor Hungary and Slovakia, two European and Nato countries that import Russian oil. And he's ignored the fact that Japan has started to do so from June this year Has Donald Trump got it in for India? He's slapped 50% tariffs, he's suspended trade talks till the tariff dispute is resolved, he says he doesn't care if India's 'dead economy' sinks and Peter Navarro, his trade advisor, has said India is threatening America's national security by buying Russian oil. Worst of all, Scott Bessent, the treasury secretary, has revealed that secondary tariffs on India could increase if Trump's talks with Putin fail. He also wants Europe to impose its own secondary tariffs. Does all of this suggest India has fallen out of America's favour? There is a view that Trump is using India to send a message to China and Russia. It's not a comforting one. It means we're collateral damage and he doesn't really care what happens to us. On the other hand — and this is equally galling — Trump seems to have fallen in love with Pakistan. He's only imposed 19% tariffs, his government considers Islamabad a 'phenomenal partner' in the fight against counter-terrorism — last week it lauded Pakistan's 'continued successes in containing terrorist entities' — he invited Field Marshal Asim Munir for lunch and wants to help Pakistan prospect for oil. In fact, Trump has taunted India with the tease that Pakistan could one day sell oil to Delhi. So, is Pakistan the new belle of the ball? Let's focus on the issue of Russian oil, both because it rankles with Delhi but also because Trump has made it clear that until it's resolved there'll be no trade negotiations. In fact, Bessent has threatened further penalties. The truth is the Biden Administration encouraged India to buy Russian oil. In May 2024, this is what Eric Garcetti, the American ambassador in Delhi, said: 'Actually, they (India) bought Russian oil because we (the US) wanted somebody to buy Russian oil at a price cap … because as a commodity we didn't want oil prices going up and they fulfilled that.' Today Trump is deliberately ignoring his predecessor's policy and blaming India instead. Secondly, Trump is also being hypocritical. America continues to import palladium, uranium hexafluoride, fertilisers and chemicals from Russia and reports indicate that in the last six months the amount imported has increased substantially compared to last year. So, if America can import from Russia, why can't India? Thirdly — and this hints at Trump's real intentions — there's another double standard. He has not threatened China and Turkey, the largest and third largest importers of Russian oil. Nor Hungary and Slovakia, two European and Nato countries that import Russian oil. And he's ignored the fact that Japan has started to do so from June this year. In fact, he's just extended the trade truce with China for another 90 days. Clearly his wrath is single-mindedly directed at Delhi. There is, however, another equally worrying aspect of the problem. Does Trump's attitude and behaviour suggest Quad has lost its utility in his eyes? If it has, where does America's Indo-Pacific strategy stand? It brought great comfort to India vis-à-vis our problems with China. If Trump is no longer committed to it, that will create worrying concerns for us. Whether Trump reaches an economic deal with China is hard to predict but probably likely because he's already talking of a summit with Xi Jinping. The question is, will the deal also presage a better political understanding of China? More space for Beijing's regional ambitions? In that event, will India continue to have US support over our border dispute with China? The biggest problem is what can we do about this? The truthful answer is very little. There's nothing we export to America that America can't do without. China has rare earth minerals and metals. We don't. Our leverage is very limited. Our only hope is a Putin-Trump deal on Ukraine which could lead to the secondary sanctions being lifted. Scott Bessent's comments suggest the White House has India in its sights if they aren't. Hell, it seems, hath no fury like a Trump scorned! Karan Thapar is the author of Devil's Advocate: The Untold Story. The views expressed are personal.
&w=3840&q=100)
First Post
29 minutes ago
- First Post
A non-NATO pact for Ukraine? US floats Western alliance-style security guarantees for Kyiv
The US has proposed security guarantees for Ukraine similar to – but separate from – the collective defence agreement between NATO member countries. US President Donald Trump gives a thumbs up after landing at Joint Base Andrews in Maryland, on August 15, 2025. Donald Trump and Vladimir Putin made no breakthrough on Ukraine at their high-stakes summit on August 15, 2025, pointing to areas of agreement and rekindling a friendship but offering no news on a ceasefire. Photo- AFP The United States has proposed offering Ukraine a set of NATO-style security guarantees that stop short of full alliance membership, Italian Prime Minister Giorgia Meloni and diplomatic sources confirmed AFP on Saturday. The proposal, raised by President Donald Trump during calls with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy and European leaders following his Alaska summit with Russian President Vladimir Putin, would create a 'non-NATO Article 5' clause to assure Kyiv of collective support without extending NATO membership, a key Russian red line. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD 'As one of the security guarantees for Ukraine, the American side proposed a non-NATO Article 5 type guarantee, supposedly agreed with Putin,' the diplomatic source told AFP on condition they not be identified in any way. NATO's collective security is based on its Article 5 principle: if one member is attacked, the entire alliance comes to its defence. Italian Prime Minister Giorgia Meloni, who was on the call with Trump, confirmed the US president had raised the idea of security guarantee 'inspired' by Article 5, which she has been pushing for several months. The starting point for the proposal was defining a collective security clause 'that would allow Ukraine to benefit from the support of all its partners, including the US, (which would be) ready to act in case it is attacked again', Meloni said in a statement. In March, Meloni told Italian senators that any such response would not necessarily involve going to war. She noted that, while NATO's Article 5 has the use of force as an option, 'it is not the only possible option'. Kyiv has long aspired to join NATO – but Russia has given that as one of its reasons for its war in Ukraine, and some Western circles have expressed resistance to the idea. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD Trump has repeatedly ruled out Ukraine joining the Western military alliance. Before his joint call with Zelenskyy and European leaders, Trump spoke just with the Ukrainian president about Friday's Alaska summit. 'The American side voiced this (joint security proposal) during a conversation with the president (Zelensky) and then repeated it during a joint conversation with the Europeans,' the diplomatic source said. Another source with knowledge of the matter confirmed the NATO-like guarantees had been discussed. But that source added: 'No-one knows how this could work and why Putin would agree to it if he is categorically against NATO and obviously against really effective guarantees of Ukraine's sovereignty." European Leaders Reaffirm Support for Ukraine Several European leaders jointly pledged to continue support for Ukraine and maintain pressure on Russia until the war in Ukraine ends, after a summit in Alaska between U.S. President Donald Trump and Russian President Vladimir Putin. The joint statement from leaders including German Chancellor Friedrich Merz, French President Emmanuel Macron, British Prime Minister Keir Starmer and Italian Prime Minister Giorgia Meloni was issued after Trump briefed them on his talks with Putin. It said the next step must be talks with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskiy, and that they were ready to work with Trump and Zelenskiy towards a three-way summit with European support. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD Trump said after his talks with Putin that Ukraine should agree a deal to end the war with Russia. He said he had agreed with the Russian leader that the best way to do this was to go straight to a peace settlement rather than via a ceasefire, something hitherto opposed by Kyiv and its European allies. The European statement - also signed by EU Commission President Ursula von der Leyen, Polish Prime Minister Donald Tusk, Finnish President Alexander Stubb and European Council President Antonio Costa - said Ukraine must have 'ironclad' security guarantees to defend its territorial integrity. 'It will be up to Ukraine to make decisions on its territory. International borders must not be changed by force. 'Our support to Ukraine will continue. We are determined to do more to keep Ukraine strong in order to achieve an end to the fighting and a just and lasting peace,' the statement said. 'As long as the killing in Ukraine continues, we stand ready to uphold the pressure on Russia. We will continue to strengthen sanctions and wider economic measures to put pressure on Russia's war economy until there is a just and lasting peace." STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD With inputs from agencies
Economic Times
31 minutes ago
- Economic Times
EU leaders to hold ‘coalition of willing' call tomorrow ahead of Zelenskyy–Trump Ukraine peace talks
Synopsis Britain, France and Germany are set to hold urgent talks with allies after Donald Trump's summit with Vladimir Putin in Alaska ended without a ceasefire. Putin demanded Ukraine hand over Donetsk in return for freezing advances elsewhere, while Trump urged leaders to pursue a peace agreement rather than a temporary truce. President Volodymyr Zelenskyy is due in Washington to meet Trump, as European leaders push to keep sanctions on Russia and safeguard Ukraine's path to Nato and the EU. Reuters French President Emmanuel Macron walks alongside Antonio Costa, President of the European Council, after an online meeting with other European leaders where they discussed the ongoing war in Ukraine, at Fort de Bregancon in Bormes-les-Mimosas, France, 13 August 2025. PHILIPPE MAGONI/Pool via Reuters Britain, France and Germany will convene a video call on Sunday with Ukraine's allies to discuss the war and possible steps towards peace, according to the French presidency. The 'coalition of the willing' call will be led by Prime Minister Keir Starmer, President Emmanuel Macron and Chancellor Friedrich Merz. It comes a day before Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy is expected in Washington for talks following the Alaska summit between Donald Trump and Vladimir disclosed that he held late-night calls with several European leaders, Nato's secretary general and Zelenskyy after his meeting with Putin. He said: 'The meeting with President Vladimir Putin of Russia went very well, as did a late night phone call with President Zelenskyy of Ukraine, and various European Leaders, including the highly respected Secretary General of NATO. It was determined by all that the best way to end the horrific war between Russia and Ukraine is to go directly to a Peace Agreement, which would end the war, and not a mere Ceasefire Agreement, which often times do not hold up.' European officials had criticised Trump for leaving Zelenskyy out of the Alaska talks, but they later backed the idea of a direct three-way summit between Trump, Putin and Zelenskyy, given the failure to secure even a temporary reported by the Financial Times, according to four people with direct knowledge of the Alaska meeting, Putin told Trump he would only move towards ending the war if Ukraine withdrew from the eastern Donetsk region. In exchange, he offered to freeze the frontline in Kherson and Zaporizhzhia, where Russian forces occupy significant territory, and not launch new offensives to take more demand would hand Moscow full control of Donetsk, much of which it already occupies and where its troops are advancing at the fastest pace since November. Russia currently controls about 70 per cent of the region, though Ukraine still holds key western cities that anchor its defences. Putin also repeated his core demands to 'resolve the root causes' of the conflict, which would mean limiting Ukraine's sovereignty and reversing Nato's eastward expansion. A former senior Kremlin official said the Russian president might compromise on territory if these broader demands were familiar with Zelenskyy's thinking said he would not agree to surrender Donetsk, but that he remained open to discussing territory with Trump in Washington and possibly in a three-way meeting with echoed this approach in a social media post on Saturday, writing: 'It was determined by all that the best way to end the horrific war between Russia and Ukraine is to go directly to a Peace Agreement, which would end the war, and not a mere Ceasefire Agreement, which often times do not hold up.' He added: 'If all works out, we will then schedule a meeting with President Putin.'The Kremlin later said Putin and Trump did not discuss a trilateral meeting with Zelenskyy in Anchorage, and did not comment on the Donetsk Trump's calls for a peace deal, European leaders made clear they would not ease pressure on Moscow. Macron, Merz, Starmer and European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen issued a joint statement saying: 'We will continue to strengthen sanctions and wider economic measures to put pressure on Russia's war economy until there is a just and lasting peace.'They underlined that Russia has no right to decide Ukraine's future in the European Union or Alaska meeting between Trump and Putin lasted three hours but failed to deliver a ceasefire. Instead, it gave Putin a platform to re-enter international diplomacy despite being wanted by the International Criminal Court over war crimes linked to the 2022 invasion of leaders had been alarmed before the meeting when Trump floated land swaps as part of a potential deal. They were reassured when he promised to press Putin for a halt to hostilities and threatened 'severe consequences' if Russia refused. The promise, however, did not materialise. Trump welcomed Putin with a red carpet in Anchorage and was seen joking with him before the will arrive in Washington on Monday to meet Trump. European leaders have been invited to join, according to officials cited by the New York Times. The White House described the Alaska summit as making 'great progress' but admitted no agreement had been now, Putin's demand over Donetsk, Trump's push for a direct peace deal, and Europe's insistence on sanctions set the stage for tense negotiations in Washington.
